Next Article in Journal
Community-Level Analysis of Value Webs of Biomass-Based Resources: A Case Study among Local Actors in Ghana
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Winery Visitors in the Emerging Wine Regions of the North Central United States
 
 
Article

The Heterogeneous Impacts of R&D on Innovation in Services Sector: A Firm-Level Study of Developing ASEAN

School of Economics, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(4), 1643; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041643
Received: 20 January 2020 / Revised: 15 February 2020 / Accepted: 18 February 2020 / Published: 22 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)
Identifying the determinants of firms’ investment in knowledge, this study first explores the heterogeneous impacts of research and development (R&D) on product, process, organization, and marketing innovation. Second, it examines if there exists a complementary (substitute) relation in terms of firms’ preference between four types of innovation. Studying 1500 firms of seven developing economies of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), we applied the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), a machine learning-based regression, to identify key predictors likely to influence firms’ R&D propensity and intensity. Estimating the knowledge function, we found—in line with LASSO—that medium-sized firms, human capital (training) and credit facilities favorably affect firms’ decision to invest in R&D. Contrarily, the impact is adverse if the first or main product generates firms’ large share of revenue, a unique finding not captured by previous studies. The marginal effects of four univariate probit models indicate that firms’ investment in R&D translates into innovation. However, the application of the Geweke–Hajivassiliour–Keane (GHK)-simulator based multivariate probit, which considers simultaneity of firms’ innovation decisions that univariate probit ignores, suggests that the relationship between different types of innovation is complementary. Firms’ strategy to adopt a particular type of innovation is influenced by other types. This led to the estimation of R&D’s impact on technological and nontechnological innovation, which shows that while firms innovate both types, there is a skewed link between nontechnological innovation and the services sector. View Full-Text
Keywords: R&D; technological innovation; nontechnological innovation; LASSO; Tobit; multivariate probit R&D; technological innovation; nontechnological innovation; LASSO; Tobit; multivariate probit
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Islam, M.S. The Heterogeneous Impacts of R&D on Innovation in Services Sector: A Firm-Level Study of Developing ASEAN. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041643

AMA Style

Zhang J, Islam MS. The Heterogeneous Impacts of R&D on Innovation in Services Sector: A Firm-Level Study of Developing ASEAN. Sustainability. 2020; 12(4):1643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041643

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jianhua, and Mohammad Shahidul Islam. 2020. "The Heterogeneous Impacts of R&D on Innovation in Services Sector: A Firm-Level Study of Developing ASEAN" Sustainability 12, no. 4: 1643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041643

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop