Industry 4.0 Contribution to Asset Management in the Electrical Industry
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Background
2.1. Asset Management Definition
2.2. Industry 4.0 Definition
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Literature Identification
3.2. Literature Analysis Process
4. Results
4.1. Evolution of Publications
4.2. Keywords Analysis
4.3. Application Field Analysis
- Demand response is assured by enhanced Reliability and accurate Load forecasting;
- Optimization is often combined with Planning or Budget, investments, and cost management;
- Monitoring needs Information and data management processes to manage the voluminous amount of data it generates;
- Information and data management leads to an improved Decision-making process;
- Risk management is assured by an appropriate Decision-making process, improved Forecasting methods, and enhanced Maintenance and health management;
- Monitoring leads to Anomaly, outages, and failure detection and analysis improvement, which helps Maintenance and health management;
- Optimal Planning, Decision making, and Risk management, as well as the integration of refined Forecasting methods, contribute to efficient Budget, investments, and cost management.
4.3.1. Information and Data Management
“[RFID] can achieve […] real-time access, maintenance and data verification […], ensure the consistency, […] synchronization of […] information, reduce the workload of […] information management, and can significantly improve the accuracy of asset information and the ease of control in the process of operation and maintenance.”(Liu et al. [37])
4.3.2. Budget, Investment and Cost Management
4.3.3. Decision Making
- Many methods and processes detailed in other application fields aim to enhance decision making. For example:
- Optimizing investments from modeling and simulation support decision making regarding budget [27];
- Simulating the long-term impact of the maintenance strategy also influences decision making relating to maintenance policies [44];
- Improving maintenance activities helps decision making related to resource constraints [45].
4.3.4. Load Forecasting and Management
4.3.5. Reliability Improvement
4.3.6. Anomaly, Outages, and Failure Detection/Analysis
4.3.7. Increase Efficiency of Inspection and Maintenance Activities
4.3.8. Maintenance and Health Management
- Appropriately processing heterogeneous big data;
- The IoT, as devices installed on equipment, send data that can predict necessary maintenance activities before failure [22];
- The use of algorithms and simulation methods to support the calculation of the equipment’s residual life.
4.3.9. Risk Management
4.3.10. Network Configuration Optimization
4.3.11. Electricity Consumption Optimization
5. Discussion
5.1. Industry 4.0 Impact to AM Model, from an Electrical Industry Point of View
5.2. Challenges in the Application of Industry 4.0 Tools
6. Conclusions
- Significant increase in investment in assets;
- Limited financial and human resources;
- A need to prioritize investments to maximize performance while minimizing costs and risks for the entire electricity production, transmission, and distribution chain.
- Modeling and simulation of the entire complex system reliability, considering:
- o
- The residual life of aging equipment;
- o
- Outage forecasting;
- o
- Extreme weather conditions and network resilience.
- Integration of machine learning algorithms based on properly structured data from systems and equipment of these three functions to improve simulation models;
- Integration of predictive maintenance methods;
- Prioritize investments from the calculation of the health index carried out with appropriate algorithms.
7. Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Vermeer, M.; Wetzer, J.; Van Der Wielen, P.; De Haan, E.; De Meulemeester, E.; Mischa, V. Asset-management decision-support modeling, using a health and risk model. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 29 June–2 July 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Côté, A.; Messaoudi, D.; Komljenovic, D.; Alarie, S.; Blancke, O.; Gaha, M.; Truchon, E.; Pelletier, S. Élaboration d’un systeme d’aide à la décision pour la gestion des actifs à TransÉnergie. In Proceedings of the Congrès 2019 CIGRÉ, Montreal, QC, Canada, 16–19 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Khaliq, S.A.; Mahmood, M.N.; Das, N. Towards a best practice asset management framework for electrical power distribution organisations. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 15–18 November 2015; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mamun, K.A.; Islam, F.R. Reliability evaluation of power network: A case study of Fiji Islands. In Proceedings of the 2016 Australian Universities Power Engineering Conference, AUPEC, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 25–28 September 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmood, I.; Kausar, T.; Sarjoughian, H.S.; Malik, A.W.; Riaz, N. An Integrated Modeling, Simulation and Analysis Framework for Engineering Complex Systems. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 67497–67514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Q.; Jia, X.; He, L. The control of Distributed Generation System using Multi-Agent System. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Electronics and Information Engineering, Kyoto, Japan, 1–3 August 2010; Volume 1, pp. V1-30–V1-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amadi-Echendu, J.E.; Mafutsana, J.M. A bibliographic review of trends in design and management of electrical power transmission transformers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management 2016, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 8–10 March 2016; pp. 2010–2018. Available online: www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85018435774&partnerID=40&md5=bcc218b220fe4e8623d2daf34851ad1c (accessed on 15 September 2021).
- Zou, Q.M.; Qin, L.J.; Ma, Q.Y. The Application of the Internet of Things in the Smart Grid. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 433–440, 3388–3394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goyal, R.K. IoT for Indian Power Sector. In ISGW 2018 Compendium of Technical Papers. ISGW 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2020; Volume 580, pp. 191–197. [Google Scholar]
- Koziel, S.; Hilber, P.; Ichise, R. Application of big data analytics to support power networks and their transition towards smart grids. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 9–12 December 2019; pp. 6104–6106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koziel, S.; Hilber, P.; Ichise, R. A review of data-driven and probabilistic algorithms for detection purposes in local power systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems, PMAP, Liege, Belgium, 18–21 August 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moharm, K. State of the art in big data applications in microgrid: A review. Adv. Eng. Informatics 2019, 42, 100945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angell, D.; Ayers, L.M. Applicability of asset analytics, CBM and life cycle management to the smart grid: Balancing short-term and long-term risks. In Proceedings of the CIGRE 2013 Lisbon Symposium–Smarts Grids: Next Generation Grids for Energy Trends, Lisbon, Portugal, 21 April 2013; Volume 2013. Available online: www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85048431578&partnerID=40&md5=f8f3d69361db18d197f3881458a75784 (accessed on 15 September 2021).
- Stimmel, C.L. Big Data Analytics Strategies for the Smart Grid; Auerbach Publications: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; pp. 1–224. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, K.; Fu, C.; Yang, S. Big data driven smart energy management: From big data to big insights. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhichao, L.; Yuping, Z. Research on Distribution Network Operation and Control Technology Based on Big Data Analysis. In Proceedings of the China International Conference on Electricity Distribution, CICED 2018, Tianjin, China, 17–19 September 2018; pp. 1158–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 55000:2014. Gestion d’actifs—Aperçu Général, Principes et Terminologie; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- IPWEA. IIMM Supplement 2015 Meeting ISO 55001 Requirements for Asset Management; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- PAS55:2008-1:2008. Specification for the Optimized Management of Physical Assets, PAS 55-1:2008; B.S. Institute: New Delhi, India, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Wheeldon, M.; Hayes, J. Developing a whole company culture of asset management through organisational structure, an asset management framework and a risk based approach for asset intervention. In Proceedings of the IET & IAM Asset Management Conference, London, UK, 27–28 November 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biard, G.; Vaillancourt, R.; Abdul-Nour, G.; Langheit, C.; Gaha, M.; Houle, G. Determining the lifecycle and future re-placement cost of distribution network equipement. Int. J. Mod. Eng. Res. 2021, 10, 51–60. [Google Scholar]
- Dos Santos, R.S.; Vianna Lordelo, S.A. Internet of Things, Big Data and Simulation as a Competitive Advantage in the New Age of Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering & Operations Managemen, Toronto, ON, Canada, 23–25 October 2019; pp. 2686–2694. Available online: http://biblioproxy.uqtr.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aci&AN=137667447&site=ehost-live (accessed on 15 September 2021).
- Kiran, D.R. Internet of Things. In Production Planning and Control–A Comprehensive Approach; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Hermann, M.; Pentek, T.; Otto, B. Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios. In Proceedings of the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2016; pp. 3928–3937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hofmann, E.; Rüsch, M. Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Comput. Ind. 2017, 89, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erboz, G. How to Define Industry 4.0: Main Pillars of Industry 4.0. In Managerial Trends in the Development of Enterprises in Globalization Era; Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra: Nitra, Slovakia, 2017; Available online: www.researchgate.net/publication/326557388_How_To_Define_Industry_40_Main_Pillars_Of_Industry_40 (accessed on 15 September 2021).
- Lasi, H.; Fettke, P.D.P.; Kemper, H.-G.; Feld, D.-I.T.; Hoffmann, D.-H.M. Industry 4.0. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2014, 6, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rousseau, D.M. Conclusion. In Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Gavrikova, E.; Volkova, I.; Burda, Y. Strategic Aspects of Asset Management: An Overview of Current Research. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polenghi, A.; Roda, I.; Macchi, M.; Trucco, P. Risk Sources Affecting the Asset Management Decision-Making Process in Manufacturing: A Systematic Review of the Literature. In Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management for the Factory of the Future; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salvadorinho, J.; Teixeira, L. Stories Told by Publications about the Relationship between Industry 4.0 and Lean: Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. Publications 2021, 9, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beltrami, M.; Orzes, G.; Sarkis, J.; Sartor, M. Industry 4.0 and sustainability: Towards conceptualization and theory. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 312, 127733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koziel, S.; Hilber, P.; Westerlund, P.; Shayesteh, E. Investments in data quality: Evaluating impacts of faulty data on asset management in power systems. Appl. Energy 2020, 281, 116057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDonald, J.D. A Holistic Approach to Becoming a Data-Driven Utility. In Big Data Application in Power Systems; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 3–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gil, S.; Zapata-Madrigal, G.D.; García-Sierra, R. Electrical Internet of Things–EIoT: A Platform for the Data Management in Electrical Systems. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 49–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, Y.; Zhang, K.; Cao, L.; Zhang, Z. Design and Research of Distribution Equipment and Asset Management System Based on Internet of Things Technology. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration, EI2 2018, Beijing, China, 20–22 October 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Cheng, P.; Cao, J.; Zhou, Z.N.; Zheng, T. Lean Management Method for Distribution Network Assets Operation and Maintenance Based on RFID. In Electrical Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 1007–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMorran, A.W.; Rudd, S.E.; Shand, C.M.; Simmins, J.J.; McCollough, N.; Stewart, E.M. Data integration challenges for standards–Compliant mobile applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society Transmission and Distribution Conference, Chicago, IL, USA, 14–17 April 2014; Available online: www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84908439838&partnerID=40&md5=36f5f0f6470c1e467ea940c239f1d2ea (accessed on 15 September 2021).
- Liu, D.; Wang, R.; Zhang, H.; Chen, J.; Liu, X.; Ma, L. Research on Terminal Security Technology of Ubiquitous Power Internet of Things Based on PUF and SM3. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration: Ubiquitous Energy Network Connecting Everything, EI22019, Changsha, China, 8–10 November 2019; pp. 910–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butans, J.; Orlovs, I. Diagnostics and Long Term Prognostics for Investment Decision Support in Smart Grids. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2016, 49, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Yang, L.; Zhang, L.; Ye, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, D.Y. Research on Intelligent Evaluation and Monitoring Method for Cost of Transmission and Transformation Project. IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 645, 012062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamad, A.A.; Ghunem, R.A. A Techno-Economic Framework for Replacing Aged XLPE Cables in the Distribution Network. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2020, 35, 2387–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goyal, A.; Aprilia, E.; Janssen, G.; Kim, Y.; Kumar, T.; Mueller, R.; Phan, D.; Raman, A.; Schuddebeurs, J.; Xiong, J.; et al. Asset health management using predictive and prescriptive analytics for the electric power grid. IBM J. Res. Dev. 2016, 60, 4:1–4:14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suryani, E.; Hendrawan, R.A.; Faster, E.A.P.; Dewi, L.P. A Simulation Model for Strategic Planning in Asset Management of Electricity Distribution Network. In Communications in Computer and Information Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; Volume 516, pp. 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Clements, D.; Mancarella, P. Systemic modelling and integrated assessment of asset management strategies and staff constraints on distribution network reliability. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2018, 155, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaukat, M.; Shaukat, H.; Qadir, Z.; Munawar, H.; Kouzani, A.; Mahmud, M. Cluster Analysis and Model Comparison Using Smart Meter Data. Sensors 2021, 21, 3157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalyasmaa, A.I.; Dmitriev, S. Expert system for engineering assets’ management of utility companies. In Proceedings of the SDEMPED 2015: IEEE 10th International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives, Guarda, Portugal, 1–4 September 2015; pp. 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dokic, T.; Kezunovic, M. Predictive Risk Management for Dynamic Tree Trimming Scheduling for Distribution Networks. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2018, 10, 4776–4785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montanari, G.C.; Hebner, R.; Seri, P.; Ghosh, R. Self-Assessment of Health Conditions of Electrical Assets and Grid Components: A Contribution to Smart Grids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2021, 12, 1206–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ku, T.-T.; Li, C.-S.; Lin, C.-H.; Chen, C.-S.; Hsu, C.-T. Faulty Line-Section Identification Method for Distribution Systems Based on Fault Indicators. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2020, 57, 1335–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabin, D.; Macleod, G.; Wojdan, M. Using smart grid sensors and advanced software applications as an asset management tool at Hydro Ottawa. CIRED–Open Access Proc. J. 2017, 2017, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lamberti, L.; Parmakovic, A.; Krsman, V. FLISR with Field Devices and Distribution Management System. In Proceedings of the 11th IET International Conference on Advances in Power System Control, Operation and Management (APSCOM 2018), Hong Kong, China, 11–15 November 2018; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Vasconcelos, F.M.; Rocha, C.H.S.; Almeida, C.F.M.; Pereira, D.D.S.; Rosa, L.H.L.; Kagan, N. Methodology for Inspection Scheduling in Power Distribution Networks Based on Power Quality Indexes. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2020, 36, 1211–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fleckenstein, M.; Balzer, G. Outage cost oriented maintenance strategies of outgoing feeders in transmission systems. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems, PMAPS 2014, Durham, UK, 7–10 July 2014; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goerdin, S.A.; Smit, J.J.; Mehairjan, R.P.Y. Monte Carlo simulation applied to support risk-based decision making in electricity distribution networks. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 29 June–2 July 2015; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thurlby, R. Managing the asset time bomb: A system dynamics approach. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Forensic Eng. 2013, 166, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naranpanawe, L.; Ma, H.; Saha, T.K.; Lee, C.; Ghosal, A. A Practical Health Index for Overhead Conductors: Experience from Australian Distribution Networks. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 218863–218873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koksal, A.; Ozdemir, A.; Ata, O. RCAM based maintenance plan of the power transformers using k-means clustering algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2017 19th International Conference on Intelligent System Application to Power Systems, ISAP, San Antonio, TX, USA, 17–20 September 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clements, D.; Mancarella, P. Resource constrained distribution network modelling under severe weather conditions. In Proceedings of the IET International Conference on Resilience of Transmission and Distribution Networks (RTDN), Birmingham, UK, 20–24 September 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Youssefi, N.; Moselhi, O. Risk Asset Management of Power Grids. In Proceedings of the 2016 Construction Research Congress, Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan, CRC2016, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 31 May–2 June 2016; pp. 1628–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, A.; Strachan, S.; Ault, G.W. A framework for asset replacement and investment planning in power distribution networks. In Proceedings of the IET& IAM Asset Management Conference 2012, London, UK, 27–28 November 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Crossley, P. Reliability improvement using ant colony optimization applied to placement of sectionalizing switches. Energy Procedia 2017, 142, 2604–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Najafi, S.; Gholizadeh, R. On optimal sizing, siting and timing of distribution substations. In Proceedings of the EPDC 2013–18th Electric Power Distribution Network Conference, Kermanshah, Iran, 30 April–1 May 2013; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravadanegh, S.N.; Gholizadeh-Roshanagh, R. A heuristic algorithm for optimal multistage sizing, siting and timing of MV distribution substations. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2013, 105, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pouya, S.; Javad, S. Optimal fuzzy switch placement to increase automation level of electric distribution network considering asset management principles. J. Central South Univ. 2019, 26, 1897–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, H.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Liao, M.; Liu, W.; Huang, Y. Dynamic Optimal Configuration Method for Distribution Network Based on Multidimensional Reliability Improvement. IOP Conf. Series Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 769, 042021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Concepts, Technological Possibilities, and Tools | Definition |
---|---|
Internet of Things (IoT) | Allows the interoperability of the elements of a system by providing a digital interaction between objects. |
Cyber-Physical System (CPS) | Aims to link the physical and virtual environment of the organizations’ elements in order to synchronize them in real-time. |
Big Data | The key element of industry 4.0. It represents the astronomical quantity and variety of data collected that makes them unusable in their raw state. Proper processing, paired with relevant junctions between types of data, leads to important insights [22]. |
Cloud | Supports the interconnections between software and data with servers hosted on the web rather than in organizations. It provides higher data storage and calculation capacities as well as accessibility. |
Machine Learning | A concept of artificial intelligence, using mathematical algorithms, from the analysis of big data. Over time, the compiled data improves the algorithm calculations and therefore increases the performance of the results. |
Simulation and modeling | Used to perform complex analyzes that would be impossible to implement with traditional analytical techniques and to simulate the effect of decisions before applying them. |
Digital twin | A simulation tool. It is a digital reproduction of the components or equipment of an organization or system. This virtual copy is designed to react the same way the real machine would. |
AugmentedReality | Technology that allows a virtual environment to be linked to the real physical environment, enriching the real environment with additional data and information. |
Smart factory | A factory where the production system is decentralized, and the entire value chain is autonomous. |
Additivemanufacturing | Manufacturing products from 3D printers by juxtaposing multiple layers of raw materials based on a virtual design of the final product. |
Keywords | Freq. | Prop. |
---|---|---|
Algorithms | 17 | 22% |
Big data | 14 | 18% |
Modeling | 13 | 17% |
Simulation | 11 | 14% |
IoT | 9 | 12% |
Artificial intelligence | 2 | 3% |
Cloud | 2 | 3% |
Virtual reality | 1 | 1% |
Real-time systems | 1 | 1% |
Keywords | Freq. | Prop. |
---|---|---|
Information and data management | 22 | 29% |
Budget, investment, and cost management | 22 | 29% |
Reliability | 18 | 24% |
Anomaly, outages and failure detection/analysis | 17 | 22% |
Decision making | 15 | 20% |
Smart grid | 15 | 20% |
Optimization | 12 | 16% |
Maintenance and health management | 12 | 16% |
Risk management | 12 | 16% |
Load forecasting and management | 11 | 14% |
Monitoring | 11 | 14% |
Planning | 10 | 13% |
Demand response | 6 | 8% |
Forecasting | 6 | 8% |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Biard, G.; Nour, G.A. Industry 4.0 Contribution to Asset Management in the Electrical Industry. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10369. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810369
Biard G, Nour GA. Industry 4.0 Contribution to Asset Management in the Electrical Industry. Sustainability. 2021; 13(18):10369. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810369
Chicago/Turabian StyleBiard, Gabrielle, and Georges Abdul Nour. 2021. "Industry 4.0 Contribution to Asset Management in the Electrical Industry" Sustainability 13, no. 18: 10369. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810369