Next Article in Journal
Is Knowledge of Circular Economy, Pro-Environmental Behavior, Satisfaction with Life, and Beliefs a Predictor of Connectedness to Nature in Rural Children and Adolescents? A Pilot Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Building Sustainably: A Pilot Study on the Project Manager’s Contribution in Delivering Sustainable Construction Projects—A Maltese and International Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Contributions from Social Theory to Sustainability for All
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enablers and Barriers for Creating a Marketplace for Construction and Demolition Waste: A Systematic Literature Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cost–Benefit Analysis of Municipal Sludge as a Low-Grade Nutrient Source: A Case Study from South Africa

by
Eyob Habte Tesfamariam
*,
Zekarias Mihreteab Ogbazghi
*,
John George Annandale
and
Yemane Gebrehiwot
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Private Bag: X20, Hatfield, 0028 Pretoria, South Africa
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(23), 9950; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239950
Submission received: 16 October 2020 / Revised: 16 November 2020 / Accepted: 17 November 2020 / Published: 28 November 2020

Abstract

Municipal sludge has economic value as a low-grade fertilizer as it consists of appreciable amounts of the macro and micronutrients. When using sludge as fertilizer, the economic aspect should be taken into account. In this study, the following specific objectives were identified: (a) to investigate the economic feasibility of using sludge as a fertilizer; (b) to estimate the maximum economic distance sludge can be transported as a fertilizer; and (c) to test the economic feasibility of selling sludge using commercial inorganic fertilizer as a bench mark. The study showed that for anaerobically digested, paddy dried, municipal sludge consisting of 3% N, 2% P, and 0.3% K the economic feasibility of transporting the sludge was limited to a diameter of 20 km in the arid zone, 28 km in the semi-arid zone, 51 km in the sub humid zone, 66 km in the humid zone, and 75 km in the super-humid zone. Therefore, the economic feasibility of using sludge as a substitute for or complementary to commercial inorganic fertilizer is dictated by the distance between the wastewater care work and the farm, sludge nutrient concentration, agro-ecological zone (rain and temperature), and the real-time commercial inorganic fertilizer price.
Keywords: cost–benefit analyses; municipal sludge; commercial fertilizer; assumptions cost–benefit analyses; municipal sludge; commercial fertilizer; assumptions

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tesfamariam, E.H.; Ogbazghi, Z.M.; Annandale, J.G.; Gebrehiwot, Y. Cost–Benefit Analysis of Municipal Sludge as a Low-Grade Nutrient Source: A Case Study from South Africa. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239950

AMA Style

Tesfamariam EH, Ogbazghi ZM, Annandale JG, Gebrehiwot Y. Cost–Benefit Analysis of Municipal Sludge as a Low-Grade Nutrient Source: A Case Study from South Africa. Sustainability. 2020; 12(23):9950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239950

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tesfamariam, Eyob Habte, Zekarias Mihreteab Ogbazghi, John George Annandale, and Yemane Gebrehiwot. 2020. "Cost–Benefit Analysis of Municipal Sludge as a Low-Grade Nutrient Source: A Case Study from South Africa" Sustainability 12, no. 23: 9950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239950

APA Style

Tesfamariam, E. H., Ogbazghi, Z. M., Annandale, J. G., & Gebrehiwot, Y. (2020). Cost–Benefit Analysis of Municipal Sludge as a Low-Grade Nutrient Source: A Case Study from South Africa. Sustainability, 12(23), 9950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239950

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop