Next Article in Journal
A Safety-Centric Study on the Use of Inflatable Abdominal Binders for Managing Orthostatic Hypotension
Next Article in Special Issue
Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Clinical Practice of Dental Hygienists and Dentists, Prevention and Awareness among Italian Professionals: Focus on Enlarging Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Hard and Soft Tissue Facial Landmarks for Mandibular Angle Reduction: A Clinical Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anterior Hyperfunction Syndrome: Literature Review and Conceptual Model
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Clinics and Practice
Volume 14
Issue 5
10.3390/clinpract14050137
clinpract-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Accelerated Orthodontics: A Descriptive Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 50 Cited Articles from 2012 to 2023

by
Ahmed A. Alsulaiman
* and
Osama A. Alsulaiman
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 32222, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Clin. Pract. 2024, 14(5), 1716-1736; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14050137
Submission received: 1 July 2024 / Revised: 9 August 2024 / Accepted: 27 August 2024 / Published: 29 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends, Materials, and Technologies and Consolidating Best Practices in Dentistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Accelerated orthodontics represents a significant shift in dental practice aimed at reducing treatment times while maintaining optimal patient outcomes. This bibliometric analysis evaluated the research landscape of accelerated orthodontics from 2012 to 2023, focusing on publication trends, citation patterns, influential journals, leading institutions, and key contributors. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search in Scopus identified 600 relevant articles, with the top 50 most-cited papers encompassing systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and experimental studies. Key techniques, such as corticotomy and piezocision, have been frequently highlighted for their effectiveness in expediting tooth movement. Results: The analysis revealed fluctuating annual scientific outputs, with notable peaks driven by technological advancements and increased patient demand for quicker orthodontic solutions. However, the production of high-impact papers was hindered by delays in citation accumulation and disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Keyword analysis identified critical themes, such as orthodontic tooth movement, malocclusion, and demographic factors, while a global collaboration map underscored extensive international research partnerships. Leading journals included the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, and prominent institutions such as the University of California at Los Angeles played significant roles in advancing the field. Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of accelerated orthodontics, emphasizing the need for continued research, particularly RCTs, to further refine and validate accelerated orthodontic techniques and improve clinical outcomes.

1. Introduction

Accelerated orthodontics represents a paradigm shift in dental practice aimed at reducing treatment times while maintaining optimal patient outcomes [1,2]. This field, which is rapidly advancing, has garnered extensive interest from researchers, healthcare professionals, and industry leaders who are looking for new ways to improve orthodontic treatment. Orthodontic treatment traditionally spans several months to years, necessitating regular clinical visits and patient compliance with treatment protocols [2,3,4].
Adult patients often hesitate to undergo orthodontic treatment because of concerns about the lengthy treatment duration, discomfort, and inconvenience associated with wearing orthodontic appliances [5]. A major problem for adults undergoing orthodontic treatment is the prolonged duration of the process. Adults typically prefer shorter treatment times and often require more esthetically pleasing appliances. Recent studies have revealed an increased number of adults in the United Kingdom seeking orthodontic care [6]. A notable study revealed that the primary motivation behind adults seeking orthodontic treatment is to achieve optimal dental alignment and enhance the esthetics of their smiles [7]. It is worth mentioning that orthodontic treatment for adults is significantly different from that for adolescents and is influenced by both psychological factors and biological considerations [8]. However, accelerated orthodontics introduces techniques aimed at expediting tooth movement and reducing the overall treatment duration. These techniques include surgical interventions such as corticotomy, piezocision, and the use of biological agents such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) [9,10,11,12]. The potential benefits of accelerated orthodontics include shorter treatment times, reduced patient discomfort, and improved treatment predictability, making it an appealing option for both patients and practitioners.
Accelerated orthodontics is a treatment option that promises quicker results; however, it presents some significant drawbacks. A key concern is the increased risk of root resorption, which can compromise the long-term health and stability of the teeth [13,14]. Additionally, the use of advanced methods such as corticotomies or bone remodeling devices often results in increased discomfort, pain, and potential complications. These techniques also come with a higher price tag, limiting accessibility [15,16,17]. Furthermore, the long-term effectiveness and safety of accelerated orthodontics is not as well-established as traditional methods, casting doubt on the durability of rapid treatments. Finally, the specialized training and equipment required to perform this treatment restrict its availability to certain practitioners, limiting patient options [16,18].
This study was conducted to accomplish several objectives through a bibliometric analysis of the top 50 papers on accelerated orthodontics. The primary aim was to identify the key contributors and institutions driving research in this particular field. Another objective was to evaluate publication trends over time and across diverse geographic regions. In addition, the analysis aimed to identify the most influential studies and journals in the field. Finally, the study sought to uncover emerging themes and gaps in the current research. By systematically reviewing the literature, this study aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current state of accelerated orthodontic research. The ultimate goal of this analysis was to inform clinicians, researchers, and policymakers about the current state of accelerated orthodontics and guide future research priorities and clinical advancements in the field.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Sources and Search Strategies

Bibliometric analysis was conducted using Scopus as the sole data source. A comprehensive search strategy was used to identify relevant articles published between 2012 and 2023. The search was conducted on 30 June 2024 and was carefully designed to encompass all relevant studies on accelerated orthodontics, ensuring a thorough and exhaustive collection of data. The search results were exported as a BibTeX file for further analysis. The resulting dataset was analyzed to extract key bibliometric indicators, including the number of publications, citation counts, and the distribution of study types among the top 50 most-cited articles. The detailed search strategy is included in Appendix A.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

The analysis included all peer-reviewed publications related to accelerated orthodontics published between 2012 and 2023. This encompasses various study types, including original research articles, review articles, experimental studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, cross-sectional studies, and retrospective studies. Only articles available in English and indexed in Scopus were considered to ensure the consistency and reliability of the data. Duplicate records, conference abstracts, and non-peer-reviewed articles were excluded to maintain the dataset quality. This inclusive approach ensured a comprehensive overview of the significant research contributions and trends in accelerated orthodontics over a specified period.

2.3. Data Collection

To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data collection process, two independent reviewers meticulously verified the data entry, and considered a number of different data elements, including titles, keywords, publication dates, authors, linked organizations, publishing journals, the total number of citations, and the authors’ national and regional locations. This rigorous verification process helped to eliminate errors and inconsistencies, ensuring the integrity of the dataset used for the bibliometric analysis.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The analysis was conducted using R version 4.3.3 and the bibliometrix package. Additionally, “biblioshiny”, a web interface for bibliometrix, was integrated into RStudio version 3.6.0, facilitating a multifaceted bibliometric analysis [19]. This comprehensive analysis included several key aspects: annual scientific production, average citations per year, most relevant sources, most relevant affiliations, keyword analysis, most relevant authors, author production over time, and a countries’ collaboration world map. The use of the bibliometrix package and biblioshiny interface enabled detailed and robust statistical analysis, providing valuable insights into the trends and patterns within the field of accelerated orthodontics from 2012 to 2023.

3. Results

A comprehensive search of studies on accelerated orthodontics yielded 846 papers. When the search was limited to publications published between 2012 and 2023, the number of studies was reduced to 600. Among the top 50 most-cited articles, 251 authors contributed to the publications with an average of 59.62 citations per document. The distribution of study types among the top 50 articles included 13 systematic reviews, 14 prospective studies, 6 randomized controlled trials, 4 experimental studies, 10 reviews, 1 case report, 1 cross-sectional study, and 1 preliminary study (Figure 1). Table 1 provides a detailed list of the top 50 cited papers, organized from the most-cited to the least-cited, with the total number of citations amounting to 2981. A table listing the top 50 most-cited original articles, excluding review articles, is included in Table S1.

3.1. Annual Scientific Production

The annual scientific production of articles on accelerated orthodontics among the top 50 most-cited papers from 2012 to 2023 has exhibited a fluctuating trend. Starting with two articles in 2012, the number increased to six in both 2013 and 2014. There was a slight decline to four articles in 2015, followed by a peak of ten articles in 2016. The production then fluctuated, with six articles in 2017 and seven in 2018. A notable decline occurred in 2019 with only three articles, followed by a slight increase to five articles in 2020. However, there was a significant drop to zero articles in 2021 and only one article in 2022. This trend is illustrated in Figure 2, which shows the yearly distribution of articles and their corresponding scientific production.

3.2. Average Citation Per Year

The average number of citations per year for the top 50 most-cited articles on accelerated orthodontics from 2012 to 2023 demonstrated varying trends in scholarly impact (Figure 3). In 2012, the mean total citations per article (Mean TC per Art) was 52.5, with a mean citation per year (Mean TC per Year) of 4.04 over 13 citable years. In 2013, these values increased to 75 and 6.25, respectively, over the 12 citable years. The trend continued in 2014, with a Mean TC per Art of 73.5 and a Mean TC per year of 6.68, over 11 citable years. A decline was observed in 2015 with Mean TC per art at 48 and Mean TC per year at 4.80, over 10 citable years. However, there was a peak in 2016, with Mean TC per Art at 65.5, and Mean TC per Year at 7.28, over nine citable years. The trend dipped in 2017, with Mean TC per Art at 44.33, and Mean TC per Year at 5.54, over eight citable years. Then, 2018 saw an increase, with Mean TC per Art at 70 and Mean TC per Year at 10.00 over seven citable years, followed by 2019, with Mean TC per Art at 52.67 and Mean TC per Year at 8.78 over six citable years. In 2020, the values were 38 and 7.60, respectively, over five citable years. The year 2022 had the lowest Mean TC per art at 34, but a high Mean TC per year at 11.33, over three citable years.
Among the top 50 most-cited articles, the top 10 most-cited documents were particularly notable for their significant contributions to the field. Leading this group is the article by Li (2018) [20] with 229 citations and an average of 32.71 citations per year, reflecting its substantial impact. Following closely are Nimeri G (2013) [15] with 172 citations and Hernández-Alfaro F (2014) [21] with 117 citations, showcasing their critical roles in advancing research on accelerated orthodontics. The top 10 most-cited documents globally among the top 50 cited articles are shown in Figure 4.

3.3. Most Relevant Sources

The most relevant sources for the articles on accelerated orthodontics from 2012 to 2023 were identified, highlighting the key journals contributing significantly to this field. Leading the list is the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, with 7 articles among the top 50 most-cited. This is followed by the Angle Orthodontist, contributing six articles, and Progress in Orthodontics, contributing five articles. Other notable journals include the Journal of Dental Research and the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, each contributing three articles. Additional relevant sources with two articles each are BMC Oral Health, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, and Journal of Periodontology. The distribution of these top 10 sources is illustrated in Figure 5, highlighting their prominence and contribution to the literature.

3.4. Most Relevant Affiliations

The most relevant affiliations contributing to research on accelerated orthodontics from 2012 to 2023 were identified, showcasing institutions that have made significant contributions to this specialized area. Topping the list is the University of California in Los Angeles, with 9 articles among the top 50 most-cited. Following closely are Sichuan University and University of Damascus Dental School, each contributing seven articles. Several institutions, including Damascus University, Hacettepe University, Islamic Azad University, Prince of Songkla University, Universidad de los Andes, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, and University Hospital of Liège, have contributed three articles each. These affiliations, highlighted in Figure 6, underscore their substantial role in advancing research and innovation in accelerated orthodontics and in shaping the landscape of scholarly discourse in the field.

3.5. Keyword Analysis

An analysis of keywords from the top 50 most-cited articles in accelerated orthodontics research between 2012 and 2023 revealed significant themes and focal points. Terms such as “human” (51 occurrences), “humans” (41 occurrences), “adult” (37 occurrences), “female” (36 occurrences), and “male” (35 occurrences) underscored the demographic focus and gender considerations of the studies. Key topics included “orthodontic tooth movement” (28 occurrences), “orthodontics” (27 occurrences), “young adult” (26 occurrences), “malocclusion” (25 occurrences), and “adolescent” (24 occurrences), highlighting the central areas of investigation and treatment approaches. Additionally, terms such as “osteotomy” (21 occurrences), “periodontal disease” (21 occurrences), “controlled study” (18 occurrences), and “procedures” (17 occurrences) reflect methodological and clinical aspects explored in the literature. These findings were further elucidated through a co-occurrence network (Figure 7) and visual representation in a word cloud (Figure 8), providing insights into the interconnected themes and research emphasis in accelerated orthodontics.

3.6. Most Relevant Authors and Author Production over Time

The analysis of the top authors in accelerated orthodontics research from 2012 to 2023 highlights notable contributors and their production trends. Among the top 50 cited articles, Hamadah O, Kau CH, and Li Y stood out with significant contributions, each having authored multiple impactful papers. Hamadah O and Kau CH each contributed three articles, showcasing their consistent presence and impact in the field. Li Y, known for their influential work, particularly in 2018 with a highly cited article, also demonstrates a strong publication record. Author production over time reveals dynamic trends, with some authors such as Ajjaj MA, Alfawal AMH, and Charoemratrote C publishing consistently across different years, reflecting sustained research output and influence. These insights underscore the pivotal role of these authors in advancing knowledge and innovation in accelerated orthodontics. Additionally, their collaborative networks and interactions within the field are shown in Figure 9, which provides a comprehensive overview of their scholarly connections and collaborative efforts in accelerated orthodontic research. These analyses underscore the dynamic contributions of individual authors and their collaborative networks in advancing knowledge and innovation in the field.

3.7. Countries’ Collaboration World Map

The collaboration network among countries in accelerated orthodontic research from 2012 to 2023 reveals a diverse and interconnected landscape. Collaborations such as US–Canada, US–Belgium, and US–Thailand demonstrate transcontinental partnerships that contribute to global research endeavors. Similarly, collaborations between Malaysia and Switzerland and Malaysia–United Kingdom highlight international cooperation bridging different continents. These collaborative efforts underscore the global nature of research in accelerated orthodontics, facilitating knowledge exchange and mutual advancement across borders. The geographical distribution and interrelations of these collaborations are visually represented in Figure 10, illustrating the interconnectedness and impact of international partnerships in shaping the field’s scholarly discourse.

4. Discussion

The field of accelerated orthodontics has gained considerable attention over the past decade owing to its potential to reduce treatment times and improve patient satisfaction. This bibliometric analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the research landscape of accelerated orthodontics from 2012 to 2023. It focuses on publication trends, citation patterns, influential journals, leading institutions, and key contributors. By quantifying the annual scientific output and analyzing the average citations per year, we identified the most-cited papers and categorized them by study type. The analysis highlights the top 50 papers on this topic, underscores the significant role of key journals, such as the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, and identifies leading institutions, such as the University of California at Los Angeles. Additionally, keyword analysis revealed dominant themes and focus areas, while author contributions and collaboration networks illustrated the extent of research partnerships.
A thorough search for studies on accelerated orthodontics resulted in 846 papers, which narrowed down to 600 when focusing on publications from 2012 to 2023. Among the top 50 most-cited articles, 251 authors contributed, with an average of nearly 60 citations per document. These top articles included a mix of systematic reviews, prospective studies, randomized controlled trials, experimental studies, reviews, case reports, cross-sectional studies, and preliminary studies. The annual scientific production of these articles showed a fluctuating trend, peaking and declining over time. The average citations per year for these top articles varied, reflecting different levels of scholarly impact. The most relevant sources in this field were journals such as the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, followed by the Angle Orthodontist and Progress in Orthodontics. The leading institutions included the University of California at Los Angeles and Sichuan University. Keyword analysis highlighted significant themes and focal points, such as demographics, orthodontic tooth movement, and clinical procedures. Notable authors in the field included Hamadah O, Kau CH, and Li Y, each contributing multiple influential papers. The research landscape also featured extensive international collaboration, with notable partnerships between countries such as the USA and Canada, Malaysia and Switzerland, and others, underscoring the global nature of research in accelerated orthodontics.
Among the top 50 articles on accelerated orthodontics, most focused on the mechanisms underlying orthodontic procedures. Some were randomized controlled trials, whereas others were systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This diversity highlights the importance of future research, particularly emphasizing randomized controlled trials, to further advance this field. Various techniques have been employed to shorten the duration of orthodontic treatment. However, surgical interventions tend to be more clinically effective, often yielding better results in reducing the overall treatment duration [27]. Kole’s surgical procedure proposes that accelerated tooth movement is achieved by selectively cutting the bone, allowing the movement of “blocks of bone” [68]. However, recent evidence indicates that the increased rate of tooth movement is due to localized osteoporosis as part of the healing process, known as the regional acceleratory phenomenon (RAP) [69]. Various surgical techniques have been employed to leverage the RAP and accelerate tooth movement, including conventional corticotomy [70,71], piezocision-based flapless corticotomy [39,72], corticision [73], and laser-assisted flapless corticotomy [74,75].
The general pattern of the annual scientific output demonstrates a downward trend in publications on accelerated orthodontics, with a notable peak of 80 articles in 2016. This increase suggests that there is a slight interest and investment in the field, which is probably driven by technological advancements and the growing demand for quicker orthodontic solutions. However, the decline in publications after 2019 might indicate a change in research priorities, market saturation, or the influence of global events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, on research and clinical activities [76,77]. The production of high-impact papers in accelerated orthodontics is limited by several factors. First, scientific papers typically require a considerable amount of time to receive citations, especially if they are not published in prestigious, high-impact journals that naturally attract more attention and citations. This time lag means that even high-quality research may not be immediately recognized or widely cited. Second, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on global research activities, including orthodontics. During the pandemic, many research projects in orthodontics were halted or delayed, owing to restrictions on in-person activities and access to laboratories and clinical settings. Additionally, the focus of many researchers and healthcare professionals has shifted towards addressing the immediate challenges posed by the pandemic, further slowing the progress of ongoing research in fields such as orthodontics. Moreover, the pandemic has disrupted the usual channels of academic communication and collaboration. Conferences and other professional gatherings where researchers typically share and discuss their findings were canceled or moved online, reducing opportunities for networking and the dissemination of new research. This disruption likely contributed to the slower pace of publication and reduced the visibility of new research during this period. A recent investigation revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic had a considerable influence on orthodontic clinical education in both pre- and post-doctoral orthodontic programs [78]. In general, there was a noticeable decrease in patient care, which could result in the delayed treatment of patients and fewer training opportunities for learners.
The keyword analysis results revealed important themes, including “orthodontic tooth movement”, “malocclusion”, and “maxilla”, which are central to the research focus in this field. Additionally, the presence of demographic terms such as “human”, “male”, and “female” highlights the diverse demographics involved in studies, which is crucial for generalizing findings across different populations. The co-occurrence network provides insights into how these themes intersect, emphasizing the need for comprehensive research frameworks and multidisciplinary approaches to address various aspects of accelerated orthodontics. The international collaboration map highlights a strong global network, with notable partnerships between countries such as the USA, Brazil, Italy, and others. These collaborations facilitate knowledge exchange, resource sharing, and diverse perspectives, thereby enhancing the quality and impact of research. The extent of the network indicates that accelerated orthodontics is a globally relevant field, with significant contributions from various regions fostering innovation and advancements.
A widely implemented intervention in accelerated orthodontics is the use of PAOO, which has been the subject of extensive research [4]. Studies suggest that both PAOO and corticotomy-only groups experience a reduction in bone density [79,80]. This decrease is linked to the surgical trauma that triggers localized osteoporosis. However, further research has shown a substantial increase in alveolar bone density during the follow-up phase. PAOO has been shown to significantly reduce treatment time compared to alternative methods [81].
Studies have established the usefulness of PAOO in hastening the process of tooth alignment and leveling [82,83]. Additionally, studies have emphasized their effectiveness in accelerating the retraction of the upper anterior teeth compared to conventional orthodontic methods [49,84]. This expedited retraction is attributed to the surgical procedure, which triggers the regional accelerator phenomenon (RAP). This phenomenon takes effect shortly after surgery and reaches its peak within one–two months. RAP can persist for half to two years, with its maximum observed approximately one month after surgery, followed by a gradual decline over subsequent months [85].
This bibliography represents the first significant contribution to the literature on accelerated orthodontics and offers fundamental insights into this field. It incorporates a diverse range of recent and relevant sources, providing a well-structured organization that enables seamless access to specific studies or themes. The inclusion of various viewpoints and methodologies enriches comprehension, presenting a sophisticated outlook on the subject matter. Appropriate citation ensures transparency, allowing for the further verification and exploration of the referenced research. Furthermore, this bibliometric analysis explains the top 50 articles and lays the foundation for future studies on high-impact work. However, the bibliography’s reliance exclusively on the Scopus database and its restriction to the timeframe between 2012 and 2023 may introduce bias. It could potentially disregard relevant studies not indexed in Scopus or published beyond this period, limiting the completeness of coverage. Although comprehensive within its scope, the literature may not encompass all aspects of accelerated orthodontic research, particularly those from alternative databases or older studies. These factors could potentially hamper the breadth and depth of the insights offered, impacting the overall perspective on the topic.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, accelerated orthodontics represents a transformative approach in dental practice, focusing on reducing treatment duration while ensuring optimal outcomes. Our bibliometric analysis, covering research from 2012 to 2023, identified key trends, influential studies, and major contributors to the field. It reveals a diverse range of studies, including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and experimental research, highlighting the significant role of surgical techniques such as corticotomy and piezocision in expediting tooth movement. Despite the fluctuating trend in annual scientific output, with peaks in interest driven by technological advancements and patient demand for quicker solutions, the production of high-impact papers has faced challenges, particularly owing to the time required for citation accumulation and disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The keyword analysis underscores critical themes such as orthodontic tooth movement and demographic considerations, while international collaborations reflect a robust global research network. The findings of this study provide a comprehensive overview of accelerated orthodontics, emphasizing the importance of ongoing research, especially randomized controlled trials, to further advance this field.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/clinpract14050137/s1, Table S1: List of Top 50 Most-Cited Articles in Accelerated Orthodontics (2012–2023), Ranked by Total Citations. (Original articles only, excluding reviews).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.A. and O.A.A.; methodology, A.A.A. and O.A.A.; software, A.A.A. and O.A.A.; validation, A.A.A. and O.A.A.; formal analysis, A.A.A.; investigation, A.A.A. and O.A.A.; resources, A.A.A. and O.A.A.; data curation, A.A.A. and O.A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.A. and O.A.A.; writing—review and editing, A.A.A. and O.A.A.; visualization, A.A.A. and O.A.A.; supervision, A.A.A.; project administration, A.A.A. and O.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article and Supplementary Materials; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Scopus search string:
(TITLE-ABS-KEY (accelerated AND orthodontics) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (orthodontic AND acceleration) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (accelerated AND tooth AND movement) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (rapid AND orthodontic AND treatment) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (speed AND orthodontics) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (expedited AND orthodontics) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (fast AND orthodontic AND treatment) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (quick AND orthodontic AND treatment) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (enhanced AND orthodontics) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (accelerated AND dental AND movement) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (rapid AND dental AND alignment) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (micro-osteoperforation) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (low-level AND laser AND therapy) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (piezocision) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (corticotomy) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (vibration AND therapy) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (high-frequency AND vibration) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (photobiomodulation) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (acceledent) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (wilckodontics) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (propel AND orthodontics) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (pulsed AND electromagnetic AND field) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (alveolar AND corticotomy) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (surgical-assisted AND orthodontics) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (laser-assisted AND orthodontics) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (self-ligating AND brackets) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (mops) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (lllt) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (paoo) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (periodontally AND accelerated AND osteogenic AND orthodontics) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (cytokine AND therapy) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (drug-induced AND orthodontic AND acceleration) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (mechanical AND vibration) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (resonance AND vibration) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (light AND emitting AND diodes) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (magnetic AND fields) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (corticostomy) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (osteotomy) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (piezoincision) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (peridontally AND assisted) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (osteogenic AND orthodontic AND treatment) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (dental AND distraction) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (dentoalveolar AND distraction AND osteogenesis) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (calcium) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (vitamin AND d3) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (parathyroid) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (prostaglandin) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (corticosteroids) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (osteocalcin) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (cytokines) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (relaxin)).

References

  1. Javid, K.; Mello-Machado, R.C.; Montemezzi, P.; Dos Santos Pereira, R.; Lowenstein, A.; Mourão, C.F. Harnessing the Power of PAOO and Invisalign: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Orthodontic Care. Medicina 2023, 59, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Singh, S.; Jayan, B. Comparative Evaluation of Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO) Versus Conventional Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Adult Patients with Bimaxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2019, 39, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Alsino, H.I.; Hajeer, M.Y.; Burhan, A.S.; Alkhouri, I.; Darwich, K. The Effectiveness of Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO) in Accelerating Tooth Movement and Supporting Alveolar Bone Thickness During Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2022, 14, e24985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Keser, E.; Naini, F.B. Accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: Surgical techniques and the regional acceleratory phenomenon. Maxillofac. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2022, 44, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Keim, R.G.; Gottlieb, E.L.; Nelson, A.H.; Vogels, D.S., 3rd. 2013 JCO Orthodontic Practice Study. Part 1: Trends. J. Clin. Orthod. 2013, 47, 661–680. [Google Scholar]
  6. Christensen, L.; Luther, F. Adults seeking orthodontic treatment: Expectations, periodontal and TMD issues. Br. Dent. J. 2015, 218, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cedro, M.K.; Moles, D.R.; Hodges, S.J. Adult orthodontics—Who’s doing what? J. Orthod. 2010, 37, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tayer, B.H.; Burek, M.J. A survey of adults’ attitudes toward orthodontic therapy. Am. J. Orthod. 1981, 79, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Viwattanatipa, N.; Charnchairerk, S. The effectiveness of corticotomy and piezocision on canine retraction: A systematic review. Korean J. Orthod. 2018, 48, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fujinaka, T.; Kernitsky, J.; Liu, J.; Dibart, S. Piezocision Through Computer-Guided Navigation. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2023. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Charavet, C.; Van Hede, D.; Maes, N.; Albert, A.; Lambert, F. Disentangling the effects of CAD/CAM customized appliances and piezocision in orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2021, 91, 764–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mitsui, N.; Suzuki, N.; Maeno, M.; Yanagisawa, M.; Koyama, Y.; Otsuka, K.; Shimizu, N. Optimal compressive force induces bone formation via increasing bone morphogenetic proteins production and decreasing their antagonists production by Saos-2 cells. Life Sci. 2006, 78, 2697–2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sebaoun, J.D.; Surmenian, J.; Dibart, S. Accelerated orthodontic treatment with piezocision: A mini-invasive alternative to conventional corticotomies. Orthod. Fr. 2011, 82, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zimmo, N.; Saleh, M.H.; Mandelaris, G.A.; Chan, H.L.; Wang, H.L. Corticotomy-Accelerated Orthodontics: A Comprehensive Review and Update. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2017, 38, 17–25, quiz 26. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Nimeri, G.; Kau, C.H.; Abou-Kheir, N.S.; Corona, R. Acceleration of tooth movement during orthodontic treatment—A frontier in orthodontics. Prog. Orthod. 2013, 14, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Charavet, C.; Lecloux, G.; Bruwier, A.; Rompen, E.; Maes, N.; Limme, M.; Lambert, F. Localized Piezoelectric Alveolar Decortication for Orthodontic Treatment in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Dent. Res. 2016, 95, 1003–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Meuli, S.; Brugnami, F.; Marrocco, S.; Orsini, R.; Scopelliti, D. Invisalign treatment with periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. J. Clin. Orthod. 2023, 57, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Jerrold, L. Litigation and legislation. Accelerated orthodontics or accelerated liability? Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2014, 145, S148–S151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Massimo, A.; Corrado, C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Y.; Jacox, L.A.; Little, S.H.; Ko, C.C. Orthodontic tooth movement: The biology and clinical implications. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2018, 34, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hernández-Alfaro, F.; Guijarro-Martínez, R.; Peiró-Guijarro, M.A. Surgery first in orthognathic surgery: What have we learned? A comprehensive workflow based on 45 consecutive cases. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2014, 72, 376–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abbas, N.H.; Sabet, N.E.; Hassan, I.T. Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2016, 149, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gkantidis, N.; Mistakidis, I.; Kouskoura, T.; Pandis, N. Effectiveness of non-conventional methods for accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent. 2014, 42, 1300–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Genc, G.; Kocadereli, I.; Tasar, F.; Kilinc, K.; El, S.; Sarkarati, B. Effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on orthodontic tooth movement. Lasers Med. Sci. 2013, 28, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hoogeveen, E.J.; Jansma, J.; Ren, Y. Surgically facilitated orthodontic treatment: A systematic review. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2014, 145, S51–S64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kau, C.H.; Kantarci, A.; Shaughnessy, T.; Vachiramon, A.; Santiwong, P.; da la Fuente, A.; Skrenes, D.; Ma, D.; Brawn, P. Photobiomodulation accelerates orthodontic alignment in the early phase of treatment. Prog. Orthod. 2013, 14, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Alfawal, A.M.H.; Hajeer, M.Y.; Ajaj, M.A.; Hamadah, O.; Brad, B. Effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the acceleration of tooth movement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog. Orthod. 2016, 17, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Patterson, B.M.; Dalci, O.; Darendeliler, M.A.; Papadopoulou, A.K. Corticotomies and Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2016, 74, 453–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aksakalli, S.; Calik, B.; Kara, B.; Ezirganli, S. Accelerated tooth movement with piezocision and its periodontaltransversal effects in patients with Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2016, 86, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cao, H.; Kou, X.; Yang, R.; Liu, D.; Wang, X.; Song, Y.; Feng, L.; He, D.; Gan, Y.; Zhou, Y. Force-induced Adrb2 in periodontal ligament cells promotes tooth movement. J. Dent. Res. 2014, 93, 1163–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Amit, G.; Kalra, J.P.S.; Pankaj, B.; Suchinder, S.; Parul, B. Periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO)—A review. J. Clini. Exp. Dent. 2012, 4, e292–e296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. AlSayed Hasan, M.M.A.; Sultan, K.; Hamadah, O. Low-level laser therapy effectiveness in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2017, 87, 499–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kalemaj, Z.; Debernardl, C.L.; Buti, J. Efficacy of surgical and non-surgical interventions on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2015, 8, 9–24. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sivarajan, S.; Doss, J.G.; Papageorgiou, S.N.; Cobourne, M.T.; Wey, M.C. Mini-implant supported canine retraction with micro-osteoperforation: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2019, 89, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Leethanakul, C.; Suamphan, S.; Jitpukdeebodintra, S.; Thongudomporn, U.; Charoemratrote, C. Vibratory stimulation increases interleukin-1 beta secretion during orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod. 2016, 86, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. De Clerck, H.J.; Proffit, W.R. Growth modification of the face: A current perspective with emphasis on Class III treatment. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2015, 148, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yi, J.; Xiao, J.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Zhao, Z. Efficacy of piezocision on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2017, 87, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aboalnaga, A.A.; Salah Fayed, M.M.; El-Ashmawi, N.A.; Soliman, S.A. Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Prog. Orthod. 2019, 20, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alfawal, A.M.H.; Hajeer, M.Y.; Ajaj, M.A.; Hamadah, O.; Brad, B. Evaluation of piezocision and laser-assisted flapless corticotomy in the acceleration of canine retraction: A randomized controlled trial. Head Face Med. 2018, 14, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kao, R.T.; Curtis, D.A.; Kim, D.M.; Lin, G.H.; Wang, C.W.; Cobb, C.M.; Hsu, Y.T.; Kan, J.; Velasquez, D.; Avila-Ortiz, G.; et al. American Academy of Periodontology best evidence consensus statement on modifying periodontal phenotype in preparation for orthodontic and restorative treatment. J. Periodontol. 2020, 91, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cheung, T.; Park, J.; Lee, D.; Kim, C.; Olson, J.; Javadi, S.; Lawson, G.; McCabe, J.; Moon, W.; Ting, K.; et al. Ability of mini-implant–facilitated micro-osteoperforations to accelerate tooth movement in rats. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2016, 150, 958–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Attri, S.; Mittal, R.; Batra, P.; Sonar, S.; Sharma, K.; Raghavan, S.; Rai, K. Comparison of rate of tooth movement and pain perception during accelerated tooth movement associated with conventional fixed appliances with micro-osteoperforations–a randomised controlled trial. J. Orthod. 2018, 45, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sonesson, M.; De Geer, E.; Subraian, J.; Petrén, S. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in accelerating tooth movement, preventing relapse and managing acute pain during orthodontic treatment in humans: A systematic review. BMC Oral Health 2016, 17, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gil, A.P.S.; Haas, O.L.; Méndez-Manjón, I.; Masiá-Gridilla, J.; Valls-Ontañón, A.; Hernández-Alfaro, F.; Guijarro-Martínez, R. Alveolar corticotomies for accelerated orthodontics: A systematic review. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 2018, 46, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Varella, A.M.; Revankar, A.V.; Patil, A.K. Low-level laser therapy increases interleukin-1β in gingival crevicular fluid and enhances the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2018, 154, 535–544.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Alikhani, M.; Alansari, S.; Sangsuwon, C.; Alikhani, M.; Chou, M.Y.; Alyami, B.; Nervina, J.M.; Teixeira, C.C. Micro-osteoperforations: Minimally invasive accelerated tooth movement. Semin. Orthod. 2015, 21, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yi, J.; Xiao, J.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Zhao, Z. Effectiveness of adjunctive interventions for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review of systematic reviews. J. Oral Rehabil. 2017, 44, 636–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fu, T.; Liu, S.; Zhao, H.; Cao, M.; Zhang, R. Effectiveness and Safety of Minimally Invasive Orthodontic Tooth Movement Acceleration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Dent. Res. 2019, 98, 1469–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bhattacharya, P.; Bhattacharya, H.; Anjum, A.; Bhandari, R.; Agarwal, D.K.; Gupta, A.; Ansar, J. Assessment of corticotomy facilitated tooth movement and changes in alveolar bone thickness—A ct scan study. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2014, 8, ZC26–ZC30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shoreibah, E.A.; Salama, A.E.; Attia, M.S.; Abu-Seida, S.M. Corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics in adults using a further modified technique. J. Int. Acad. Periodontol. 2012, 14, 97–104. [Google Scholar]
  51. Coscia, G.; Coscia, V.; Peluso, V.; Addabbo, F. Augmented corticotomy combined with accelerated orthodontic forces in class iii orthognathic patients: Morphologic aspects of the mandibular anterior ridge with cone-beam computed tomography. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2013, 71, 1760.e1–1760.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Shaughnessy, T.; Kantarci, A.; Kau, C.H.; Skrenes, D.; Skrenes, S.; Ma, D. Intraoral photobiomodulation-induced orthodontic tooth alignment: A preliminary study. BMC Oral Health 2016, 16, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, C.W.; Yu, S.H.; Mandelaris, G.A.; Wang, H.L. Is periodontal phenotype modification therapy beneficial for patients receiving orthodontic treatment? An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. J. Periodontol. 2020, 91, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ize-Iyamu, I.N.; Saheeb, B.D.; Edetanlen, B.E. Comparing the 810nm diode laser with conventional surgery in orthodontic soft tissue procedures. Ghana Med. J. 2013, 47, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Zingler, S.; Hakim, E.; Finke, D.; Brunner, M.; Saure, D.; Hoffmann, J.; Lux, C.J.; Erber, R.; Seeberger, R. Surgery-first approach in orthognathic surgery: Psychological and biological aspects—A prospective cohort study. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 2017, 45, 1293–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Leethanakul, C.; Kanokkulchai, S.; Pongpanich, S.; Leepong, N.; Charoemratrote, C. Interseptal bone reduction on the rate of maxillary canine retraction. Angle Orthod. 2014, 84, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Miles, P. Accelerated orthodontic treatment—what’s the evidence? Aust. Dent. J. 2017, 62, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Feizbakhsh, M.; Zandian, D.; Heidarpour, M.; Farhad, S.Z.; Fallahi, H.R. The use of micro-osteoperforation concept for accelerating differential tooth movement. J. World Fed. Orthod. 2018, 7, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Keser, E.I.; Dibart, S. Sequential piezocision: A novel approach to accelerated orthodontic treatment. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2013, 144, 879–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Maspero, C.; Cappella, A.; Dolci, C.; Cagetti, M.G.; Inchingolo, F.; Sforza, C. Is Orthodontic Treatment with Microperforations Worth It? A Scoping Review. Children 2022, 9, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Muñoz, F.; Jiménez, C.; Espinoza, D.; Vervelle, A.; Beugnet, J.; Haidar, Z. Use of leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO): Clinical effects on edema and pain. J. Clini. Exp. Dent. 2016, 8, e119–e124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Schröder, A.; Käppler, P.; Nazet, U.; Jantsch, J.; Proff, P.; Cieplik, F.; Deschner, J.; Kirschneck, C. Effects of Compressive and Tensile Strain on Macrophages during Simulated Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Mediat. Inflamm. 2020, 2020, 2814015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sivarajan, S.; Ringgingon, L.P.; Fayed, M.M.S.; Wey, M.C. The effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2020, 157, 290–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wu, Z.; Dai, W.; Wang, P.; Zhang, X.; Tang, Y.; Liu, L.; Wang, Q.; Li, M.; Tang, C. Periostin promotes migration, proliferation, and differentiation of human periodontal ligament mesenchymal stem cells. Connect. Tissue Res. 2018, 59, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Jiang, C.; Li, Z.; Quan, H.; Xiao, L.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Gou, Y.; An, S.; Huang, Y.; et al. Osteoimmunology in orthodontic tooth movement. Oral Dis. 2015, 21, 694–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Babanouri, N.; Ajami, S.; Salehi, P. Effect of mini-screw-facilitated micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A single-center, split-mouth, randomized, controlled trial. Prog. Orthod. 2020, 21, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hoffmann, S.; Papadopoulos, N.; Visel, D.; Visel, T.; Jost-Brinkmann, P.G.; Präger, T.M. Influence of piezotomy and osteoperforation of the alveolar process on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review. J. Orofac. Orthop. 2017, 78, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Köle, H. Surgical operations on the alveolar ridge to correct occlusal abnormalities. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1959, 12, 515–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Frost, H.M. The regional acceleratory phenomenon: A review. Henry Ford Hosp. Med. J. 1983, 31, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  70. Al-Naoum, F.; Hajeer, M.Y.; Al-Jundi, A. Does alveolar corticotomy accelerate orthodontic tooth movement when retracting upper canines? A split-mouth design randomized controlled trial. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2014, 72, 1880–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Khlef, H.N.; Hajeer, M.Y.; Ajaj, M.A.; Heshmeh, O.; Youssef, N.; Mahaini, L. The effectiveness of traditional corticotomy vs flapless corticotomy in miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion: A single-centered, randomized controlled clinical trial. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2020, 158, e111–e120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Han, S.H.; Park, W.J.; Park, J.B. Comparative Efficacy of Traditional Corticotomy and Flapless Piezotomy in Facilitating Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina 2023, 59, 1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sirri, M.R.; Burhan, A.S.; Hajeer, M.Y.; Nawaya, F.R. Evaluation of corticision-based acceleration of lower anterior teeth alignment in terms of root resorption and dehiscence formation using cone-beam computed tomography in young adult patients: A randomized controlled trial. Int. Orthod. 2021, 19, 580–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jaber, S.T.; Al-Sabbagh, R.; Hajeer, M.Y. Evaluation of the efficacy of laser-assisted flapless corticotomy in accelerating canine retraction: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2022, 26, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Toodehzaeim, M.H.; Maybodi, F.R.; Rafiei, E.; Toodehzaeim, P.; Karimi, N. Effect of laser corticotomy on canine retraction rate: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2024, 24, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Patano, A.; Cirulli, N.; Beretta, M.; Plantamura, P.; Inchingolo, A.D.; Inchingolo, A.M.; Bordea, I.R.; Malcangi, G.; Marinelli, G.; Scarano, A.; et al. Education Technology in Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Singh, H.; Maurya, R.K.; Sharma, P.; Kapoor, P.; Mittal, T. Aerosol generating procedural risks and concomitant mitigation strategies in orthodontics amid COVID-19 pandemic—An updated evidence-based review. Int. Orthod. 2021, 19, 329–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wemyss, C.; Benington, P.; Chung, L.; El-Angbawi, A.; Ayoub, A. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthognathic patients: What have we learned? Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2022, 60, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shoreibah, E.A.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Attia, M.S.; Diab, M.M. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of bone grafting in corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics. Effectiveness of bovine-derived xenograft in adults. J. Int. Acad. Periodontol. 2012, 14, 105–113. [Google Scholar]
  80. Bahammam, M.A. Effectiveness of bovine-derived xenograft versus bioactive glass with periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics in adults: A randomized, controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2016, 16, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chandra, R.V.; Rachala, M.R.; Madhavi, K.; Kambalyal, P.; Reddy, A.A.; Ali, M.H. Periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics combined with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: An outcome assessment. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2019, 23, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Al-Naoum, F.; Al-Sabbagh, R.; Al-Jundi, A. Periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics versus conventional extraction-based orthodontics in dental decrowding: A randomized controlled trial. Int. Arab J. Dent. 2015, 6, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Abbas, I.T.; Moutamed, G.M. Acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement by alveolar corticotomy using piezosurgery. J. Am. Sci. 2012, 8, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  84. Wu, J.; Jiang, J.H.; Xu, L.; Liang, C.; Bai, Y.; Zou, W. A pilot clinical study of Class III surgical patients facilitated by improved accelerated osteogenic orthodontic treatments. Angle Orthod. 2015, 85, 616–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wilcko, W.M.; Wilcko, T.; Bouquot, J.E.; Ferguson, D.J. Rapid orthodontics with alveolar reshaping: Two case reports of decrowding. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2001, 21, 9–19. [Google Scholar]
Clinpract 14 00137 g001
Figure 1. Distribution of study types among the top 50 most-cited articles in accelerated orthodontics (2012–2023).
Figure 1. Distribution of study types among the top 50 most-cited articles in accelerated orthodontics (2012–2023).
Clinpract 14 00137 g001
Clinpract 14 00137 g002
Figure 2. Annual scientific production of top 50 most-cited articles on accelerated orthodontics (2012–2023).
Figure 2. Annual scientific production of top 50 most-cited articles on accelerated orthodontics (2012–2023).
Clinpract 14 00137 g002
Clinpract 14 00137 g003
Figure 3. Average citations per year for top 50 most-cited articles on accelerated orthodontics (2012–2023).
Figure 3. Average citations per year for top 50 most-cited articles on accelerated orthodontics (2012–2023).
Clinpract 14 00137 g003
Clinpract 14 00137 g004
Figure 4. Top ten globally cited documents in accelerated orthodontics [15,16,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27].
Figure 4. Top ten globally cited documents in accelerated orthodontics [15,16,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27].
Clinpract 14 00137 g004
Clinpract 14 00137 g005
Figure 5. Distribution of most relevant sources in accelerated orthodontics literature (2012–2023).
Figure 5. Distribution of most relevant sources in accelerated orthodontics literature (2012–2023).
Clinpract 14 00137 g005
Clinpract 14 00137 g006
Figure 6. Most relevant affiliations among top 50 most-cited articles contributing to accelerated orthodontics research (2012–2023).
Figure 6. Most relevant affiliations among top 50 most-cited articles contributing to accelerated orthodontics research (2012–2023).
Clinpract 14 00137 g006
Clinpract 14 00137 g007
Figure 7. Co-occurrence network of keywords in accelerated orthodontics research.
Figure 7. Co-occurrence network of keywords in accelerated orthodontics research.
Clinpract 14 00137 g007
Clinpract 14 00137 g008
Figure 8. Word cloud representation of keyword frequencies in accelerated orthodontics Top 50 most-cited papers.
Figure 8. Word cloud representation of keyword frequencies in accelerated orthodontics Top 50 most-cited papers.
Clinpract 14 00137 g008
Clinpract 14 00137 g009
Figure 9. Collaborative networks of authors in accelerated orthodontics research.
Figure 9. Collaborative networks of authors in accelerated orthodontics research.
Clinpract 14 00137 g009
Clinpract 14 00137 g010
Figure 10. Countries’ collaboration network in accelerated orthodontics research (2012–2023).
Figure 10. Countries’ collaboration network in accelerated orthodontics research (2012–2023).
Clinpract 14 00137 g010
Table 1. List of top 50 most-cited articles in accelerated orthodontics (2012–2023), ranked by total citations.
Table 1. List of top 50 most-cited articles in accelerated orthodontics (2012–2023), ranked by total citations.
TitleFirst Author, YearJournal NameTotal
Citations		TC per YearNormalized TCStudy Type
Orthodontic tooth movement: The biology and clinical implications [20]LI Y, 2018The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences22932.713.27Review
Acceleration of tooth movement during orthodontic treatment—a frontier in Orthodontics [15]NIMERI G, 2013Progress in Orthodontics17214.332.29Review
Surgery First in Orthognathic Surgery: What Have We Learned? A Comprehensive Workflow Based on 45 Consecutive Cases [21]HERNÁNDEZ-ALFARO F, 2014Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery11710.641.59Prospective Study
Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction [22]ABBAS NH, 2016American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics10611.781.62Prospective Study
Localized Piezoelectric Alveolar Decortication for Orthodontic Treatment in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial [16]CHARAVET C, 2016Journal of Dental Research9710.781.48Randomized Controlled Trial
Effectiveness of non-conventional methods for accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review and meta-analysis [23]GKANTIDIS N, 2014Journal of Dentistry908.181.22Systematic Review
Effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on orthodontic tooth movement [24]GENC G, 2013Lasers in Medical Science887.331.17Prospective Study
Surgically facilitated orthodontic treatment: A systematic review [25]HOOGEVEEN EJ, 2014American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics877.911.18Systematic Review
Photobiomodulation accelerates orthodontic alignment in the early phase of treatment [26]KAU CH, 2013Progress in Orthodontics786.501.04Prospective Study
Effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the acceleration of tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis [27]ALFAWAL AMH, 2016Progress in Orthodontics768.441.16Systematic Review
Corticotomies and Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review [28]PATTERSON BM, 2016Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery758.331.15Systematic Review
Accelerated tooth movement with piezocision and its periodontal-transversal effects in patients with Class II malocclusion [29]AKSAKALLI S, 2016The Angle orthodontist717.891.08Prospective Study
Force-induced Adrb2 in Periodontal Ligament Cells Promotes Tooth Movement [30]CAO H, 2014Journal of Dental Research686.180.93Experimental study
Periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO)—a review [31]AMIT G, 2012Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry644.921.22Review
Low-level laser therapy effectiveness in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: A randomized controlled clinical trial [32]ALSAYED HASAN MMA, 2017The Angle orthodontist637.881.42Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy of surgical and non-surgical interventions on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review [33]KALEMAJ Z, 2015European journal of oral implantology616.101.27Systematic Review
Mini-implant supported canine retraction with micro-osteoperforation: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial [34]SIVARAJAN S, 2019The Angle orthodontist6010.001.14Randomized Controlled Trial
Vibratory stimulation increases interleukin-1 beta secretion during orthodontic tooth movement [35]LEETHANAKUL C, 2016The Angle orthodontist576.330.87Prospective Study
Growth modification of the face: A current perspective with emphasis on Class III treatment [36]DE CLERCK HJ, 2015American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics565.601.17Review
Efficacy of piezocision on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review [37]YI J, 2017The Angle orthodontist567.001.26Systematic Review
Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial [38]ABOALNAGA AA, 2019Progress in Orthodontics559.171.04Randomized Controlled Trial
Evaluation of piezocision and laser-assisted flapless corticotomy in the acceleration of canine retraction: a randomized controlled trial [39]ALFAWAL AMH, 2018Head & face medicine547.710.77Systematic Review
American Academy of Periodontology best evidence consensus statement on modifying periodontal phenotype in preparation for orthodontic and restorative treatment [40]KAO RT, 2020Journal of periodontology5410.801.42Review
Ability of mini-implant-facilitated micro-osteoperforations to accelerate tooth movement in rats [41]CHEUNG T, 2016American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics535.890.81Experimental study
Comparison of rate of tooth movement and pain perception during accelerated tooth movement associated with conventional fixed appliances with micro-osteoperforations—a randomised controlled trial [42]ATTRI S, 2018Journal of orthodontics486.860.69Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in accelerating tooth movement, preventing relapse and managing acute pain during orthodontic treatment in humans: a systematic review [43]SONESSON M, 2016BMC Oral Health volume485.330.73Systematic Review
Alveolar corticotomies for accelerated orthodontics: A systematic review [44]GIL APS, 2018Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery486.860.69Systematic Review
Low-level laser therapy increases interleukin-1β in gingival crevicular fluid and enhances the rate of orthodontic tooth movement [45]VARELLA AM, 2018American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics456.430.64Prospective Study
Micro-osteoperforations: Minimally invasive accelerated tooth movement [46]ALIKHANI M, 2015Seminars in Orthodontics444.400.92Review
Effectiveness of adjunctive interventions for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review of systematic reviewsb [47]YI J, 2017Journal of Oral Rehabilitation445.500.99Systematic Review
Effectiveness and Safety of Minimally Invasive Orthodontic Tooth Movement Acceleration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [48]FU T, 2019Journal of Dental Research437.170.82Systematic Review
Assessment of Corticotomy Facilitated Tooth Movement and Changes in Alveolar Bone Thickness—A CT Scan Study [49]BHATTACHARYA P, 2014Journal of clinical and diagnostic research423.820.57Cross-sectional Study
Corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics in adults using a further modified technique [50]SHOREIBAH EA, 2012Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology413.150.78Prospective Study
Augmented Corticotomy Combined With Accelerated Orthodontic Forces in Class III Orthognathic Patients: Morphologic Aspects of the Mandibular Anterior Ridge With Cone-Beam Computed Tomography [51]COSCIA G, 2013Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery403.330.53Prospective Study
Intraoral photobiomodulation-induced orthodontic tooth alignment: a preliminary study [52]SHAUGHNESSY T, 2016BMC Oral Health384.220.58Preliminary Study
Is periodontal phenotype modification therapy beneficial for patients receiving orthodontic treatment? An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review [53]WANG CW, 2020Journal of periodontology387.601.00Review
Comparing the 810 nm Diode Laser with Conventional Surgery in Orthodontic Soft Tissue Procedures [54]IZE-IYAMU IN, 2013Ghana medical journal383.170.51Prospective Study
Surgery-first approach in orthognathic surgery: Psychological and biological aspects—A prospective cohort study [55]ZINGLER S, 2017Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery384.750.86Prospective Study
Interseptal bone reduction on the rate of maxillary canine retraction [56]LEETHANAKUL C, 2014The Angle orthodontist373.360.50Prospective Study
Accelerated orthodontic treatment—what’s the evidence? [57]MILES P, 2017Australian dental journal354.380.79Review
The use of micro-osteoperforation concept for accelerating differential tooth movement [58]FEIZBAKHSH M, 2018Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists344.860.49Prospective Study
Sequential piezocision: A novel approach to accelerated orthodontic treatment [59]KESER EI, 2013American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics342.830.45Case report
Is Orthodontic Treatment with Microperforations Worth It? A Scoping Review [60]MASPERO C, 2022Children (Basel, Switzerland)3411.331.00Review
Use of leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO): Clinical effects on edema and pain [61]MUÑOZ F, 2016Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry343.780.52Prospective Study
Effects of Compressive and Tensile Strain on Macrophages during Simulated Orthodontic Tooth Movement [62]SCHRÖDER A, 2020Mediators of inflammation346.800.89Experimental study
The effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review and meta-analysis [63]SIVARAJAN S, 2020American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics346.800.89Systematic Review
Periostin promotes migration, proliferation, and differentiation of human periodontal ligament mesenchymal stem cells [64]WU Z, 2018Connective tissue research324.570.46Experimental study
Osteoimmunology in orthodontic tooth movement [65]JIANG C, 2015Oral diseases313.100.65Review
Effect of mini-screw-facilitated micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a single-center, split-mouth, randomized, controlled trial [66]BABANOURI N, 2020Progress in Orthodontics306.000.79Randomized Controlled Trial
Influence of piezotomy and osteoperforation of the alveolar process on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review [67]HOFFMANN S, 2017Journal of orofacial orthopedics303.750.68Systematic Review
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alsulaiman, A.A.; Alsulaiman, O.A. Accelerated Orthodontics: A Descriptive Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 50 Cited Articles from 2012 to 2023. Clin. Pract. 2024, 14, 1716-1736. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14050137

AMA Style

Alsulaiman AA, Alsulaiman OA. Accelerated Orthodontics: A Descriptive Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 50 Cited Articles from 2012 to 2023. Clinics and Practice. 2024; 14(5):1716-1736. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14050137

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alsulaiman, Ahmed A., and Osama A. Alsulaiman. 2024. "Accelerated Orthodontics: A Descriptive Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 50 Cited Articles from 2012 to 2023" Clinics and Practice 14, no. 5: 1716-1736. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14050137

APA Style

Alsulaiman, A. A., & Alsulaiman, O. A. (2024). Accelerated Orthodontics: A Descriptive Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 50 Cited Articles from 2012 to 2023. Clinics and Practice, 14(5), 1716-1736. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14050137

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop