1. Introduction
Industrial production plays an extremely important role in promoting the development of national economies, but it also brings serious environmental issues [
1]. The problems of how to minimize pollution, lower energy consumption, and maximally reduce environmental damage have become very important concerns in the current academic field [
2,
3]. In other words, the question of how to ensure environmental benefits while pursuing economic benefits has become a big challenge that industry faces during production. As the gap between energy supply and demand is increasing, industrial green production has drawn more and more attention from the public as an effective approach to energy saving and emission reduction. Industrial green production plays an important role in the reduction of energy consumption and the improvement of the ecological environment, and it can be used to effectively reduce the environmental damage caused by industrial production [
4]. As early as 1996, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (which is the leading global environmental authority that sets the global environmental agenda, promotes the coherent implementation of the environmental dimension of sustainable development within the United Nations system, and serves as an authoritative advocate for the global environment) came up with the concept of industrial green production. Industrial green production is also known as cleaner production, which means that an integrated environmental strategy is used in the production, product, and service, so as to save energy and reduce environmental pollution. The essence of industrial green production is to integrate the concept of sustainability into the entire life cycle of industrial products. On one hand, it helps the enterprises to save energy and maximally reduce environmental pollution. On the other hand, it can improve the utilization rate of resources and enterprises’ competitiveness. Many researchers have proved that there is a positive correlation between industrial green production and enterprise performance. For example, in the research of Lin [
5], it was believed that industrial green production could not only improve environmental benefits, but also increase the economic benefits of enterprises. Dangelico [
6] believed that the green environmental protection behaviors of enterprises could improve the capacities of the organization significantly, including the coordinating capabilities of stakeholders, higher learning ability, and sustainable innovation ability, and these capabilities could bring more market benefits to enterprises. Therefore, it can be concluded that industrial green production realizes the coordination and utilization of enterprises’ benefits, consumers’ benefits, and environmental benefits.
Industrial green production can not only improve the core competitiveness of enterprises, but can also help those enterprises to maximally save energy and reduce environmental pollution. However, in real life, not all enterprises can accept the idea of industrial green production [
7]. The basic reason is that they believe that the economic benefits for enterprises are contradictory with environmental benefits and cannot be unified. They believe that the implementation of green production can improve social and environmental benefits, but it will inevitably reduce the economic benefits for enterprises. Based on this point, many enterprises find that it is very difficult for them to make industrial green production decisions. Smith and Lewis came up with the theory of paradoxical cognition [
8]. This theory indicates that economic benefits for enterprises have a close relationship with social environmental benefits, even though it looks like there is contradiction. In nature, that is a paradoxical relationship of opposition and unity.
This opinion is consistent with the concept of sustainable development. It pays attention to environmental protection while pursuing economic development, so as to ensure harmony between man and nature. Some scholars have carried out in-depth studies on sustainable development [
9,
10,
11].
In paradox theory, it is thought that the paradox cognition of enterprises has a great influence on the decision making and behavior of enterprises. The higher the level of paradox cognition, the stronger the inclusiveness of the paradox and the greater the possibility of implementing green production in industry. On the contrary, the lower the cognitive level of paradox, the less the acceptance of industrial green production. Therefore, based on the paradox cognitive theory, this paper constructs a model of the relationship between paradox cognition, industrial green production, and enterprise performance, and focuses on the study of two issues. Firstly, does paradox cognition have a positive effect on the green production behavior of industrial enterprises—in other words, whether paradox cognition is the premise and basis for enterprises to decide the implementation of industrial green production. Secondly, can industrial green production activities promote increases in enterprise performance? In other words, does industrial green production relieve the contradiction between the economic benefits and environmental benefits of enterprises?
2. Literature Review
Green production is also known as cleaner production, which emphasizes that the production and operation activities of enterprises must be carried out on the basis of environmental protection and the reduction of energy consumption. It requires enterprises to change the traditional production methods and insist on suitable development in terms of the research and development of products, material selection, production, packaging, transportation, selling, pollution, recycling, and reuse, so as to achieve the goal of energy saving and environmental protection. However, in the actual production process, enterprises need to bear higher costs and certain risks in order to implement green production. The main concern for these enterprises is whether these costs and risks are worthwhile or not. In other words, whether industrial green production can bring benefits to enterprises has become the most critical factor influencing industrial enterprises in making green production decisions. Some scholars have proved that environmental problems have significant features of externalities through their researches. [
12,
13]. The economic benefits of industrial enterprises come into conflict with social environmental benefits. The green production of enterprises does not bring benefits to enterprises, so relevant policies shall be made by governments to force enterprises to reduce energy consumption, environmental damage and pollution. For example, in the study of Olson [
14], the author believed that the production costs of enterprises would be increased if they adopted green production to reduce energy consumption and protect the environment, and as a result, the enterprise performance would be decreased. Roxas and Coetzer [
15] found that supervision and regulation policies about environmental protection affected the attitude and opinions of enterprises regarding environmental issues, and then they would adopt the strategy of sustainable development. After carrying out extensive investigation on industrial enterprises, Snell [
16] found that the greater the pollution discharge, the higher the market benefits the enterprises receive; that is, there was a positive correlation between the pollution discharge and yield rate. In the above research studies, it is believed that green production behaviors cannot bring benefits to enterprises and even require higher product costs. In other words, the economic benefits for enterprises cannot be coordinated with social environmental benefits. Therefore, the green production behaviors of enterprises are the results of policy implementation, not voluntary actions of enterprises.
Some scholars hold opposing opinions on this issue, and they believe that the green production of enterprises can bring benefits to enterprises. For example, Maas [
17] found that after improving the production process, enterprises improved the efficiency of resource utilization, which could reduce the production costs of enterprises further. Meanwhile, the market return of green products was greater than that of non-green products. Cheng [
18] believed that the green production behavior of enterprises could improve enterprise profitability. Bai and Chang [
19] believed that green production behavior could significantly improve the competitiveness of enterprises, and thus increase financial performance. The above research shows that the green production behavior of enterprises can not only reduce energy consumption and environmental impact, but also improve the efficiency of resource utilization and market returns of enterprises. This shows that green production behavior is the result of enterprises’ pursuit of competitive advantage and improvement of core competitiveness.
Therefore, two completely different opinions are formed. One is that industrial green production requires higher costs, so it will reduce enterprise benefits. The other opinion is that green production behavior can improve the efficiency of resource utilization and enhance the core competitiveness of enterprises, and thus it will increase the market returns of enterprises. So, which opinion is right? Why are there two completely different viewpoints on the same issue? In our opinion, the major reason is that there is conflict and interdependence between the economic benefits for enterprises and the environmental benefits for society, but the above research studies did not take these factors into consideration. Smith and Lewis put forward the paradox cognitive theory [
8], which considers that the relationship between the economic interests of enterprises and the environmental benefits for society is neither a simple irreconcilable relationship with conflict and contradiction, nor a simple consistent and mutually-reinforcing relationship. It is a paradox relationship of opposition and unity. In other words, on the surface, the economic benefits for enterprises and the environmental benefits for society are contradictory, but in essence, they are closely interdependent. Whether an enterprise can implement industrial green production actively and voluntarily depends on whether they have such paradox awareness. In recent years, from the perspective of paradox cognition, the study of pro-environment behavior of enterprises has gradually attracted the attention of scholars. For example, Smith and Lewis’s research shows that paradox cognition has a great impact on the strategic decision making of enterprises [
8]. Hahn et al. found that paradox cognition can help enterprises to pay attention to environmental protection while focusing on financial performance at the same time [
20]. Based on the paradox cognitive theory, this study analyzed the impact of paradox cognition on the green production behavior of industrial enterprises on the basis of two issues. The first paradox was whether cognition had a positive and significant impact on the green production behavior of industrial enterprises; the second was whether the implementation of industrial green production could increase the economic benefits for enterprises while protecting the environment and saving energy.
3. Research Model and Hypotheses
So far, different scholars have studied the factors that affect the green production behavior of industry from different perspectives, which leads to the formation of two very different views.
However, both viewpoints above ignore the influence of corporate cognition on green industrial production, since it would be a hard task to explain internal motivations and fundamental motives of enterprises to implement green industrial production if the cognitive factors of enterprises were to be excluded. Shah et al. found that firm level environmental policies and to a lesser extent relationships with external stakeholder networks were the main determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the green economy [
21]. Corporate cognition in relation to green industrial production is hereby the core issue. Based on this, Smith and Lewis proposed the theory of paradox, and in this theory it is believed that the enterprise’s economic benefits and social environmental benefits have neither a purely contradictory relationship nor a mutually promoting relationship. Whether the enterprise can reduce environmental pollution and save energy while achieving economic benefits depends on their paradox cognition level. The higher the paradox cognition level is, the more likely it is for them to find a way to take both economic and environmental benefits into consideration. Paradox is defined by Smith and Lewis as a relation structure between two contradictory yet interconnected elements [
8], whereas paradox cognition is the process of identifying and withstanding paradoxes. There exists such a contradictory but interrelated relationship structure between the environmental benefits for society and the economic interests of enterprises since the production and operation of an enterprise cannot be separated from the natural environment, but the environmentally friendly behaviors in demand bring costs to the enterprise. Smith [
22] discovered in case studies that corporate paradox cognition could be beneficial for companies to find ways to balance and further resolve contradictions. Enterprises with a higher level of paradox cognition could better and more clearly identify interrelations between subjects, could take into account issues interactively, and were more capable of more inclusive and integrated paradox resolutions. As evidenced by the research results of Hahn [
20] and others, paradox cognition helps enterprises to simultaneously underline economic, environmental and social benefits. Paradox is thereby assumed in this paper as the basis and premise for enterprises to implement green industrial production.
Green industrial production refers to the way in which energy conservation can be maximized, environmental pollution be reduced, and sustainable development be achieved by industrial units through various ways within the life cycle of products. Green industrial production, having been defined and illustrated from various angles by many scholars [
23], is generally constituted by the supply of green products, the use of green technologies, and the implementation of green management. Whether green industrial production can bring environmental benefits and enhance the market performance of enterprises is a very important issue. Green industrial production, as is believed by many scholars, can greatly enhance the core competitiveness [
24]. Studies by many scholars have also shown a significant and positive relationship between green industrial production and corporate performance. Yet, such views are opposed by many scholars who believe the opposite, i.e., that greater risks and uncertainties lie behind green industrial production, which will lead to an increase in corporate costs and further reduce the corporate competitiveness. Higher costs that may be induced by green industrial green production are here, in this paper, considered to be short-term and temporary. In this paper, it is believed that industrial green production also brings a temporary and short-term cost increase, and industrial green production is one of the innovations. All enterprises need to make innovation for development, and all innovation activities indicate certain increase of cost. However, in the long term, the economic benefits of enterprises promoted by innovations will be far higher than the cost. Corporate performance here is not only the direct financial performance of the enterprise, but also the internal operation status of the enterprise and the external market environment, including customer satisfaction, market share increase, corporate image, and other potential performance aspects. Corporate performance is considered from two aspects in a paper by Perramon [
25]: potential performance and financial performance.
Potential performance refers to that which cannot be directly expressed in financial indicators, including the improvement of customer satisfaction, corporate image, and corporate core competence. Financial performance involves things that can be directly expressed by financial indicators. As a result, corporate performance (including both potential performance and financial performance) is hereby assumed to be positively affected by green industrial production in this paper. Based on the theory, the present paper, with green industrial production as the intermediary to construct a relationship model between paradox cognition, green industrial production, and corporate performance, as shown by
Figure 1, focuses on three issues. First, whether paradox cognition is the premise and basis for enterprises to implement green industrial production, or if there is a significant and positive relationship between cognitive level and green industrial production. Second, whether the green industrial production of enterprises can improve enterprise performance. Third, if corporate performance is enhanced by green industrial production, whether green industrial production will directly impact on the financial performance or indirectly affect financial performance by affecting the potential performance of enterprises.
In the paradox theory, it is believed that paradox cognition can help enterprises to recognize the paradoxes that enterprises are faced with, and can help enterprises to find a method for the contradictory balance, so as to resolve conflicts [
8]. Therefore, when the enterprises realize the mutual contradiction between economic benefits and environmental benefits, as well as their interdependency, the enterprises will pay more attention to both economic benefits and environmental benefits, so as to carry out industrial green production. Therefore, in this paper, it is assumed that paradox cognition has significant and positive influences on green production behaviors (the improvement of green products, green technology and green management), and thus Hypotheses 1, 2 and 3 are formed:
Hypothesis 1. The paradox cognition of industrial units has a positive and significant impact on green production management.
Hypothesis 2. The paradox cognition of industrial units has a positive and significant impact on green production technology.
Hypothesis 3. The paradox cognition of industrial units has a positive and significant impact on green product supply.
Cheng [
18] states that the pro-environmental behavior of enterprises can improve the profitability of enterprises. Bai and Chang [
19] believe that the pro-environmental behavior of enterprises can improve enterprise competitiveness significantly, so as to enhance the financial performance. Therefore, Hypotheses 4–9 are formed:
Hypothesis 4. Paradox cognition will positively affect the green production management of enterprises and then improve their financial performance.
Hypothesis 5. Paradox cognition will positively affect the green production management of enterprises, then improve the potential performance of enterprises, and finally indirectly affect the financial performance of enterprises.
Hypothesis 6. Paradox cognition will positively affect the green production technology of enterprises, and then improve the financial performance of enterprises.
Hypothesis 7. Paradox cognition has positive influence on green production technology of enterprises, thus improving the potential performance of enterprises, and finally indirectly affects the financial performance of enterprises.
Hypothesis 8. Paradox cognition will positively affect the provision of green products and improve the financial performance of enterprises in turn.
Hypothesis 9. Paradox cognition has positive influence on the supply of green products, thereby improving the potential performance of enterprises, and affecting the financial performance of enterprises indirectly.
6. Discussion
Based on the paradox theory, a model of the relationship between paradox cognition, industrial green production, and enterprise performance has been constructed in this paper. It mainly studies whether paradox cognition can positively affect the green production behavior of industrial enterprises, and thus improve the economic interests of enterprises. Based on the survey of 305 samples, the mutual relationship between paradox cognition, green product supply, green production technology, green production management, potential performance and financial performance of enterprises has been verified by the structural equation path coefficient and intermediary effect. The results proved the interactions between all the variables in the model. In
Figure 1, there are two paths that are not significant: “green production management → enterprise financial performance” and “green production technology → enterprise financial performance”. So, the two paths were deleted in the model. As shown in
Figure 4, the paths listed in
Figure 4 are all significant and proved influential paths.
6.1. Research Conclusion
According to the confirmed theoretical model (
Figure 4), the following research conclusions can be made. Firstly, paradox cognition has a positive and significant impact on green industrial production, which includes green product provision, green production technology and green production management. Secondly, paradox cognition has the most significant impact on the provision of green products followed by green production management, and green production technology successively. Thirdly, paradox cognition can improve the potential performance of enterprises by affecting “green product provision”, “green production management” and “green production technology”, and then indirectly improve the financial performance of enterprises.
6.2. Suggestions and Applications
According to the above conclusions, it can be seen that paradox cognition has a significant impact on industrial green production behavior. Thus, the reason why enterprises refuse to implement green production in industry is explained from a cognitive point of view. Although many countries have issued policies to encourage enterprises to implement green production, the effect has not been significant. One of the most important reasons for this is that most of these policies originate from outside of the enterprises, encouraging them to implement green production in different ways.
However, the enterprises do not have such paradox cognition as they can only see the contradiction between their economic benefits and environmental benefits, while neglecting the relationship between the two. The higher the cognitive level of the enterprise, the greater the probability of them implementing industrial green production behavior, and the greater the possibility for them to take both environmental benefits and enterprise economic benefits into consideration. Therefore, from the government’s point of view, it is necessary to popularize the paradoxical cognitive level of enterprises.
Secondly, paradox cognition can improve the potential performance of enterprises by affecting “green product provision”, “green production management”, and “green production technology”, and then indirectly improve the financial performance of enterprises. This shows that although the paradox cognition can stimulate green industrial production, the industrial green production behavior cannot bring financial performance to enterprises directly. It will have a positive impact on the potential performance of enterprises, and then indirectly improve the financial performance of enterprises. For industrial enterprises, the implementation of green production can help the enterprises to enhance their image and reputation, improve their innovation ability and the efficiency of resource utilization, while those factors will greatly improve the financial performance of enterprises.