Next Article in Journal
Organizational Capabilities for Family Firm Sustainability: The Role of Knowledge Accumulation and Family Essence
Previous Article in Journal
Technification in Dairy Farms May Reconcile Habitat Conservation in a Brazilian Savanna Region
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ageing in Place in Disaster Prone Rural Coastal Communities: A Case Study of Tai O Village in Hong Kong
Article

A Conceptual Framework Integrating “Building Back Better” and Post-Earthquake Needs for Recovery and Reconstruction

by 1,2, 1,*, 1 and 1
1
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621000, China
2
Institute of Geographical Sciences and Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100864, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: John T. Cooper
Sustainability 2021, 13(10), 5608; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105608
Received: 4 March 2021 / Revised: 21 April 2021 / Accepted: 30 April 2021 / Published: 18 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Planning for Resilience in Rural Communities)
Global disasters due to earthquakes have become more frequent and intense. Consequently, post-disaster recovery and reconstruction has become the new normal in the social process. Through post-disaster reconstruction, risks can be effectively reduced, resilience can be improved, and long-term stability can be achieved. However, there is a gap between the impact of post-earthquake reconstruction and the needs of the people in the disaster area. Based on the international consensus of “building back better” (BBB) and a post-disaster needs assessment method, this paper proposes a new (N-BBB) conceptual model to empirically analyze recovery after the Changning Ms 6.0 earthquake in Sichuan Province, China. The reliability of the model was verified through factor analysis. The main observations were as follows. People’s needs focus on short-term life and production recovery during post-earthquake recovery and reconstruction. Because of disparities in families, occupations, and communities, differences are observed in the reconstruction time sequence and communities. Through principal component analysis, we found that the N-BBB model constructed in this study could provide strong policy guidance in post-disaster recovery and reconstruction after the Changning Ms 6.0 earthquake, effectively coordinate the “top-down” and “bottom-up” models, and meet the diversified needs of such recovery and reconstruction. View Full-Text
Keywords: building back better; post-disaster needs; post-disaster recovery and reconstruction; environment and safety; community resilience building back better; post-disaster needs; post-disaster recovery and reconstruction; environment and safety; community resilience
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, M.; Cao, Q.; Ran, B.; Wei, L. A Conceptual Framework Integrating “Building Back Better” and Post-Earthquake Needs for Recovery and Reconstruction. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105608

AMA Style

Shi M, Cao Q, Ran B, Wei L. A Conceptual Framework Integrating “Building Back Better” and Post-Earthquake Needs for Recovery and Reconstruction. Sustainability. 2021; 13(10):5608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105608

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Manjiang, Qi Cao, Baisong Ran, and Lanyan Wei. 2021. "A Conceptual Framework Integrating “Building Back Better” and Post-Earthquake Needs for Recovery and Reconstruction" Sustainability 13, no. 10: 5608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105608

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop