Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,
The study aims at investigating the "Innovative contract solutions for the provision of agri-environmental climatic public goods: A literature review". 
Although the paper deals with an interesting topic, major revisions are required. 
The paper is not satisfactory written, needs a careful editing, fonts, and style. 
Further, the study aim and background are not well presented, repetitions occurring in the paper should be avoided. 
However, it is recommended:
- Reformulate the abstract by telling prospective readers what you did and what the important findings of your research were. Don't use abbreviations in the abstract. 
- Introduction and, above all, the discussion can be improved in order to show better aim and results for further studies in the topic.
- Material and methods is very poorly written,  must be supported with reference literature:
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207394
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.026
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.054
https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040106
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063453
https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310008
https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/wep/article/view/9101

- Conclusion section needs improvement. Please provide more quantitative key contributions of the study with proper discussions, highlight the limitations of this study and the future work. 
Accordingly, it is opinion of this reviewer to accept with major revisions the proposed manuscript for a publication on this journal.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The study addresses an interesting subject. Moreover, this is a well-structured and organized manuscript. The authors have done certain things well, yet some revisions and improvements are required.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

I am happy to inform you that I have accepted your revision of the manuscript and will recommend it for publication.

Congratulations. I look forward to reading it online.

Thank you for the opportunity to let me contribute a small part to your publication.

 

Author Response

Dear Revisor

We want to thank you for your manuscript acceptance and for your interesting and useful comments.

Your revision has been important to improve the quality of the paper.

Thank you again.

The authors

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Most of my remarks from the previous round of revision have been addressed carefully. Yet, there are a few minor issues that need to be addressed.  

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf