Next Article in Journal
Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Arctic Summer Climate Comfort Level in the Context of Regional Tourism Resources from 1979 to 2019
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Marketing of Bulgarian Natural Heritage for Tourism and Recreation
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Healthy Metaphor? The North Sea Consultation and the Power of Words
Article

Continuous Negotiation in Climate Adaptation: The Challenge of Co-Evolution for the Capability Approach to Justice

Department of Values, Technology and Innovation, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands
Academic Editor: Oz Sahin
Sustainability 2021, 13(23), 13072; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313072
Received: 30 September 2021 / Revised: 12 November 2021 / Accepted: 17 November 2021 / Published: 25 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ethics of Climate Adaptation)
The capability approach is increasingly presented as a promising approach to address questions of justice in local climate adaptation. In an attempt to integrate environmental protections into the capability approach, Breena Holland developed the meta-capability Sustainable Ecological Capacity to establish substantive ecological limits. This article, however, empirically demonstrates that defining ecosystem thresholds in co-evolving systems is subject to conflict and continuous negotiation. Taking the Haringvliet dam in the Dutch South-West Delta as an illustrative case, this paper shows how people uphold different views about the Haringvliet’s most desirable ecosystem state. Future shifts in the socio-ecological system, such as decreased fresh water availability and sea-level rise, are expected to uproot today’s compromise about chloride levels in the Haringvliet. This suggests that anticipatory water management should not only address climate impacts, but also prepare for re-negotiations of established ecological thresholds. The associated politics of climate adaptation deals with questions about which functions to protect, at what costs and for whom. Hence, it is critical to integrate procedural justice and attention to political inequalities in capabilities-based adaptation justice frameworks. View Full-Text
Keywords: justice; capability approach; climate adaptation; co-evolution; socio-ecological systems; political ecology; ethics justice; capability approach; climate adaptation; co-evolution; socio-ecological systems; political ecology; ethics
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Brackel, L. Continuous Negotiation in Climate Adaptation: The Challenge of Co-Evolution for the Capability Approach to Justice. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313072

AMA Style

Brackel L. Continuous Negotiation in Climate Adaptation: The Challenge of Co-Evolution for the Capability Approach to Justice. Sustainability. 2021; 13(23):13072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313072

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brackel, Lieke. 2021. "Continuous Negotiation in Climate Adaptation: The Challenge of Co-Evolution for the Capability Approach to Justice" Sustainability 13, no. 23: 13072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313072

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop