Next Article in Journal
Reconciling Life Cycle Environmental Impacts with Ecosystem Services: A Management Perspective on Agricultural Land Use
Next Article in Special Issue
An Optimization-LCA of a Prestressed Concrete Precast Bridge
Previous Article in Journal
Measuring the Dynamic Efficiency of Regional Industrial Green Transformation in China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Crack on Durability of RC Material under the Chloride Aggressive Environment
Open AccessArticle

Can the SDGs Provide a Basis for Supply Chain Decisions in the Construction Sector?

1
Centre for Environment and Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
2
Previously also Carillion plc, Carillion House, 84 Salop Street, Wolverhampton WV3 0SR, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(3), 629; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030629
Received: 30 November 2017 / Revised: 21 February 2018 / Accepted: 21 February 2018 / Published: 28 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Construction)
The Construction sector is characterised by complex supply networks delivering unique end products over short time scales. Sustainability has increased in importance but continues to be difficult to implement in this sector; thus, new approaches and practices are needed. This paper reports an empirical investigation into the value of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially Sustainable Consumption and Production (SDG12), when used as a framework for action by organisations to drive change towards sustainability in global supply networks. Through inductive research, two different and contrasting approaches to improving the sustainability of supply networks have been revealed. One approach focuses on the “bottom up” ethical approach typified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification of timber products, and the other on “top-down” regulations exemplified by the UK Modern Slavery Act. In an industry noted for complex supply networks and characterised by adversarial relationships, the findings suggest that, in the long term, promoting shared values aligned with transparent, third-party monitoring will be more effective than imposing standards through legislation and regulation in supporting sustainable consumption and production. View Full-Text
Keywords: SDGs; construction; supply networks; sustainability; FSC; modern slavery SDGs; construction; supply networks; sustainability; FSC; modern slavery
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Russell, E.; Lee, J.; Clift, R. Can the SDGs Provide a Basis for Supply Chain Decisions in the Construction Sector? Sustainability 2018, 10, 629.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop