Next Article in Journal
Multi-Conflicts between the Government, the Non-Profit Organisation and the People after a Serious Landslide Disaster Based Upon Qualitative Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Four Environmental Assessment Tools in Swedish Manufacturing: A Case Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Environmental Optimization of Precast Concrete Beams Using Fibre Reinforced Polymers

Sustainability 2019, 11(7), 2174; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072174
by R. R. L. (Rick) van Loon, Ester Pujadas-Gispert *, S. P. G. (Faas) Moonen and Rijk Blok
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sustainability 2019, 11(7), 2174; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072174
Submission received: 8 February 2019 / Revised: 28 March 2019 / Accepted: 5 April 2019 / Published: 11 April 2019

Round  1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper addresses an important and timely topic– the environmental minimization. The obtained results are interesting. However, the authors should address some issues before publication consideration can be made.

1.       The information regarding shadow costs must be completed. Authors should provide a table with this information.

2.       Paper talks about life cycle assessment. However, I cannot find the life cycle assessment during use and end of life stages.

3.       Besides, the optimization algorithm should be explained. Authors should complete the information regarding optimization procedure.


Author Response

see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The study is very interesting, and give a good overview of how various types of fibers influence design of single span concrete beam.

But one type of FRP is missing so I would recommend adding in this study basalt fibers (BFRP) see article :

Marianne Kjendseth Wiik, Eythor Rafn Thorhallsson, Kamal Azrague: A Mechanical and Environmental Assessment and Comparison of Basalt Fibre Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) Rebar and Steel Rebar in Concrete Beams. Energy Procedia 03/2017; 111(C):31-40., DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.005


There are a few things I would like to clear better:

The colors in figure 1 are to like each other, so the picture is not quite clear as it is now.


In figure 3 is shown stresses in concrete and in FRP, but for what case are these values?

Also as the FRP tubes are used, there are also stresses in that material. How are stresses from the tube included in the overall design?

Also in figure 3, there are no size measurements of the beams.


In table 2, the should be also a column with the regular concrete beam as a reference.


Author Response

see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round  2

Reviewer 1 Report

Because the authors have addressed all my comments, the paper worth publishing in this journal in my opinion.

Back to TopTop