Next Article in Journal
Living Labs for Rural Areas: Contextualization of Living Lab Frameworks, Concepts and Practices
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Corporate Green Efforts for Sustainability: An Event Study Approach
Previous Article in Journal
DanRETRO: A Decision-Making Tool for Energy Retrofit Design and Assessment of Danish Buildings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Incentive Mechanism for Sustainable Improvement in a Supply Chain
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Creating Sustainable and Climate Shared Value in Public Institution: Lessons from a Case of Korea Army Cadet Military School

Sustainability 2019, 11(14), 3796; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143796
by Hyuck Shin Kwon 1 and Hyun Chae Park 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2019, 11(14), 3796; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143796
Submission received: 30 May 2019 / Revised: 2 July 2019 / Accepted: 8 July 2019 / Published: 11 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Firms’ Response to Sustainable Climate Change)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Line 15-32: Why do you use inverted commas? This is used when using a direct quote and this should not be used in the abstract. In addition, the abstract must be re-written as in its current form it is not an abstract. Follow the IMRAD structure (Introduction, Methodology, Results and Discussion, and Conclusion/recommendations).

Line 37-52: This paragraph almost reads as a newspaper advertisement of the school. Re-phrase in a more academic manner.

Line 66: Explain the abbreviation NPM

Line 82 – 86: Again why the use of inverted commas?

Line 109: Why is ‘Negative Relations’ and ‘Irrelevant’ in ‘’and with capital letters?

Line 133, 138: same comment as line 109


Overall the language of the paper is good. However, the precise purpose of the paper is not clear. No methodology is included and no formal results or discussion section. As the paper is currently it is an extended literature review. This can easily be amended by included a qualitative methodology  like an extensive document analysis or a systematic literature review methodology.


Author Response

 Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Interesting topic with some contribution. However it is based on one case. 

Some recommendation  would be: 

- The paper in the introduction part shouldnt start with the explanation why they selected (KACMS).

- In the end of the introduction part there is no clear explanation what this paper includes. 

-The literature review might benefit from papers like: 

1) Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and innovation–the drivers of business growth?

- Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013

2. (2016). The Architecture of Social Finance.in Routledge Handbook of Social Finance


Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The study is very interesting since it takes CSV into consideration by public institution. However I think that the methodology used, the limits of the research and the suggestions for future research should be explained more in detail.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for considering my recommendations. Congratulations!

Back to TopTop