Next Article in Journal
Spatial Analysis and Geographic Information Systems as Tools for Sustainability Research
Next Article in Special Issue
Improvement of Quality of Higher Education Institutions as a Basis for Improvement of Quality of Life
Previous Article in Journal
Mulching Measures Improve Soil Moisture in Rain-Fed Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) Orchards in the Loess Hilly Region of China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Can Digital Transformation Solve the Problem of Arctic Youth Migration Outflow?
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

How to Make Digitalization Better Serve an Increasing Quality of Life?

Sustainability 2021, 13(2), 611; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020611
by Oleg A. Kryzhanovskij 1, Natalia A. Baburina 2 and Anastasia O. Ljovkina 1,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sustainability 2021, 13(2), 611; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020611
Submission received: 12 December 2020 / Revised: 31 December 2020 / Accepted: 8 January 2021 / Published: 11 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection The Impact of Digitalization on the Quality of Life)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The method is impressive, the authors use original approach to the quality of life measurement

I appreciate that the paper suggests to use correlation to identify and monitor the unambiguous interrelations between digitalization and quality of life which hasn’t been done before in many research papers. The authors visualize matrix method to identify and monitor national trends of digitalization in the context of quality of life.

I would recommend to elaborate the policy and conditions of digitalization and other sufficient social-economic factors, which are more fundamental for the countries’ social policy than digitalization itself.

The authors make a very important conclusion that statistical approach alone is not relevant for managing the digitalization process for increasing quality of life. However, the main official approach for the quality of life measurement used in many countries to date is statistical. In this regard, it would be very interesting to know the alternative methodologies of measuring the quality of life and the indicators the authors suggest.

I would recommend to describe the tools which is considered useful for managing and monitoring national digital development in more details.

Author Response

Answers to the reviewer in the uploaded file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This is an interesting work, based on existing studies. It brings new insights by studying correlations between indices, but in my opinion it should also present at least one case study (e.g., in the author's own country) to improve the quality of its conclusions.

Some other suggestions include: replacing "digitization" with "digitalization" in the two instances it appears, and discussing in the limitations section about the possible third variables that might influence both sides of the correlations. Also, I would recommend changing "high" and "low" in the tables, figures and text discussing the correlations (maybe with "reduced" and "increased"), since it is confusing for properly reading the HDI values, which in itself uses these terms.

Author Response

Answers to the reviewer in the uploaded file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop