Next Article in Journal
Entrepreneurship Through Open Data: An Opportunity for Sustainable Development
Next Article in Special Issue
The Use of Drones in Disaster Aerial Needs Reconnaissance and Damage Assessment – Three-Dimensional Modeling and Orthophoto Map Study
Previous Article in Journal
Burnout Syndrome in Reception Systems for Illegal Immigrants in the Mediterranean. A Quantitative and Qualitative Study of Italian Practitioners
Previous Article in Special Issue
Risk-Based Approach for Informing Sustainable Infrastructure Resilience Enhancement and Potential Resilience Implication in Terms of Emergency Service Perspective
 
 
Article

A Taxonomy of Crisis Management Functions

Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(12), 5147; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125147
Received: 2 June 2020 / Revised: 17 June 2020 / Accepted: 19 June 2020 / Published: 24 June 2020
The management of crises triggered by natural or manmade events requires a concerted effort of various actors crossing institutional and geographic boundaries. Technological advances allow to make crisis management more effective, but innovation is hindered by dispersed and often disconnected knowledge on the lessons learned, gaps, and solutions. Taxonomies enable the search for information of potential interest. This article presents a taxonomy of crisis management functions, designed on the basis of a conceptual model integrating the concepts of hazard, vulnerability, risk, and community, and the main consequence- and management-based concepts. At its highest level, the taxonomy includes ten functional areas: preparatory (mitigation, capability development, and strategic adaptiveness), operational (protection, response, and recovery), and common (crisis communications and information management; command, control, and coordination; logistics; and security management). The taxonomy facilitates the navigation of online platforms and the matching of needs and solutions. It has broader applications, e.g., for structuring the assessment of the societal impact of crisis management solutions and as a framework for a comprehensive assessment of disaster risk reduction measures. While the taxonomy was developed within a research and innovation project supported by the European Union, it reflects and is compatible with established international concepts and classification schemes, and is thus applicable by a wider international community. View Full-Text
Keywords: crisis management; emergency management; disaster risk reduction; climate change adaptation; resilience; taxonomy crisis management; emergency management; disaster risk reduction; climate change adaptation; resilience; taxonomy
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Tagarev, T.; Ratchev, V. A Taxonomy of Crisis Management Functions. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5147. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125147

AMA Style

Tagarev T, Ratchev V. A Taxonomy of Crisis Management Functions. Sustainability. 2020; 12(12):5147. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125147

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tagarev, Todor, and Valeri Ratchev. 2020. "A Taxonomy of Crisis Management Functions" Sustainability 12, no. 12: 5147. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125147

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop