Next Article in Journal
Weight Approximation for Spatial Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal
Chocolate Consumption and Purchasing Behaviour Review: Research Issues and Insights for Future Research
Article

Archetypes of Goal and Scope Definitions for Consistent Allocation in LCA

Institute of Molecular Sciences (ISM), University of Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, UMR 5255, F-33400 Talence, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(14), 5587; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145587
Received: 9 June 2020 / Revised: 8 July 2020 / Accepted: 9 July 2020 / Published: 11 July 2020
The selection of an appropriate allocation procedure for co-production and recycling in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) depends on the goal and scope of the analysis. However, it is not always clear when partitioning or system expansion can be applied, or when to conduct an attributional or a consequential LCA, both for LCA practitioners and users of LCA results. In this paper, the influence of the goal and scope on the selected modeling approaches is clarified. The distinction between process-oriented and product-oriented LCAs, between system expansion and substitution, and between the cut-off approach and other allocation procedures are highlighted. Archetypes of goal and scope definitions are developed. These archetypes reflect the minimum amount of information required to select an allocation procedure. It is demonstrated via an illustrative example that the question “what is the environmental impact of a product” can result in at least 15 different research questions requiring at least five different modeling methods. Finally, perspectives are provided on the use of attributional and consequential approaches to evaluate the environmental, social, and economic sustainability of products and processes. View Full-Text
Keywords: life cycle assessment; allocation; recycling; attributional LCA; consequential LCA; sustainability; goal and scope; life cycle inventory life cycle assessment; allocation; recycling; attributional LCA; consequential LCA; sustainability; goal and scope; life cycle inventory
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Schrijvers, D.; Loubet, P.; Sonnemann, G. Archetypes of Goal and Scope Definitions for Consistent Allocation in LCA. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5587. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145587

AMA Style

Schrijvers D, Loubet P, Sonnemann G. Archetypes of Goal and Scope Definitions for Consistent Allocation in LCA. Sustainability. 2020; 12(14):5587. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145587

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schrijvers, Dieuwertje; Loubet, Philippe; Sonnemann, Guido. 2020. "Archetypes of Goal and Scope Definitions for Consistent Allocation in LCA" Sustainability 12, no. 14: 5587. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145587

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop