Next Article in Journal
Sustainability of Railway Undertaking Services with Lean Philosophy in Risk Management—Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Vulnerabilities to COVID-19 in Bangladesh and a Reconsideration of Sustainable Development Goals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of the Covid-19 Crisis on Global PM2.5 Concentration and Related Health Impacts

Graduate School of Environmental and Information Studies, Tokyo City University, Tokyo 158-0087, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(13), 5297; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135297
Submission received: 28 May 2020 / Revised: 23 June 2020 / Accepted: 25 June 2020 / Published: 30 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Health, Well-Being and Sustainability)

Abstract

:
The decrease in human activities following the COVID-19 pandemic caused an important change in PM2.5 concentration, especially in the most polluted areas in the world: China (44.28 and 18.88 µg/m3 in the first quarters of 2019 and 2020, respectively), India (49.84 and 31.12, respectively), and Nigeria (75.30 and 34.31, respectively). In this study, satellite observations from all around the world of PM2.5 concentration were collected on the grid scale with a high resolution of 0.125° (about 15km). Population data for 2020 were also collected on the same scale. Statistical data from the World Health Organization (WHO) concerning the diseases caused by air pollution (e.g., stroke) were obtained for each country to determine the change in mortality between the first quarter of 2019 and the first quarter of 2020. Expressed in disability-adjusted life years (DALY), it was found that the largest reductions were observed for China (−13.9 million DALY), India (−6.3 million DALY), and Nigeria (−2.3 million DALY).

1. Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented change in people’s daily lives all around the world, having an important impact on both the economy and human health [1,2,3,4,5]. The pandemic has officially caused more than 300,000 deaths (18 May, 2020 [6]), and the global economy is expected to shrink by 3.2% in 2020 [7]. This economic loss is partly due to the shortage of activity following the national lockdowns imposed by different governments.
Some studies attempted to confirm the link between air pollution and the COVID-19 pandemic [8,9]; others highlighted the change in pollutant concentration, especially in China [10]. However, no study has quantified the global damage reduction in the first quarter of the year.
Air pollution is one of the major causes of death every year in the world (about seven million, including more than 4.2 million due to ambient air pollution according to the World Health Organization (WHO) [11]); it is strongly linked to several diseases such as stroke and heart disease. It would be interesting to observe if the temporary reduction in activity in the first quarter of 2020 had an impact on PM2.5 concentration, which is often used as one of the key indicators to estimate the burden from air pollution, such as in life-cycle assessment (LCA) [12,13].
Therefore, this research aimed at evaluating the global mortality reduction in the first quarter of 2020 due to the reduction in PM2.5 concentration. Compared to recent studies on the topic [14,15,16], we highlighted the change in global PM2.5 concentration but also tried to estimate the reduction in burden due to the change in concentration. Compared with the traditional approach (national or continental) used, for example, in LCA, this study was based on a grid-scale approach to improve the accuracy of the assessment.
This research did not aim to minimize the number of deaths from COVID-19 but rather to support the idea that the improvement in air quality has helped to indirectly save several lives during this period.

2. Methodology

2.1. PM2.5 Concentration Data

PM2.5 concentration (µg/m3) was collected from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) satellite [17] at grid scale (0.125°, which is about 15 km or 4,150,080 grids globally); data were collected for the periods from 1 January to 30 April, 2019, and from 1 January to 30 April, 2020. Data post-treatment was performed using MATLAB software [18]. For each month, the average concentration as a common indicator for air quality measurement was calculated for both 2019 and 2020. Several studies demonstrated the reliability of satellite data in comparison with ground measurements [19,20,21]. As ground measurement stations are still limited in Africa and Southern America [22], the satellite data helped to overcome this limitation.

2.2. Population Data

The gridded population data were collected for 2020 from the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) [23]; the data are represented in Figure 1. The different age groups for each grid were obtained from the same source for 2010, which was the year with the latest data available. We further confirmed from different sources [24,25] that the share in the age groups in the cities did not change significantly in the last 10 years. Finally, the data provided by the CIESIN at a resolution of 0.042° were converted to the same scale as the PM2.5 concentration data (0.125°).

2.3. WHO Data

Data from the WHO [26] were collected for each country (Appendix A Table A1), representing the annual mortality rate per health effect (in 2016). In accordance with previous studies [13,27,28], the population under 5 years old and over 30 years were considered. The information collected corresponds to the mortality rate for health diseases related to air pollution: for people aged above 30 years old, ischemic heart disease (IHD), stroke, lung cancer (LC), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and for people aged under five years old, acute lower respiratory infections (ALRI). The maps of the populations under 5 years old and over 30 years old are shown in Figure 2.

2.4. Concentration Response Function (CRF)

Based on previous cohort studies [13,27,29], it was decided to pick a relative risk of 1.01 per µg/m3 per health effect. The equation for the CRF applied in each grid is
CRF = RR MR   Δ C Pop
where:
  • RR is the relative risk of a health effect due to exposure to PM2.5 (µg/m3 of air).
  • MR (death/person/month) is the mortality rate specific to each country for the health effects related to air pollution.
  • Δ C is the difference in PM2.5 concentration (µg/m3 of air) between each monthly average in the first quarter of years 2019 and 2020.
  • Pop is the population under 5 years old and over 30 years old in the grid.
To express the overall burden, the number of deaths was converted to disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) using the WHO data (Table A1 [26]).

3. Results

3.1. Results Per Country

The highest reductions in burden occurred for China (−13.9 million DALY), India (−6.3 million), and Nigeria (−2.3 million). Italy (26,943 DALY), Germany (23,150), and Switzerland (4,744) showed increases in mortality compared to the same period last year. The results are shown in Table 1 and Figure 3. The results for each grid (including main parameters) are provided in the Supplementary Information.
The PM2.5 concentration was generally low in Western Europe in the first quarter of the year; events related to lockdowns, such as the reduction in transportation or the temporary reduction in industrial activity, did not affect the level of pollution.
The total reduction in the burden globally was 34.4 million DALY (or 1.3 million deaths), confirming that the actions taken against the COVID-19 pandemic indirectly helped to improve air quality.

3.2. Results Per City

The results for each city were observed: the top 10 is occupied by Chinese cities (eight) and Indian cities (two). With these cities having a high population density and being among the most polluted cities in the world, these results were expected (Table 2).

4. Discussion

4.1. Confirmation of the Results in Accordance with the National Lockdowns

To confirm the validity of the results, we compared the results obtained in this study with the level of confinement in the different countries. The duration of these confinements was considered, as shown in Table 3 and Figure 4.
From the previous information, it was confirmed that the countries with the highest burden reduction adopted strict measures to stop the progress of the COVID-19 pandemic. It can also be supposed that the reduction of pollutant emissions in each country probably improved the air quality in the surrounding countries (even though these surrounding countries adopted less strict measures). Several studies highlighted the importance of the air pollution transboundary effect [12,31,32].

4.2. Comparison with the Annual WHO Estimation

The results were also compared with the annual estimation of the WHO [11]. A comparison for the countries experiencing a reduction in burden above 500,000 DALY according to our results is shown in Table 4.
Except for China (54%) and Niger (63%), all of the results were below 50%. Even though direct comparison of the results is difficult (2020 vs. 2016), several studies, such as in China [33,34], showed that the monthly concentration at the end and the beginning of each year are much more important than during the rest of year. This would explain why the reduction in each country was within the range of 20–50%. To confirm this observation, the monthly average for 2019 of each country listed above was collected (Figure 5). In these countries, the level of air pollution in the first quarter of the year (as well as the last quarter of the year) was the highest.

4.3. Sensitivity Analysis

To confirm the accuracy of our calculation, we considered different methodologies. First, using He et al. 2016 [29] and the conversion provided by the WHO (0.65 PM10 = PM2.5 [35]) coupled with the United Nations (UN) population data [36], different relative risks for each age group were determined: 1.029 for the age group 0–5 years old, 1.006 for the 30–50-year-olds, 1.01 for the 50–60-year-olds, and 1.014 for the population over 60 years old. Then, a different approach based on different relative risks (RRs) for each disease related to air pollution [27] was considered: 1.013 for cardiopulmonary diseases, 1.014 for lung cancer and 1.024 for ischemic heart disease, with ALRI not being considered in the study. The results obtained in this study for the 20 countries with the highest reductions in burden (representing 85% of the global reduction of burden) were compared using these two different approaches, as shown in Table 5.
The following observations were noted from the results. Based on the approach adapted from He et al. [29], for the most developed countries on the list (USA, China, and Korea), the results were estimated to be less than 20% higher; for the African countries, the results were estimated to be more than 100% higher. In these developed countries, the age groups are homogeneous, whereas, for African countries, the population under five years old is the highest in the world. Based on the approach by Krewski et al. 2009 [27], an opposite trend was observed: the results were higher for the most developed countries, but lower for the African countries. The two reasons for this are that ALRI is not considered in this method, and, more importantly according to the WHO statistics, that the sub-Saharan African population is young, so this population suffers less from heart diseases.
These results confirm the approach chosen in this study. To avoid any over- or underestimation due to the lack of detailed information concerning each country, we chose a constant relative risk of 1.01, which is midway between the relative risk of 1.006 adapted from He et al. [29] (age group 30–50) and the relative risk of 1.024 for IHD in Krewski et al. [27]. This constant relative risk is also in the same range as the value adapted from He et al. [29] for the age group 50–60 (RR = 1.01) and the RRs for lung cancer and cardiopulmonary disease in Krewski et al. [27] (1.013 and 1.014, respectively).

4.4. Why Did the PM2.5 Concentration Not Fall to Zero?

One of the last questions that one may ask could be: “why have air pollution levels not dropped to zero and even increased in some areas where a lockdown was active?”.
It should be clarified that PM2.5 emissions as a primary source, followed by NOx, SO2 and, NH3 as secondary sources, contribute to the PM2.5 concentration.
There are several reasons that the PM2.5 concentration did not fall to zero: electricity generation from industry decreased [37], but electricity generation in the residential sector did not stop during the lockdown period [38]. Many countries (e.g., in Asia) still rely considerably on coal-fired power plants, which emit a large amount of PM2.5, NOx and SO2 (especially when technologies such as electrostatic precipitators (ESP), selective catalytic redactors (SCR) and flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) are not applied), thereby contributing to the PM2.5 concentration. According to the user data provided by Apple [39], in different cities all around the world, key workers were still active during lockdowns. Shipments by heavy trucks, one of the major contributors of NOx emissions, were popular during the different lockdowns. Finally, agriculture, a major source of NH3 emissions, also contributed to keeping the PM2.5 concentration at a certain level.

4.5. Limitations and Future Work

The results of this study were obtained from models but not clinical observations; therefore, caution is needed when interpreting the results. Heterogeneity also exists between the population of the same country following, for example, their economic situation or their access to medical structure. Cohort studies conducted in developing countries (e.g., those in South/Southeast Asia and Western Africa) are urgently required, as only models based on the situation in developed countries are available for predicting the damage caused by air pollution in developing countries.
As highlighted in Section 4.4, even during strict lockdowns, the levels of air pollution remained at a certain level. Some additional work is needed to isolate the sources of air pollution in each country; the lockdowns provide a good opportunity to isolate the different sources as reported by some recent studies [40,41]. Similar to water [42] or carbon dioxide [43,44], a detailed database for air pollution could be created. Once such a database is established, different scenarios could be considered to keep the PM2.5 concentration under a certain level in daily life.

5. Conclusions

In this study, it was confirmed that national lockdowns helped to reduce the impact of air pollution in the first quarter of 2020, especially in Asia and Western Africa. The greatest reductions were observed in China (−13.9 million DALY), India (−6.3 million DALY), and Nigeria (−2.3 million DALY). In developed countries, such as those in Western Europe, no major difference was observed compared with 2019.
These observations provide some indications. In Western Europe, advanced technologies (e.g., electricity from renewable energies, vehicles with high fuel efficiency) already help to keep the air pollution level low in daily life. Conversely, with these technologies still being unavailable in several parts of the world, the suspension of activity directly reduced the impact of polluting technologies. Advanced technologies are usually expensive; using a cost-benefit approach, future works might focus on comparing the affordability of advanced technologies and opportunities for teleworking in developing countries.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://zenodo.org/record/3932692#.XwQZTOcRVPY.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K. and N.I.; methodology, S.K. and N.I.; software, S.K.; formal analysis, S.K.; investigation, S.K.; resources, N.I.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K.; supervision, N.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. WHO data for each country concerning the diseases related to air pollution.
Table A1. WHO data for each country concerning the diseases related to air pollution.
ISO Alpha−3
CODE [45]
Stroke
(DALY/Person/Month)
IHD
(DALY/Person/Month)
LC
(DALY/Person/Month)
COPD
(DALY/Person/Month)
ALRI (DALY/Person/Month)Stroke
(DALY/Death)
IHD
(DALY/Death)
LC (DALY/Death)COPD (DALY/Death)ALRI (DALY/Death)
AFG1.2 × 10−42.7 × 10−48.9 × 10−63.6 × 10−52.0 × 10−42828332991
ALB2.6 × 10−43.6 × 10−45.5 × 10−53.0 × 10−52.2 × 10−51718241993
DZA7.1 × 10−52.0 × 10−41.2 × 10−51.8 × 10−55.5 × 10−52221302891
AGO7.9 × 10−59.9 × 10−52.1 × 10−62.4 × 10−52.7 × 10−42524303091
ATG8.5 × 10−51.5 × 10−46.7 × 10−62.2 × 10−53.2 × 10−62221282194
ARG7.5 × 10−51.8 × 10−43.7 × 10−57.6 × 10−51.2 × 10−52218251892
ARM1.1 × 10−44.4 × 10−46.6 × 10−55.1 × 10−52.2 × 10−52117261892
AUS6.1 × 10−51.3 × 10−44.9 × 10−55.0 × 10−51.8 × 10−61615211895
AUT6.7 × 10−52.7 × 10−45.8 × 10−55.0 × 10−52.7 × 10−71814231899
AZE1.2 × 10−43.9 × 10−41.9 × 10−52.6 × 10−56.3 × 10−52321312492
BHS6.8 × 10−51.2 × 10−41.6 × 10−59.8 × 10−62.6 × 10−52322272792
BHR1.2 × 10−56.0 × 10−57.7 × 10−66.8 × 10−62.4 × 10−63327254095
BGD1.4 × 10−41.4 × 10−41.6 × 10−57.7 × 10−59.3 × 10−52526272491
BRB1.6 × 10−41.7 × 10−42.0 × 10−52.7 × 10−55.0 × 10−61818241895
BLR1.9 × 10−47.6 × 10−44.3 × 10−52.6 × 10−53.8 × 10−62218272495
BEL8.2 × 10−51.7 × 10−47.7 × 10−57.7 × 10−51.7 × 10−61715231893
BLZ7.8 × 10−51.5 × 10−42.2 × 10−52.6 × 10−51.8 × 10−52322282392
BEN1.2 × 10−41.4 × 10−41.3 × 10−63.6 × 10−52.7 × 10−42724342991
BTN8.1 × 10−51.9 × 10−49.0 × 10−67.6 × 10−58.2 × 10−52930333092
BOL8.3 × 10−51.8 × 10−47.4 × 10−64.4 × 10−59.0 × 10−52722252091
BIH2.5 × 10−43.9 × 10−46.6 × 10−54.7 × 10−55.2 × 10−62018252195
BWA8.6 × 10−51.2 × 10−44.5 × 10−64.0 × 10−56.8 × 10−52323312891
BRA8.3 × 10−51.3 × 10−42.3 × 10−54.7 × 10−52.2 × 10−52324252192
BRN5.0 × 10−59.7 × 10−52.5 × 10−52.8 × 10−54.4 × 10−62926252993
BGR3.6 × 10−46.2 × 10−46.3 × 10−56.3 × 10−51.8 × 10−51818272192
BFA8.3 × 10−51.5 × 10−42.8 × 10−62.2 × 10−51.9 × 10−42825323191
BDI1.0 × 10−41.1 × 10−42.3 × 10−63.3 × 10−52.2 × 10−42726342991
KHM1.4 × 10−41.1 × 10−41.7 × 10−52.8 × 10−58.7 × 10−52525283492
CMR1.2 × 10−41.4 × 10−42.3 × 10−63.9 × 10−52.3 × 10−42624392891
CAN4.5 × 10−51.4 × 10−47.3 × 10−55.0 × 10−51.5 × 10−62117221895
CPV1.1 × 10−42.4 × 10−43.3 × 10−63.4 × 10−54.7 × 10−52118322291
CAF1.7 × 10−41.6 × 10−42.6 × 10−64.3 × 10−53.9 × 10−42525332891
TCD1.3 × 10−41.7 × 10−41.6 × 10−63.7 × 10−55.8 × 10−42926353091
CHL7.8 × 10−51.0 × 10−42.8 × 10−53.8 × 10−54.5 × 10−62120231792
CHN2.0 × 10−41.9 × 10−46.2 × 10−58.7 × 10−52.0 × 10−52319232092
COL6.3 × 10−51.7 × 10−42.2 × 10−53.6 × 10−52.5 × 10−52321251892
COM9.0 × 10−51.4 × 10−42.8 × 10−62.6 × 10−52.4 × 10−42726312991
COG8.9 × 10−51.2 × 10−41.9 × 10−62.8 × 10−51.4 × 10−42523292991
CRI5.4 × 10−51.3 × 10−41.2 × 10−54.0 × 10−57.2 × 10−61921221693
CIV1.6 × 10−42.3 × 10−42.4 × 10−64.2 × 10−52.9 × 10−43128313191
HRV1.9 × 10−43.8 × 10−48.4 × 10−55.5 × 10−53.1 × 10−61816241894
CUB1.0 × 10−42.3 × 10−46.3 × 10−55.5 × 10−51.1 × 10−51919231992
CYP6.9 × 10−51.9 × 10−44.4 × 10−55.2 × 10−54.9 × 10−71718231594
CZE1.0 × 10−43.6 × 10−46.2 × 10−54.5 × 10−53.4 × 10−61916232293
PRK2.7 × 10−41.8 × 10−48.0 × 10−51.8 × 10−45.1 × 10−52321272192
COD1.1 × 10−41.1 × 10−41.6 × 10−63.2 × 10−52.8 × 10−42524312891
DNK7.8 × 10−51.2 × 10−49.0 × 10−59.3 × 10−51.2 × 10−61817211893
DJI8.9 × 10−51.4 × 10−44.1 × 10−62.3 × 10−51.6 × 10−42725323091
DOM1.1 × 10−42.3 × 10−42.1 × 10−52.0 × 10−55.8 × 10−52423252291
ECU5.9 × 10−51.0 × 10−41.1 × 10−53.5 × 10−54.4 × 10−52220231691
EGY1.2 × 10−43.5 × 10−41.0 × 10−53.6 × 10−53.9 × 10−52425302892
SLV4.0 × 10−52.0 × 10−41.1 × 10−52.8 × 10−52.9 × 10−52420232092
GNQ7.9 × 10−51.2 × 10−44.8 × 10−62.7 × 10−52.5 × 10−42725343091
ERI1.3 × 10−41.3 × 10−43.5 × 10−63.8 × 10−51.6 × 10−42524342791
EST9.4 × 10−55.5 × 10−46.7 × 10−52.6 × 10−52.2 × 10−62315222198
ETH8.8 × 10−51.3 × 10−44.6 × 10−62.8 × 10−51.7 × 10−42524342891
FJI3.0 × 10−52.8 × 10−47.9 × 10−62.8 × 10−54.4 × 10−53327283192
FIN9.9 × 10−52.5 × 10−45.2 × 10−53.0 × 10−58.5 × 10−71915212394
FRA6.8 × 10−51.2 × 10−46.8 × 10−54.1 × 10−57.0 × 10−71715241498
GAB8.6 × 10−51.2 × 10−47.4 × 10−62.5 × 10−51.1 × 10−42220322791
GMB9.7 × 10−51.8 × 10−42.8 × 10−63.1 × 10−51.7 × 10−42724312891
GEO3.8 × 10−47.1 × 10−43.3 × 10−56.2 × 10−51.2 × 10−51917272092
DEU8.5 × 10−52.8 × 10−46.8 × 10−57.0 × 10−51.1 × 10−61815231994
GHA1.5 × 10−41.6 × 10−43.0 × 10−62.5 × 10−51.2 × 10−42523312991
GRC1.6 × 10−42.4 × 10−48.0 × 10−57.0 × 10−52.7 × 10−61516221892
GRD1.2 × 10−42.1 × 10−42.3 × 10−52.4 × 10−53.0 × 10−51921242292
GTM5.3 × 10−51.1 × 10−45.3 × 10−62.6 × 10−57.8 × 10−52120252091
GIN1.4 × 10−41.8 × 10−42.1 × 10−64.0 × 10−52.8 × 10−42725372991
GNB1.1 × 10−41.5 × 10−42.6 × 10−63.1 × 10−52.9 × 10−42724323091
GUY1.7 × 10−42.8 × 10−46.3 × 10−63.3 × 10−54.6 × 10−52526272491
HTI1.7 × 10−42.5 × 10−41.0 × 10−53.5 × 10−52.6 × 10−42625272591
HND3.9 × 10−51.6 × 10−48.0 × 10−63.2 × 10−53.7 × 10−52522262192
HUN1.3 × 10−45.2 × 10−41.1 × 10−47.4 × 10−54.2 × 10−62117262394
ISL6.1 × 10−51.9 × 10−45.9 × 10−55.4 × 10−517142119
IND9.8 × 10−52.2 × 10−41.2 × 10−51.1 × 10−41.1 × 10−42627302791
IDN1.7 × 10−42.1 × 10−42.2 × 10−54.1 × 10−56.7 × 10−52626283292
IRN6.4 × 10−52.0 × 10−41.0 × 10−52.1 × 10−53.1 × 10−52120262492
IRQ7.6 × 10−52.3 × 10−41.7 × 10−51.3 × 10−58.3 × 10−52522273191
IRL5.3 × 10−51.5 × 10−45.6 × 10−55.9 × 10−51.1 × 10−61917221893
ISR5.1 × 10−51.0 × 10−44.3 × 10−53.7 × 10−59.2 × 10−71916231993
ITA1.2 × 10−42.2 × 10−46.7 × 10−56.1 × 10−56.7 × 10−71414201494
JAM1.4 × 10−41.2 × 10−42.9 × 10−52.9 × 10−51.1 × 10−51817242093
JPN1.1 × 10−41.4 × 10−47.2 × 10−55.8 × 10−52.9 × 10−61715171793
JOR7.5 × 10−51.8 × 10−41.4 × 10−51.5 × 10−52.5 × 10−52325282892
KAZ1.8 × 10−44.5 × 10−43.9 × 10−55.4 × 10−52.4 × 10−52420272492
KEN3.9 × 10−54.1 × 10−52.7 × 10−61.3 × 10−51.3 × 10−42524283191
KIR1.3 × 10−41.3 × 10−42.1 × 10−53.5 × 10−51.7 × 10−43030303591
KWT3.1 × 10−51.1 × 10−48.3 × 10−67.8 × 10−68.6 × 10−62932263792
KGZ1.7 × 10−44.4 × 10−41.7 × 10−54.7 × 10−57.1 × 10−52419292192
LAO1.6 × 10−42.0 × 10−41.8 × 10−54.3 × 10−52.0 × 10−42625293291
LVA3.1 × 10−45.6 × 10−45.9 × 10−52.0 × 10−54.8 × 10−61816242495
LBN5.7 × 10−54.0 × 10−42.9 × 10−53.1 × 10−57.2 × 10−62320262393
LSO1.8 × 10−41.7 × 10−44.1 × 10−68.7 × 10−52.5 × 10−42222312491
LBR9.1 × 10−51.4 × 10−42.1 × 10−61.9 × 10−52.1 × 10−42523352991
LBY6.5 × 10−52.3 × 10−42.1 × 10−52.2 × 10−51.9 × 10−52524282892
LTU2.4 × 10−46.7 × 10−45.6 × 10−52.5 × 10−53.4 × 10−61815242296
LUX5.6 × 10−51.3 × 10−45.6 × 10−55.0 × 10−52.8 × 10−71917231896
MDG1.3 × 10−49.8 × 10−59.2 × 10−63.8 × 10−51.5 × 10−42725292891
MWI6.1 × 10−58.9 × 10−51.4 × 10−62.1 × 10−51.3 × 10−42322312791
MYS7.9 × 10−52.0 × 10−42.7 × 10−52.8 × 10−57.9 × 10−62523283692
MDV3.6 × 10−51.3 × 10−49.2 × 10−63.7 × 10−59.9 × 10−62420292692
MLI1.2 × 10−41.7 × 10−42.9 × 10−65.3 × 10−52.7 × 10−42724342891
MLT8.4 × 10−52.6 × 10−45.4 × 10−54.0 × 10−53.1 × 10−61716221891
MRT8.7 × 10−51.7 × 10−41.9 × 10−62.4 × 10−52.3 × 10−42623352891
MUS1.1 × 10−42.1 × 10−41.8 × 10−56.7 × 10−51.6 × 10−52423262692
MEX4.9 × 10−51.4 × 10−49.8 × 10−63.9 × 10−52.5 × 10−52120241892
FSM1.5 × 10−42.2 × 10−42.8 × 10−55.5 × 10−58.5 × 10−52524283091
MNG1.8 × 10−42.4 × 10−42.5 × 10−51.2 × 10−54.1 × 10−52925273092
MNE3.5 × 10−43.6 × 10−47.3 × 10−53.6 × 10−52.4 × 10−617183019102
MAR7.8 × 10−52.3 × 10−42.0 × 10−52.3 × 10−55.2 × 10−52019312491
MOZ9.0 × 10−58.0 × 10−53.6 × 10−61.8 × 10−51.8 × 10−42523273091
MMR1.7 × 10−41.0 × 10−42.9 × 10−57.4 × 10−51.6 × 10−42524282891
NAM1.1 × 10−41.4 × 10−44.9 × 10−64.8 × 10−51.3 × 10−42322302791
NPL1.2 × 10−42.5 × 10−42.0 × 10−51.0 × 10−49.1 × 10−52424302691
NLD7.5 × 10−51.4 × 10−48.4 × 10−56.9 × 10−59.5 × 10−71816222092
NZL7.1 × 10−51.6 × 10−45.1 × 10−55.2 × 10−55.9 × 10−61716221992
NIC4.8 × 10−51.4 × 10−49.8 × 10−62.7 × 10−56.2 × 10−52520262091
NER1.1 × 10−41.6 × 10−49.8 × 10−73.2 × 10−53.2 × 10−42825332991
NGA9.9 × 10−51.6 × 10−41.4 × 10−62.9 × 10−53.7 × 10−42825343091
NOR7.0 × 10−51.5 × 10−45.8 × 10−56.7 × 10−58.1 × 10−71815221893
OMN2.4 × 10−51.1 × 10−44.7 × 10−64.6 × 10−61.1 × 10−53127294892
PAK1.4 × 10−42.9 × 10−48.0 × 10−66.4 × 10−52.1 × 10−42424302891
PAN7.3 × 10−51.2 × 10−41.5 × 10−53.8 × 10−53.6 × 10−51920231892
PNG1.2 × 10−41.8 × 10−48.2 × 10−64.3 × 10−51.5 × 10−42828303591
PRY9.6 × 10−51.7 × 10−42.2 × 10−52.9 × 10−53.6 × 10−52422252192
PER4.8 × 10−51.2 × 10−41.5 × 10−52.7 × 10−52.5 × 10−52621232192
PHL1.7 × 10−42.3 × 10−42.1 × 10−55.0 × 10−58.7 × 10−52927293391
POL1.1 × 10−44.0 × 10−48.3 × 10−55.1 × 10−53.8 × 10−62117252093
PRT1.4 × 10−41.4 × 10−44.8 × 10−55.4 × 10−52.9 × 10−61616241592
QAT7.8 × 10−64.7 × 10−55.0 × 10−62.3 × 10−66.4 × 10−64231346993
KOR6.8 × 10−56.4 × 10−54.7 × 10−52.5 × 10−51.2 × 10−62219212697
MDA2.4 × 10−46.1 × 10−43.9 × 10−53.0 × 10−54.5 × 10−52118282192
ROU2.7 × 10−45.1 × 10−46.5 × 10−54.6 × 10−54.3 × 10−51817272292
RUS2.8 × 10−45.4 × 10−45.6 × 10−52.7 × 10−58.3 × 10−62018272493
RWA6.2 × 10−56.6 × 10−52.1 × 10−62.5 × 10−58.8 × 10−52523332891
LCA1.3 × 10−41.2 × 10−41.5 × 10−54.0 × 10−51.6 × 10−51921302592
VCT1.4 × 10−42.4 × 10−41.3 × 10−52.5 × 10−53.3 × 10−52118292392
WSM1.1 × 10−41.8 × 10−41.2 × 10−53.6 × 10−52.7 × 10−52422313192
STP1.2 × 10−41.1 × 10−42.0 × 10−57.1 × 10−57.9 × 10−52320262291
SAU5.5 × 10−51.4 × 10−44.4 × 10−68.9 × 10−61.3 × 10−52526303391
SEN9.1 × 10−51.6 × 10−42.4 × 10−63.2 × 10−51.3 × 10−42522362791
SRB2.0 × 10−43.1 × 10−48.5 × 10−55.8 × 10−53.5 × 10−62018272194
SYC8.1 × 10−51.8 × 10−42.1 × 10−53.1 × 10−51.4 × 10−52724273592
SLE1.6 × 10−42.2 × 10−41.9 × 10−64.0 × 10−52.9 × 10−43128363191
SGP5.0 × 10−51.1 × 10−44.3 × 10−51.3 × 10−54.5 × 10−62221222792
SVK1.1 × 10−43.1 × 10−45.7 × 10−52.6 × 10−51.0 × 10−52217252492
SVN1.2 × 10−42.3 × 10−46.9 × 10−53.3 × 10−55.2 × 10−718152418109
SLB1.2 × 10−41.5 × 10−49.7 × 10−64.5 × 10−57.9 × 10−52625313192
SOM1.1 × 10−41.5 × 10−43.0 × 10−62.6 × 10−55.7 × 10−42827332991
ZAF1.0 × 10−41.4 × 10−42.5 × 10−55.6 × 10−51.2 × 10−42424282892
SSD9.0 × 10−51.1 × 10−43.3 × 10−62.4 × 10−53.5 × 10−42625313091
ESP7.3 × 10−51.4 × 10−45.6 × 10−56.8 × 10−51.2 × 10−61615231493
LKA9.3 × 10−52.1 × 10−49.9 × 10−63.9 × 10−59.0 × 10−62323273293
SDN1.2 × 10−43.3 × 10−42.6 × 10−63.5 × 10−51.7 × 10−42828312991
SUR1.5 × 10−41.9 × 10−42.2 × 10−52.0 × 10−52.3 × 10−52424262592
SWZ1.1 × 10−41.4 × 10−44.5 × 10−65.4 × 10−51.9 × 10−42423312791
SWE8.4 × 10−52.2 × 10−45.1 × 10−55.6 × 10−51.5 × 10−61715202093
CHE5.5 × 10−51.7 × 10−45.1 × 10−54.3 × 10−59.3 × 10−71814222093
SYR6.8 × 10−53.7 × 10−42.3 × 10−51.8 × 10−52.8 × 10−52722272891
TJK1.5 × 10−43.2 × 10−48.5 × 10−64.0 × 10−51.3 × 10−42220322292
THA8.9 × 10−51.2 × 10−43.9 × 10−55.2 × 10−51.6 × 10−52522262892
MKD2.6 × 10−42.4 × 10−45.6 × 10−54.4 × 10−51.3 × 10−52021282292
TLS1.0 × 10−41.5 × 10−43.4 × 10−53.4 × 10−51.9 × 10−42625303691
TGO1.2 × 10−41.8 × 10−41.8 × 10−63.6 × 10−52.1 × 10−42825332991
TON9.5 × 10−51.8 × 10−44.7 × 10−55.4 × 10−52.8 × 10−52222252692
TTO1.1 × 10−42.2 × 10−41.7 × 10−52.3 × 10−52.3 × 10−52123262292
TUN1.0 × 10−42.9 × 10−42.5 × 10−53.1 × 10−51.8 × 10−52120292492
TUR6.7 × 10−52.0 × 10−44.9 × 10−55.5 × 10−57.7 × 10−62321302292
TKM1.6 × 10−44.3 × 10−41.7 × 10−51.3 × 10−51.4 × 10−42823353191
UGA7.7 × 10−58.2 × 10−53.4 × 10−62.6 × 10−51.6 × 10−42725342991
UKR2.2 × 10−48.5 × 10−44.7 × 10−53.2 × 10−51.2 × 10−52117282393
ARE2.2 × 10−55.4 × 10−53.0 × 10−66.9 × 10−65.7 × 10−63834335894
GBR7.7 × 10−51.5 × 10−47.3 × 10−57.4 × 10−52.8 × 10−61817201892
TZA6.7 × 10−51.2 × 10−41.1 × 10−62.3 × 10−51.5 × 10−42623302991
USA6.3 × 10−52.1 × 10−46.7 × 10−58.3 × 10−53.0 × 10−62218222393
URY1.2 × 10−41.8 × 10−46.1 × 10−57.7 × 10−56.1 × 10−61917251892
UZB1.0 × 10−44.0 × 10−48.9 × 10−61.1 × 10−55.8 × 10−52521322992
VUT1.1 × 10−41.9 × 10−41.3 × 10−54.3 × 10−56.6 × 10−52624303192
VEN7.8 × 10−51.9 × 10−42.4 × 10−53.2 × 10−52.8 × 10−52222272292
VNM1.4 × 10−41.2 × 10−43.7 × 10−53.8 × 10−54.5 × 10−52319272992
YEM1.5 × 10−43.6 × 10−44.6 × 10−64.1 × 10−51.6 × 10−42828292891
ZMB6.5 × 10−59.5 × 10−52.2 × 10−62.2 × 10−51.6 × 10−42625293191
ZWE6.9 × 10−51.0 × 10−44.2 × 10−63.1 × 10−51.4 × 10−42622272991

References

  1. Ayittey, F.K.; Ayittey, M.K.; Chiwero, N.B.; Kamasah, J.S.; Dzuvor, C. Economic impacts of Wuhan 2019-nCoV on China and the world. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 473–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Muhammad, S.; Long, X.; Salman, M. COVID-19 pandemic and environmental pollution: A blessing in disguise? Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 728, 138820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Saadat, S.; Rawtani, D.; Hussain, C.M. Environmental perspective of COVID-19. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 728, 138870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zambrano-Monserrate, M.A.; Ruano, M.A.; Sanchez-Alcalde, L. Indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 728, 138813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sarkodie, S.A.; Owusu, P.A. Global assessment of environment, health and economic impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Johns Hopkins University. Available online: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  7. United Nations. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/world-economic-situation-and-prospects-as-of-mid-2020/ (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  8. Wu, X.; Nethery, R.C.; Sabath, B.M.; Braun, D.; Dominici, F. Exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 mortality in the United States. medRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Andree, B.P.J. Incidence of COVID-19 and Connections with Air Pollution Exposure: Evidence from the Netherlands. World Bank Policy Res. Work. Paper 2020, 5. Available online: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/462481587756439003/incidence-of-covid-19-and-connections-with-air-pollution-exposure-evidence-from-the-netherlands (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  10. Bao, R.; Zhang, A. Does lockdown reduce air pollution? Evidence from 44 cities in northern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 139052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. World Health Organization (WHO). Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution#tab=tab_1 (accessed on 26 May 2019).
  12. Tang, L.; Nagashima, T.; Hasegawa, K.; Ohara, T.; Sudo, K.; Itsubo, N. Development of human health damage factors for PM2.5 based on a global chemical transport model. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2018, 23, 2300–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. van Zelm, R.; Preiss, P.; van Goethem, T.; Van Dingenen, R.; Huijbregts, M. Regionalized life cycle impact assessment of air pollution on the global scale: Damage to human health and vegetation. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 134, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Berman, J.D.; Ebisu, K. Changes in U.S. air pollution during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 739, 139864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Krecl, P.; Targino, A.C.; Oukawa, G.Y.; Cassino Junior, R.P. Drop in urban air pollution from COVID-19 pandemic: Policy implications for the megacity of São Paulo. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 265, 114883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kanniah, K.D.; Kamarul Zaman, N.A.F.; Kaskaoutis, D.G.; Latif, M.T. COVID-19’s impact on the atmospheric environment in the Southeast Asia region. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 736, 139658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. ECMWF. Available online: https://www.ecmwf.int/ (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  18. MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release 2019a; The MathWorks, Inc.: Natick, MA, USA, 2019; Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  19. Copernicus. Available online: https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/sites/default/files/2019-03/16_CAMS84_2018SC1_D1.1.1_SON2018_v1.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  20. Zhao, Y.; Huang, B.; Marinoni, A.; Gamba, P. High spatiotemporal resolution PM2.5 concentration estimation with satellite and ground observations: A case study in New York City. IEEE 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Prud’homme, G.; Dobbin, N.A.; Sun, L. Comparison of remote sensing and fixed-site monitoring approaches for examining air pollution and health in a national study population. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 80, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. WHO. Available online: https://www.who.int/airpollution/data/AAP_database_summary_results_2018_final2.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  23. SEDAC. Available online: https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/collection/gpw-v4. (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  24. INSEE. Available online: https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques. (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  25. China Statistics Press. Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/. (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  26. WHO. Available online: https://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/en/, (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  27. Krewski, D.; Jerrett, M.; Burnett, R.T.; Ma, R.; Hughes, E.; Shi, Y.; Thun, M.J. Extended Follow-up and Spatial Analysis of the American Cancer Society Study Linking Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality (No. 140) 2009; Health Effects Institute: Boston, MA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  28. Apte, J.S.; Marshall, J.D.; Cohen, A.J.; Brauer, M. Addressing Global Mortality from Ambient PM2.5. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 49, 8057–8066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. He, G.; Fan, M.; Zhou, M. The effect of air pollution on mortality in China: Evidence from the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2016, 79, 18–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Le Quéré, C.; Jackson, R.B.; Jones, M.W.; Smith, A.J.; Abernethy, S.; Andrew, R.M.; Friedlingstein, P. Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2020, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yienger, J.J.; Galanter, M.; Holloway, T.A.; Phadnis, M.J.; Guttikunda, S.K.; Carmichael, G.R.; Levy, H. The episodic nature of air pollution transport from Asia to North America. J. Geophysical Res. Atmos. 2000, 105, 26931–26945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Chen, D.S.; Cheng, S.Y.; Liu, L.; Chen, T.; Guo, X.R. An integrated MM5–CMAQ modeling approach for assessing trans-boundary PM10 contribution to the host city of 2008 Olympic summer games—Beijing, China. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 1237–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Long, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, K.; Zhang, J. Population exposure to ambient PM2.5 at the subdistrict level in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Wang, W.; Zhao, S.; Jiao, L.; Taylor, M.; Zhang, B.; Xu, G.; Hou, H. Estimation of PM2.5 Concentrations in China using a spatial back propagation neural network. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  35. WHO. Carbonh. Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/Climate-change/publications/2018/achieving-health-benefits-from-carbon-reductions-manual-for-carbonh-calculation-tool-2018 (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  36. UN, World Population Prospects 2019. Available online: https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/ (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  37. RTE France, Eco2mix. Available online: https://www.rte-france.com/en/eco2mix/eco2mix (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  38. ENTSO-E, Transparency Platorm. Available online: https://transparency.entsoe.eu/generation/r2/actualGenerationPerProductionType/show (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  39. Apple, Mobility Trends Reports. Available online: https://www.apple.com/covid19/mobility (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  40. Tobías, A.; Carnerero, C.; Reche, C. Changes in air quality during the lockdown in Barcelona (Spain) one month into the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 726, 138540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kerimray, A.; Baimatova, N.; Ibragimova, O.P. Assessing air quality changes in large cities during COVID-19 lockdowns: The impacts of traffic-free urban conditions in Almaty, Kazakhstan. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 730, 139179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. FAO. 2016. Available online: http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/data/query/index.html?lang=en (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  43. IDEAv2 Database. Available online: http://idea-lca.com/?lang=en (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  44. GREET Model. Available online: https://greet.es.anl.gov/ (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  45. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Available online: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#search/code/ (accessed on 26 May 2020).
Figure 1. World population in 2020 [23].
Figure 1. World population in 2020 [23].
Sustainability 12 05297 g001
Figure 2. Ratio of population (a) > 30 years old and (b) < 5 years old.
Figure 2. Ratio of population (a) > 30 years old and (b) < 5 years old.
Sustainability 12 05297 g002
Figure 3. DALY reduction Q1 2020 vs. Q1 2019: (a) by country; (b) by grid.
Figure 3. DALY reduction Q1 2020 vs. Q1 2019: (a) by country; (b) by grid.
Sustainability 12 05297 g003
Figure 4. Highest confinement level by country between 1 January and 30 April 2020 (numbers represent the number of weeks under the highest level).
Figure 4. Highest confinement level by country between 1 January and 30 April 2020 (numbers represent the number of weeks under the highest level).
Sustainability 12 05297 g004
Figure 5. Monthly population-weighted PM2.5 (µg/m3) concentration in 2019.
Figure 5. Monthly population-weighted PM2.5 (µg/m3) concentration in 2019.
Sustainability 12 05297 g005
Table 1. Comparison of the burden of air pollution at the country level between Q1 2019 and Q1 2020.
Table 1. Comparison of the burden of air pollution at the country level between Q1 2019 and Q1 2020.
Rank
(By DALY Reduction)
CountryAverage Concentration Q1 2019 (µg/m3)Average Concentration Q1 2020 (µg/m3) [Difference in %] Δ Burden
(DALY)
(Year)
Δ Burden
(Death)
(Person)
1China44.2818.88 [−57%]−13,904,672−646,164
2India49.9030.99 [−38%]−6,300,012−206,727
3Nigeria75.3034.31 [−54%]−2,296,551−40,790
4Indonesia12.445.33 [−57%]−938,082−32,650
5Pakistan43.9627.76 [−37%]−822,236−24,560
6Bangladesh70.4445.26 [−36%]−728,264−24,836
7Egypt65.1312.28 [−81%]−567,987−21,409
8Niger121.5643.91 [−64%]−531,374−9221
9Mexico21.5517.52 [−19%]−391,795−18,050
10Mali108.4938.52 [−64%]−371,698−7666
11USA6.244.56 [−27%]−345,296−16,826
12Chad108.4444.61 [−59%]−335,997−5266
13Sudan67.6024.43 [−64%]−326,182−8689
14Philippines16.975.99 [−65%]−286,481−9135
15Myanmar51.1724.21 [−−53%]−265,381−8674
16Korea45.6719.82 [−57%]−248,186−11,682
17Viet Nam37.5816.62 [−56%]−231,642−9426
18Saudi Arabia91.0015.95 [−82%]−216,057−8157
19DR Korea41.0021.09 [−49%]−209,621−9.047
20Burkina Faso79.8134.64 [−57%]−206,691−4301
21Senegal103.7333.31 [−68%]−194,609−5111
22Iraq65.4227,33 [−58%]−194,020−6251
23Japan12.537.05 [−44%]−190,996−11,610
24Yemen64.3412.00 [−81%]−187,702−5047
25Guinea78.4729.07 [−63%]−176,165−3771
26Russia3.292.09 [−37%]−175,918−8925
27Cameroon49.2826.35 [−47%]−174,854−3622
28Laos134.9534.20 [−75%]−154,851−4166
29Brazil6.033.74 [−38%]−151,322−6336
30Thailand34.4016.89 [−51%]−141,147−5685
31Iran33.1214.26 [−57%]−138,746−6358
32Côte d’Ivoire38.5816.56 [−57%]−123,258−2752
33Nepal37.2128.85 [−22%]−119,319−4289
34Colombia18.3510.00 [−46%]−119,130−5243
35Congo DR14.8410.80 [−27%]−109,275−2054
36Mauritania113.3121.76 [−81%]−106,973−2303
37Sierra Leone75.4023.66 [−69%]−103,114−2266
38Ghana49.2722.89 [ −54%]−94,944−2775
39Chile8.603.33 [−61%]−91,702−4455
40Syrian Arab Republic44.3922.60 [−49%]−82,341−3311
41Turkey13.487.81 [−42%]−79,542−3461
42Benin61.2827.52 [−55%]−69,186−1345
43Malaysia13.595.90 [−57%]−68,465−2724
44Guatemala40.1111.38 [−72%]−63,437−1980
45Haiti24.809.20 [−63%]−63,354−1766
46Morocco27.565.90 [−50%]−57,008−2691
47Ethiopia20.2713.30 [−34%]−56,294−1280
48South Sudan39.5823.27 [−41%]−55,947−998
49Cambodia47.7917.67 [−63%]−55,843−1724
50Venezuela16.177.24 [−55%]−45,261−1907
51Uzbekistan25.0912.16 [−52%]−44,100−1805
52Peru5.944.49 [−24%]−43,536−1794
53Libya79.6512.65 [−84%]−40,488−1586
54Somalia15.746.12 [−61%]−40,184−623
55Sri Lanka21.5513.49 [−37%]−40,079−1654
56Turkmenistan28.4315.06 [−47%]−36,702−1305
57Argentina6.123.64 [−41%]−35,376−1779
58Dominican Republic25.588.95 [−65%]−35,302−1380
59Togo54.8425.98 [−53%]−34,637−805
60UAE79.4115.44 [−81%]−32,864−869
61Uganda16.3910.79 [−34%]−32,578−642
62CAF49.9129.97 [−40%]−32,128−674
63El Salvador48.7410.57 [−78%]−31,487−1426
64Ukraine6.945.70 [−18%]−30,239−1611
65Algeria67.0520.12 [−70%]−28,523−1098
66Gambia96.7336.07 [−63%]−28,479−655
67Lebanon36.8520.14 [−45%]−28,453−1367
68Canada1.000.77 [−23%]−28,230−1497
69Romania8.426.36 [−24%]−26,036−1418
70Jordan54.9412.88 [−77%]−25,171−937
71United Republic of Tanzania5.672.83 [−50%]−25,075−574
72South Africa11.244.61 [−59%]−23,956−760
73Guinea−Bissau88.0732.12 [−64%]−23,582−468
74Afghanistan22.9214.04 [−39%]−23,285−540
75Israel52.8917.89 [−66%]−22,654−1227
76Angola6.422.91 [−55%]−21,834−382
77Kuwait102.1832.21 [−68%]−21,474−664
78Qatar84.6420.91 [−75%]−21,457−622
79Greece12.794.85 [−62%]−19,301−1147
80Bulgaria9.775.06 [−48%]−18,738−1015
81Australia19.563.38 [−83%]−18,118−1057
82Honduras26.5813.70 [−48%]−18,097−703
83Ecuador13.357.80 [−42%]−17,392−736
84Cuba12.527.67 [−39%]−17,241−877
85Tunisia45.7614.42 [−68%]−17,028−788
86Liberia30.908.96 [−71%]−16,825−383
87Kazakhstan10.056.48 [−36%]−15,329−679
88Singapore64.4925.35 [−61%]−11,832−537
89Oman66.8011.83 [−82%]−9612−324
90Spain6.474.77 [−26%]−8932−543
91Kenya9.205.59 [−39%]−8222−140
92Mozambique3.802.25 [−41%]−8209−158
93UK5.064.14 [−18%]−7558−416
94Azerbaijan11.558.92 [−23%]−6922−298
95Mongolia20.925.92 [−71%]−6510−231
96Poland6.876.16 [−10%]−6493−345
97Tajikistan7.097.62 [7%]−6073−217
98Portugal7.284.09 [−44%]−5830−349
99Belarus5.354.20 [−21%]−5725−296
100Georgia7.825.14 [−34%]−5573−303
101Papua New Guinea5.392.79 [−48%]−5246−142
102Bahrain97.4937.87 [−61%]−5007−172
103Panama13.305.28 [−60%]−4970−228
104Serbia8.626.44 [−25%]−4859−243
105Bhutan25.4918.93 [−26%]−4708−143
106Nicaragua14.326.42 [−55%]−4607−162
107Costa Rica14.694.73 [−68%]−4600−230
108Jamaica25.6710.54 [−59%]−4592−243
109Burundi11.969.87 [−17%]−4479−88
110Zambia4.162.21 [−47%]−4445−87
111Hungary8.066.67 [−17%]−4366−229
112Albania10.324.60 [−55%]−4251−226
113Paraguay9.007.48 [−17%]−4020−161
114Eritrea30.1620.08 [−33%]−3933−94
115Malawi4.632.91 [−37%]−3544−77
116Bosnia and Herzegovina7.674.78 [−38%]−3381−176
117Rwanda18.1915.53 [−15%]−3270−81
118Namibia14.402.32 [−84%]−3232−100
119Republic of Moldova7.715.53 [−28%]−3203−164
120New Zealand5.741.95−3074−172
121Sweden2.871.56 [−45%]−3013−181
122Djibouti25.8611.00 [−57%]−2926−79
123Madagascar2.602.01 [−23%]−2644−65
124Croatia8.446.37 [−25%]−2556−145
125Armenia10.597.68 [−27%]−2307−120
126Cyprus21.417.83 [−63%]−2225−126
127Uruguay6.093.64 [−40%]−2020−106
128Lesotho9.574.30 [−55%]−1933−58
129Cape Verde52.2812.22 [−77%]−1841−97
130Denmark5.693.96 [−30%]−1747−95
131Zimbabwe3.962.75 [−30%]−1743−41
132Macedonia8.765.52 [−37%]−1729−81
133Latvia6.334.97 [−21%]−1524−87
134Finland2.401.57 [ −35%]−1408−81
135Trinidad and Tobago12.046.71 [−44%]−1231−54
136Norway2.211.55 [−30%]−1201−69
137Slovakia7.576.62 [−13%]−1198−61
138Equatorial Guinea10.646.95 [−35%]−1120−24
139Montenegro8.653.99 [−54%]−1080−59
140Ireland5.614.16 [−26%]−1079−59
141Botswana7.992.51 [−69%]−1017−35
142Gabon8.035.02 [−38%]−1004−30
143Lithuania6.195.29 [−15%]−983−59
144Suriname10.673.65 [−66%]−968−39
145Estonia5.823.94 [−32%]−754−44
146Congo13.229.49 [−28%]−753−18
147Swaziland9.976.18 [−21%]−728−19
148Guyana9.944.52 [−55%]−709−27
149Malta20.976.87 [−67%]−709−41
150Brunei Darussalam25.3010.55 [−58%]−707−26
151Timor−Leste4.472.18 [−51%]−575−14
152Fiji4.172.20 [−47%]−377−13
153Bolivia4.033.63 [−10%]−372−14
154Belize12.956.43 [−50%]−270−11
155Solomon Islands3.130.98 [−69%]−162−5
156Barbados11.537.41 [−36%]−115−6
157Mauritius7.096.05 [−15%]−99−4
158Maldives14.257.67 [−46%]−78−3
159Vanuatu4.552.54 [−44%]−71−2
160Saint Vincent and the Grenadines10.526.81 [−35%]−61−3
161Saint Lucia9.616.78 [−29%]−57−3
162Grenada11.327.20 [−36%]−47−2
163Sao Tome and Principe4.993.27 [−34%]−32−1
164Iceland1.401.31 [−6%]−23−1
165Tonga5.363.21 [−32%]−18−1
166Micronesia (Federated States of)7.394.28 [−42%]−17−1
167Samoa2.471.36 [−42%]−17−1
168Antigua and Barbuda6.845.32 [−22%]−100
169Seychelles3.622.28 [−37%]−90
170Kiribati4.223.50 [−17%]−40
171Comoros5.635.30 [−6%]−20
172Bahamas5.607.12 [+27%]833
173Luxembourg5.206.62 [+27%]1126
174Slovenia7.137.44 [+4%]18611
175Czechia7.287.44 [+2%]35720
176Netherlands6.366.43 [+1%]81144
177Kyrgyzstan7.266.92 [−5%]84537
178Austria5.196.29 [+21%]114870
179Belgium6.437.18 [+12%]132775
180France6.486.19 [−4%]161692
181Switzerland2.926.32 [+117%]4744283
182Germany5.256.12 [+17%]23,1501373
183Italy7.528.19 [+9%]26,9431826
Table 2. Comparison of the burden of air pollution at the city(area) level between Q1 2019 and Q2 2020 (top10 DALY reduction).
Table 2. Comparison of the burden of air pollution at the city(area) level between Q1 2019 and Q2 2020 (top10 DALY reduction).
RankCity/Area [Country]Average Concentration Q1 2019 (µg/m3)Average Concentration Q1 2020 (µg/m3) [Difference in %] Δ Burden
(DALY)
(Year)
Δ Burden
(Death)
(Person)
1Beijing [CHN]85.0351.24 [−40%]−405,447−18,922
2Chongqing [CHN]76.9436.33 [−53%]−389,247−18,110
3Shanghai [CHN]61.0726.28 [−57%]−323,425−15,104
4Chengdu [CHN]94.5148.61 [−49%]−297,614−13,889
5Xian [CHN]109.9853.02 [−52%]−274,686−12,788
6Tianjin [CHN]92.0948.76 [−47%]−236,113−11,014
7Wuhan [CHN]102.5448.58 [−53%]−235,140−10,691
8Hangzhou [CHN]58.9727.37 [−54%]−210,310−9808
9New Delhi [IND]87.5454.95 [−37%]−190,616−6325
10Kolkata [IND]97.2559.75 [−39%]−189,126−6502
Table 3. Definition of the confinement level [30].
Table 3. Definition of the confinement level [30].
LevelDescription
0No restrictions
1Low restrictions (e.g., public gatherings >5000 people forbidden)
2Medium restrictions (e.g., borders closed, public gatherings >100 people forbidden, schools and restaurants closed)
3High restrictions (e.g., household confinement as much as possible, public gatherings banned)
Table 4. Comparison between this study and the annual burden of air pollution.
Table 4. Comparison between this study and the annual burden of air pollution.
Rank (by Reduction Q12020CountryDALY Reduction Q1 2020 vs. Q1 2019
(year)
Annual DALY Attributable to Air Pollution (WHO, 2016)
(Year)
Reduction Q1 vs. Annual Estimation WHO 2016
1China−13,904,67225,824,548−54%
2India−6,300,01233,727,823−19%
3Nigeria−2,296,5517,523,259−31%
4Indonesia−938,0822,953,382−32%
5Pakistan−822,2364,705,933−17%
6Bangladesh−728,2642,580,528−28%
7Egypt−567,9872,068,658−27%
8Niger−531,374841,844−63%
Table 5. Comparison between different approaches based on different relative risks (RRs) in DALY (death).
Table 5. Comparison between different approaches based on different relative risks (RRs) in DALY (death).
Country
(Ranked by the Highest Reduction in Section 3.1)
This Study
(Constant RR = 1.01)
He et al. 2016 [29]
(RR Based on Age Groups)
[Comparison with the Approach Used in This Study]
Krewski et al. 2009 [27]
(RR Based on Diseases)
[Comparison with the Approach Used in This Study]
China−13,904,672 (–646,164)−16,403,411 (–779,350) [+18%]−22,746,387 (–1,093,541) [+64%]
India−6,300,012 (–206,727)−9,203,451 (–283,933) [+46%]−9,748,511 (–361,514) [+55%]
Nigeria−2,296,551 (–40,790)−5,754,759 (–86,523) [+151%]−1,099,094 (–41,984) [−52%]
Indonesia−938,082 (–32,650)−1,214,983 (–41,680) [+30%]−1,544,644 (–58,038) [+65%]
Pakistan−822,236 (–24,560)−1,510,268 (–37,912) [+84%]−1,008,465 (–41,348) [+23%]
Bangladesh−728,264 (–24,836)−1,202,456 (–39,118) [+65%]−1,004,931 (–39,889) [+38%]
Egypt−567,987 (–21,409)−708,513 (–25,717) [+25%]−1,063,102 (–42,649) [+87%]
Niger−531,374 (–9221)−1,342,248 (–19,729) [+153%]−233,392 (–8929) [−56%]
Mexico−391,795 (–18,050)−519590 (–23,163) [+33%]−691,548 (–34,472) [+77%]
Mali−371,698 (–7666)−902,714 (–16,700) [+143%]−228,988 (–9178) [−38%]
USA−345,296 (–16,826]−413,510 (–20,925) [+20%]−624,464 (–31,412) [+81%]
Chad−335,997 (–5266]−872,974 (–11,864) [+160%]−115,100 (–4200) [−66%]
Sudan−326,182 (–8689)−574,027 (–12,892) [+76%]−418,553 (–15,005) [+28%]
Philippines−286,481 (–9135)−382,932 (–11,405) [+34%]−445,912 (–16,059) [+56%]
Myanmar−265,381 (–8674)−430,630 (–12,470) [+62%]−322,872 (–12,892) [+22%]
Korea−248,186 (–11,682)−271,290 (–13,360) [+9%]−402,701 (–19,459) [+62%]
Viet Nam−231,642 (–9426)−301,894 (–12,029) [+30%]−343,165 (–15,579) [+48%]
Saudi Arabia−216,057 (–8157)−241,187 (–9212) [+12%]−423,174 (–16,461) [+96%]
DR Korea−209,621 (–9047)−287,163 (–12,925] [+37%]−319,766 (–14,305) [+52%]
Burkina Faso−206,691 (–4301)−489,007 (–8780) [+137%]−143,608 (–5541) [−31%]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karkour, S.; Itsubo, N. Influence of the Covid-19 Crisis on Global PM2.5 Concentration and Related Health Impacts. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5297. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135297

AMA Style

Karkour S, Itsubo N. Influence of the Covid-19 Crisis on Global PM2.5 Concentration and Related Health Impacts. Sustainability. 2020; 12(13):5297. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135297

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karkour, Selim, and Norihiro Itsubo. 2020. "Influence of the Covid-19 Crisis on Global PM2.5 Concentration and Related Health Impacts" Sustainability 12, no. 13: 5297. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135297

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop