Next Article in Journal
Impression Management in Graphical Representation of Economic, Social, and Environmental Issues: An Empirical Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Platform, Participation, and Power: How Dominant and Minority Stakeholders Shape Agricultural Innovation
Previous Article in Journal
Relationship between Entrepreneurial Team Characteristics and Venture Performance in China: From the Aspects of Cognition and Behaviors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Responsible Agricultural Mechanization Innovation for the Sustainable Development of Nepal’s Hillside Farming System
Open AccessArticle

Stakeholder Perspectives to Prevent Soil Organic Matter Decline in Northeastern Italy

1
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
2
Countryside and Community Research Institute, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucester GL2 9HW, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(1), 378; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010378
Received: 19 November 2019 / Revised: 20 December 2019 / Accepted: 31 December 2019 / Published: 2 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Natural Resource Management)
A transition from conventional to more sustainable soil management measures (SMMs) is required to reverse the current soil organic matter (SOM) losses in the agroecosystems. Despite the innovations and technologies that are available to prevent SOM decline, top–down knowledge transfer schemes that incentivize a certain measure are often ineffective. Here, we discuss relevant outcomes from a participatory approach where researchers, farmers, practitioners and government officials have discussed opportunities and barriers around SMM application to prevent SOM decline. Within a series of workshops, stakeholders identified, scored, and selected SMMs to field-tests and evaluated the benefits and drawbacks from their application. Results showed that the stakeholders recognized the need for innovations, although they valued the most promising SMM as already available continuous soil cover and conservation agriculture. In contrast, more innovative SMMs, such as biochar use and the variable rate application of organic amendments through precision farming, were the least valued, suggesting that people’s resistance to new technologies is often governed by the socio-cultural perception of them that goes beyond the economic and technological aspects. The valuation of benefits and drawbacks by stakeholders on trialed measures emphasized that stakeholders’ perspective about soil management is a combination of economic, environmental, and socio-cultural aspects, thus corroborating the need for transdisciplinary bottom–up approaches to prevent SOM depletion and increase soil rehabilitation and SOM content. View Full-Text
Keywords: Agroecosystem; land degradation; participatory approach; stakeholder involvement; sustainable soil management. Agroecosystem; land degradation; participatory approach; stakeholder involvement; sustainable soil management.
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Dal Ferro, N.; Camarotto, C.; Piccoli, I.; Berti, A.; Mills, J.; Morari, F. Stakeholder Perspectives to Prevent Soil Organic Matter Decline in Northeastern Italy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 378.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop