Next Article in Journal
Charcoal and Wood Biomass Utilization in Uganda: The Socioeconomic and Environmental Dynamics and Implications
Next Article in Special Issue
Waste to Catalyst: Synthesis of Catalysts from Sewage Sludge of the Mining, Steel, and Petroleum Industries
Previous Article in Journal
Unraveling the Effects of Ethical Leadership on Knowledge Sharing: The Mediating Roles of Subjective Well-Being and Social Media in the Hotel Industry
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Policy Framework with Plastic Waste Control Plan for Effective Plastic Waste Management
Open AccessReview

A Review of the Financial Value of Faecal Sludge Reuse in Low-Income Countries

1
Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK
2
Centre of Excellence in Water and Sanitation, Mzuzu University, P/Bag 201, Mzuzu 2, Malawi
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(20), 8334; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208334
Received: 6 August 2020 / Revised: 16 September 2020 / Accepted: 25 September 2020 / Published: 10 October 2020
Faecal sludge reuse could promote responsible waste management and alleviate resource shortages. However, for this reuse to be carried out at scale, it needs to be financially viable. This paper reviews the financial values of resource recovery from 112 data points from 43 publications from academic and grey literature. The results found 65% of the existing literature is projected rather than being based on observed data from products in practice, with limited studies providing actual experiences of revenue in practice. Some of the estimates of the potential value were ten times those observed in data from operating businesses. Reasons for this include pricing of products against unrealistic competitors, for example, pricing briquettes against diesel fuel, or difficulties in marketing or regulation of products in practice. The most common form of reuse in practice is agricultural composting, which is also the lowest value product. Few cases were able to achieve more than $5/person/year from sludge reuse, therefore other drivers are needed to promote proper human waste disposal, including the health and dignity of citizens, but which are not easily monetised. Certification and recognition of product safety can improve the perception of value and products. Resource recovery has a limited role in the financial viability of providing Circular Economy sanitation in low-income countries. Instead, there is a need to focus on supportive policies and subsidies enabling the transition towards a Circular Economy supporting environmental quality, ecological health and human health. View Full-Text
Keywords: agriculture; economics; faecal sludge management; reuse; sanitation; waste management agriculture; economics; faecal sludge management; reuse; sanitation; waste management
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Mallory, A.; Holm, R.; Parker, A. A Review of the Financial Value of Faecal Sludge Reuse in Low-Income Countries. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8334.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop