Next Article in Journal
Mechanical Degradation and Thermal Decomposition of Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate (EVA) Polymer-Modified Cement Mortar (PCM) Exposed to High-Temperature
Next Article in Special Issue
Soil Pollution Management in China: A Brief Introduction
Previous Article in Journal
Supermarket-Led Development and the Neglect of Traditional Food Value Chains: Reflections on Indonesia’s Agri-Food System Transformation
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Evolution of Sustainable Development in Scotland—A Case Study of Community Right-to-Buy Law and Policy 2003–2018
Open AccessArticle

Policy Hotspots for Sustainability: Changes in the EU Regulation of Sustainable Business and Finance

Department of Private Law, University of Oslo, Box 6706, St. Olavs plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
Sustainability 2019, 11(2), 499; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020499
Received: 30 November 2018 / Revised: 30 December 2018 / Accepted: 15 January 2019 / Published: 18 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Law for Sustainability 2018)
To ensure sustainable development, there is not only a need to re-think how the economic playing field is structured, but also the regulatory system that governs it. Business and finance law reforms will represent a crucial element of such a transition. However, little progress has been made to date. The European Union (EU) business and financial market law have been analysed systematically in relation to sustainability to a limited extent. This study aims to contribute to this gap through a reflexive governance analysis of corporate financialisation in the EU business and financial market law. I identify ‘policy hotspots’ with the potential to advance the EU’s commitment to sustainable development. I use a mixed-methods approach consisting of social network analysis and semi-structured interviews. This approach allows me to perform a structural analysis of the formal institutional processes, complemented by a qualitative analysis that unpacks the potential of the identified policy hotspots. I argue that the EU’s action has a path dependency created by two major policy approaches that have informed the EU business and financial market law. These approaches build on the shareholder maximisation norm and an action agenda on non-binding measures. This has contributed to internalising the corporate financialisation processes in EU policy-making and seems to limit the EU’s ability to create sustainable legislation. While these approaches may represent barriers, the findings show that the identified policy hotspots represent two tentative pathways of action for achieving sustainable business and finance in the EU: the Sustainable Finance initiative and the Single Market. View Full-Text
Keywords: policy hotspots; EU business law; EU financial market law; sustainable development; corporate financialisation; reflexive governance policy hotspots; EU business law; EU financial market law; sustainable development; corporate financialisation; reflexive governance
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahlström, H. Policy Hotspots for Sustainability: Changes in the EU Regulation of Sustainable Business and Finance. Sustainability 2019, 11, 499.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop