Next Article in Journal
“Depression from Overestimation”: Income, Perception Bias and Children’s Mental Health in China’s Rural Households
Next Article in Special Issue
Urban Forestry in Brazilian Amazonia
Previous Article in Journal
Determinants of Farm Resilience to Climate Change: The Role of Farmer Entrepreneurship and Value Chain Collaborations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stakeholders’ Engagement on Nature-Based Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review

Printed Edition

A printed edition of this Special Issue is available at MDPI Books....
Open AccessEditor’s ChoiceArticle

Social Factors Key to Landscape-Scale Coastal Restoration: Lessons Learned from Three U.S. Case Studies

1
The Nature Conservancy, URI Bay Campus, Narragansett, RI 02882, USA
2
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740, USA
3
Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Annapolis, MD 21403, USA
4
Natural Capital Project, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
5
School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
6
Department of Biology and Coastal Studies Institute, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
7
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley, MA 01035, USA
8
Restore America’s Estuaries, Arlington, VA 22201, USA
9
The Nature Conservancy, Baton Rouge, LA 70802, USA
10
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Washington, DC 20005, USA
11
The Water Institute of the Gulf, Baton Rouge, LA 70802, USA
12
Coastwise Partners, St. Petersburg, FL 34219, USA
13
Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council, New Orleans, LA 70130, USA
14
United States Environmental Protection Agency Gulf of Mexico Program, Gulfport, MS 39501, USA
15
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Team, Madison, MS 39110, USA
16
Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Marine Science Center, Nahant, MA 01908, USA
17
San Francisco Estuary Institute, Richmond, CA 94804, USA
18
Tampa Bay Estuary Program, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA
19
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Restoration Center, Annapolis, MD 21401, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(3), 869; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030869
Received: 21 November 2019 / Revised: 6 January 2020 / Accepted: 16 January 2020 / Published: 23 January 2020
In the United States, extensive investments have been made to restore the ecological function and services of coastal marine habitats. Despite a growing body of science supporting coastal restoration, few studies have addressed the suite of societally enabling conditions that helped facilitate successful restoration and recovery efforts that occurred at meaningful ecological (i.e., ecosystem) scales, and where restoration efforts were sustained for longer (i.e., several years to decades) periods. Here, we examined three case studies involving large-scale and long-term restoration efforts including the seagrass restoration effort in Tampa Bay, Florida, the oyster restoration effort in the Chesapeake Bay in Maryland and Virginia, and the tidal marsh restoration effort in San Francisco Bay, California. The ecological systems and the specifics of the ecological restoration were not the focus of our study. Rather, we focused on the underlying social and political contexts of each case study and found common themes of the factors of restoration which appear to be important for maintaining support for large-scale restoration efforts. Four critical elements for sustaining public and/or political support for large-scale restoration include: (1) resources should be invested in building public support prior to significant investments into ecological restoration; (2) building political support provides a level of significance to the recovery planning efforts and creates motivation to set and achieve meaningful recovery goals; (3) recovery plans need to be science-based with clear, measurable goals that resonate with the public; and (4) the accountability of progress toward reaching goals needs to be communicated frequently and in a way that the general public comprehends. These conclusions may help other communities move away from repetitive, single, and seemingly unconnected restoration projects towards more large-scale, bigger impact, and coordinated restoration efforts. View Full-Text
Keywords: coastal restoration; oyster; marsh; seagrass; restoration success; coastal habitat coastal restoration; oyster; marsh; seagrass; restoration success; coastal habitat
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

DeAngelis, B.M.; Sutton-Grier, A.E.; Colden, A.; Arkema, K.K.; Baillie, C.J.; Bennett, R.O.; Benoit, J.; Blitch, S.; Chatwin, A.; Dausman, A.; Gittman, R.K.; Greening, H.S.; Henkel, J.R.; Houge, R.; Howard, R.; Hughes, A.R.; Lowe, J.; Scyphers, S.B.; Sherwood, E.T.; Westby, S.; Grabowski, J.H. Social Factors Key to Landscape-Scale Coastal Restoration: Lessons Learned from Three U.S. Case Studies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 869. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030869

AMA Style

DeAngelis BM, Sutton-Grier AE, Colden A, Arkema KK, Baillie CJ, Bennett RO, Benoit J, Blitch S, Chatwin A, Dausman A, Gittman RK, Greening HS, Henkel JR, Houge R, Howard R, Hughes AR, Lowe J, Scyphers SB, Sherwood ET, Westby S, Grabowski JH. Social Factors Key to Landscape-Scale Coastal Restoration: Lessons Learned from Three U.S. Case Studies. Sustainability. 2020; 12(3):869. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030869

Chicago/Turabian Style

DeAngelis, Bryan M.; Sutton-Grier, Ariana E.; Colden, Allison; Arkema, Katie K.; Baillie, Christopher J.; Bennett, Richard O.; Benoit, Jeff; Blitch, Seth; Chatwin, Anthony; Dausman, Alyssa; Gittman, Rachel K.; Greening, Holly S.; Henkel, Jessica R.; Houge, Rachel; Howard, Ron; Hughes, A. R.; Lowe, Jeremy; Scyphers, Steven B.; Sherwood, Edward T.; Westby, Stephanie; Grabowski, Jonathan H. 2020. "Social Factors Key to Landscape-Scale Coastal Restoration: Lessons Learned from Three U.S. Case Studies" Sustainability 12, no. 3: 869. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030869

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop