Next Article in Journal
Comparative Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction Performance of Reinforced Concrete and Timber Stadiums—A Case Study in China
Next Article in Special Issue
Waste Reduction for Green Service Supply Chain—the Case Study of a Payment Service Provider in Iran
Previous Article in Journal
An IoT-Based Thermoelectric Air Management Framework for Smart Building Applications: A Case Study for Tropical Climate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Automated Reconditioning of Thin Wall Structures Using Robot-Based Laser Powder Coating
Open AccessArticle

Transferability of Process Parameters in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Processes for an Energy and Cost Efficient Manufacturing

Hybrid Additive Manufacturing, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(4), 1565; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041565
Received: 19 January 2020 / Revised: 16 February 2020 / Accepted: 17 February 2020 / Published: 19 February 2020
In the past decade, the sales of metal additive manufacturing systems have increased intensely. In particular, PBF-LB/M systems (powder bed fusion of metals using a laser-based system) represent a technology of great industrial interest, in which metallic powders are molten and solidified layer upon layer by a focused laser beam. This leads to a simultaneous increase in demand for metallic powder materials. Due to adjusted process parameters of PBF-LB/M systems, the powder is usually procured by the system’s manufacturer. The requirement and freedom to process different feedstocks in a reproducible quality and the economic and ecological factors involved are reasons to have a closer look at the differences between the quality of the provided metallic powders. Besides, different feedstock materials require different energy inputs, allowing a sustainable process control to be established. In this work, powder quality of stainless steel 1.4404 and the effects during the processing of metallic powders that are nominally the same were analyzed and the influence on the build process followed by the final part quality was investigated. Thus, a correlation between morphology, particle size distribution, absorptivity, flowability, and densification depending on process parameters was demonstrated. Optimized exposure parameters to ensure a more sustainable and energy and cost-efficient manufacturing process were determined. View Full-Text
Keywords: additive manufacturing; PBF-LB/M; powder characterization; sustainable process parameters; stainless steel (1.4404; 316L); energy and cost-efficient manufacturing additive manufacturing; PBF-LB/M; powder characterization; sustainable process parameters; stainless steel (1.4404; 316L); energy and cost-efficient manufacturing
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Pannitz, O.; Sehrt, J.T. Transferability of Process Parameters in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Processes for an Energy and Cost Efficient Manufacturing. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1565.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop