Next Article in Journal
Taking Stock of a Genre-Based Pedagogy: Sustaining the Development of EFL Students’ Knowledge of the Elements in Argumentation and Writing Improvement
Next Article in Special Issue
Emerging Technologies and Innovation—Hopes for and Obstacles to Inclusive Societal Co-Construction
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect Evaluation of China’s Energy-Consuming Right Trading Policy: Empirical Analysis Based on PSM-DID
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Integrative Expert: Moral, Epistemic, and Poietic Virtues in Transformation Research
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development

by
Nora Weinberger
1,*,
Silvia Woll
1,
Christopher Conrad Maximillian Kyba
2 and
Nona Schulte-Römer
2
1
Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
2
GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(21), 11613; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111613
Submission received: 8 July 2021 / Revised: 13 October 2021 / Accepted: 15 October 2021 / Published: 21 October 2021

Abstract

The participation of citizens in scientific research has a long tradition, and in some disciplines, especially medical research, it is even common practice. In Technology Assessment (TA), Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), and Sustainable Development (SD), the participation of citizens can be of considerable value. In this paper, we explore this value for three concepts, based on the researcher’s insights from three participatory research projects. The first project is the citizen science project TeQfor1, which was conducted with, for, and on the type 1 diabetes community, who do not feel adequately supported by the conventional health care system. In the second project, citizens with vision impairments participated in the technological development of an audio-tactile navigation tool in the TERRAIN project. The third project (Nachtlichter) dealt with light pollution. Based on the three projects presented, we show that citizen participation makes specific contributions to TA, RRI, and SD. We also investigate the specificity of citizen engagement and motivation by differentiating between existing and emerging involvement. In conclusion, we discuss the benefits that may be added by participatory approaches for the three concepts of TA, RRI, and SD.
Keywords: transdisciplinary research; citizen participation; citizen science; technology assessment; responsible research and innovation; sustainable development transdisciplinary research; citizen participation; citizen science; technology assessment; responsible research and innovation; sustainable development

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Weinberger, N.; Woll, S.; Kyba, C.C.M.; Schulte-Römer, N. The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11613. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111613

AMA Style

Weinberger N, Woll S, Kyba CCM, Schulte-Römer N. The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development. Sustainability. 2021; 13(21):11613. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111613

Chicago/Turabian Style

Weinberger, Nora, Silvia Woll, Christopher Conrad Maximillian Kyba, and Nona Schulte-Römer. 2021. "The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development" Sustainability 13, no. 21: 11613. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111613

APA Style

Weinberger, N., Woll, S., Kyba, C. C. M., & Schulte-Römer, N. (2021). The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 13(21), 11613. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111613

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop