Next Article in Journal
Demand Responsive Service-based Optimization on Flexible Routes and Departure Time of Community Shuttles
Previous Article in Journal
Panel Econometric Analysis on Mobile Payment Transactions and Traditional Banks Effort toward Financial Accessibility in Sub-Sahara Africa
Open AccessReview

Similarities and Differences between International REDD+ and Transnational Deforestation-Free Supply Chain Initiatives—A Review

1
Thuenen Institute of International Forestry and Forest Economics, 21031 Hamburg, Germany
2
European Forest Institute (EFI) Governance Programme, 53113 Bonn, Germany & IPB Bogor Agricultural University, 16680 Bogor, Indonesia
3
Institute of Silviculture, Departement of Ecology and Ecosystem Sciences, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(3), 896; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030896
Received: 6 November 2019 / Revised: 19 December 2019 / Accepted: 14 January 2020 / Published: 25 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Use of the Environment and Resources)
After years of multilateral deliberations on how to stop global deforestation, such as REDD+ under the UNFCCC, deforestation-free supply chain (DFSC) initiatives emerged from the private sector. Linking both concepts conceptually and in policy practice could provide for synergies and enable more effective approaches against global deforestation. To operationalise such a linkage, a prerequisite is the knowledge of both concepts’ key characteristics, as well as resulting similarities and differences. This literature review firstly identifies key characteristics that affects the potential impact of such concepts, secondly analyses if and how REDD+ and DFSC define these characteristics, and thirdly compares both concepts towards a potential linkage. The results show that a linkage of REDD+ and DFSC provides numerous complementarities which could foster the goal of halting deforestation. This includes for example the driver commercial agriculture, and in terms of permanence, leakage, and degradation. But close coordination is needed to avoid unintended negative consequences, especially for subsistence and smallholder agriculture. The comparison shows that the political consensus found under REDD+ provides a good basis to be supplemented with private sectors’ DFSC initiatives, but additional initiatives like the Bonn Challenge and investments in agroforestry are needed in order to ensure the long-term effect on forest conversion. View Full-Text
Keywords: UNFCCC REDD+; deforestation-free supply chains; zero-deforestation commitments; state & private regimes UNFCCC REDD+; deforestation-free supply chains; zero-deforestation commitments; state & private regimes
MDPI and ACS Style

Hargita, Y.; Giessen, L.; Günter, S. Similarities and Differences between International REDD+ and Transnational Deforestation-Free Supply Chain Initiatives—A Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 896.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop