Next Article in Journal
Optimal Coordinated Planning of Energy Storage and Tie-Lines to Boost Flexibility with High Wind Power Integration
Next Article in Special Issue
Integrating Regionalized Socioeconomic Considerations onto Life Cycle Assessment for Evaluating Bioeconomy Value Chains: A Case Study on Hybrid Wood–Concrete Ceiling Elements
Previous Article in Journal
Chilling and Heat Accumulation of Fruit and Nut Trees and Flower Bud Vulnerability to Early Spring Low Temperatures in New Mexico: Meteorological Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Implications of Low Carbon City Sustainability Strategies for 2050
 
 
Article

Life Cycle Assessment of Households in Santiago, Chile: Environmental Hotspots and Policy Analysis

1
School of Environmental Sciences and Sustainability, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago 8370251, Chile
2
Center for Sustainability Research, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370251, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Bhavik Bakshi
Sustainability 2021, 13(5), 2525; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052525
Received: 5 February 2021 / Revised: 21 February 2021 / Accepted: 23 February 2021 / Published: 26 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Life Cycle Management for Sustainable Regional Development)
The aim of this study is to assess the environmental impacts of household life cycles in Santiago, Chile, by household income level. The assessment considered scenarios associated with environmental policies. The life cycle assessment was cradle-to-grave, and the functional unit considered all the materials and energy required to meet an inhabitant’s needs for one year (1 inh/year). Using SimaPro 9.1 software, the Recipe Midpoint (H) methodology was used. The impact categories selected were global warming, fine particulate matter formation, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, freshwater ecotoxicity, mineral resource scarcity, and fossil resource scarcity. The inventory was carried out through the application of 300 household surveys and secondary information. The main environmental sources of households were determined to be food consumption, transport, and electricity. Food consumption is the main source, responsible for 33% of the environmental impacts on global warming, 69% on terrestrial acidification, and 29% on freshwater eutrophication. The second most crucial environmental hotspot is private transport, whose contribution to environmental impact increases as household income rises, while public transport impact increases in the opposite direction. In this sense, both positive and negative environmental effects can be generated by policies. Therefore, life-cycle environmental impacts, the synergy between policies, and households’ socio-economic characteristics must be considered in public policy planning and consumer decisions. View Full-Text
Keywords: LCA; city metabolism; environmental management LCA; city metabolism; environmental management
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

López-Eccher, C.; Garrido-Ramírez, E.; Franchi-Arzola, I.; Muñoz, E. Life Cycle Assessment of Households in Santiago, Chile: Environmental Hotspots and Policy Analysis. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052525

AMA Style

López-Eccher C, Garrido-Ramírez E, Franchi-Arzola I, Muñoz E. Life Cycle Assessment of Households in Santiago, Chile: Environmental Hotspots and Policy Analysis. Sustainability. 2021; 13(5):2525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052525

Chicago/Turabian Style

López-Eccher, Camila, Elizabeth Garrido-Ramírez, Iván Franchi-Arzola, and Edmundo Muñoz. 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Households in Santiago, Chile: Environmental Hotspots and Policy Analysis" Sustainability 13, no. 5: 2525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052525

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop