Next Article in Journal
Indicators for Monitoring Urban Climate Change Resilience and Adaptation
Next Article in Special Issue
Injury Severity of Bus–Pedestrian Crashes in South Korea Considering the Effects of Regional and Company Factors
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Urban Mobility Policies as a Path to Healthy Cities—The Case Study of LMA, Portugal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Built Environment Features and Pedestrian Accidents: An Italian Retrospective Study
Article

Passengers’ Perceptions of Security Check in Metro Stations

1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, School of Transportation, Southeast University, 2 Dongnandaxue Rd, Nanjing 211189, China
2
School of Engineering, RMIT University, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(10), 2930; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102930
Received: 26 April 2019 / Revised: 17 May 2019 / Accepted: 20 May 2019 / Published: 23 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pedestrian Safety and Sustainable Transportation)
A safer and securer public transport provides a wide range of sustainability benefits to a community. This paper explores passengers’ perception of security checks (SCs) in metro stations, with a focus on the safety and mobility of passenger flows. We used 27 scaling items categorized into five variables: efficiency, comfort, safety, privacy and willingness-to-pay. A questionnaire survey of 880 metro passengers in China showed that respondents are generally homogenous in their perceptions of metro SCs in terms of their agreement on mandatory SC policy and the priority of safety. Most passengers are willing to trade-off their trip efficiency and privacy in exchange for safety improvement, while a small proportion of people are inclined to trade-off their trip efficiency for a more comfortable waiting and riding experiences. Demographic differences such as gender and age group effects are observed. For example, females tend to be more concerned with trip comfort while older passengers are more likely to compromise their privacy with enhancement in safety features. Findings from this study can be a valuable resource to railway authorities in designing and developing a SC system at major railway hubs. View Full-Text
Keywords: pedestrians; safety; security; emergency evacuation; metro station; sustainability pedestrians; safety; security; emergency evacuation; metro station; sustainability
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, X.; Ye, Z.; Shiwakoti, N.; Li, H. Passengers’ Perceptions of Security Check in Metro Stations. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102930

AMA Style

Shi X, Ye Z, Shiwakoti N, Li H. Passengers’ Perceptions of Security Check in Metro Stations. Sustainability. 2019; 11(10):2930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102930

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Xiaomeng, Zhirui Ye, Nirajan Shiwakoti, and Huaxin Li. 2019. "Passengers’ Perceptions of Security Check in Metro Stations" Sustainability 11, no. 10: 2930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102930

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop