Next Article in Journal
Smart Urban Planning: Evaluating Urban Logistics Performance of Innovative Solutions and Sustainable Policies in the Venice Lagoon—the Results of a Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Legal Regulations Concerning Access to Public Waters—A Comparative Study
Review

Green Facades and Living Walls—A Review Establishing the Classification of Construction Types and Mapping the Benefits

1
Independent Scholar, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
2
Faculty VI—Planning Building, Environment, Institute for City and Regional Planning Technical University of Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
3
Faculty for Construction Management, Architecture Department, Union University Nikola Tesla, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
4
Faculty for Architecture, Technical University of Munich, 80333 München, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(17), 4579; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174579
Received: 21 June 2019 / Revised: 29 July 2019 / Accepted: 16 August 2019 / Published: 23 August 2019
The green facades and living walls of vertical greenery systems (VGS) are gaining increasing importance as sustainable building design elements because they can improve the environmental impact of a building. The field could benefit from a comprehensive mapping out of VGS types, an improved classification and nomenclature system, and from linking the benefits to a specific construction type. Therefore, this research reviews existing VGS construction types and links associated benefits to them, clearly differentiating empirical from descriptive supporting data. The study adopted a scoping research review used for mapping a specific research field. A systematic literature review based on keywords identified 13 VGS construction types—four types of green facades, nine types of living walls, and ten benefits. Thermal performance, as a benefit of VGS, is the most broadly empirically explored benefit. Yet, further qualitative studies, including human perception of thermal comfort are needed. Improvements in air quality, reduction of noise, positive effects on hydrology, and visual benefits need much further empirical testing, as the current supporting data is mostly descriptive and based on the similarities with green roofs. The educational benefits of VGS has no supporting empirical evidence, while the social benefits have only been empirically evaluated through one identified study. Future progress of the field depends on the adoption of a clear VGS nomenclature system and further qualitative and quantitative empirical testing of VGS benefits, which should be clearly linked to a specific VGS construction type so that cross-comparison of studies is enabled. View Full-Text
Keywords: external vertical greenery systems; living walls; green facades; classification of VGS construction types; VGS benefits external vertical greenery systems; living walls; green facades; classification of VGS construction types; VGS benefits
MDPI and ACS Style

Radić, M.; Brković Dodig, M.; Auer, T. Green Facades and Living Walls—A Review Establishing the Classification of Construction Types and Mapping the Benefits. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174579

AMA Style

Radić M, Brković Dodig M, Auer T. Green Facades and Living Walls—A Review Establishing the Classification of Construction Types and Mapping the Benefits. Sustainability. 2019; 11(17):4579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174579

Chicago/Turabian Style

Radić, Mina, Marta Brković Dodig, and Thomas Auer. 2019. "Green Facades and Living Walls—A Review Establishing the Classification of Construction Types and Mapping the Benefits" Sustainability 11, no. 17: 4579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174579

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop