Next Article in Journal
Influence of Livelihood Capitals on Livelihood Strategies of Herdsmen in Inner Mongolia, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Whose Agency Counts in Land Use Decision-Making in Myanmar? A Comparative Analysis of Three Cases in Tanintharyi Region
Previous Article in Journal
Consumers’ Preference and Factors Influencing Offal Consumption in Amathole District Eastern Cape, South Africa
Previous Article in Special Issue
Participation as Relational Space: A Critical Approach to Analysing Participation in Sustainability Research
Open AccessReview

Participation, Power, and Equity: Examining Three Key Social Dimensions of Fisheries Comanagement

1
Department of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-4493, USA
2
Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(9), 3324; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093324
Received: 23 June 2018 / Revised: 26 July 2018 / Accepted: 30 July 2018 / Published: 18 September 2018
Comanagement of natural resources is a well-established approach to the management of common-pool resources such as small-scale fisheries, operating in multiple contexts and settings for over two decades. These programs are expected to be adaptable and promote social and ecological benefits, such as sustainable livelihoods and biodiversity goals. As programs mature, it is important to consider how some core principles of comanagement have manifested in practice, as well as whether they deliver on these promised benefits. Drawing from the conservation, small-scale fisheries, and fisheries management literature, this paper examines three fundamental principles of fisheries comanagement: participation, equity, and power. The conceptualization, definitions, and measures of each theme are presented, with discussion of the current gaps in the literature. We also demonstrate the deep interrelationships between these key dimensions of comanagement, and the need for greater attention to their combined influence on comanagement outcomes and processes. While the literature offers foundational ideas for incorporating these themes into fisheries comanagement practice, tethering these concepts to clear, but context-specific goals and practices is essential for improving social outcomes. We find that key goals of fisheries comanagement could be impeded by the lack of depth in addressing these themes in practice, and suggest the need for greater critical attention to their expressions in comanagement processes. View Full-Text
Keywords: equity; power; participation; small-scale fisheries; comanagement; social outcomes; marine conservation; coastal resource governance equity; power; participation; small-scale fisheries; comanagement; social outcomes; marine conservation; coastal resource governance
MDPI and ACS Style

Quimby, B.; Levine, A. Participation, Power, and Equity: Examining Three Key Social Dimensions of Fisheries Comanagement. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3324.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop