1. Introduction
Currently, to address the lack of skilled labor and problems of poor consolidation and finish quality of concrete construction, self-compacting concrete (SCC) technology has emerged and become the mainstream. SCCs have exceptional flowability, pass through rebar, and consolidate under their weight without segregation or bleeding [
1,
2,
3,
4]. Apart from their self-compacting ability, SCCs have a high filling and passing ability as well as appropriate segregation resistance, making them ideal for various applications in the construction industries, including precast concrete, repair works, and underwater construction. Nevertheless, traditional SCC requires a high amount of binder to achieve its exceptional engineering properties. The use of Portland cement (PC) as the primary binder in SCC remains a major concern because of the elevated levels of carbon dioxide (CO
2) emissions and embodied energy (EE) associated with its production. Cement production constitutes approximately 7% of the global CO
2 emissions [
5,
6,
7]. If the cement industries were considered as a country, it would indeed rank third after China and the USA in terms of total CO
2 emissions. To overcome this problem, substantial efforts have been dedicated to developing novel construction materials using sustainable alternative binders with less-harmful environmental footprints.
Over the last several decades, there has been increasing research into and production of geopolymer binders (GBs) as an environmentally friendly alternative to the conventional PC. Since the CO
2 emissions and high energy consumption of PC production are eliminated, GBs have emerged as a sustainable alternative [
8]. Generally, GBs are produced from aluminosilicate precursors, often consisting of recycled byproducts and waste materials activated by alkaline solutions to yield geopolymer concrete (GC) [
9,
10]. GC has been characterized by its excellent durability and mechanical performance compared to that of traditional Portland cement concrete (PCC) [
11,
12,
13]. Uses of GBs have recently been explored to enhance the sustainability of SCC. In the remainder of this paper, SCCs produced with GC are referred as self-compacting geopolymer concrete (SCGCs). They can be considered as pioneering construction materials with exceptional performance and sustainability features.
Worldwide, enormous amounts of industrial by-products like GBFS from steel manufacturing and FA from coal fired power-generation plants) are produced annually. The cost and environmental impact associated with the disposal of these redundant byproducts can be avoided by using them as binders in SCGC production. Meanwhile, the geopolymer technology has demonstrated robust capacity in completely extirpating PC from the process of producing concrete. Several preliminary studies on SCGCs have been conducted which received considerable attention. This technology can be applied toward the containment of hazardous waste, refractories, ceramics, and fire-resistant construction materials [
14]. Nevertheless, the most attractive strategy for SCGCs in the construction industry is the total replacement of the PC binder in concrete [
15]. The properties of SCGCs are largely related to their source materials, generally industrial wastes and byproducts that, unlike normal cement, do not require stringent quality control procedures.
Previously, diverse sources of industrial by-products have been used for making GCs. However, FA- and GBFS-based SCGCs became advantageous because of their rapid rate of strength gain, enhanced resistance to sulphate and acid attacks, superior resistance to fire, low permeability, low creep and drying shrinkage strains, and very good bond to reinforcing steel. GBFS contains adequate amounts of aluminum, silicon, and calcium oxide, making it an appropriate precursor for producing SCGC mixtures. In GCs or mortars, using GBFS as a binder can increase the compressive strength (CS) owing to better structuring of poorly arranged microstructures, micro-filling of voids, twin creations during calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel formation, and the existence of extremely polymerized units of alkali activation [
16,
17,
18]. Nonetheless, the large CO
2 emission and EE during the production stage along with the poor durability to H
2SO
4 exposure and rapid setting time limit the consumption of GBFS in SCGCs. FA incorporation lowers the levels of Ca and constitutes one of the best industrial by-products to produce alkali-activated concrete for several reasons, including its wide availability in many countries, high contents of SiO
2 and Al
2O
3, and low cost and energy requirements [
19,
20,
21]. Likewise, FA-incorporated GCs give reliable flexibility to heat curing for long-term and short-term in the environment [
18,
22,
23]. However, the main problem for the extensive application of FA in GCs is related to its reduced strength development upon curing at room temperature and the requirement for high-molarity (Up to 10 M) sodium hydroxide (NaOH, hereafter called NH) and alkaline activator solutions. Therefore, in GCs the benefits of using FA alone as a precursor are very limited.
Most of the earlier research has focused primarily on the behavior of alkali-activated slag pastes and mortar mixtures, and only some recent studies were performed on SCGCs. Various studies confirmed that many factors influence the characteristics (fresh as well as hardened) of the SCGCs. These include the mixture design methods [
1]; chemical and physical properties of the precursor wastes used as a binder; the alkaline activator solution compositions [
24]; the molarity of NH [
25]; the ratios of NH to sodium silicate [
26]; water and superplasticizer levels [
27]; as well as the contents, types, and sizes of the fine and coarse aggregates. Several investigations have been carried out to determine the properties of SCGCs made with GBFS as a sole precursor. Nevertheless, few studies have looked at the mechanical, structural, and morphological properties of the SCGCs incorporated with FA as partial replacement for GBFS.
An all-inclusive overview of the existing literature showed that the latent uses of FA as partial replacement for GBFS to develop eco-friendly SCGCs have not yet been explored. From another perspective, the production of various cement-free SCCs is very attractive since it significantly minimizes CO2 emissions and the cost and labor associated with the extraction of raw materials. Accordingly, the present study is expected to contribute to the state-of-the-art of knowledge through the implementation and standardization of the industrial-scale manufacturing approaches of low-carbon-footprint SCGCs in the foreseeable future. This is particularly significant in the geographic locations having an abundance of volcanic ash and East Asian countries with extensive FA production.
Considering the abovementioned facts, the current study aims to produce SCGCs incorporated with FA and GBFS at various proportions and examine their synergistic effects. For instance, FA increases the setting time of the mixture, while GBFS mitigates the slow strength development of FA. Therefore, an experimental program was conducted on the control specimens made using 100% GBFS and mixture designs incorporated with FA and GBFS at different proportions. The structures and morphologies of the alkali-activated SCGCs were first explored using diverse non-destructive tests including XRD and SEM. Subsequently, the workability and mechanical properties of six SCGC mixtures were examined using a series of tests. Additionally, an optimized hybrid artificial neural network (ANN) coupled with a metaheuristic Bat optimization algorithm (Bat-ANN) was developed to estimate the CS of SCGC mixtures. The proposed informational model will ultimately enable the design of SCGCs with targeted mechanical properties based on locally available industrial by-products. This will help to attain appropriate engineering properties while saving the labor, cost, and materials wastage associated with numerous trial batches.
4. Strengths and UPV Correlation of SCGCs
The CS is the most important mechanical property of concrete, and the most specified for construction materials. Moreover, TS and FS are of primary importance and CS is often used to estimate these properties. For instance, ACI 318-14 [
54] proposes the following relationships between CS, TS, and FS for conventional concretes:
Figure 12 presents the correlation between CS, TS, and FS of the proposed SCGCs. The accuracy of the ACI relationships for the alkali-activated SCGCs was investigated at the age of 28 days. The ACI relationships of the proposed mixes did not correctly estimate the correlation among various mechanical properties.
The non-destructive ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) test has been used by many researchers to estimate the CS value of concrete. The UPV test can appraise the positions of defects and cracks, and well as the homogeneity and dynamic elastic moduli of concrete. Nevertheless, it is extensively applied to evaluate concrete’s CS in prevailing and fresh construction on-site. The most straightforward and commonly used relationship between the CS of concrete and UPV is presented in the following form:
where V is the pulse velocity (km/s), and A and B are constants. Using the form of Equation (3), several researchers proposed an empirical equation to correlate CS with UPV [
55,
56]. Nash’t et al. [
57] tested 161 cubic concrete specimens (150 mm × 150 mm × 150 mm) and evaluated the influence of curing conditions on the CS (in MPa) and UPV (in km/s) correlation for curing ages ranged from 7–138 days). The following relationship was proposed based on the results:
Considering the CS and UPV of all studied mixture designs in this study, as shown in
Table 4, it was revealed that Equation 4 resulted in a conservative estimation for SCGCs. Since the binder plays an important role in the development of CS for SCGC mixtures, this study proposes a new regression equation to estimate the CS of SCGCs using the ratio of aggregate to binder and the pulse velocity of the hardened concrete, as expressed in the equation below and depicted in
Figure 13.