Next Article in Journal
Analyzing the Intention of Consumer Purchasing Behaviors in Relation to Internet Memes Using VAB Model
Previous Article in Journal
Workplace Ostracism and Knowledge Hiding: The Mediating Role of Job Tension
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Innovation on the Firm Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility of Vietnamese Manufacturing Firms
Open AccessArticle

Romanian Business Leaders’ Perceptions of Business-to-Business Corruption: Leading More Responsible Businesses?

Research Center in Business and Economics (CCREI), The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(20), 5548; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205548
Received: 29 July 2019 / Revised: 26 September 2019 / Accepted: 3 October 2019 / Published: 9 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue CSR and Business Ethics for Sustainable Development)
Business-to-business (B2B) corruption, also known as private corruption, refers to unethical or illicit activities between private parties, without the direct participation of the state. Existing literature on the topic, while still limited, has taken several avenues, from qualitative studies to perception-based surveys and research experiments. Upon reviewing key studies and their findings, this article concentrates on research questions related to: business people’s perceptions on the determinants that favor B2B corruption in Romania, consequences of the phenomenon, and potential solutions. Findings are based on primary data collected through a 2019 questionnaire administered to 120 business leaders in Romania. Results confirm earlier studies’ findings that general context, malfunction of the institutions, and mentality favor B2B corruption, and that there is a lack of consensus among the business community on how to recognize and deal with various forms of B2B corruption, despite the widely spread belief that B2B corruption negatively affects business activities. Also, both internal and external solutions are considered to work against B2B corruption. The current article also opens new avenues in the literature, showing that: the probability to face B2B corruption increases with business leaders’ professional experience; preferences on how to deal with corruption cases vary based on a firm’s capital structure (domestic vs. foreign), reflecting the importance of organizational culture; and business leaders overwhelmingly want to fight against B2B corruption through both internal and external measures. Substantial progress, however, will require a proper common understanding by the private sector of what constitutes B2B corruption, including its causes, consequences, and remedies. View Full-Text
Keywords: business-to-business (B2B) corruption; private corruption; anticorruption; responsible business; determinants of B2B corruption; Romania business-to-business (B2B) corruption; private corruption; anticorruption; responsible business; determinants of B2B corruption; Romania
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Burduja, S.I.; Zaharia, R.M. Romanian Business Leaders’ Perceptions of Business-to-Business Corruption: Leading More Responsible Businesses? Sustainability 2019, 11, 5548.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop