Next Article in Journal
Techno-Economic and Voltage Quality Optimization of Distributed Energy Resources and EV Charging Stations in Unbalanced Distribution Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Validation and Comparative Assessment of PD and MPC for a Quadratic Buck Converter Using a C2000 DSP
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermal Management of a Zero-Emission Magnetorheological Braking: CFD Evaluation of Liquid-Cooling Strategies

by
Ali Mirzaei
,
Giovanni Imberti
,
Henrique De Carvalho Pinheiro
* and
Massimiliana Carello
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering DIMEAS, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
World Electr. Veh. J. 2026, 17(7), 370; https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj17070370
Submission received: 4 June 2026 / Revised: 4 July 2026 / Accepted: 9 July 2026 / Published: 17 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Vehicle Control and Management)

Abstract

MagnetoRheological Brakes (MRBs) can provide wear-free, electrically controllable braking torque, but repeated high-load braking can cause rapid heat accumulation in the narrow rotor–stator gap and degrade MRF performance. This study evaluates rotor-only, stator-only and combined rotor–stator liquid-cooling configurations using transient 3-D conjugate heat-transfer CFD in ANSYS Fluent 2024 R1 for a UN Regulation No. 13-H-based 10-cycle duty profile (8.5 s acceleration, 20 s constant speed and 2.5 s braking per cycle). The activated MRF is modeled as an incompressible laminar Herschel–Bulkley fluid during braking, while the field-OFF phases use a Newtonian viscosity of 0.114 Pa·s; viscous dissipation and coil volumetric heating are included as internal heat sources. Cooling simulations apply water with a 130 kPa (absolute) inlet pressure and a conservative +20% heat-load margin with adiabatic external boundaries. Baseline uncooled dynamometer data (no integrated cooling) verify the thermal implementation, with a 7.06% underprediction of the measured temperature rise. In the uncooled case, the MRF reaches a temperature of 501 K after ten cycles; rotor-only and stator-only cooling reduce temperatures but do not fully suppress cumulative heating, whereas the combined configuration maintains the MRF below 400 K after ten cycles. These results indicate that cooling both dominant heat paths is required for stable MRB thermal operation under severe repeated braking.
Keywords: magnetorheological brake; integrated liquid cooling; centrifugal passive flow; thermal management; electric vehicle braking magnetorheological brake; integrated liquid cooling; centrifugal passive flow; thermal management; electric vehicle braking

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mirzaei, A.; Imberti, G.; De Carvalho Pinheiro, H.; Carello, M. Thermal Management of a Zero-Emission Magnetorheological Braking: CFD Evaluation of Liquid-Cooling Strategies. World Electr. Veh. J. 2026, 17, 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj17070370

AMA Style

Mirzaei A, Imberti G, De Carvalho Pinheiro H, Carello M. Thermal Management of a Zero-Emission Magnetorheological Braking: CFD Evaluation of Liquid-Cooling Strategies. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2026; 17(7):370. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj17070370

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mirzaei, Ali, Giovanni Imberti, Henrique De Carvalho Pinheiro, and Massimiliana Carello. 2026. "Thermal Management of a Zero-Emission Magnetorheological Braking: CFD Evaluation of Liquid-Cooling Strategies" World Electric Vehicle Journal 17, no. 7: 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj17070370

APA Style

Mirzaei, A., Imberti, G., De Carvalho Pinheiro, H., & Carello, M. (2026). Thermal Management of a Zero-Emission Magnetorheological Braking: CFD Evaluation of Liquid-Cooling Strategies. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 17(7), 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj17070370

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop