Next Article in Journal
Insect Farming for Feed and Food Production from a Circular Business Model Perspective
Next Article in Special Issue
Life Cycle Assessment of Households in Santiago, Chile: Environmental Hotspots and Policy Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Waste Electronic Product Trade-in Strategies in Predictive Twin Disassembly Systems in the Era of Blockchain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Insights from the Sustainability Monitoring Tool SUMINISTRO Applied to a Case Study System of Prospective Wood-Based Industry Networks in Central Germany
Article

Implications of Low Carbon City Sustainability Strategies for 2050

1
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Aschebergsgatan 44, 411 33 Göteborg, Sweden
2
Department of Electro-Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 2, 166 27 Praha6, Czech Republic
3
Department of Environmental Science—Environmental Social Science and Geography, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, Building 7407, 135, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(13), 5417; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135417
Received: 3 June 2020 / Revised: 24 June 2020 / Accepted: 26 June 2020 / Published: 4 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Life Cycle Management for Sustainable Regional Development)
Cities and urban areas are critical nodes of societal resource flows, responsible for both global and local sustainability implications. They are complex systems and understanding the implications of potential actions by cities is critical for progress towards sustainability. In this paper the future implications of sustainability strategies are assessed for 10 European cities by comparing two scenarios for 2050: a business-as-usual (BAU) and a post-carbon/sustainability scenario (PC2050) (generated by city stakeholders). The effects of the scenarios are assessed using a mixed methodology: a semi-quantitative sustainability indicator analysis, energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (both production-based and consumption-based accounting (PBA and CBA)), land-use spatial modelling, and cost–benefit analysis. The paper highlights the clear benefits of PC2050 with improved sustainability indicator results, reduced land sprawl (which averages 16% in BAU) and positive cost–benefit results. Nonetheless, inequality and segregation are a common concern. In addition, whilst PBA indicates a significant decrease (average decrease from 4.7 to 1.3 tCO2eq per capita) CBA demonstrates rising overall emissions from an average of 11 to 14.8 tCO2eq per capita. This is linked to rising affluence and consumption trends despite local improvements in GHG emissions, which highlights a need for cities to address consumption-based emissions. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainability assessment; consumption-based accounting; land-use change; scenario analysis sustainability assessment; consumption-based accounting; land-use change; scenario analysis
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Harris, S.; Weinzettel, J.; Levin, G. Implications of Low Carbon City Sustainability Strategies for 2050. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5417. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135417

AMA Style

Harris S, Weinzettel J, Levin G. Implications of Low Carbon City Sustainability Strategies for 2050. Sustainability. 2020; 12(13):5417. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135417

Chicago/Turabian Style

Harris, Steve, Jan Weinzettel, and Gregor Levin. 2020. "Implications of Low Carbon City Sustainability Strategies for 2050" Sustainability 12, no. 13: 5417. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135417

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop