Research on Consumer Purchase Intention for New Energy Vehicles Based on Text Mining and Bivariate Logit Model: Empirical Evidence from Urumqi, China
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Mining of Influencing Factors Based on the Autohome Platform
2.1. Data Collection
2.2. Frequency Analysis of Words
2.3. LDA Thematic Clustering
3. Design of Survey Programs Based on Text Mining
3.1. Questionnaire Design
3.2. Methods of Investigation
3.3. Demographics of Respondents
4. Correlation Analysis of Influencing Factors Based on Binary Logit
4.1. Overview of the Model
4.2. Model Building
4.3. Reliability and Validity Testing
4.4. Model Application
- Purchase subsidies: The regression coefficient for purchase subsidies is 0.688, with a significance of 0.01, indicating that the subsidy policy significantly increases consumers’ willingness to buy. For every additional unit of subsidy, the likelihood of purchase intention increases by 1.989 times. Especially in the price-sensitive market, subsidies can effectively reduce the cost of vehicle purchase.
- Vehicle Purchase Tax: The regression coefficient of purchase tax is 0.542, with a significance of 0.01, showing that purchase tax has a positive effect on purchase intention. For every unit increase in purchase tax, the willingness to buy increases by 1.719 times. Although the rise in purchase tax may increase the burden, it may reflect the influence of government policy guidance.
- Driving experience: The regression coefficient of driving experience is 0.512, with a significance of 0.01, indicating that driving experience has a positive influence on purchase intention. For every unit of improvement in driving experience, purchase intention increases by 1.669 times, especially in new energy vehicles where comfort and maneuverability become key factors in decision-making.
- Intelligent technology: the regression coefficient of intelligent technology is 0.504, with a significance of 0.01, indicating that intelligent technology has an important influence on purchase intention. For every unit increase in intelligent technology, the purchase intention increases by 1.655 times, and technological progress attracts more and more consumers’ interest.
- Battery technology: the regression coefficient of battery technology is 0.906 with significance of 0.01, indicating that battery technology is crucial to purchase intention. For every unit of battery technology improvement, purchase intention increases by 2.474 times, and battery performance improvement significantly improves consumers’ purchase experience.
- Selling price: The regression coefficient of selling price is 1.384 with a significance of 0.01, showing that price has a significant positive effect on purchase intention. Each unit increase in price increases willingness to buy by 3.991 times, especially with subsidy support, and the influence of price on purchase decision gradually becomes positive.
- Electricity cost: The regression coefficient of electricity cost is 0.402 with a significance of 0.05, indicating that electricity cost has a positive effect on purchase intention. For every unit increase in electricity cost, the purchase intention increases by 1.495 times, and the lower cost of use can effectively increase the purchase interest.
- After-sales service: the regression coefficient of after-sales service is −0.446 and the significance is 0.05, indicating that after-sales service has a negative influence on purchase intention. For every unit of after-sales service, purchase intention decreases by 0.640 times. Consumers may pay more attention to the value of the product itself rather than after-sales service. This result reflects consumers’ relative neglect of after-sales services in their purchasing decisions. When choosing new energy vehicles, consumers typically pay more attention to core factors such as battery technology, driving range, vehicle performance, and price, while after-sales services may be seen as an added value rather than a decisive factor. Furthermore, the emergence of negative coefficients may also be related to consumers’ low concern for brand loyalty and high expectations for product quality. Many consumers believe that the core performance and technical features of a car are more important than after-sales services. Some brands in the market may have established strong product trust, leading consumers to believe that basic after-sales services are sufficient. This finding reminds us that when promoting new energy vehicles, companies need to pay more attention to enhancing the core competitiveness of the product itself, in addition to after-sales services, to meet consumers’ high demand for technology and performance.
5. Consumption Mining and Classification Based on Second-Order Clustering
5.1. Second-Order Cluster Analysis
5.2. Model Comparison
5.3. Analysis of Results
6. Conclusions and Recommendations
- Main influencing factors: The main factors for consumers to purchase new energy vehicles in Urumqi include purchase subsidies, vehicle purchase tax, driving experience, intelligent technology, battery technology, sales price, electricity cost, and after-sales service. Through regression analysis, the regression coefficients of battery technology and sales price are 0.906 and 1.384, respectively, indicating that the improvement of battery technology and the reduction in price have a significant driving effect on the purchase intention, especially in the Urumqi market, the influence of these two factors is more prominent.
- Consumer Group Analysis: Consumers in Urumqi can be divided into six categories: technologically innovative, cost-performance oriented, brand oriented, all-round consideration oriented, experience priority oriented, and practical and economic oriented. Technologically innovative consumers emphasize battery technology and smart functions and are willing to pay higher prices; cost-performance-oriented consumers value the balance between price and performance, especially battery life and power costs; brand-oriented consumers have high requirements for brand reputation and after-sales service; and all-round consideration consumers consider factors such as technology, price and brand in a comprehensive manner. Experience-first consumers focus on driving experience and intelligent technology, and practical and economical consumers are more concerned about cost-effectiveness and basic functions.
- In order to promote the development of the new energy vehicle market in Urumqi, firstly, cost-performance oriented and practical economy consumers are more sensitive to price and battery life, so, it is recommended that the Government optimize the cost-performance ratio by lowering the sales price of new energy vehicles and upgrading the battery technology, as well as launching entry-level models suitable for these groups. Second, for technologically innovative consumers, who are more concerned about battery technology and intelligent features, the government should increase R&D support in these areas and encourage companies to launch new energy vehicles with leading technology. Meanwhile, brand-oriented and all-encompassing consumers have higher requirements for branding and after-sales services, and the government should strengthen brand building and consumer education in order to improve brand identity and market competitiveness. Through these targeted policy measures, the needs of different consumer groups can be effectively met and the healthy development of the new energy vehicle market in Urumqi can be promoted.
- By analyzing consumers’ purchase intentions for new energy vehicles in Urumqi, this study proposes targeted policy recommendations that emphasize the impact of key factors such as battery technology, sales price, and government policies on consumer decision-making. These policy recommendations are applicable not only to Urumqi, but also to other regions with slower economic development and incomplete infrastructure. We suggest that other similar cities can optimize policy support, increase infrastructure development, and enhance technological innovation, especially in battery technology and smart technology, based on the results of this study, so as to effectively promote the development of the new energy vehicle market. However, this study also has some shortcomings. First, the study sample is mainly from Urumqi city. The research method is relatively single, in the future, the sample can be expanded to cover consumers in more regions or cities, as well as to improve the research method, such as through consistency scoring and perplexity analysis in LDA topic modeling and considering the interactions between different variables to improve the generalizability of the results. Meanwhile, the study did not differentiate between the two types of consumers with and without cars but included all consumers uniformly in the analysis. There is a plan to compare car owners and car owners without cars as a group in future studies to explore the impact of this difference on purchase intentions. In addition, the study mainly focuses on the analysis of consumer purchase intention, and the relationship between consumer intention and actual behavior can be further verified in the future by combining actual purchase behavior and market sales data. With the rapid development of new energy vehicle technology, future research could also delve into how emerging technologies, such as autonomous driving and connected vehicles, affect consumers’ purchase decisions. In conclusion, although this study provides valuable market recommendations, there is still room for further improvement in terms of research methodology and data scope.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yalçın, E.S. Development of a Forecasting Framework Based on Advanced Machine Learning Algorithms for Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Systems 2024, 12, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, X.; Liu, X.; Zuo, J. The development of new energy vehicles for a sustainable future: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J. Effects of electric vehicle demonstration and promotion policy on air pollution: Evidence from China. Transp. Policy 2025, 162, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Ma, R. Clean energy synergy with electric vehicles: Insights into carbon footprint. Energy Strategy Rev. 2024, 53, 101394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, D.; Gou, Z.; Gui, X. How electric vehicles benefit urban air quality improvement: A study in Wuhan. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 906, 167584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yalçın, E.S. Adoption of New Energy Vehicle in the Post-Subsidy Era with Heterogeneous Consumer Demand. Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 2024, 32, 141–152. [Google Scholar]
- Ge, Y.; Chen, K. Selection of Production Strategies for New Energy Vehicles: An Analysis of the Impact of Government Intervention Policies. Systems 2025, 13, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.D.; Yang, J.Y. Adoption of New Energy Vehicle with Reference Effect. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 2024, 33, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Lv, T.; Cai, R.; Deng, X. Research on Content Analysis and Quality Evaluation for Online Reviews of New Energy Vehicles. Inf. Dev. 2024, in press. [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Sinha, P.N.; Zhang, X.; Wang, S.; Lee, Y.-K. The Impact of NEV Users′ Perceived Benefits on Purchase Intention. Travel Behav. Soc. 2024, 34, 100681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, R.; Lin, B. Are People Willing to Support the Construction of Charging Facilities in China? Energy Policy 2020, 143, 111604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.J.; Sun, Y.M. Competitive Pricing Strategies of Vehicle Manufacturers Considering Smart Manufacturing Technical Subsidy Policy. J. Syst. Manag. 2024, 33, 890–900. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, P.; Zhang, J.; Yang, D.; Lin, X.; Xu, T. The Evolution of China′s New Energy Vehicle Industry from the Perspective of a Technology–Market–Policy Framework. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ou, S.; Lin, Z.; Qi, L.; Li, J.; He, X.; Przesmitzki, S. The Dual-Credit Policy: Quantifying the Policy Impact on Plug-in Electric Vehicle Sales and Industry Profits in China. Energy Policy 2018, 121, 597–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, F. Current Situation, Problems and Countermeasures of New Energy Vehicles in Xinjiang. Innov. Entrep. Theory Res. Pract. 2019, 2, 158–159. [Google Scholar]
- He, Y.M. Opportunities and Challenges: Developing Strategies of New Silk Road Economic Belt and the Development of Cities in Xinjiang. J. Sichuan Norm. Univ. 2015, 42, 16–27. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Wen, Y.; Xu, Y.; Shi, L.; Yang, X. Health Benefits Quantification for New-Energy Vehicles Promotion: A Case Study of Beijing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xian, Y.; Wang, Q.; Fan, W.; Da, Y.; Fan, J. The Impact of Different Incentive Policies on New Energy Vehicle Demand in China′s Gigantic Cities. Energy Policy 2022, 168, 113137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, B.; Wen, Z.; Qin, Q. Competition and Cooperation Mechanism of New Energy Vehicle Policies in China′s Key Regions. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2024, 11, 1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, W.; Zhang, G.; Xiao, J.; Bénard, P.; Chahine, R. Demonstrations and Marketing Strategies of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles in China. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 13859–13872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, H.; Lin, B. Why Chinese Residents Underinvest in New Energy Vehicles? Insights from Prospect Theory. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2025, accepted. [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.S.; Zhu, J.S.; Yu, S.W.; Qiu, G.Y. Research of Customer’s Choice Preference for New Energy Vehicles: Based on the Analysis of a Consumer Survey in Shenzhen. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Pekin. 2017, 53, 429–435. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, K.; Bu, H.; Huang, R.; Liu, M.T. How Green Marketing Practices Improve Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Green Corporate Image and the Moderating Role of Green Self-Identity in the New Energy Vehicle Market. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2025, 37, 1067–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, Y.; Dong, X.Y.; Deng, Y.X.; Li, L.-X.; Ma, Y. What Influences Personal Purchases of New Energy Vehicles in China? An Empirical Study Based on a Survey of Chinese Citizens. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2016, 8, 065904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, J.L.; Wang, Q.; Yang, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X. Determinant Changes of Consumer Preference for NEVs in China: A Comparison Between 2012 and 2017. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 23557–23575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Ma, Y.; Shao, S.; Ma, T. What Determines Consumers′ Acceptance of Electric Vehicles: A Survey in Shanghai, China. Energy Econ. 2022, 108, 105805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Keywords | Frequency of Words |
---|---|
space | 834 |
range | 668 |
vehicle | 424 |
satisfaction | 410 |
appearance | 343 |
feeling | 269 |
charging | 263 |
interior | 254 |
power | 242 |
design | 207 |
Topic I | Topic II | Topic III | Topic IV | Theme V |
---|---|---|---|---|
charging | range | exterior | driving | space |
brake | satisfaction | door | fastest | design |
rear | feeling | cute | mode | one |
face | mileage | fast charging | lumin | class |
really | Economy | not good. | outside | body |
price | liked | configuration | gray | instrumentation |
place | free | disadvantages | habit | flashing |
cart | first warranty | auto | adjustment | handbrake |
kilometers | vehicle | setup | fixed car | calculator |
looking for | expensive | inside the car | high | steering wheel |
General Layers | Primary Sampling Frame | Into the Sample Area | Secondary Sampling Frame | Into the Sample | Tertiary Sampling Frame |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main city | All administrative districts in the main urban area | New city district | All neighborhoods in the new downtown area | Jinfeng Community | All permanent residents in Jinfeng neighborhood |
Guizhou East Road Community | All residents in Guizhou East Road Community | ||||
Xintong Community | All residents in Xintong Community | ||||
Tianshan District | All neighborhoods in Tianshan District | Sanshan Community | All residents in Sanshan Community | ||
Kunlun East Street Community | All residents of Kunlun East Street Community | ||||
Shayibak District | All neighborhoods in Shayibak District | Golden Flower Garden Community | All residents of Golden Garden Community | ||
New town | All administrative districts in the new city | Midong District | All neighborhoods in Midong District | Werui Community | All residents of Heshui Community |
Welfare Road Community | All residents of Welfare Road Community | ||||
Tutunhe District | All neighborhoods in Tutunhe District | Binhe Community | All residents of Riverside Community | ||
Oasis Street South Community | All residents of Oasis Street South Community |
Name | Option | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 222 | 55.500 |
Female | 178 | 44.500 | |
Age | 18–24 years old | 39 | 9.750 |
25–34 years old | 168 | 42.000 | |
34–44 years old | 111 | 27.750 | |
44–54 years old | 54 | 13.500 | |
54 years old and above | 28 | 7.000 | |
Academic qualifications | Junior high school and below | 115 | 28.750 |
High school, technical secondary school, vocational high school | 129 | 32.250 | |
Undergraduate and vocational programs | 133 | 33.250 | |
Master’s degree or above | 23 | 5.750 | |
Annual income | CNY 50,000 and below | 44 | 11.000 |
CNY 50,001–100,000 | 200 | 50.000 | |
CNY 100,001–200,000 | 118 | 29.500 | |
Over CNY 200,000 | 38 | 9.500 | |
Family size | 1 person | 13 | 3.250 |
2 people | 56 | 14.000 | |
3 people | 158 | 39.500 | |
4 people | 131 | 32.750 | |
5 or more people | 42 | 10.500 | |
Knowledge of new energy vehicles | Ignorant | 93 | 23.250 |
Do not understand | 33 | 8.250 | |
General understanding | 111 | 27.750 | |
More familiar | 37 | 9.250 | |
Fully aware of | 126 | 31.500 | |
Range | 150 km and below | 14 | 3.500 |
150–200 km | 39 | 9.750 | |
200–250 km | 59 | 14.750 | |
250–300 km | 116 | 29.000 | |
Over 300 km | 172 | 43.000 | |
Psychological price | CNY 80,000 and below | 175 | 43.750 |
CNY 80,000 to 120,000 | 121 | 30.250 | |
CNY 120,000 to 200,000 | 56 | 14.000 | |
CNY 200,000 to 350,000 | 29 | 7.250 | |
Over CNY 350,000 | 19 | 4.750 | |
Acceptable charging time | 5 h or less | 85 | 21.250 |
5–8 h | 147 | 36.750 | |
8–10 h | 120 | 30.000 | |
10–15 h | 32 | 8.000 | |
More than 15 h | 16 | 4.000 |
Name | Variable Assignment |
---|---|
Have you ever purchased a new energy vehicle | 1 = yes, 0 = no |
Gender | 1 = male, 0 = female |
Age | 1 = under 18 years old, 2 = 18–24 years old, 3 = 25–34 years old, 4 = 34–44 years old, 5 = 44–54 years old, 6 = over 55 years old |
Educational background | 1 = junior high school and below, 2 = high school, vocational school, 3 = undergraduate, associate degree, 4 = master’s degree or above |
Annual household income | 1 = CNY 50,000 and below, 2 = CNY 50,001–100,000, 3 = CNY 100,001–200,000, 4 = CNY 200,000 and above |
Family size | 1 = 1 person, 2 = 2 people, 3 = 3 people, 4 = 4 people, 5 = 5 people or more |
Understanding level | 1 = completely unfamiliar, 2 = not familiar, 3 = generally familiar, 4 = somewhat familiar, 5 = completely familiar. |
Can you accept one slow charging time | 1 = 5 h and below, 5 = 5–8 h, 3 = 8–10 h, 4 = 10–15 h, 5 = 15 h or more |
What is your desired range for new energy vehicles | 1 = 150 km and below, 2 = 150–200 km, 3 = 200–250 km, 4 = 250–300 km, 5 = 300 km and above |
Your psychological price range | 1 = 80,000 and below, 2 = 8–12 years old, 3 = 120–200,000, 4 = 200,000–350,000, 5 = 350,000 and above |
Name | Variable Assignment |
---|---|
Purchase subsidy | 1 = Very unimportant, 2 = Not important, 3 = Generally, 4 = Important, 5 = Very important |
Vehicle purchase tax | |
Free registration | |
Driving experience | |
Vehicle brand | |
Intelligent technology | |
Ride comfort | |
Appearance and interior | |
Safety performance | |
Battery technology | |
Climbing performance | |
Selling price | |
Maintenance and upkeep costs | |
Electricity costs and other usage expenses | |
Convenient car purchase credit services | |
After-sales service | |
Pre-sales consulting services | |
Promotion and publicity strategy |
Item | Correlation of Corrected Entries to Totals | Clonebach Alpha After Deletion of Items | Cronbach Alpha | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Car buying factors | Purchase subsidy | 0.595 | 0.900 | 0.906 |
Vehicle purchase tax | 0.599 | 0.899 | ||
Free license plate | 0.423 | 0.907 | ||
Driving experience | 0.468 | 0.903 | ||
Vehicle brand | 0.580 | 0.900 | ||
Intelligent technology | 0.550 | 0.901 | ||
Ride comfort | 0.564 | 0.901 | ||
Exterior and interior | 0.528 | 0.902 | ||
safety | 0.610 | 0.899 | ||
Battery technology | 0.486 | 0.903 | ||
Hill climbing performance | 0.653 | 0.898 | ||
selling price | 0.415 | 0.905 | ||
Maintenance and servicing costs | 0.651 | 0.898 | ||
Cost of use such as electricity costs | 0.547 | 0.901 | ||
Convenient credit facilities | 0.618 | 0.899 | ||
After-sales service | 0.670 | 0.897 | ||
Pre-sales consulting services | 0.592 | 0.900 | ||
Promotion strategy | 0.636 | 0.898 | ||
Perceived value | pv1 | 0.698 | 0.766 | 0.834 |
pv2 | 0.680 | 0.784 | ||
pv3 | 0.704 | 0.759 | ||
Perceived risk | pr1 | 0.595 | 0.607 | 0.746 |
pr2 | 0.595 | 0.582 | ||
Community effects | si1 | 0.732 | 0.833 | 0.871 |
si2 | 0.709 | 0.842 | ||
si3 | 0.743 | 0.828 | ||
SI4 | 0.717 | 0.839 |
KMO Value | 0.933 | |
---|---|---|
Bartlett Sphericity Check | Approximate chi-square | 4621.732 |
df | 351.000 | |
p | 0.000 |
Item | Factor Loading Factor | Commonality | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 | Factor 5 | Factor 6 | ||
Purchase subsidy | 0.279 | 0.041 | 0.185 | −0.010 | 0.739 | 0.227 | 0.711 |
Vehicle purchase tax | 0.254 | 0.063 | 0.154 | −0.029 | 0.620 | 0.385 | 0.625 |
Free license plate | 0.161 | 0.056 | 0.074 | 0.203 | 0.658 | −0.082 | 0.516 |
Driving experience | 0.603 | 0.059 | 0.111 | 0.022 | −0.147 | 0.265 | 0.472 |
Vehicle brand | 0.524 | 0.013 | −0.178 | 0.135 | 0.269 | 0.286 | 0.479 |
Intelligent technology | 0.183 | 0.042 | 0.095 | −0.036 | 0.672 | 0.370 | 0.634 |
Ride comfort | 0.508 | 0.009 | −0.112 | 0.041 | 0.225 | 0.323 | 0.427 |
Exterior and interior | 0.631 | −0.008 | −0.010 | 0.063 | 0.222 | 0.047 | 0.453 |
Safety | 0.743 | −0.023 | 0.016 | 0.034 | 0.147 | 0.121 | 0.591 |
Battery technology | 0.507 | 0.253 | 0.185 | 0.073 | 0.192 | 0.079 | 0.404 |
Hill climbing performance | 0.673 | −0.102 | −0.003 | 0.024 | 0.130 | 0.343 | 0.599 |
Selling price | 0.193 | 0.260 | 0.378 | 0.089 | −0.017 | 0.519 | 0.525 |
Maintenance and servicing costs | 0.682 | −0.030 | 0.032 | 0.077 | 0.180 | 0.240 | 0.564 |
Cost of use such as electricity costs | 0.728 | 0.093 | 0.158 | 0.157 | 0.055 | 0.022 | 0.592 |
Convenient credit facilities | 0.527 | 0.047 | −0.025 | −0.036 | 0.178 | 0.442 | 0.509 |
After-sales service | 0.421 | −0.038 | −0.094 | 0.135 | 0.269 | 0.594 | 0.631 |
Pre-sales consulting services | 0.290 | −0.007 | 0.028 | 0.103 | 0.122 | 0.728 | 0.641 |
Promotion and publicity strategy | 0.320 | 0.001 | −0.015 | 0.061 | 0.252 | 0.686 | 0.641 |
PV1 | 0.062 | 0.095 | 0.820 | −0.072 | 0.169 | −0.034 | 0.720 |
PV2 | 0.008 | 0.138 | 0.822 | −0.072 | 0.127 | 0.020 | 0.717 |
PV3 | 0.025 | 0.104 | 0.856 | −0.024 | 0.037 | 0.049 | 0.749 |
PR1 | 0.125 | −0.091 | −0.031 | 0.863 | 0.034 | 0.151 | 0.793 |
PR2 | 0.158 | −0.018 | −0.118 | 0.846 | 0.094 | 0.049 | 0.766 |
SI1 | 0.033 | 0.845 | 0.100 | 0.015 | 0.011 | 0.021 | 0.727 |
SI2 | 0.083 | 0.831 | 0.073 | −0.010 | 0.055 | −0.026 | 0.707 |
SI3 | −0.002 | 0.847 | 0.078 | −0.066 | 0.034 | 0.036 | 0.731 |
SI4 | −0.030 | 0.830 | 0.118 | −0.057 | 0.040 | 0.048 | 0.711 |
Term | Regression Coefficient | z-Value | Wald χ2 | p-Value | OR Value | OR Value 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | −0.599 | −1.814 | 3.290 | 0.070 | 0.549 | 0.288~1.049 |
Age | 0.014 | 0.073 | 0.005 | 0.942 | 1.014 | 0.694~1.482 |
Educational background | 0.316 | 1.342 | 1.800 | 0.180 | 1.371 | 0.865~2.175 |
Annual income | 0.006 | 0.029 | 0.001 | 0.977 | 1.006 | 0.678~1.492 |
Family size | 0.038 | 0.217 | 0.047 | 0.828 | 1.039 | 0.738~1.462 |
Understanding level | −0.076 | −0.710 | 0.503 | 0.478 | 0.927 | 0.751~1.143 |
Acceptable charging time | 0.146 | 0.870 | 0.757 | 0.384 | 1.157 | 0.833~1.606 |
Range | −0.177 | −1.273 | 1.620 | 0.203 | 0.838 | 0.638~1.100 |
Psychological price | 0.164 | 1.058 | 1.119 | 0.290 | 1.178 | 0.869~1.597 |
Purchase subsidy | 0.688 | 3.759 | 14.130 | 0.000 ** | 1.989 | 1.390~2.847 |
Vehicle purchase tax | 0.542 | 3.061 | 9.371 | 0.002 ** | 1.719 | 1.215~2.431 |
Free registration | −0.070 | −0.455 | 0.207 | 0.649 | 0.933 | 0.691~1.260 |
Driving experience | 0.512 | 2.976 | 8.859 | 0.003 ** | 1.669 | 1.191~2.339 |
Vehicle brand | −0.305 | −1.656 | 2.741 | 0.098 | 0.737 | 0.514~1.058 |
Intelligent technology | 0.504 | 2.728 | 7.444 | 0.006 ** | 1.655 | 1.152~2.377 |
Ride comfort | −0.252 | −1.392 | 1.938 | 0.164 | 0.778 | 0.546~1.108 |
Appearance and interior | −0.262 | −1.370 | 1.877 | 0.171 | 0.769 | 0.529~1.120 |
Safety performance | 0.014 | 0.082 | 0.007 | 0.934 | 1.014 | 0.732~1.405 |
Battery technology | 0.906 | 5.601 | 31.375 | 0.000 ** | 2.474 | 1.802~3.397 |
Climbing performance | −0.203 | −0.938 | 0.880 | 0.348 | 0.816 | 0.534~1.248 |
Selling price | 1.384 | 7.342 | 53.903 | 0.000 ** | 3.991 | 2.758~5.775 |
Maintenance and upkeep costs | −0.315 | −1.624 | 2.638 | 0.104 | 0.730 | 0.499~1.067 |
Electricity costs and other usage expenses | 0.402 | 2.325 | 5.405 | 0.020 * | 1.495 | 1.065~2.097 |
Convenient car purchase credit services | −0.227 | −1.092 | 1.192 | 0.275 | 0.797 | 0.530~1.198 |
After-sales services | −0.446 | −2.167 | 4.697 | 0.030 * | 0.640 | 0.428~0.958 |
Pre-sales consulting services | −0.297 | −1.579 | 2.495 | 0.114 | 0.743 | 0.514~1.074 |
Promotion and publicity strategy | −0.226 | −1.158 | 1.342 | 0.247 | 0.798 | 0.544~1.169 |
Chinese Name | Variable Name |
---|---|
Sex | |
Age | |
Academic qualifications | |
Annual income | |
Family size | |
Understanding | |
Acceptable charging time | |
Mileage | |
Psychological price | |
Purchase subsidy | |
Vehicle purchase tax | |
Free license plate | |
Driving experience | |
Vehicle brand | |
Intelligent technology | |
Ride comfort | |
Exterior and interior | |
Safety | |
Battery technology | |
Hill climbing performance | |
Selling price | |
Maintenance and servicing costs | |
Cost of use such as electricity costs | |
Convenient credit facilities | |
After-sales service | |
Pre-sales consulting services | |
Promotion and publicity strategies |
Type | Technologically Innovative Consumers | Cost-Performance Oriented Consumers | Brand Oriented Consumers | Omni-Directional Consumer | Experience First Consumers | Practical Economy Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Purchase subsidy | General | Very important | General | Important | Very unimportant | Important |
Vehicle purchase tax | Important | Important | General | Important | General | Important |
Driving experience | General | Important | Important | Important | Not important | Very important |
Intelligent technology | Important | Important | General | Very important | Not important | General |
Battery technology | Important | Important | Important | Important | Not important | General |
Selling price | Important | Very important | General | Important | General | Important |
Electricity costs and other usage expenses | Important | Important | General | Very important | Not important | Very important |
After-sales service | Not important | Important | Important | Not important | Not important | Not important |
Perceived usefulness | Important | Important | General | Important | Important | Important |
Identify risks | General | General | Important | Important | General | Not important |
Social influence | General | Very important | General | Important | Very unimportant | Important |
Account for | 29.75% | 21.5% | 15.5% | 12.5% | 10.5% | 10.25% |
Typology | Technologically Innovative | Cost-Performance Oriented | Brand-Oriented | Omni-Directional | Experience-First | Practical and Economical |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage | 29.75% | 21.5% | 15.5% | 12.5% | 10.5% | 10.25% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Published by MDPI on behalf of the World Electric Vehicle Association. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hao, Z.; Hu, J.; Ran, J.; Lu, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, X. Research on Consumer Purchase Intention for New Energy Vehicles Based on Text Mining and Bivariate Logit Model: Empirical Evidence from Urumqi, China. World Electr. Veh. J. 2025, 16, 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16080440
Hao Z, Hu J, Ran J, Lu Q, Zheng Y, Zhang X. Research on Consumer Purchase Intention for New Energy Vehicles Based on Text Mining and Bivariate Logit Model: Empirical Evidence from Urumqi, China. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2025; 16(8):440. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16080440
Chicago/Turabian StyleHao, Zhenxiang, Jianping Hu, Jin Ran, Qiong Lu, Yuhang Zheng, and Xuetao Zhang. 2025. "Research on Consumer Purchase Intention for New Energy Vehicles Based on Text Mining and Bivariate Logit Model: Empirical Evidence from Urumqi, China" World Electric Vehicle Journal 16, no. 8: 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16080440
APA StyleHao, Z., Hu, J., Ran, J., Lu, Q., Zheng, Y., & Zhang, X. (2025). Research on Consumer Purchase Intention for New Energy Vehicles Based on Text Mining and Bivariate Logit Model: Empirical Evidence from Urumqi, China. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 16(8), 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16080440