Next Article in Journal
Implementation of SDGs in University Teaching: A Course for Professional Development of Teachers in Education for Sustainability for a Transformative Action
Next Article in Special Issue
Primary Education Truancy and School Performance in Social Exclusion Settings: The Case of Students in Cañada Real Galiana
Previous Article in Journal
Driving Forces of Changing Environmental Pressures from Consumption in the European Food System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Knowledge of Child Abuse among Trainee Teachers and Teachers in Service in Spain
Article

The 2030 Challenge in the Quality of Higher Education: Metacognitive, Motivational and Structural Factors, Predictive of Written Argumentation, for the Dissemination of Sustainable Knowledge

Department of Didactics and School Organization, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(19), 8266; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198266
Received: 24 August 2020 / Revised: 5 October 2020 / Accepted: 6 October 2020 / Published: 8 October 2020
The United Nations 2030 agenda includes quality university education, highlighting the importance of writing competence, as a basic skill for the dissemination of sustainable knowledge. However, there is little evidence of the factors that predict effective written communication to support such quality. Among these factors, the literature highlights motivation and writing metacognition, as well as the adequate structuring of the academic and/or scientific genre. The main novelty of the present research is the study of the relationships between the mentioned factors, measured with validated instruments. To this end, content analysis is first applied to determine the rhetorical moves of argumentative essays written by a sample of 72 university students. Secondly, the correlations between each of the rhetorical moves, metacognition and argumentative writing self-efficacy are calculated. The relationships are studied in depth, applying step-by-step linear regression models. Finally, the dependence of the results, observed with respect to unmeasured factors, is contrasted by means of a confirmatory analysis based on structural equations. The analyses show that it is the practical ability to express rhetorical moves—Conclusion and Bibliographic References—which predicts a students’ writing metacognition. Moreover, the minor relationship that argumentative self-efficacy shows with the expression of rhetorical moves, compared to writing metacognition, point to the need to consider another motivational dimension that is driving the learning of the argumentative essay at university level, a hypothesis that is confirmed with the structural equations model. These, and other findings, allow for the establishment of a series of educational quality criteria for the empowerment of written argumentation in academic and scientific contexts. View Full-Text
Keywords: high-quality education; 21st century skills; argumentative essay; prediction factors; writing metacognition; rhetorical moves; writing self-efficacy high-quality education; 21st century skills; argumentative essay; prediction factors; writing metacognition; rhetorical moves; writing self-efficacy
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Arroyo González, R.; de la Hoz-Ruiz, J.; Montejo Gámez, J. The 2030 Challenge in the Quality of Higher Education: Metacognitive, Motivational and Structural Factors, Predictive of Written Argumentation, for the Dissemination of Sustainable Knowledge. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198266

AMA Style

Arroyo González R, de la Hoz-Ruiz J, Montejo Gámez J. The 2030 Challenge in the Quality of Higher Education: Metacognitive, Motivational and Structural Factors, Predictive of Written Argumentation, for the Dissemination of Sustainable Knowledge. Sustainability. 2020; 12(19):8266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198266

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arroyo González, Rosario, Javier de la Hoz-Ruiz, and Jesús Montejo Gámez. 2020. "The 2030 Challenge in the Quality of Higher Education: Metacognitive, Motivational and Structural Factors, Predictive of Written Argumentation, for the Dissemination of Sustainable Knowledge" Sustainability 12, no. 19: 8266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198266

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop