Availability of Non-Market Values to Inform Decision-Making in Australian Fisheries and Aquaculture: An Audit and Gap Analysis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Workshop
2.2. Review of Available Australian Non-Market Values
2.3. Gap Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Usefulness of Non-Market Values to Managers
3.2. Availability of Australian Non-Market Values Relevant to Fisheries and Aquaculture Management
3.3. Gap Analysis
4. Discussion
4.1. Are There Enough Non-Market Valuation Studies Already in Australia to Support Fisheries and Aquaculture Management?
4.2. What Key Alternatives Are Currently in Use to Support Decision-Making in Fisheries and Aquaculture Management?
4.3. Does Satisfaction Need a Non-Market Value?
4.4. Estimate or Borrow?
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Barbier, E.B. Marine ecosystem services. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, R507–R510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farmery, A.K.; Ogier, E.; Gardner, C.; Jabour, J. Incorporating ecologically sustainable development policy goals within fisheries management: An assessment of integration and coherence in an Australian context. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 249, 109230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Department of Agriculture and Fisheries. Queensland Sustainable Fisheries Strategy, 2017–2027; Queensland Government: Brisbane, Australia, 2017.
- Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Commonwealth Fisheries Harvest Strategy Policy. Framework for Applying an Evidence-Based Approach to Setting Harvest Levels in Commonwealth Fisheries; Department of Agriculture and Water Resources: Canberra, Australia, 2018.
- Sumaila, U.R.; Bellmann, C.; Tipping, A. Fishing for the future: An overview of challenges and opportunities. Mar. Policy 2016, 69, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elkington, J. Cannibals with Forks-Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business; New Society Publishers: Stoney Creek, CT, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Pascoe, S.; Dichmont, C.M.; Brooks, K.; Pears, R.; Jebreen, E. Management objectives of Queensland fisheries: Putting the horse before the cart. Mar. Policy 2013, 37, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jennings, S.; Pascoe, S.; Hall-Aspland, S.; Le Bouhellec, B.; Norman-Lopez, A.; Sullivan, A.; Pecl, G. Setting objectives for evaluating management adaptation actions to address climate change impacts in south-eastern Australian fisheries. Fish. Oceanogr. 2016, 25 (Suppl. 1), 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dichmont, C.M.; Pascoe, S.; Jebreen, E.; Pears, R.; Brooks, K.; Perez, P. Choosing a fishery’s governance structure using data poor methods. Mar. Policy 2013, 37, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plagányi, É.E.; van Putten, I.; Hutton, T.; Deng, R.A.; Dennis, D.; Pascoe, S.; Skewes, T.; Campbell, R.A. Integrating indigenous livelihood and lifestyle objectives in managing a natural resource. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 3639–3644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS). Aboriginal Fishing Values of the South Coast of NSW: Community Report for the Livelihood Values of Indigenous Cultural Fishing Project; FRDC: Canberra, Australia, 2018.
- Elvarsson, B.Þ.; Agnarsson, S.; Guðmundsdóttir, S.; Viðarsson, J. Using multi-criteria analysis the assess impacts of change in ecosystem-based fisheries management: The case of the Icelandic cod. Mar. Policy 2020, 116, 103825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Estévez, R.A.; Gelcich, S. Participative multi-criteria decision analysis in marine management and conservation: Research progress and the challenge of integrating value judgments and uncertainty. Mar. Policy 2015, 61, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pascoe, S.; Cannard, T.; Dowling, N.A.; Dichmont, C.M.; Breen, S.; Roberts, T.; Pears, R.J.; Leigh, G.M. Developing harvest strategies to achieve ecological, economic and social sustainability in multi-sector fisheries. Sustainability 2019, 11, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fischer-Kowalski, M.; Haberl, H. Social metabolism: A metric for biophysical growth and degrowth. In Handbook of Ecological Economics; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Martinez-Alier, J. Social Metabolism, Ecological Distribution Conflicts, and Languages of Valuation. Capital. Nat. Soc. 2009, 20, 58–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barkin, D. Social Metabolism: A Construct for Teaching and Research in Ecological Economics. In Ecological Economics and Social-Ecological Movements. Science, Policy and Challenges to Global Processes in a Troubled World; Barkin, D., Carrillo, G., Eds.; Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Xochimilco: Mexico City, Mexico, 2019; pp. 47–56. [Google Scholar]
- Dale, M.; Krumdieck, S.; Bodger, P. Global energy modelling-A biophysical approach (GEMBA) part 1: An overview of biophysical economics. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 73, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, P.; Patel, B.; Vekaria, E.; Shah, M. Biophysical economics and management of biodiesel, a harbinger of clean and sustainable energy. Int. J. Energy Water Resour. 2020, 4, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boardman, A.E.; Greenberg, D.H.; Vining, A.R.; Weimer, D.L. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Venn, T.J.; Calkin, D.E. Accommodating non-market values in evaluation of wildfire management in the United States: Challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2011, 20, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Office of Environment and Heritage. Guidelines for Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Assess Coastal Management Options; Office of Environment and Heritage: Sydney, Australia, 2018.
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Baker, R.; Ruting, B. Environmental Policy Analysis: A Guide to Non-Market Valuation; Productivity Commission: Canberra, Australia, 2014.
- Pearce, D.; Atkinson, G.; Mourato, S. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris, France, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Pascoe, S.; Doshi, A.; Dell, Q.; Tonks, M.; Kenyon, R. Economic value of recreational fishing in Moreton Bay and the potential impact of the marine park rezoning. Tour. Manag. 2014, 41, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prayaga, P.; Rolfe, J.; Stoeckl, N. The value of recreational fishing in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia: A pooled revealed preference and contingent behaviour model. Mar. Policy 2010, 34, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindner, R.; McLeod, P.; Nicholls, J. Dynamic Modelling of the Socially Optimal Allocation of Fish Resources between Commercial and Recreational Use; Fisheries Research and Development Corporation: Canberra, ACT, Australia, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Pascoe, S.; Hutton, T.; Hoshino, E. Offsetting Externalities in Estimating MEY in Multispecies Fisheries. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 146, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanley, N.; Barbier, E.B. Pricing Nature-Cost-Benefit Analysis and Envrionmental Policy; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Lipton, D.; Lew, D.K.; Wallmo, K.; Wiley, P.; Dvarskas, A. The evolution of non-market valuation of US coastal and marine resources. J. Ocean Coast. Econ. 2014, 2014, 6. [Google Scholar]
- Johnston, R.J.; Rolfe, J.; Rosenberger, R.S.; Brouwer, R. Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values. A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners; The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; Volume 14. [Google Scholar]
- Lindhjem, H.; Navrud, S. How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers? Ecol. Econ. 2008, 66, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hoehn, J.P. Methods to address selection effects in the meta regression and transfer of ecosystem values. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 60, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bacon, D.R. A comparison of approaches to importance-performance analysis. Int. J. Mark. Res. 2003, 45, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martilla, J.A.; James, J.C. Importance-Performance Analysis. J. Mark. 1977, 41, 77–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yavas, U.; Shemwell, D.J. Modified importance-performance analysis: An application to hospitals. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 2001, 14, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- O’Neill, M.A.; Palmer, A. Importance-performance analysis: A useful tool for directing continuous quality improvement in higher education. Qual. Assur. Educ. 2004, 12, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azzopardi, E.; Nash, R. A critical evaluation of importance-performance analysis. Tour. Manag. 2013, 35, 222–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, I.K.W.; Hitchcock, M. Importance-performance analysis in tourism: A framework for researchers. Tour. Manag. 2015, 48, 242–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tonge, J.; Moore, S.A. Importance-satisfaction analysis for marine-park hinterlands: A Western Australian case study. Tour. Manag. 2007, 28, 768–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eiswerth, M.E.; Shaw, W.D. Adjusting benefits transfer values for inflation. Water Resour. Res. 1997, 33, 2381–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosenberger, R.S.; Johnston, R.J. Selection Effects in Meta-Analysis and Benefit Transfer: Avoiding Unintended Consequences. Land Econ. 2009, 85, 410–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hein, L.; van Koppen, C.S.A.; van Ierland, E.C.; Leidekker, J. Temporal scales, ecosystem dynamics, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystems services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2016, 21, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryan, B.A.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, J.; Connor, J.D. Land-use change impacts on ecosystem services value: Incorporating the scarcity effects of supply and demand dynamics. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 32, 144–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scheufele, G. Environmental Values and Valuation over Time; Australian National University: Canberra, Australia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Skourtos, M.; Kontogianni, A.; Harrison, P.A. Reviewing the dynamics of economic values and preferences for ecosystem goods and services. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19, 2855–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pendleton, L.; Atiyah, P.; Moorthy, A. Is the non-market literature adequate to support coastal and marine management? Ocean Coast. Manag. 2007, 50, 363–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnston, R.J.; Rosenberger, R.S. Methods, trends and controversies in contemporary benefit transfer. J. Econ. Surv. 2010, 24, 479–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farr, M.; Stoeckl, N.; Alam Beg, R. The non-consumptive (tourism) ‘value’ of marine species in the Northern section of the Great Barrier Reef. Mar. Policy 2014, 43, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pascoe, S.; Doshi, A.; Kovac, M.; Austin, A. Estimating coastal and marine habitat values by combining multi-criteria methods with choice experiments. Ecosyst. Serv. 2019, 38, 100951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gislason, G. Bycatch Management in Fisheries: Impacts and Challenges. In Fisheries Bycatch: Global Issues and Creative Solutions; Kruse, G.S., An, H.-C., DiCosimo, J., Eishens, C.A., Gisalason, G.S., McBride, D.N., Rose, C.S., Siddon, C.E., Eds.; University of Alaska Fairbanks Alaska Sea Grant: Anchorage, AK, USA, 2015; pp. 25–39. [Google Scholar]
- Condie, H.; Grant, A.; Catchpole, T. Incentivising selective fishing under a policy to ban discards; lessons from European and global fisheries. Mar. Policy 2014, 45, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hobday, A.J.; Fleming, A.; Ogier, E.M.; Thomas, L.; Hartog, J.R.; Hornborg, S.; Stephenson, R.L. Perceptions regarding the need for broad sustainability assessments of Australian fisheries. Fish. Res. 2018, 208, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lew, D.K. Willingness to pay for threatened and endangered marine species: A review of the literature and prospects for policy use. Front. Mar. Sci. 2015, 2, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wallmo, K.; Lew, D.K. Public Willingness to Pay for Recovering and Downlisting Threatened and Endangered Marine Species. Conserv. Biol. 2012, 26, 830–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marre, J.-B.; Thebaud, O.; Pascoe, S.; Jennings, S.; Boncoeur, J.; Coglan, L. The use of ecosystem services valuation in Australian coastal zone management. Mar. Policy 2015, 56, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rogers, A.A.; Kragt, M.E.; Gibson, F.L.; Burton, M.P.; Petersen, E.H.; Pannell, D.J. Non-market valuation: Usage and impacts in environmental policy and management in Australia. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2015, 59, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans Joel, R.; Mathur, A. The value of online surveys. Internet Res. 2005, 15, 195–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raguragavan, J.; Hailu, A.; Burton, M. Economic valuation of recreational fishing in Western Australia: Statewide random utility modelling of fishing site choice behaviour. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2013, 57, 539–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- García-de-la-Fuente, L.; García-Flórez, L.; Fernández-Rueda, M.P.; Alcázar-Álvarez, J.; Colina-Vuelta, A.; Fernández-Vázquez, E.; Ramos-Carvajal, C. Comparing the contribution of commercial and recreational marine fishing to regional economies in Europe. An Input-Output approach applied to Asturias (Northwest Spain). Mar. Policy 2020, 118, 104024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyder, K.; Weltersbach, M.S.; Armstrong, M.; Ferter, K.; Townhill, B.; Ahvonen, A.; Arlinghaus, R.; Baikov, A.; Bellanger, M.; Birzaks, J.; et al. Recreational sea fishing in Europe in a global context—Participation rates, fishing effort, expenditure, and implications for monitoring and assessment. Fish Fish. 2018, 19, 225–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voyer, M.; Barclay, K.; McIlgorm, A.; Mazur, N. Using a well-being approach to develop a framework for an integrated socio-economic evaluation of professional fishing. Fish Fish. 2017, 18, 1134–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crompton, J.L. Economic impact studies: Instruments for political shenanigans? J. Travel Res. 2006, 45, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brooks, K.; Schirmer, J.; Pascoe, S.; Triantafillos, L.; Jebreen, E.; Cannard, T.; Dichmont, C.M. Selecting and assessing social objectives for Australian fisheries management. Mar. Policy 2015, 53, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pascoe, S.; Brooks, K.; Cannard, T.; Dichmont, C.M.; Jebreen, E.; Schirmer, J.; Triantafillos, L. Social objectives of fisheries management: What are managers’ priorities? Ocean Coast. Manag. 2014, 98, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carlin, L.; Morison, J. Economic Indicators for the South Australian Marine Scalefish Fishery 2016/17. In A Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture; The Government of South Australia, The Department of Primary Industries and Regions (PIRSA): Adelaide, Australia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Pouso, S.; Borja, Á.; Martín, J.; Uyarra, M.C. The capacity of estuary restoration to enhance ecosystem services: System dynamics modelling to simulate recreational fishing benefits. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2019, 217, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heck, N.; Stedman, R.C.; Gaden, M. Indicators to Evaluate the Social Dimensions of the Recreational Fishery in the Great Lakes. North Am. J. Fish. Manag. 2016, 36, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tate, A.; Ryan, K.; Smallwood, C.; Desfosses, C.; Taylor, S.; Blight, E.L.S. Review of Recreational Fishing Surveys in Western Australia; Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development: Perth, Australia, 2020.
- Pascoe, S.; Cannard, T.; Jebreen, E.; Dichmont, C.; Schirmer, J. Satisfaction with fishing and the desire to leave. AMBIO 2015, 44, 401–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Holland, D.S.; Abbott, J.K.; Norman, K.E. Fishing to live or living to fish: Job satisfaction and identity of west coast fishermen. AMBIO 2019, 49, 628–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crona, B.; Gelcich, S.; Bodin, Ö. The Importance of Interplay between Leadership and Social Capital in Shaping Outcomes of Rights-Based Fisheries Governance. World Dev. 2017, 91, 70–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ward, H.G.M.; Allen, M.S.; Camp, E.V.; Cole, N.; Hunt, L.M.; Matthias, B.; Post, J.R.; Wilson, K.; Arlinghaus, R. Understanding and Managing Social–Ecological Feedbacks in Spatially Structured Recreational Fisheries: The Overlooked Behavioral Dimension. Fisheries 2016, 41, 524–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arlinghaus, R.; Alós, J.; Beardmore, B.; Daedlow, K.; Dorow, M.; Fujitani, M.; Hühn, D.; Haider, W.; Hunt, L.M.; Johnson, B.M.; et al. Understanding and Managing Freshwater Recreational Fisheries as Complex Adaptive Social-Ecological Systems. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 2017, 25, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frey, B.S.; Luechinger, S.; Stutzer, A. The Life Satisfaction Approach to Environmental Valuation. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 2010, 2, 139–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Spagnoli, P.; Caetano, A.; Santos, S.C. Satisfaction with job aspects: Do patterns change over time? J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 609–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S. Participative Management and Job Satisfaction: Lessons for Management Leadership. Public Adm. Rev. 2002, 62, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bull, M.; Brown, T. Change communication: The impact on satisfaction with alternative workplace strategies. Facilities 2012, 30, 135–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Marre, J.-B.; Thébaud, O.; Pascoe, S.; Jennings, S.; Boncoeur, J.; Coglan, L. Is economic valuation of ecosystem services useful to decision-makers? Lessons learned from Australian coastal and marine management. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 178, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Rolfe, J.; Dyack, B. Valuing Recreation in the Coorong, Australia, with Travel Cost and Contingent Behaviour Models. Econ. Rec. 2011, 87, 282–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pascoe, S. Recreational beach use values with multiple activities. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 160, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paredes, S. The Value of Fisheries for Tourism and the Local Coastal Community; Queensland University of Technology: Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Rosenberger, R.S.; Loomis, J.B. Using meta-analysis for benefit transfer: In-sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database. Water Resour. Res. 2000, 36, 1097–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stapler, R.W.; Johnston, R.J. Meta-Analysis, Benefit Transfer, and Methodological Covariates: Implications for Transfer Error. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2009, 42, 227–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergstrom, J.C.; Taylor, L.O. Using meta-analysis for benefits transfer: Theory and practice. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 60, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Londoño, L.M.; Johnston, R.J. Enhancing the reliability of benefit transfer over heterogeneous sites: A meta-analysis of international coral reef values. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 78, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richardson, L.; Loomis, J. The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: An updated meta-analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 1535–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ready, R.; Navrud, S. International benefit transfer: Methods and validity tests. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 60, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shrestha, R.K.; Loomis, J.B. Testing a meta-analysis model for benefit transfer in international outdoor recreation. Ecol. Econ. 2001, 39, 67–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czajkowski, M.; Ahtiainen, H.; Artell, J.; Meyerhoff, J. Choosing a Functional Form for an International Benefit Transfer: Evidence from a Nine-country Valuation Experiment. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 134, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muthke, T.; Holm-mueller, K. National and International Benefit Transfer Testing with a Rigorous Test Procedure. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2004, 29, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Value | Importance | Discounted Age of Most Recent NMV Study by State | Av. Score | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qld | NSW | Vic | Tas | SA | WA | NT | |||
1. Commercial fisher satisfaction | 8.32 | 0 | |||||||
2. An individual fish to a recreational fisher | 8.22 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.200 | |||||
3. Fish to Indigenous communities | 7.85 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1 | 0.200 | ||||
4. Recreational fishing experience | 7.43 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.629 | |
5. Bycatch and discarding of commercial species | 7.46 | 0 | |||||||
6. Having a local commercial fishing fleet (heritage value) | 7.37 | 1 | 0.143 | ||||||
7. Non-extractive uses | 7.10 | 1 | 1 | 0.286 | |||||
8. Habitats affected by fishing | 6.71 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.429 | ||||
9. Ecosystem services affected by fishing | 5.80 | 0 | |||||||
10. TEP species bycatch | 5.68 | 0.8 | 0.114 | ||||||
11. Amenity values | 5.22 | 0 | |||||||
12. Access to water (aquaculture) | 4.72 | 0 | |||||||
13. Changes in water quality | 4.63 | 0.8 | 1 | 0.257 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Coglan, L.; Pascoe, S.; Scheufele, G. Availability of Non-Market Values to Inform Decision-Making in Australian Fisheries and Aquaculture: An Audit and Gap Analysis. Sustainability 2021, 13, 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020920
Coglan L, Pascoe S, Scheufele G. Availability of Non-Market Values to Inform Decision-Making in Australian Fisheries and Aquaculture: An Audit and Gap Analysis. Sustainability. 2021; 13(2):920. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020920
Chicago/Turabian StyleCoglan, Louisa, Sean Pascoe, and Gabriela Scheufele. 2021. "Availability of Non-Market Values to Inform Decision-Making in Australian Fisheries and Aquaculture: An Audit and Gap Analysis" Sustainability 13, no. 2: 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020920