Review Reports
- Yuting Li,
- Rong Yang* and
- Zhengteng Wu
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Antonio Cano-Ortega Reviewer 3: Moshe Averbukh
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The results and their contribution was presented clear, I recommend this work but in the introduction you can ameliorate by adding more references.
Author Response
Thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript. We appreciate your valuable comments and suggestions, which have greatly helped improve the quality of our paper. In this response, we address each of your comments and provide detailed explanations and revisions accordingly.Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
- The abstract must be revised and improved.
- The Introduction / background section also needs to be improved with latest research work proposed in this research area since last 3 years.
- Authors should mention clearly about the novelty of the paper and contributions in the introductory section and in the abstract.
- Methodology section is well explained and easy for the reader to follow
Author Response
Thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript. We appreciate your valuable comments and suggestions, which have greatly helped improve the quality of our paper. In this response, we address each of your comments and provide detailed explanations and revisions accordingly.Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Dear authors,
Your work is interesting and represents the interest for the specialists in the field. However, some improvements regarding English style and the correct usage of articles should be done. More detailed analysis is attached in the file.
Good work!
The reviewer.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Dear Editor,
The work is interesting and represents the interest for the specialists in the field. However, some improvements regarding English style and the correct usage of articles should be done. More detailed analysis is attached in the file.
Good work!
Sincerely,
The reviewer.
Author Response
Thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript. We appreciate your valuable comments and suggestions, which have greatly helped improve the quality of our paper. In this response, we address each of your comments and provide detailed explanations and revisions accordingly.Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
Accept