Modelling as a Tool for the Planning of the Transport System Performance in the Conditions of a Raw Material Mining
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Modelling by Using Mathematical Equations
- (A).
- The hourly performance of a quarry lorry;
- (B).
- The number of lorry rounds per hour along a given route;
- (C).
- The number of lorries needed to handle the loader’s performance.
- (A)
- The calculation of the hourly performance of one lorry was done by the following Formula (1):
- (B)
- The number of lorry turns per hour for a given transport distance—the route is calculated as:
- (C)
- The number of lorries needed to handle its performance is calculated by the ratio of the effective performance of a loader and the performance of a lorry :
2.2. Modelling by Applying Simulation
- A.
- Identification of the system and its graphical interpretation for the needs of a simulation model creation. In this step, the real transport system, elements of the system, its surroundings and basic characteristics of the system are identified. A graphical representation of the system is created.
- B.
- Creating a simulation model by the selected simulation tool. Currently, simulation packages are used for creating a simulation, which facilitate the work of creating a model. Their advantage is graphic symbolism, creation of statistics, 2D or 3D animation and flexibility both when changing the model itself and changing the input data.
- C.
- Simulation of experiments, in which the input parameters of the simulation model are changed. The task of the experiments is to see changes in the output parameters of the system.
- D.
- Analysis of simulation results and recommendations. Outputs from individual experiments (statistical parameters, performance parameters and graphical outputs) are used for analysis and behavior of the system under changed conditions. These results need to be interpreted and used correctly.
3. Results
3.1. The Model Conditions
3.2. Capacity Calculation of Road Transport and Determination of the Transport Performance
3.3. Simulation
3.3.1. The Simulation Model
3.3.2. The Simulation Experiments and the Simulation Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Behun, M.; Kascak, P.; Hrabcak, M.; Behunova, A.; Knapcikova, L.; Sofranko, M. Investigation of Sustainable Geopolymer Composite Using Automatic Identification Technology. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sofranko, M.; Khouri, S.; Vegsoova, O.; Kacmary, P.; Mudarri, T.; Koncek, M.; Tyulenev, M.; Simkova, Z. Possibilities of Uranium Deposit Kuriskova Mining and Its Influence on the Energy Potential of Slovakia from Own Resources. Energies 2020, 13, 4209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krol, R.; Kawalec, W.; Gladysiewicz, L. An Effective Belt Conveyor for Underground Ore Transportation Systems. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Prague, Czech Republic, 11–15 September 2017; Volume 95, pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sofranko, M.; Listiakova, V.; Zilak, M. Optimizing transport in surface mines, taking into account the quality of extracted raw ore. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2012, 17, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
- Saderova, J. The selection of loading and transportation means in quarry. In Proceedings of the SGEM 2019 Conference Proceedings, 1.3. Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration and Mining: Exploration and Mining Mineral Processing, Albena, Bulgaria, 30 June–6 July 2019; STEF92 Technology: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2019; pp. 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greberg, J.; Salama, A.; Gustafson, A.; Skawina, B. Alternative Process Flow for Underground Mining Operations: Analysis of Conceptual Transport Methods Using Discrete Event Simulation. Minerals 2016, 6, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wolny, S. Emergency braking of a mine hoist in the context of the braking system selection. Arch. Min. Sci. 2017, 62, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Manyele, S. Analysis of Waste-Rock Transportation Process Performance in an Open-Pit Mine Based on Statistical Analysis of Cycle Times Data. Engineering 2017, 9, 649–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Marasova, D.; Zolotukhin, V.; Ambrisko, L. Application of the ecological closed transport systems in mining industry. In Proceedings of the SGEM 2019 Conference Proceedings, 1.3. Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration and Mining: Exploration and Mining Mineral Processing, Albena, Bulgaria, 30 June–6 July 2019; STEF92 Technology: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2019; pp. 57–64. [Google Scholar]
- Burmistrov, K.V.; Osintsev, N.A.; Shakshakpaev, A.N. Selection of Open-Pit Dump Trucks during Quarry Reconstruction. Procedia Eng. 2017, 206, 1696–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumykova, T.M.; Kumykov, V.K. Method of Shaping Loading-and-Transportation System in Deep Open Pit Complex Ore Mines. J. Min. Sci. 2017, 53, 708–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Y.; Miwa, K.; Chinbat, U.; Takakuwa, S. Operations modeling and analysis of open pit copper mining using GPS tracking data. In Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Berlin, Germany, 9–12 December 2012; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yosoon Choi, Y.; Park, H.-D.; Sunwoo, C.; Clarke, K.C. Multi-criteria evaluation and least-cost path analysis for optimal haulage routing of dump trucks in large scale open-pit mines. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2009, 23, 1541–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caccetta, L. Application of Optimisation Techniques in Open Pit Mining. In Handbook of Operations Research in Natural Resources; Weintraub, A., Romero, C., Bjørndal, T., Epstein, R., Miranda, J., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2007; Volume 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbaspour, H.; Drebenstedt, C.; Dindarloo, S.R. Evaluation of safety and social indexes in the selection of transportation system alternatives (Truck-Shovel and IPCCs) in open pit mines. Saf. Sci. 2018, 108, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sergey Kuzmin, S.; Kadnikova, O.; Altynbayeva, G.; Turbit, A.; Khabdullina, Z. Development of a New Environmentally-Friendly Technology for Transportation of Mined Rock in the Opencast Mining. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2020, 24, 341–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koptev, V.Y.; Kopteva, A.V. Improving Pit Vehicle Ecology Safety. J. Phys. Conf. Series 2018, 1015, 052014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kot, S. Cost structure in relation to the size of road transport enterprises. Promet 2015, 27, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Straka, M.; Rosova, A.; Malindzakova, M.; Khouri, S.; Culkova, K. Evaluating the Waste Incineration Process for Sustainable Development through Modelling, Logistics, and Simulation. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2018, 27, 2739–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sofranko, M.; Wittenberger, G.; Skvarekova, E. Optimisation of technological transport in quarries using application software. Int. J. Min. Miner. Eng. 2015, 6, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malindzakova, M.; Straka, M.; Rosova, A.; Kanuchova, M.; Trebuna, P. Modeling the process for incineration of municipal waste. Przem. Chem. 2015, 94, 1260–1264. [Google Scholar]
- Marasova, D. Proposal of alternatives for the transport of backfill material based on the capacity calculation of truck transport in mining conditions: Case study. In Proceedings of the SGEM 2018 Conference Proceedings, 1.3. Science and Technologies in Geology: Exploration and Mining, Albena, Bulgaria, 2–8 July 2018; STEF92 Technology: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2018; pp. 685–692. [Google Scholar]
- Saderova, J.; Marasova, D.; Gallikova, J. Simulation as logistic support to handling in the warehouse: Case study. TEM J. 2018, 7, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saderova, J.; Bindzar, P. Using a model to approach the process of loading and unloading of mining output at a quarry. Gospod. Surowcami Miner. Miner. Resour. Manag. 2014, 30, 97–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Straka, M.; Saderova, J.; Bindzar, P.; Malkus, T.; Lis, M. Computer simulation as a means of efficiency of transport processes of raw materials in relation to a cargo rail terminal: A case study. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2019, 24, 307–314. [Google Scholar]
- Malindzak, D.; Michalikova, E.; Pandula, B. Heuristic model for production scheduling wide-strip rolling mill. Metal. Metall. 2019, 58, 117–119. [Google Scholar]
- Flores-Geronimo, M.; Hernandez-Martinez, E.G.; Ferreira-Vazquez, E.D.; Flores-Godoy, J.J.; Fernandez-Anaya, G. A Hybrid Representation of Urban Traffic Networks using Multi-agent Systems and Petri Nets. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), Paris, France, 23–26 April 2019; pp. 1562–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N.; Tewari, P.C.; Sachdeva, A. Petri Nets Modelling and Analysis of the Veneer Layup System of Plywood Manufacturing Plant. Eng. Model. 2020, 33, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavone, G.; Dotoli, M.; Seatzu, C. Resource planning of intermodal terminals using timed Petri nets. In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Discrete Event Systems (WODES), Xi’an, China, 30 May–1 June 2016; pp. 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trebuna, P.; Straka, M.; Rosova, A.; Malindzakova, M. Petri nets as a tool for production streamlining. Przem. Chem. 2015, 94, 1605–1608. [Google Scholar]
- Malandria, C.; Briccolia, M.; Mantecchinia, L.; Paganellia, F. A Discrete Event Simulation Model for Inbound Baggage Handling. Transp. Res. Procedia 2018, 35, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Straka, M.; Malindzakova, M.; Rosova, A.; Trebuna, P. The simulation model of the material flow of municipal waste recovery. Przem. Chem. 2016, 95, 773–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janic, P.; Jadlovska, S.; Zapach, J.; Koska, L. Modeling of underground mining processes in the environment of MATLAB / Simulink. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2019, 24, 44–52. [Google Scholar]
- Onofrejova, D.; Janekova, J.; Grincova, A.; Soltysova, Z. Simulation and evaluation of production factors in manufacturing of fireplaces. Int. J. Simul. Model. 2020, 19, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siderska, J. Application of Tecnomatix plant simulation for modeling production and logistics pro-cesses. Bus. Man. Educ. 2016, 14, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marasova, M.; Saderova, J.; Ambriško, L. Simulation of the Use of the Material Handling Equipment in the Operation Process. Open Eng. 2020, 10, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazmierczak, M.; Sawicka, H. Redesign of warehousing process with an application of object-oriented simulation method. Res. Logist. Prod. 2017, 7, 351–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saderová, J.; Straka, M.; Erdeljan, D.J. New approach to increasing the vertical conveyance capacity through transport cycle modification. Arch. Min. Sci. 2019, 64, 709–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bardzinski, P.J.; Krol, R.; Jurdziak, L. Empirical model of discretized copper ore flow within the underground mine transport system. Int. J. Simul. Model. 2019, 18, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashemi, A.S.; Sattarvand, J. Application of ARENA Simulation Software for Evaluation of Open Pit Mining Transportation Systems—A Case Study. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium Continuous Surface Mining, Aachen, Germany, 22–24 September 2014; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Muniappen, K.; Genc, B. Dynamic simulation of an opencast coal mine: A case study. Int. J. Coal. Sci. Technol. 2020, 7, 164–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bastos, G.S.; Souza, L.E.; Ramos, F.T.; Ribeiro, C.H.C. A single-dependent agent approach for stochastic time-dependent truck dispatching in open-pit mining. In Proceedings of the 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Washington, DC, USA, 5–7 October 2011; pp. 1057–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20110707222339/http://www.belaz-export.com/pdf/75600_en.pdf (accessed on 11 September 2020).
- Saderová, J.; Ristovic, I. Application of the model approach for the process of bulk material loading. In Proceedings of the SGEM 2018 Conference Proceedings, 1.3. Science and Technologies in Geology: Exploration and Mining, Albena, Bulgaria, 2–8 July 2018; STEF92 Technology: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2018; pp. 127–134. [Google Scholar]
- Straka, M.; Rosová, A.; Lenort, R.; Besta, P.; Šaderová, J. Principles of computer simulation design for the needs of improvement of the raw materials combined transport system. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2018, 23, 163–174. [Google Scholar]
- Saderova, J.; Marasova, D.; Gallikova, J. Determining of mining transport capacity by simulation. In Proceedings of the SGEM 2019 Conference Proceedings, 1.3. Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration and Mining: Exploration and Mining Mineral Processing, Albena, Bulgaria, 30 June–6 July 2019; STEF92 Technology: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2019; pp. 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parameter | Value | ||
---|---|---|---|
Bulk density of a material, ρ [t·m−3] | 1.8 | ||
Bucket filling coefficient, cf [-] | 0.8 | ||
Excavator bucket volume, [m3] | 2.5 | ||
Weight of material in the excavator bucket, [t] | 4.4 | ||
Loader working cycle time, [seconds] | 48 | ||
A quarry lorry capacity, C [t] | 13.2 | ||
Number of lorries in operation, [pcs] | 2 | ||
Shift length, T [hours] | 8 | ||
Time utilization coefficient per shift, η [-] | 0.75 | ||
Raw material unloading time, t3 [seconds] | 43 | ||
Place of loading | P1 | P2 | P3 |
Transport distance among the places of loading and unloading, D [km] | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.45 |
Average speed of a lorry with/without load, [km/h] | 6/9 | 9/12 | 9/12 |
Place of Loading | Transport Distance [km] | Driving Time with the Load [min] | Driving Time without the Load [min] | Tc [min] | [t/h] | [pcs] | [pcs] | [t/shift] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | 0.5 | 5 | 3.34 | 13.92 | 56.9 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 682.92 |
P2 | 1.1 | 7.34 | 5.5 | 18.42 | 43 | 3.3 | 4.7 | 516.05 |
P3 | 1.45 | 9.67 | 7.25 | 22.5 | 35.2 | 2.66 | 5.8 | 422.40 |
Experiment 1 | Experiment 2 | Experiment 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
The number of cycles of a loader | 155 | 120 | 96 |
Utilisation of a loader [%] | 57 | 44 | 35 |
The number of loaded lorries | 51 | 40 | 32 |
The number of unloaded lorries | 51 | 38 | 32 |
The number of a lorry cycles | 50 | 38 | 30 |
ML [t/shift] | 682 | 528 | 422.4 |
[t/shift] | 673.2 | 501.6 | 396 |
Loading Lace Parameter | P1 | P2 | P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Calculation | Simulation | Calculation | Simulation | Calculation | Simulation | |
[t/hour] | 56.9 | 35.2 | 43 | 26.4 | 35.2 | 22 |
[t/hour] | 682.92 | 673.2 | 516 | 501.6 | 422.4 | 396 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Saderova, J.; Rosova, A.; Kacmary, P.; Sofranko, M.; Bindzar, P.; Malkus, T. Modelling as a Tool for the Planning of the Transport System Performance in the Conditions of a Raw Material Mining. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198051
Saderova J, Rosova A, Kacmary P, Sofranko M, Bindzar P, Malkus T. Modelling as a Tool for the Planning of the Transport System Performance in the Conditions of a Raw Material Mining. Sustainability. 2020; 12(19):8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198051
Chicago/Turabian StyleSaderova, Janka, Andrea Rosova, Peter Kacmary, Marian Sofranko, Peter Bindzar, and Tomasz Malkus. 2020. "Modelling as a Tool for the Planning of the Transport System Performance in the Conditions of a Raw Material Mining" Sustainability 12, no. 19: 8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198051
APA StyleSaderova, J., Rosova, A., Kacmary, P., Sofranko, M., Bindzar, P., & Malkus, T. (2020). Modelling as a Tool for the Planning of the Transport System Performance in the Conditions of a Raw Material Mining. Sustainability, 12(19), 8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198051