Do Ambient Conditions (Air Quality, Noise Level and Temperature) and Image Congruity Matter for Boosting Customer Approach Behaviors in the FSC Sector?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Quality of Ambient Conditions
2.2. Image Congruity
2.3. Lovemarks
2.4. Perceived FSC Ticket Price
2.5. Proposed Model and Its Constituents
3. Methods
3.1. Measurement Development
3.2. Data Collection and Demographic Profile
4. Results
4.1. Confirmatory Factor Analysis
4.2. Structural Equation Modeling
4.3. Metric Invariance Test
5. Discussion
6. Recommendation
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Quality of ambient conditions (Bitner, 1992; Han, 2013) (“Strongly disagree” [1] to “Strongly agree” [7]) The air quality during the flight was comfortable (air quality). The aircraft noise during the flight was not too loud or bothersome (noise level). The temperature during the flight was comfortable (temperature). |
Image congruity (Sirgy et al., 1997) (“Strongly disagree” [1] to “Strongly agree” [7]) The typical customer using this FSC has an image similar to how other people see me. The typical customer using this FSC has an image similar to how I would like other people to see me. |
FSC love (Carroll and Ahuvia, 2006; Song et al., 2019) (“Strongly disagree” [1] to “Strongly agree” [7]) I love this FSC. This FSC is a pure delight. |
FSC respect (Song et al., 2019) (“Strongly disagree” [1] to “Strongly agree” [7]) I respect this FSC. This FSC is responsible and honest to me. |
Perceived FSC ticket price (Oh, 2000; Han et al., 2020) (“Strongly disagree” [1] to “Strongly agree” [7]) This FSC is reasonably priced. This FSC is a good product for the price. Overall, this FSC offers an adequate level of ticket price. |
Approach behaviors for an FSC (Ajzen and Kruglanski, 2019; Oliver, 2010) (“Strongly disagree” [1] to “Strongly agree” [7]) I will make an effort to use this FSC when I travel in the future. I will say positive things about this FSC. I will encourage other people to use this FSC. I will spend extra in order to use this FSC. |
References
- Gössling, S.; Scott, D.; Hall, C.M. Pandemics, tourism and global change: A rapid assessment of COVID-19. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 29, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forgas, S.; Moliner, A.M.; Sánchez-García, J.; Palau, R.; Forgas-Coll, S. Antecedents of airline passenger loyalty: Low-cost versus traditional airlines. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2010, 16, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graham, A. Understanding the low cost carrier and airport relationship: A critical analysis of the salient issues. Tour. Manag. 2013, 36, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Shim, C.; Lee, W.S.; Kim, W. Product performance and its role in airline image generation and customer retention processes: Gender difference. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2019, 36, 536–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Al-Ansi, A.; Chi, X.; Baek, H.; Lee, K.-S. Impact of Environmental CSR, Service Quality, Emotional Attachment, and Price Perception on Word-of-Mouth for Full-Service Airlines. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moon, H.; Yoon, H.J.; Han, H. The effect of airport atmospherics on satisfaction and behavioral intentions: Testing the moderating role of perceived safety. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2016, 34, 749–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Koo, B.; Hyun, S.S. Image congruity as a tool for traveler retention: A comparative analysis on South Korean full-service and low-cost airlines. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2020, 37, 347–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, J.; Han, H.; Oh, M. Travelers’ switching behavior in the airline industry from the perspective of the push-pull-mooring framework. Tour. Manag. 2017, 59, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobruszkes, F. An analysis of European low-cost airlines and their networks. J. Transp. Geogr. 2006, 14, 249–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Messner, W. The impact of language proficiency on airline service satisfaction. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2020, 37, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, G.-H.; Itoh, M. Perceptions of Customers as Sustained Competitive Advantages of Global Marketing Airline Alliances: A Hybrid Text Mining Approach. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bitner, M.J. Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. J. Mark. 1992, 56, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demoulin, N.; Willems, K. Servicescape irritants and customer satisfaction: The moderating role of shopping motives and involvement. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 104, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H. Effects of in-flight ambience and space/function on air travelers’ decision to select a low-cost airline. Tour. Manag. 2013, 37, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Gursoy, D. Exploring the relationship between servicescape, place attachment, and intention to recommend accommodations marketed through sharing economy platforms. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2020, 37, 429–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hudson, S.; Roth, M.S.; Madden, T.J.; Hudson, R. The effects of social media on emotions, brand relationship quality, and word of mouth: An empirical study of music festival attendees. Tour. Manag. 2015, 47, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, R.L. Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer, 2nd ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Roberts, K. The Lovemarks Effect: WINNING in the Consumer Revolution; Powerhouse Books: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Song, H.; Bae, S.Y.; Han, H. Emotional comprehension of a name-brand coffee shop: Focus on lovemarks theory. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 31, 1046–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirgy, M.J.; Grewal, D.; Mangleburg, T.F.; Park, J.-O.; Chon, K.-S.; Claiborne, C.B.; Johar, J.S.; Berkman, H. Assessing the Predictive Validity of Two Methods of Measuring Self-Image Congruence. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1997, 25, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirgy, M.J. Promoting quality-of-life and well-being research in hospitality and tourism. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2019, 36, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, K. Lovemarks: The Future beyond Brands, 2nd ed.; Powerhouse Books: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Koklic, M.K.; Kukar-Kinney, M.; Vegelj, S. An investigation of customer satisfaction with low-cost and full-service airline companies. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 80, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikulić, J.; Prebežac, D. What drives passenger loyalty to traditional and low-cost airlines? A formative partial least squares approach. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2011, 17, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, H. The Effect of Brand Class, Brand Awareness, and Price on Customer Value and Behavioral Intentions. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2000, 24, 136–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeithaml, V.A. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. J. Mark. 1988, 52, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Hwang, J. Quality of physical surroundings and service encounters, airfare, trust and intention during the flight: Age-group difference (young, middle-aged, and mature). Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 27, 585–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Back, K.J.; Lee, J.-S. Country Club Members’ Perceptions of Value, Image Congruence, and Switching Costs: An Exploratory Study of Country Club Members’ Loyalty. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2009, 33, 528–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Back, K.-J. The Effects of Image Congruence on Customers’ Brand Loyalty in the Upper Middle-Class Hotel Industry. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2005, 29, 448–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Chua, B.; Kim, H.; Han, H. Shaping and enhancing airport lounge experiences: The application of brand personality and image congruity theories. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2017, 29, 2901–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joo, D.; Woosnam, K.M.; Lee, S.; Lee, C.-K. Destination loyalty as explained through self-congruity, emotional solidarity, and travel satisfaction. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2020, 45, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirgy, M.J.; Su, C. Destination Image, Self-Congruity, and Travel Behavior: Toward an Integrative Model. J. Travel Res. 2000, 38, 340–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berscheid, E. Love in the Fourth Dimension. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2010, 61, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hendrick, C.; Hendrick, S.S. Research on love: Does it measure up? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1989, 56, 784–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemieux, R.; Hale, J.L. Intimacy, passion, and commitment in young romantic relationships: Successfully measuring the triangular theory of love. Psychol. Rep. 1999, 85, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Overbeek, G.; Ha, T.; Scholte, R.; De Kemp, R.; Engels, R.C. Brief report: Intimacy, passion, and commitment in romantic relationships—Validation of a ‘triangular love scale’ for adolescents. J. Adolesc. 2007, 30, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shaver, P.R.; Morgan, H.J.; Wu, S. Is love a ‘basic’ emotion? Pers. Relatsh. 1996, 3, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerrero, K.K.; Andersen, P.A. Emotions in Close Relationships. In Close Relationships: A Sourcebook; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2000; pp. 171–183. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, S.-C.; Quester, P. The relative contribution of love and trust towards customer loyalty. Australas. Mark. J. 2015, 23, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, K. The Leisure Industries; Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Foster, R.J. Commodities, brands, love and kula. Anthr. Theory 2008, 8, 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawle, J.; Cooper, P. Measuring Emotion—Lovemarks, The Future Beyond Brands. J. Advert. Res. 2006, 46, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayers, J.G.; Monin, N. Love®: A critical reading of Lovemarks. J. Organ. Chang. Manag. 2007, 20, 671–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akamavi, R.K.; Mohamed, E.; Pellmann, K.; Xu, Y. Key determinants of passenger loyalty in the low-cost airline business. Tour. Manag. 2015, 46, 528–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, H.; Zhang, Y. An investigation of service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty in China’s airline market. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2016, 57, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, S.; Mattila, A.S. Perceived Fairness of Price Differences Across Channels: The Moderating Role of Price Frame and Norm Perceptions. J. Mark. Theory Pr. 2009, 17, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, R.; Murphy, J. From Loyalty to Switching: Exploring the Determinants in the Transition. In Proceedings of the ANZMAC 2005 Conference: Consumer Behaviour, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia, 1 January 2005; pp. 196–203. [Google Scholar]
- Ajzen, I.; Kruglanski, A.W. Reasoned action in the service of goal pursuit. Psychol. Rev. 2019, 126, 774–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carroll, B.A.; Ahuvia, A.C. Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Mark. Lett. 2006, 17, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simpeh, K.N.; Simpeh, M.; Abdul-Nasiru, I.; Amponsah-Tawiah, K. Servicescape and Customer Patronage of Three Star Hotels in Ghana’s Metropolitan City of Accra. Eur. J. Bus. Manag. 2011, 3, 119–131. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J. Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Lichtenstein, D.R.; Netemeyer, R.G.; Burton, S. Distinguishing coupon proneness from value consciousness: An acquisition-transaction utility theory perspective. J. Mark. 1990, 54, 54–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thaler, R.H. Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Mark. Sci. 2008, 27, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, J.; Hsu, L.; Han, H.; Kim, Y. Understanding how consumers view green hotels: How a hotel’s green image can influence behavioral intentions. J. Sustain. Tour. 2010, 18, 901–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J.; Ariza-Montes, A.; Hernández-Perlines, F.; Vega-Muñoz, A.; Han, H. Hotels’ eco-friendly physical environment as nature-based solutions for decreasing burnout and increasing job satisfaction and performance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020, 17, 6357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H. Theory of green purchase behavior (TGPB): A new theory for green hotel and green restaurant products. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 2815–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manosuthi, N.; Lee, J.-S.; Han, H. Predicting the revisit intention of volunteer tourists using the merged model between the theory of planned behavior and norm activation model. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2020, 37, 510–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, B.; Chua, B.-L.; Ryu, H.B.; Han, H. Volunteer tourism (VT) traveler behavior: Merging norm activation model and theory of planned behavior. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 1947–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | β | Mean | SD | CR | AVE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) Quality of ambient conditions1 Quality of ambient conditions2 Quality of ambient conditions3 | 1.000 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.676 0.702 0.823 | 4.404 | 0.993 | 0.779 | 0.542 |
(2) Image congruity1 Image congruity2 | 0.545 a (0.297) b | 1.000 | – | – | – | – | 0.941 0.880 | 3.988 | 1.290 | 0.907 | 0.830 |
(3) FSC love1 FSC love2 | 0.598 (0.357) | 0.685 (0.469) | 1.000 | – | – | – | 0.880 0.919 | 3.994 | 1.285 | 0.895 | 0.809 |
(4) FSC respect1 FSC respect2 | 0.563 (0.316) | 0.651 (0.423) | 0.823 (0.677) | 1.000 | – | – | 0.880 0.903 | 3.597 | 1.356 | 0.886 | 0.795 |
(5) Perceived FSC ticket price1 Perceived FSC ticket price2 Perceived FSC ticket price3 | 0.388 (0.150) | 0.462 (0.213) | 0.520 (0.270) | 0.528 (0.278) | 1.000 | – | 0.916 0.932 0.809 | 4.117 | 1.182 | 0.917 | 0.787 |
(6) Approach behaviors for a FSC1 Approach behaviors for a FSC2 Approach behaviors for a FSC3 Approach behaviors for a FSC4 | 0.657 (0.431) | 0.717 (0.514) | 0.810 (0.656) | 0.716 (0.512) | 0.556 (0.309) | 1.000 | 0.803 0.844 0.898 0.827 | 4.399 | 1.130 | 0.908 | 0.712 |
Paths | β | t-Values | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | Quality of ambient conditions | → | FSC love | 0.597 | 5.136 ** |
H2 | Quality of ambient conditions | → | FSC respect | 0.708 | 5.318 * |
H3 | Image congruity | → | FSC love | 0.360 | 3.754 ** |
H4 | Image congruity | → | FSC respect | 0.240 | 2.206 * |
H5 | FSC love | → | Approach behaviors for an FSC | 0.601 | 6.979 * |
H6 | FSC respect | → | Approach behaviors for an FSC | 0.379 | 4.654 ** |
Total effect on approach behaviors for FSC | Indirect effect on approach behaviors for FSC: | Total variance explained: | |||
β quality of ambient conditions = 0.627 ** β image congruity = 0.308 ** β FSC love = 0.601 ** β FSC respect = 0.379 * | β quality of ambient conditions = 0.627 ** β image congruity = 0.308 * | R2 (approach behaviors for an FSC) = 0.866 R2 (FSC love) = 0.792 R2 (FSC respect) = 0.801 |
Linkages | High Group of Perceived FSC Ticket Price (n = 167) | Low Group of Perceived FSC Ticket Price (n = 100) | Baseline Model (Freely Estimated) | Nested Model (Equally Constrained) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | t-Values | β | t-Values | |||
Q of AC → FSC love | 0.626 | 3.994 ** | 0.426 | 3.572 ** | χ2 (122) = 244.924 | χ2 (123) = 248.951 a |
Q of AC → FSC respect | 0.632 | 4.061 * | 0.589 | 4.303 ** | χ2 (122) = 244.924 | χ2 (123) = 244.945 b |
IC → FSC love | 0.539 | 5.061 ** | 0.285 | 2.151 * | χ2 (122) = 244.924 | χ2 (123) = 249.573 c |
IC → FSC respect | 0.340 | 2.545 ** | 0.326 | 2.836 ** | χ2 (122) = 244.924 | χ2 (123) = 245.156 d |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Han, H.; Lho, L.H.; Ariza-Montes, A.; Lee, K.-S.; Baek, H.; Araya-Castillo, L. Do Ambient Conditions (Air Quality, Noise Level and Temperature) and Image Congruity Matter for Boosting Customer Approach Behaviors in the FSC Sector? Sustainability 2020, 12, 10636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410636
Han H, Lho LH, Ariza-Montes A, Lee K-S, Baek H, Araya-Castillo L. Do Ambient Conditions (Air Quality, Noise Level and Temperature) and Image Congruity Matter for Boosting Customer Approach Behaviors in the FSC Sector? Sustainability. 2020; 12(24):10636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410636
Chicago/Turabian StyleHan, Heesup, Linda Heejung Lho, Antonio Ariza-Montes, Kyung-Sik Lee, Hyungshin Baek, and Luis Araya-Castillo. 2020. "Do Ambient Conditions (Air Quality, Noise Level and Temperature) and Image Congruity Matter for Boosting Customer Approach Behaviors in the FSC Sector?" Sustainability 12, no. 24: 10636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410636
APA StyleHan, H., Lho, L. H., Ariza-Montes, A., Lee, K.-S., Baek, H., & Araya-Castillo, L. (2020). Do Ambient Conditions (Air Quality, Noise Level and Temperature) and Image Congruity Matter for Boosting Customer Approach Behaviors in the FSC Sector? Sustainability, 12(24), 10636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410636