Next Article in Journal
The Integrated Effect of Carbon Emissions Trading and Pollution Rights Trading for Power Enterprises—A Case Study of Chongqing
Previous Article in Journal
Personality Effects on the Endorsement of Ethically Questionable Negotiation Strategies: Business Ethics in Canada and China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Crop Diseases and Mycotoxin Accumulation in Temperate Agroforestry Systems
Article Menu
Issue 11 (June-1) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Evaluating Sustainability in Traditional Silvopastoral Systems (caívas): Looking Beyond the Impact of Animals on Biodiversity

1
EPAGRI Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina, Canoinhas, CEP 89466-500, Brazil
2
Department of Vegetal Production, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, CEP 80035-050, Brazil
3
Department of History, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, CEP 84030-900, Brazil
4
Embrapa Forestry, Colombo, CEP 83411-000, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(11), 3098; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113098
Received: 29 April 2019 / Revised: 14 May 2019 / Accepted: 25 May 2019 / Published: 1 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Agroforestry Systems)
  |  
PDF [2457 KB, uploaded 1 June 2019]
  |  

Abstract

Caívas are traditional silvopastoral systems that occur in the Araucaria Forest biome, Southern Brazil, in which animal production and erva-mate extraction are integrated. Participatory research was conducted in caívas in the Northern Plateau, Santa Catarina State, to identify strategies to intensify pasture use and increase animal productivity. To better understand the outcomes of these strategies, a sustainability assessment was conducted in properties that participated in the research (improved caívas; IC) and those that did not (traditional caívas; TC). The Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture Systems (SAFA) tool 2.0.0 for smallholders was chosen as it evaluates the productive unit as a whole using environmental, social, economic, and governance indicators and is tailored for small-scale production. All evaluated indicators showed higher scores for IC properties in relation to TC. In general, the SAFA analysis showed that when evaluated as productive systems, TCs are a strategic option for rural development, as 65% of their indicators were evaluated as good. With the support of rural outreach and research and the adoption of appropriate technologies, this percentage increased to 86% in ICs. These results confirm that with adequate support caívas can significantly contribute to the development of more sustainable livestock farming in Southern Brazil. View Full-Text
Keywords: agroforestry; sustainability indicators; SAFA; traditional ecological knowledge agroforestry; sustainability indicators; SAFA; traditional ecological knowledge
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hanisch, A.L.; Negrelle, R.R.B.; Bonatto, R.A.; Nimmo, E.R.; Lacerda, A.E.B. Evaluating Sustainability in Traditional Silvopastoral Systems (caívas): Looking Beyond the Impact of Animals on Biodiversity. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3098.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top