Next Article in Journal
Phycoremediation of Potato Industry Wastewater for Nutrient Recovery, Pollution Reduction, and Biofertilizer Production for Greenhouse Cultivation of Lettuce and Celery in Sandy Soils
Previous Article in Journal
Plant Genetic Diversity Studies: Insights from DNA Marker Analyses
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Agrobacterium tumefaciens-Mediated Genetic Transformation of Eclipta alba

Department of Bio-Sciences and Technology, M.M. Engineering College, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana-Ambala 133207, India
Institute of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organisation (ARO), The Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel
University Centre for Research and Development, University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali 140413, India
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Plant Biol. 2024, 15(3), 641-651; (registering DOI)
Submission received: 11 June 2024 / Revised: 3 July 2024 / Accepted: 5 July 2024 / Published: 10 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Biochemistry and Genetics)


Eclipta alba (Linn.) Hassk. (Asteraceae) is a high value medicinal plant which possesses diverse medicinal properties. It is an important herb for the treatment of various disorders, and is primarily used as a hepatoprotectant. Its major biochemical constituents include wedelolactone and dimethyl-wedelolactone (coumestans), which possess anti-hepatotoxic properties. Due to its numerous medicinal properties, it is in high demand by the pharmaceutical industry and therefore requires urgent biotechnological interventions for its improvement. Therefore, the present study was constructed with the aim of developing an efficient genetic transformation protocol for E. alba, which will help in the mass production of the active compounds found in E. alba. Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA 4404, containing vector pBI121, was used to genetically transform the plant, and the effect of various factors such as infection type, light cycle effect, effect of pH, among others, on the genetic transformation efficiency was analyzed. Regenerated transformed shoots were confirmed using the standard Polymerase Chain Reaction PCR method. Kanamycin-resistant and beta- glucurosidaseGUS-positive shoots indicated the development of transgenic shoots in E. alba. Amplification of nptll and uidA genes confirmed the integration of t-DNA transgenic shoots. In conclusion, various factors affecting the transformation efficiency were analyzed, and a reliable A. tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation protocol was developed.

1. Introduction

Plants have been used by humans for food, flavouring, healthcare and a variety of other purposes since ancient times. Many civilizations’ ancient written records provide substantial proof of the use of medicinal plants; for example, ayurvedic writings detail the use of medicinal plants for treating a variety of diseases [1]. Medicinal plants contain phytoconstituents that provide a supply of bioactive molecules needed for significant pharmacological activity with no adverse effects. They can be used to develop new classes of possibly safer medications or treatments for a wide range of diseases [2]. The use of medicinal plants as herbal medicine is increasing in modernized countries; as per one study, 25% of the UK population uses herbal medication to meet their healthcare needs [3]. Approximately 40% of chemicals used in the pharmaceutical industry are sourced directly or indirectly from plants because chemical synthesis of such compounds is either impossible or financially unsustainable [4]. Consumers worldwide have a favourable mindset towards herbal goods, believing them to be of “natural” rather than “synthetic” origin, and believing that such products are more likely to be safe than synthetic pharmaceuticals. Herbal medications and its contents have been shown to improve long-term fitness and can be utilized effectively to treat human diseases or disorders [5].
Eclipta alba (Linn.) Hassk. (Asteraceae) is one such medicinal plant which possesses diverse medicinal properties and is primarily used as hepatoprotectant. It is also recognized as a nerve tonic, in addition to having hair-strengthening, anti-aging, and immunomodulator qualities [6]. Its main contents include coumestans, eclalbatin, alpha-amyrin, urosolic acid, oleanolic acid, daucosterol and stigmasterol-3-O-glucoside, as well as other therapeutically significant biochemical components [7].
Due to their diverse medicinal properties, medicinal plants are under high demand by the pharmaceutical industry and thus require urgent biotechnological interventions for their conservation, propagation, and improvement. As such, there is a need to conserve and genetically transform this important plant. Now-a-days, substantial advancement has been made in the practical application of in vitro culture techniques to address the aforementioned challenges in the safeguarding of valuable medicinal plants [7]. Further in vitro propagation techniques have been proposed as a viable approach for generating sufficient material for the commercial cultivation of valuable medicinal plants.
Furthermore, genetic engineering of medicinal plants is one of the most encouraging strategies to enhance the productivity and quality of these plants [8]. It will help in decreasing the stress on natural resources, and furthermore will promote sustainable development within the medicinal plant industry. Despite significant improvements in plant genetic engineering worldwide, research in this area remains relatively scarce; moreover, efforts have largely focused on model plants. Thus, there is a need to develop genetic transformation protocols for other important medicinal plants. Genetic transformation can help with the mass production of active compounds found in medicinal plants, thereby enabling more comprehensive utilization of their benefits [9].
Genetic transformation facilitates means to validate gene function and trait specific improvement in highly valuable medicinal plants without affecting their desirable genetic makeup [8]. Increasing interest in E. alba as a medicinal and oil yielding plant has opened avenues to develop an efficient genetic transformation system in order to transfer novel traits into the plant. Remarkably, only one singular instance of successful regeneration and transformation of E. alba has been documented [10]. Despite numerous micropropagation endeavors undertaken for E. alba [11,12,13], the notable absence of dedicated efforts towards developing a reliable and efficient protocol for the genetic transformation of E. alba remains conspicuous. Therefore, the present investigation aims to assess various parameters influencing genetic transformation, and to develop a dependable and reproducible A. tumefaciens-based genetic transformation technique for E. alba.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Explant Source, Preparation and Culture Conditions

The E. alba plants (young, healthy, free from any symptoms of disease) used in this study were initially collected from Tau Devi Lal herbal garden, District Yamunanager, Haryana, India, and maintained at the nursery of Maharishi Markandeshwar (deemed to be) University, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India, under standard conditions. Nodal segments were used to establish aseptic cultures using standard tissue culture protocol as mentioned by Datta et al. [13]. HiMedia Laboratories (Mumbai, India) supplied all frequently used chemicals, while Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) supplied growth regulators, antibiotics and speciality chemicals. Unless otherwise indicated, all experiments were performed in 300 mL glass culture bottles (Kasablanka, Mumbai, India) with 50 mL of Murashige and Skoog medium [14] containing 58 mM sucrose and 0.7% (w/v) agar (MS media). The pH of the medium (used for the establishment, regeneration and genetic transformation of E. alba) was adjusted to 5.8 prior to autoclaving, and cultures were incubated at 25 ± 1 °C with a light intensity of 42 mol m−2 s−1 in a 16-h light/8-h dark cycle. The explants for the investigations were expanded leaves from elongated microshoots grown on MS media [14] supplemented with 2.5 μM benzyladenine (BA) and 0.1 μM α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA).

2.2. Agrobacterium Strain, Vector and Kanamycin Sensitivity Determination

Disarmed strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains EHA105 and LBA4404 containing the binary vector pBI121 with the uidA gene (β-glucuronidase) (GUS) as a reporter marker gene and the selection marker gene nptII (neomycin phosphotransferase II) were employed for the genetic transformation investigations. Both genes were located on T-DNA and were triggered by the CaMV 35S and nos promoters, respectively [15]. The binary vector was delivered into Agrobacterium tumefaciens disarmed strains EHA105 and LBA4404 by the freeze–thaw method [16]. The presence of the pBI121 plasmid was verified in the antibiotic-resistant bacterial colonies by PCR, using nptII gene-specific primers [17]. The transformed A. tumefaciens strains were kept at 28 °C on yeast extract peptone (YEP) agar medium (10 g/L bacto peptone, 10 g/L yeast extract, 0.5 g/L NaCl and 1.5 g/L agar at pH 7) containing 15 lg/mL rifampicin and 50 lg/mL kanamycin, and were used for the genetic transformation experiments. The kanamycin resistance (tolerance limits) of explants were assessed by incubating leaves on shoot regeneration medium (MS + 15.0 μM of NAA and 1.0 μM of BA) containing variable quantities of kanamycin (0–100 µg/mL) as per the protocol mentioned by other authors [18]. Antibiotic was sterilized using a 0.22 µm filter and incorporated into the medium succeeding autoclaving.

2.3. Genetic Transformation

Co-Cultivation and Infection

Fresh pure cultures of A. tumefaciens (both EHA 105 and LBA 4404) grown overnight on YEP medium containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin and 15 μg/mL rifampicin were used. The cells were spun (5000× g, 2 min) and then resuspended in YEP medium with 100 µM acetosyringone to reach the desired OD600. Leaf explants cultivated on shoot regeneration medium for 0–5 days were wounded using various methods, including piercing with a sterile injection needle, hammering with a surgical blade, and rubbing with abrasive paper or glass beads. Then, in petri plates, they were infected with the aforementioned A. tumefaciens suspension for various time intervals (0–30 min). After infection, the explants were dried out using sterile absorbent paper to eliminate leftover bacterial cells and media. They were then cultured in an antibiotic-free co-cultivation medium for a period ranging from 1 to 5 days. The vessels containing cultures were wrapped with parafilm and maintained in various light periods (24 h light, 16-h light/8-h dark and 24 h darkness).

2.4. Regeneration of Transformed Leaf Explants

Following co-cultivation, the leaf specimens were washed with autoclaved milli-Q water with 500 μg/mL of cefotaxime. After drying the explants on sterile absorbent paper, they were subsequently shifted to vessels containing MS medium, which had been supplemented with 15.0 μM of NAA, 1.0 μM of BA, 50 μg/mL of kanamycin and 500 μg/mL of cefotaxime. Throughout the experiment, the cultures underwent periodic sub-culturing on the same medium every 25–30 days. This process was continued until successful regeneration of transformed tissue was achieved.

2.5. Measurement of GUS Activity

Regenerated shoots exhibiting resistance to kanamycin were used to conduct a GUS assay. The purpose was to assess GUS expression, following the procedure outlined by Jefferson et al. [15]. For the measurement of GUS activity, 20 explants were evaluated for every treatment (treatments as mentioned in Table 1, including infection time, pre culture, OD value, etc.). Explants exhibiting a blue coloration were considered positive.

2.6. Molecular Analysis

We isolated DNA from the leaves of both GUS-suspected transgenic shoots and non-transformed plants using the CTAB method described by [19] for PCR amplification of specific DNA fragments related to the nptII and uidA genes. The PCR mix included 20 ng of DNA, 1.0 U of Taq DNA polymerase, a 100 μM concentration of each dNTP, 2.0 µL of a 10X reaction buffer, 10 nmol of each primer and sterile Milli Q water to make a volume of 20 µL. The amplification procedure began with a denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles involving denaturation at 94 °C for one minute, annealing at 58 °C for 45 s, and extension at 72 °C for one and a half minutes, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. A DNA segment 1500 bp long specific to the gene uidA underwent amplification using designated primer pairs (FP: 5′ GGTGGGAAAGCGCGTTACAAG 3′, RP: 5′ GTTTACGCGTTGCTTCCGCCA 3′). Similarly, a DNA fragment around 760 bp in length targeting nptII was amplified with the primer pair (FP: 5′GAGGCTATTCGGCTATGACTC 3′, RP 5′ATCGGGAGAGGCGATA CCGTA 3′). Plasmid DNA from pBI121 served as a positive control, while DNA from non-transformed E. alba shoots leaves acted as the negative control. To amplify a 16S rRNA segment of about 1500 base pairs of DNA [20], the procedure as mentioned by Aggarwal et al. [21] was followed, using bacterial genomic DNA as the positive control. The PCR results were analyzed on 1.0% (w/v) agarose gel and visualized through UV illumination (Quantum ST4, France) after staining with ethidium bromide.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The trials were performed three times, each repeated three times. The results were statistically verified using analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the data, followed by mean comparisons through the DMRT test (where significance was set at p < 0.05). All these computations were carried out using GraphPad Prism 4 software.

3. Results and Discussion

Increasing interest in medicinal plants has opened up avenues to develop shoot regeneration and a genetic transformation system in order to transfer novel traits into the plants. However, the lack of an efficient genetic transformation protocol has been widely acknowledged as a hindrance to performing genetic engineering in many plants, including in E. alba [11]. Eclipta alba, a plant renowned for its distinct medicinal properties and utilization in various medical formulations, serves as a prominent example. Hence, the current research concentrates on the establishment of an efficient genetic transformation protocol for E. alba.
The fundamental approach to genetically modifying plants involves incorporating transgenes into the genomic DNA of the plant. In order to aid the transfer of DNA into host plant cells, several transformation methods have been developed [22]. The genetic transformation method involving A. tumefaciens is preferred over direct transformation methods due to its simplicity, reliability and ease of analysis for generating transgenic plants [23]. The present study explored the variables that influence the efficiency of delivering T-DNA into the E. alba plants through the utilization of A. tumefaciens. This research represents one of the limited instances where factors affecting the genetic transformation of E. alba have been investigated.
Selection of transformed tissue using a suitable antibiotic is one of the most critical steps in the development of any genetic transformation protocol. Kanamycin, an antibiotic derived from aminoglycosides, is frequently employed to identify cells possessing the nptII gene. Susceptibility to kanamycin has been found to differ among different plant species, and numerous plant species have displayed hindered regeneration across a range of concentrations [24,25]. Therefore, the kanamycin sensitivity of E. alba leaves was assessed through the cultivation of leaf explants on shoot regeneration medium (MS + 15.0 μM NAA + 1.0 μM BA) enriched with kanamycin (0–100 mg/L). At concentrations exceeding 50 mg/L, kanamycin significantly inhibited growth and completely arrested the regeneration of E. alba (Figure 1). This assessment of kanamycin sensitivity is expected to prove valuable in subsequent evaluations of transformants during genetic transformation investigations. These findings align with earlier research on various plants, including E. alba [10,26,27]. The cefotaxim concentration was kept at 500 μg/mL for the elimination of residual bacteria from the cultures. This concentration of cefotaxim was effective for the complete elimination of A. tumefaciens.
The success of transformation is often dependent on the type of A. tumefaciens strain employed for the genetic transformation [28]. In this study, two Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains, namely LBA4404 and EHA105 (both harboring the vector pBI121), were employed for experimentation. The resulting frequencies of transient GUS activity were compared to determine the transformation efficiency produced by these strains. Upon infecting the explants with the LBA4404 strain, approximately 52.3% of the explants demonstrated transient GUS activity, while the EHA105 strain led to around 48.5% transient GUS activity (Table 1). The A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404 was found useful in numerous plant transformation efforts due to its tendency to be easily removed from plant tissues at low antibiotic concentrations [21]. Conversely, the strain EHA105 presents challenges in its complete removal from plant tissues [28]. Therefore, A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404 was utilized in subsequent experiments.
The effectiveness of T-DNA delivery into leaf explants was influenced by a variety of factors (as mentioned in Table 1), including pre-culture conditions, bacterial density, damage mechanisms, incubation parameters, the presence of acetosyringone and other relevant variables [29]. Therefore, special emphasis has been given in the present study to standardize various parameters for the genetic transformation of E. alba (Table 1). Certain plant species have exhibited improved transformation outcomes when optimal explant pre-culture conditions are employed before Agrobacterium infection, and this has emerged as a pivotal element contributing to the successful transformation of many plants [30]. In the current study, leaf explants that were pre-cultured (0–5 days) on MS medium + 1.0 μM BA + 15 μM NAA supplemented with 100 μM acetosyringone for a period of two days before infection with Agrobacterium demonstrated the highest transient GUS activity (56.8%; Table 1), compared with explants without pre culturing treatment (36.8%). This increased GUS activity is most likely due to the action of growth hormones and acetosyringone, which speeds up the cell and helps by changing the physiology of leaf explants and making them competent for transformation [31].
When actively developing cells are wounded, Agrobacterium recognizes the phenolics signal, which promotes the transformation of plant cells [31]. The method of tissue injury before bacterial infection was also observed to exert a notable influence on T-DNA delivery. Among the various methods of injury used, introducing small punctures in the tissue using a hypodermic needle resulted in a significant enhancement of transient GUS activity, increasing from 36.7% (in undamaged explants) to 55.6% (Table 1). Pre-injuring the tissue prior to infection might help induce deeper penetration of bacteria into the tissue, thereby allowing improved accessibility of plant cells to Agrobacterium [31]. These factors are likely the primary contributors to the improved bacterial efficacy in T-DNA delivery [32].
Amalgamation of 150 μM acetosyringone in the co-cultivation medium increased transient GUS activity from 43.5% to 63.4% (Table 1). Previous research has demonstrated that acetosyringone enhances the efficiency of Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation in various plant species by triggering the activation of vir genes through the secretion of phenolic compounds [33,34].
Although A. tumefaciens typically thrives under neutral pH conditions [35], prior investigations into Agrobacterium-mediated transformation have revealed that lower pH promotes the ideal expression of the vir cascade [36]. Furthermore, enhanced vir gene induction has been reported under low pH conditions in the presence of acetosyringone, suggesting that the induction of the vir gene is favored under the acidic conditions [32]. Earlier studies also indicated that low pH during co-cultivation was favorable for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation [37,38]. Therefore, in this particular study, adjusting the co-cultivation medium’s pH to 5.4 resulted in the most pronounced transient GUS expression (Table 1), highlighting the significance of maintaining the appropriate pH levels throughout the co-cultivation process.
The density of the Agrobacterium inoculum used for infecting plants cells is a crucial factor in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation systems. In the current work, leaf explants were infected with Agrobacterium at varied cell densities (Table 1). The maximum transient GUS activity was observed in explants treated with a bacterial suspension at an OD600 of 0.6. As bacterial density increased beyond this point, transient GUS activity gradually decreased. This decline in transient GUS activity with increasing bacterial density could be attributed to the likelihood of increased damage to plant tissue, necrosis, and an elevated production of toxic compounds when inoculated with higher Agrobacterium densities [39]. Recently, the influence of Agrobacterium density on the genetic transformation of Solanum betaceum was reported by Cordeiro et al. [40].
In addition, the study also looked at the effect of altering the duration of the co-cultivation time (0–5 days). When explants were subjected to a co-cultivation period of two days, a peak of 54.6% exhibited transient GUS activity. Along with a co-cultivation time of 5 days, an infection time of 15 min was found to be the optimum for the genetic transformation of E. alba (Table 1). Prolonged co-cultivation periods and infection time have been known to lead to explant mortality due to bacterial overgrowth, which can negatively impact the transformation process [41].
Finally, changing the light conditions during the co-cultivation phase was discovered to have a considerable influence on transient expression efficiency [42]. The highest number of explants (56.5%, Table 1) exhibited GUS activity when exposed to a light cycle of 16/8-h light/dark ratio. Light conditions have been demonstrated to enhance Agrobacterium-mediated T-DNA transfer to plants as plant transformation is reported to be regulated by light signaling pathways mediated by photoreceptors, which regulate some of the crucial processes involved in genetic transformation [43,44].
After optimizing the abovementioned parameters for genetic transformation of E. alba, experiments were conducted for the recovery of transgenic shoots. Transgenic shoots were recovered on MS medium supplemented with 1.0 μM of BA, 15 μM of NAA, along with 50 mg/l kanamycin and 500 mg/L cefotaxime (selection medium). The cultures were sub-cultured each time with a 20-day gap in the same condition. A transformation efficiency of 4–5% was achieved on the selection medium using the abovementioned parameters. After 8–10 weeks of incubation on the selection medium, transgenic shoots of E. alba showing positive GUS activity were recovered (Figure 2).
To rule out the possibility of false transient GUS expression due to the presence of residual Agrobacterium strains in the leaves of putative transgenic plants, 16S rRNA was carried out. No amplification of the DNA fragment specific to the 16S rRNA locus indicated the complete elimination of bacteria from these tissues (Figure 3A). Previously, such analysis has been used by researchers in other plants [21,25]. To further confirm the expression of the nptII and uidA genes in transgenic shoots, PCR amplification of these two genes was carried out; amplification yielded a 720 bp fragment specific to the nptII gene (Figure 3B) and a 1500 bp fragment specific to the uidA gene (Figure 3C) from transgenic shoots, confirming the integration of both genes in the transgenic lines.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, an efficient protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of E. alba was established. Various factors such as the Agrobacterium strain, OD value, co-cultivation period, method of injury, use of acetosyringone, and the pH of the co-cultivation medium. were efficiently applied and found to have influence on the genetic transformation efficiency of leaf explants of E. alba. The presence of the transgenes, i.e., nptII and uidA genes, in transformed shoots were confirmed using PCR analysis in comparison to control plants. Further, 16srRNA analysis was carried out to rule out the possibility of false GUS positive signals in transformed plant tissue due to residual Agrobacterium contamination. Finally, this developed protocol can be used for plant gene functional analysis, as well as for the genetic improvement of this important medicinal plant.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: D.A. and P.K.; methodology: V.D.; writing—original draft preparation: D.A. and V.D.; writing—review and editing: D.A., H.S.T. and S.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


The authors would like to thank TIFAC—CORE, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab, India, for providing the bacterial strains and the binary vector for the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Prasathkumar, M.; Anisha, S.; Dhrisya, C.; Becky, R.; Sadhasivam, S. Therapeutic and pharmacological efficacy of selective Indian medicinal plants—A review. Phytomedicine Plus 2021, 1, 100029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bhat, S.G. Medicinal Plants and Its Pharmacological Values. Natural Medicinal Plants; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Msomi, N.Z.; Simelane, B.C.M. Herbal Medicine. Herbal Medicine; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Atanasov, A.G.; Waltenberger, B.; Pferschy-Wenzig, E.M.; Linder, T.; Wawrosch, C.; Uhrin, P.; Temml, V.; Wang, L.; Schwaiger, S.; Heiss, E.H.; et al. Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant-derived natural products: A review. Bi-Otechnol Adv. 2015, 33, 1582–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Luqman, S.; Rizvi, S.I.; Beer, A.-M.; Khare, S.K.; Atukeren, P. Efficacy of herbal drugs in human diseases and disorders. Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 2014, 273676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Uniyal, R.; Sandhu, S.; Chandok, J. Herbology. In the Ayurvedic Encyclopedia; Sri Satguru Publications: New Delhi India, 1998; p. 77. [Google Scholar]
  7. Aggarwal, D.; Datta, V.; Singh, R. Eclipta Alba (L.) Hassk.: An important medicinal plant for immunity and health. In Plants for immunity; Behl, R.K., Sharma, P.K., Arya, R.K., Chibbar, R.N., Eds.; Agrobios Publications: Jodhpur, India, 2022; pp. 181–191. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ma, R.; Yu, Z.; Cai, Q.; Li, H.; Dong, Y.; Oksman-Caldentey, K.-M.; Rischer, H. Agrobacterium-Mediated Genetic Transformation of the Medicinal Plant Veratrum dahuricum. Plants 2020, 9, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Niazian, M. Application of genetics and biotechnology for improving medicinal plants. Planta 2019, 249, 953–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bardar, S.; Kaul, V.K.; Kachhwaha, S.; Kothari, S. Nutrient optimization for improved in vitro plant regeneration in Eclipta alba (L.) Hassk. and assessment of genetic fidelity using RAPD analysis. Plant Tissue Cult. Biotechnol. 2014, 24, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dhaka, N.; Kothari, S.L. Micropropagation of Eclipta alba (L.) hassk—An important medicinal plant. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2005, 41, 658–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Prakash, P.; Sharumathy, D.; Sunkar, S.; Nandagopal, D.; Gopakumaran, N. Micropropagation of Eclipta alba using humic acid as media component. Plant Arch. 2015, 15, 181–185. [Google Scholar]
  13. Datta, V.; Sharma, L.; Aggarawal, D.; Sharma, A.K.; Dhama, K. Synergistic effect of plant growth regulators on micropropagation of Eclipta alba: A plant with diverse medicinal properties. J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci. 2022, 10, 1432–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A Revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jefferson, R.A.; Kavanagh, T.A.; Bevan, M.W. GUS fusions: Beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 1987, 6, 3901–3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Holsters, M.; De Waele, D.; Depicker, A.; Messens, E.; Van Montagu, M.; Schell, J. Transfection and transformation of Agro-bacterium tumefaciens. Mol. Gen Genet 1978, 163, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sun, S.B.; Meng, L.S. Genetic transformation of Gentiana dahurica Fisch by Agrobacterium tumefaciens using zygotic embryo derived callus. Acta Physiol. Plant 2010, 32, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 1990, 12, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  19. Weisburg, W.G.; Barns, S.M.; Pelletier, D.A.; Lane, D.J. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Aggarwal, D.; Jaiswal, N.; Kumar, A.; Reddy, M.S. Factors affecting genetic transformation and shoot organogenesis of Bacopa monnieri (L.) Wettst. J. Plant Biochem Biotechnol 2013, 22, 382–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gosal, S.S.; Wani, S.H. Plant genetic transformation and transgenic crops: Methods and applications. In Biotechnologies of Crop Improvement, Volume 2: Transgenic Approaches; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gelvin, S.B. Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: The biology behind the ‘gene-jockeying’ tool. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2003, 67, 16–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Acanda, Y.; Canton, M.; Wu, H.; Zale, J. Kanamycin selection in temporary immersion bioreactors allows visual selection of transgenic citrus shoots. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2017, 129, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Aggarwal, D.; Kumar, A.; Reddy, M.S. Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated genetic transformation of selected elite clone(s) of Eucalyptus tereticornis. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2011, 33, 1603–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sun, Z.-L.; Zhou, W.; Yan, J.-D.; Gao, Y.-R.; Li, X.-W.; Sun, J.-C.; Fang, K.-F.; Zhang, Q.; Xing, Y.; Qin, L.; et al. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima Blume). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2020, 140, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Agarie, S.; Umemoto, M.; Sunagawa, H.; Anai, T.; Cushman, J.C. An Agrobacterium-mediated transformation via organogenesis regeneration of a facultative CAM plant, the common ice plant Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. Plant Prod. Sci. 2020, 23, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bhatt, R.; Asopa, P.P.; Jain, R.; Kothari-Chajer, A.; Kothari, S.L.; Kachhwaha, S. Optimization of Agrobacterium Mediated Genetic Transformation in Paspalum scrobiculatum L. (Kodo Millet). Agronomy 2021, 11, 1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Beyaz, R.; Aycan, M.; Yildiz, M. The effect of explant position on Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). J. Biotechnol. 2017, 256S, S17–S43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sadhu, S.K.; Jogam, P.; Gande, K.; Banoth, R.; Penna, S.; Peddaboina, V. Optimization of different factors for an Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation system using embryo axis explants of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Plant Biotechnol. 2022, 49, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Subramoni, S.; Nathoo, N.; Klimov, E.; Yuan, Z.-C. Agrobacterium tumefaciens responses to plant-derived signaling molecules. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Lee, L.-Y.; Gelvin, S.B. T-DNA Binary Vectors and Systems. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wu, E.; Zhao, Z.Y. Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1669, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Utami, E.S.W.; Hariyanto, S.; Manuhara, Y.S.W. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Dendrobium lasianthera J.J.Sm: An important medicinal orchid. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Manfroi, E.; Yamazaki-Lau, E.; Grando, M.F.; Roesler, E.A. Acetosyringone, pH and temperature effects on transient genetic transformation of immature embryos of Brazilian wheat genotypes by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2015, 38, 470–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hwang, H.-H.; Yu, M.; Lai, E.-M. Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: Biology and applications. Arab. Book 2017, 15, e0186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Song, S.; Yan, R.; Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Sun, H. Improvement of a Genetic transformation system and preliminary study on the function of LpABCB21 and LpPILS7 based on somatic embryogenesis in Lilium pumilum DC. Fisch. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Saini, S.; Sharma, I.; Kaur, N.; Pati, P.K. Auxin: A master regulator in plant root development. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32, 741–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Maheshwari, P.; Kovalchuk, I. Agrobacterium-mediated stable genetic transformation of populus angustifolia and populus balsamifera. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cordeiro, D.; Alves, A.; Ferraz, R.; Casimiro, B.; Canhoto, J.; Correia, S. An efficient Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation method for Solanum betaceum Cav. embryogenic callus. Plants 2023, 12, 1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zuker, A.; Ahroni, A.; Tzfira, T.; Ben-Meir, H.; Vainstein, A. Wounding by bombardment yields highly efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Mol. Breed. 1999, 5, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, J.; Sasse, A.; Sheridan, H. Traditional Chinese Medicine: From Aqueous Extracts to Therapeutic Formulae; Plant ex-tracts; IntachOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tiwari, M.; Mishra, A.K.; Chakrabarty, D. Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer: Recent advancements and layered immunity in plants. Planta 2022, 37, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Y.; Tang, D.; Liu, Z.; Chen, J.; Cheng, B.; Kumar, R.; Yer, H.; Li, Y. An Improved procedure for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of ‘Carrizo’ citrange. Plants 2022, 11, 1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mao, L.; Dai, Y.; Huang, Y.; Sun, H.; Li, Z.; Yang, B.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, W.; Ou, L.; Liu, Z.; et al. Effect of light intensity on gene expression in hypocotyl during the elongation in a leaf-yellowing mutant of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Agronomy 2022, 12, 2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The effect of kanamycin in MS medium on the survival of leaf explants taken from microshoots of E. alba. Data were recorded after 4 weeks of culture. Values are the means of three experiments consisting of three replicates each (10 explants in each replicate).
Figure 1. The effect of kanamycin in MS medium on the survival of leaf explants taken from microshoots of E. alba. Data were recorded after 4 weeks of culture. Values are the means of three experiments consisting of three replicates each (10 explants in each replicate).
Ijpb 15 00047 g001
Figure 2. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of E. alba (A). Regeneration of putative transformed E. alba shoots on selection medium containing kanamycin (B). Leaves from the control plant showing no GUS activity (C,D). Transformed E. alba leaves showing GUS.
Figure 2. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of E. alba (A). Regeneration of putative transformed E. alba shoots on selection medium containing kanamycin (B). Leaves from the control plant showing no GUS activity (C,D). Transformed E. alba leaves showing GUS.
Ijpb 15 00047 g002
Figure 3. PCR-based analysis of the transformed shoots of E. alba (A). 16S rRNA analysis (~1500 bp) of transformed shoots. Lane-NC: DNA from the control plant, Lane-PC: Positive control bacterial genomic DNA, Lane-1–3: DNA from the transformed plants, Lane M: 1 KB ladder (B). Amplification of the uidA gene (~1500 bp) from the genomic DNA of the transformed tissue, Lane-NC: DNA from the untransformed plant, Lane-PC: Positive control (amplification from pBI121), Lane-1–4: Amplification from the DNA of the transformed shoot, Lane M: 1 KB ladder (C). Amplification of the nptll gene (~760 bp) from genomic DNA of the transformed tissue, Lane-NC: DNA from the untransformed plant, Lane-PC: Positive control (amplification from pBI121), Lane-1–4: Amplification from DNA of the transformed shoot, Lane M: 100 bp ladder.
Figure 3. PCR-based analysis of the transformed shoots of E. alba (A). 16S rRNA analysis (~1500 bp) of transformed shoots. Lane-NC: DNA from the control plant, Lane-PC: Positive control bacterial genomic DNA, Lane-1–3: DNA from the transformed plants, Lane M: 1 KB ladder (B). Amplification of the uidA gene (~1500 bp) from the genomic DNA of the transformed tissue, Lane-NC: DNA from the untransformed plant, Lane-PC: Positive control (amplification from pBI121), Lane-1–4: Amplification from the DNA of the transformed shoot, Lane M: 1 KB ladder (C). Amplification of the nptll gene (~760 bp) from genomic DNA of the transformed tissue, Lane-NC: DNA from the untransformed plant, Lane-PC: Positive control (amplification from pBI121), Lane-1–4: Amplification from DNA of the transformed shoot, Lane M: 100 bp ladder.
Ijpb 15 00047 g003
Table 1. Influence of various factors on genetic transformation efficiency of Eclipta alba.
Table 1. Influence of various factors on genetic transformation efficiency of Eclipta alba.
FactorVariable% GUS Expression
A. tumefaciens strain LBA 440452.3 ± 0.91 a
EHA 10548.5 ± 0.4 b
Pre-culture0 d36.8 ± 0.35 f
1 d45.7 ± 0.20 d
2 d56.8 ± 0.26 a
3 d51.2 ± 0.2 b
4 d48.3 ± 0.20 c
5 d43.7 ± 0.28 e
Method of injuryIntact36.7 ± 0.15 e
With hypodermic needle55.6 ± 0.36 a
With surgical blade48.5 ± 0.1 b
With carborundum44.5 ± 0.35 c
With glass beads40.1 ± 0.35 d
Acetosyringone043.5 ± 0.20 d
10058.6 ± 0.2 b
15063.4 ± 0.25 a
20057.4 ± 0.15 c
pH of co-cultivation medium5.251.4 ± 0.25 d
5.458.6 ± 0.15 a
5.653.3 ± 0.3 b
5.852.8 ± 0.2 c
Optical density O.D Value0.234.6 ± 0.25 e
0.442.6 ± 0.25 d
0.656.3 ± 0.20 a
0.853.8 ± 0.2 b
1.049.8 ± 0.15 c
Co-cultivation period1 d43.5 ± 0.30 d
2 d54.6 ± 0.25 a
3 d49.3 ± 0.25 b
4 d46.2 ± 0.37 c
5 d43.1 ± 0.26 d
Infection Time 5 min42.4 ± 0.3 c
10 min46.6 ± 0.25 b
15 min53.3 ± 0.26 a
20 min42.3 ± 0.15 c
30 min38.8 ± 0.20 d
Photoperiod24 h light46.3 ± 0.36 c
24 h dark51.7 ± 0.36 b
16 h light/8 h dark56.5 ± 0.35 a
Statistically validated with Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). Values sharing a common letter within the column are not significant at p < 0.05 (each factor analyzed separately). Values are the means of three experiments, consisting of three replicates each (10 explants in each replicate).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aggarwal, D.; Datta, V.; Tuli, H.S.; Kumar, P.; Ramniwas, S. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-Mediated Genetic Transformation of Eclipta alba. Int. J. Plant Biol. 2024, 15, 641-651.

AMA Style

Aggarwal D, Datta V, Tuli HS, Kumar P, Ramniwas S. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-Mediated Genetic Transformation of Eclipta alba. International Journal of Plant Biology. 2024; 15(3):641-651.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aggarwal, Diwakar, Vasudha Datta, Hardeep Singh Tuli, Pawan Kumar, and Seema Ramniwas. 2024. "Agrobacterium tumefaciens-Mediated Genetic Transformation of Eclipta alba" International Journal of Plant Biology 15, no. 3: 641-651.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop