Next Article in Journal
Synergies and Trade-Offs in Reaching the Sustainable Development Goals
Next Article in Special Issue
Generalized Resource-Constrained Critical Path Method to Improve Sustainability in Construction Project Scheduling
Previous Article in Journal
Erratum: Wolniak, R.; Skotnicka-Zasadzień, B. Developing a Model of Factors Influencing the Quality of Service for Disabled Customers in the Condition s of Sustainable Development, Illustrated by an Example of the Silesian Voivodeship Public Administration. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2171
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sensitivity Analysis in Probabilistic Structural Design: A Comparison of Selected Techniques
Article

Key Indicators for Linguistic Action Perspective in the Last Planner® System

1
School of Engineering, Department of Construction Engineering and Management, Pontificia Universidad, Católica de Chile, Avda, Vicuña Mackenna, Macul, Santiago 4860, Chile
2
Faculty of Engineering, Construction Engineering, Universidad Andres Bello, Sazié, Santiago 2119, Chile
3
DPR Construction, San Francisco, CA 94111, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(20), 8728; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208728
Received: 23 August 2020 / Revised: 17 October 2020 / Accepted: 19 October 2020 / Published: 21 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Construction Engineering and Management)
Since 2001, a link has been established between the Last Planner® System (LPS) and Linguistic Action Perspective (LAP). However, to date, it has not been studied in sufficient depth. This research developed a system of indicators to measure and control the management of commitments, through the Design Science Research (DSR) methodology, and thus contribute to the development of the social dimension of sustainability that is often neglected in construction management research. The main contributions of this paper are a proposal of five main activities to apply the DSR method, a checklist to analyze the engagement of meeting participants, a notebook for last planners, delve into the variations that can occur to the basic movements of LAP, and the creation of a system of indicators hence updating the Percent Plan Complete (PPC) with a reliability indicator. The main limitation of this research is that the system was only validated in two South American countries that implemented LPS. In future studies, we propose to apply case studies in weekly planning meetings in other industries worldwide and to determine the recommended values to improve communication and achieve the proper implementation of LAP with LPS and without LPS. View Full-Text
Keywords: linguistic action indicators; last planner system; linguistic action perspective linguistic action indicators; last planner system; linguistic action perspective
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Salazar, L.A.; Arroyo, P.; Alarcón, L.F. Key Indicators for Linguistic Action Perspective in the Last Planner® System. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8728. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208728

AMA Style

Salazar LA, Arroyo P, Alarcón LF. Key Indicators for Linguistic Action Perspective in the Last Planner® System. Sustainability. 2020; 12(20):8728. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208728

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salazar, Luis A., Paz Arroyo, and Luis F. Alarcón 2020. "Key Indicators for Linguistic Action Perspective in the Last Planner® System" Sustainability 12, no. 20: 8728. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208728

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop