Next Article in Journal
Anticipatory Non-Green-Phenomena Determination for Designing Eco-Design Products
Next Article in Special Issue
Static and Dynamic Investigations on Leaching/Retention of Nutrients from Raw Poultry Manure Biochars and Amended Agricultural Soil
Previous Article in Journal
Drivers of Car Ownership in a Car-Oriented City: A Mixed-Method Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Measurements of Local Sources of Particulates with a Portable Monitor along the Coast of an Insular City
Open AccessReview

Extended Producer Responsibility in the Australian Construction Industry

School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(2), 620; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020620
Received: 23 December 2020 / Revised: 6 January 2021 / Accepted: 7 January 2021 / Published: 11 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Waste Strategies Development in the Framework of Circular Economy)
With the COVID-19 outbreak across the world, policymakers and authorities have realised that they cannot solve the emerging issues using conventional policies and practices. COVID-19 has severely affected many industries, including construction and demolition (C&D) waste management and C&D waste resource recovery sector. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and schemes alike are policy instruments that prevent waste generation and promote a circular economy in the construction industry. These schemes are long adopted in various countries for different waste streams. EPR policy development and implementation, particularly for C&D waste, is still at an early stage in Australia. This study aims to review the Australian regulatory environment and practice to identify barriers and enablers towards successful policy development and implementation of C&D waste-related EPR. This study is based on secondary data that are publicly available. The document analysis was conducted to identify the level of regulatory and other stakeholders support in Australia. Following three rounds of examination of sources and applying multiple selection criteria, 59 different sources were reviewed in total. The results showed that there is widespread support among different stakeholders to develop EPR and expand the existing regulation to other materials. The barriers were cost and time implications for EPR policy establishment and enforcement, diversity of stakeholders involved, construction product lifecycle, responsibility of manufacturers, complexity in implantation of EPR regulations, modification inbuilt facilities and health and safety issues. Recommendations are made to alleviate these challenges. The outcome of this study could serve as a guideline for designing effective EPR policies. View Full-Text
Keywords: construction and demolition waste management; Australia; construction industry; extended producer responsibility; take-back scheme; product stewardship; environmental policy and management; circular economy in built environment construction and demolition waste management; Australia; construction industry; extended producer responsibility; take-back scheme; product stewardship; environmental policy and management; circular economy in built environment
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Shooshtarian, S.; Maqsood, T.; Wong, P.S.; Khalfan, M.; Yang, R.J. Extended Producer Responsibility in the Australian Construction Industry. Sustainability 2021, 13, 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020620

AMA Style

Shooshtarian S, Maqsood T, Wong PS, Khalfan M, Yang RJ. Extended Producer Responsibility in the Australian Construction Industry. Sustainability. 2021; 13(2):620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020620

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shooshtarian, Salman; Maqsood, Tayyab; Wong, Peter S.; Khalfan, Malik; Yang, Rebecca J. 2021. "Extended Producer Responsibility in the Australian Construction Industry" Sustainability 13, no. 2: 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020620

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop