Next Article in Journal
Role of Integrated Nutrient Management and Agronomic Fortification of Zinc on Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Quality of Wheat
Previous Article in Journal
The Trade Network Structure of the “One Belt and One Road” and Its Environmental Effects
Article

Ammonia Emission Factors and Uncertainties of Coke Oven Gases in Iron and Steel Industries

1
Climate Change and Environment Research Center, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea
2
Department of Cooperate Course for Climate Change, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea
3
Department of Climate and Environment, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(9), 3518; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093518
Received: 2 April 2020 / Revised: 23 April 2020 / Accepted: 23 April 2020 / Published: 25 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sustainability and Applications)
In this study, uncertainties related to NH3 concentration, emission factor, and emission factor estimation in the exhaust gas of the steel sintering furnace using COG (coke oven gas) among the by-product gas generated in steel production was estimated to identify the missing source. By measuring the NH3 concentration in the exhaust gas of steel sintering furnace using COG, a concentration between 0.02 and 0.12 ppm was found, with an average concentration of 0.06 ppm, confirming the emissions of NH3. Using this measurement of the NH3 concentration, an NH3 emission factor of 0.0061 kg NH3/ton was derived. The uncertainty of the developed NH3 emission factor of the sintering furnace using COG was analyzed using a Monte Carlo simulation. Consequently, the uncertainty range of NH3 emission factor of the sintering furnace using COG was derived to be −11.4% to +12.89% at the 95% confidence level. According to the results of this study, NH3 emissions occur from the use of COG, yielding values higher than the NH3 emission factor resulting from the use of LNG(liquefied natural gas) in combustion facilities. It should be recognized that it is a missing emission source and the corresponding emission should be calculated. View Full-Text
Keywords: PM 2.5 Secondary sources; Sintering furnace combustion; Coke Oven Gas; Uncertainty analysis; Ammonia emission factor PM 2.5 Secondary sources; Sintering furnace combustion; Coke Oven Gas; Uncertainty analysis; Ammonia emission factor
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, S.; Hong, Y.-J.; Kim, S.-D.; Jeon, E.-C. Ammonia Emission Factors and Uncertainties of Coke Oven Gases in Iron and Steel Industries. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3518. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093518

AMA Style

Kang S, Hong Y-J, Kim S-D, Jeon E-C. Ammonia Emission Factors and Uncertainties of Coke Oven Gases in Iron and Steel Industries. Sustainability. 2020; 12(9):3518. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093518

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kang, Seongmin, Yoon-Jung Hong, Seong-Dong Kim, and Eui-Chan Jeon. 2020. "Ammonia Emission Factors and Uncertainties of Coke Oven Gases in Iron and Steel Industries" Sustainability 12, no. 9: 3518. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093518

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop