Next Article in Journal
Towards Sustainable Mining: Exploiting Raw Materials from Extractive Waste Facilities
Next Article in Special Issue
Energy-Efficient and Integrated Allocation of Berths, Quay Cranes, and Internal Trucks in Container Terminals
Previous Article in Journal
Media Innovation Strategies for Sustaining Competitive Advantage: Evidence from Music Download Stores in Iran
Previous Article in Special Issue
Joint Optimization of Routes and Container Fleets to Design Sustainable Intermodal Chains in Chile
Open AccessArticle

Social Cost Benefit Analysis of Port Handling Plans for Annex IV waste of MARPOL: A Case Study in Las Palmas Port

1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
2
Department of Applied Economics, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(6), 2382; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062382
Received: 28 February 2020 / Revised: 12 March 2020 / Accepted: 16 March 2020 / Published: 18 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Maritime Transportation Management and Policies)
This paper analyzes the effectiveness of Directive (EU) 2019/883 from the social interest perspective. To achieve this aim, it assesses the performance of the sewage treatment plan (Annex IV of MARPOL) in Las Palmas Port and the accomplishment of the Cost Recovery System. This involves reviewing the mandatory fees for landing the sewage in the port, the sewage treatment costs and the environmental impact of the treated effluent from the vessels (environmental benefits) and addressing technical difficulties in order to meet the normative standard required from the vessels’ sewage in the framework of Las Palmas Port. Through a cost–benefit analysis not only the current protocol for the reception and treatment of Annex IV waste in the port is assessed, but also alternative waste treatment plans (sewage routes) are discussed in terms of social interest. The results of the paper show that only when the treated sewage is reused are the costs assumed to implement the directive overtaken by the benefits gained from complying with it. Consequently, the port authorities should address their efforts in this direction, as should the policy makers, who should integrate in the international normative the collaboration of the on-board sewage treatment plants to meet the PPP (Polluter Pays Principle). View Full-Text
Keywords: Annex IV of MARPOL; port waste handling plans; sustainable maritime transportation policies and implementation; managing sustainability through collaboration and coordination Annex IV of MARPOL; port waste handling plans; sustainable maritime transportation policies and implementation; managing sustainability through collaboration and coordination
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Martínez-López, A.; Ruiz-García, A.; Pérez, I. Social Cost Benefit Analysis of Port Handling Plans for Annex IV waste of MARPOL: A Case Study in Las Palmas Port. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2382. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062382

AMA Style

Martínez-López A, Ruiz-García A, Pérez I. Social Cost Benefit Analysis of Port Handling Plans for Annex IV waste of MARPOL: A Case Study in Las Palmas Port. Sustainability. 2020; 12(6):2382. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062382

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martínez-López, Alba; Ruiz-García, Alejandro; Pérez, Ivone. 2020. "Social Cost Benefit Analysis of Port Handling Plans for Annex IV waste of MARPOL: A Case Study in Las Palmas Port" Sustainability 12, no. 6: 2382. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062382

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop