Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Performance of Environmentally Friendly-Produced Zerovalent Iron Nanoparticles to Remove Pharmaceuticals from Water
Next Article in Special Issue
Digital Transformation Models for the I4.0 Transition: Lessons from the Change Management Literature
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Accounting Information System and Knowledge Management to Enhancing Organizational Performance in Iraqi SMEs
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Mediating Role of Resistance to Innovative Technology between the Characteristics of Innovative Technology and Sustainable Use of Innovative Payment Service
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Analysis on the Influence of R&D Fiscal and Tax Subsidies on Regional Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China

1
Centre for Quantitative Economics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
2
School of Business, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(22), 12707; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212707
Submission received: 27 October 2021 / Revised: 14 November 2021 / Accepted: 15 November 2021 / Published: 17 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovation and Technology Management and Sustainability)

Abstract

To promote the National Mid-andLong-Term Scientific and Technical Development Program, utilizing the technical innovation data from 30 provinces of China from2002–2016, this paper evaluates the inter-provincial differences of China’s regional innovation efficiency from four aspects of technical efficiency, efficiency index change, returns to scale, and projection analysis by using the DEA-Malmquist index method and constructs of the DEA-Tobit random response model to explore the impact of government funding on regional innovation efficiency. The research results show that: (1) The local development of regional innovation efficiency in China is unbalanced, and the level of pure technical efficiency restricts the improvement of innovation efficiency. (2) In the prophase of the scientific and technical development plan, technological progress has led to the growth of total factor productivity, resulting in the formation of scale effect; in the later stage, the scale return shows an overall increasing trend, and the continuous expansion of technological scale and opportunities has improved the regional innovation efficiency. (3) The R&D fiscal and tax subsidies have policy sustainability, and the direct government funding can significantly improve innovation efficiency, while the enterprises investment is opposite, and the pretax additional deduction has a negative but not significant impact. The government should give priority to direct subsidy and supplemented by tax preference, making reasonable policy allocations to expand the policy effect.
Keywords: regional innovation efficiency; DEA-Malmquist; R&D fiscal and tax subsidies; government subsidies; pretax additional deduction policy regional innovation efficiency; DEA-Malmquist; R&D fiscal and tax subsidies; government subsidies; pretax additional deduction policy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, W.; Bai, Y. An Analysis on the Influence of R&D Fiscal and Tax Subsidies on Regional Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12707. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212707

AMA Style

Liu W, Bai Y. An Analysis on the Influence of R&D Fiscal and Tax Subsidies on Regional Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability. 2021; 13(22):12707. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212707

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Weijiang, and Yue Bai. 2021. "An Analysis on the Influence of R&D Fiscal and Tax Subsidies on Regional Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China" Sustainability 13, no. 22: 12707. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212707

APA Style

Liu, W., & Bai, Y. (2021). An Analysis on the Influence of R&D Fiscal and Tax Subsidies on Regional Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(22), 12707. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212707

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop