Next Article in Journal
Model-Based Exploration of Co-Creation Efforts: The Case of Solar Photovoltaics (PV) in Skåne, Sweden
Next Article in Special Issue
Can Social Capital and Psychological Capital Improve the Entrepreneurial Performance of the New Generation of Migrant Workers in China?
Previous Article in Journal
The Valencia Eustress-Distress Appraisal Scale (VEDAS): Validation of the Italian Version
Previous Article in Special Issue
Does Environmental Sustainability Impact Innovation, Ecological and Social Measures of Firm Performance of SMEs? Evidence from South Africa
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2018, 10(11), 3904; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113904

Mandatory Sustainability Reporting in Germany: Does Size Matter?

Centre for Risk & Resource Management, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund 44227, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 September 2018 / Revised: 19 October 2018 / Accepted: 23 October 2018 / Published: 26 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability in SMEs)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1021 KB, uploaded 26 October 2018]   |  

Abstract

This article studies how German firms evaluate a recent national corporate social responsibility (CSR) law based on a European Union directive and the burden they expect regarding their organizational responsibilities due to mandatory sustainability reporting. One hundred and fifty-one firms of different sizes directly or indirectly affected by the law are included in the survey and their responses empirically analyzed using two-tailed t-tests and simple linear regression. Anchoring the discussion in stakeholder theory and the small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) literature while considering large-firm idiosyncrasies, the results show differing effects on SMEs and large firms as well as firms which are directly and indirectly affected. Findings show that firm size only matters for the evaluation of the law by directly affected firms, while size does not matter in the case of indirectly affected firms. Possible moderators of this evaluation are grounded in the resource-based theory and formalization of CSR. This article contributes to the understanding of when firm size matters in the case of mandatory sustainability reporting and underlines the role of organizational resources and capabilities as well as the special position of SMEs. View Full-Text
Keywords: SMEs; sustainability reporting; competitive advantages; stakeholder theory; resource-based view; formalization of CSR SMEs; sustainability reporting; competitive advantages; stakeholder theory; resource-based view; formalization of CSR
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Bergmann, A.; Posch, P. Mandatory Sustainability Reporting in Germany: Does Size Matter? Sustainability 2018, 10, 3904.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top