Next Article in Journal
Migrants Workers and Processes of Social Inclusion in Italy: The Possibilities Offered by Social Farming
Previous Article in Journal
Cluster Analysis of Haze Episodes Based on Topological Features
 
 
Article

Can Companies Survive a Multi-Brand Crisis? Research on Consumer Scapegoating

1
School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
2
Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
3
Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
4
School of Marketing and International Business, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6011, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(10), 3990; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12103990
Received: 27 April 2020 / Revised: 7 May 2020 / Accepted: 11 May 2020 / Published: 13 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)
Compared with single-brand crises, multi-brand crises have broader and deeper influence. However, there is only a limited amount of research regarding this field, especially for the phenomenon of consumer scapegoating. This research aims to further explore the consumer scapegoating effect and its psychological mechanism in the context of a multi-brand crisis. Through two experimental studies, this research discusses the influence of a multi-brand crisis and also the emergence of a scapegoat brand on two brand categories, the crisis brand category and the competing brand category. Furthermore, the current research also explores the mechanism of the consumer scapegoating effect. Results show that when a multi-brand crisis happens, consumer brand trust in the crisis brand category decreases because of assimilation, and consumer brand trust in the competing brand category increases because of contrast effect. Besides, from the perspective of the crisis brand category, the emergence of a scapegoat brand could be treated by consumers as a signal that the crisis is over, especially for a severe crisis. Results also support that cognitive dissonance mediates the process that the emergence of a scapegoat brand leads to an increase in consumer brand trust in the crisis brand category and a decrease of consumer brand trust in the competing brand category. View Full-Text
Keywords: consumer scapegoating; multi-brand crisis; brand trust; crisis severity; cognitive dissonance consumer scapegoating; multi-brand crisis; brand trust; crisis severity; cognitive dissonance
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Lei, J.; Gao, H. Can Companies Survive a Multi-Brand Crisis? Research on Consumer Scapegoating. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3990. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12103990

AMA Style

Zhang X, Zhang H, Lei J, Gao H. Can Companies Survive a Multi-Brand Crisis? Research on Consumer Scapegoating. Sustainability. 2020; 12(10):3990. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12103990

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xuan, Hongxia Zhang, Jill Lei, and Hongzhi Gao. 2020. "Can Companies Survive a Multi-Brand Crisis? Research on Consumer Scapegoating" Sustainability 12, no. 10: 3990. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12103990

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop