An Overview of Current Challenges and Emerging Technologies to Facilitate Increased Energy Efficiency, Safety, and Sustainability of Railway Transport
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Measures for Improving Railway Transport Energy Efficiency and Sustainability
2.1. Hybridisation of Conventional Diesel Engine-Based Locomotive Powertrain
- Battery costs in terms of the investment cost, replacement costs, and running (operational) costs, wherein battery durability plays a particularly important role [54]. Typically, the latest generation of lithium-based batteries, such as those based on LiFePO4 and LTO technologies, are more durable and less susceptible to aging compared to the more commonly used lithium-ion batteries. However, their initial costs are typically also greater, and their energy density is typically 30–50% lower compared to other currently available lithium batteries [47].
- Battery safety, in terms of a wide temperature operating range and the ability to withstand large charge-discharge rates, wherein advanced LiFePO4 and LTO technologies again provide the safest operational margins, especially when thermal runaway is considered [47].
- The costs and complexity of retrofitting the diesel electric powertrain with additional battery energy storage, primarily in terms of available space and mass constraints, interfacing with the internal power distribution system (power bus) and the appropriate energy management control strategy [54]. Special attention should also be given to the primary mover (diesel engine) refurbishment or possible replacement of older engines with more efficient modern designs, which is also indicated in [54].
- The choice of adequate hybrid powertrain topology, wherein there are many possible solutions with varying degrees of complexity for the same achieved powertrain performance, which should not be inferior to the performance of the conventional powertrain with similar traction characteristics. In that respect, the requirement of minimal modifications to the overall powertrain would also be desirable from the standpoint of production and overall powertrain assembly [54].
- The utilisation of advanced software tools and communication technologies should also be considered for the purpose of driving mission energy efficiency optimisation and operational safety improvement, especially when considering variable driving conditions along the track [36].
2.2. Utilisation of Battery-Based Locomotive Propulsion
2.3. Electric Powertrain Featuring Hydrogen and Other Types of Fuel Cells
2.4. Alternative Fuels Utilisation
3. Communication Technologies for Improved Energy Efficiency and Safety in Railways
3.1. State of the Art in Communication Systems in Railways
- (a)
- Level 1, which includes constant monitoring of the train movement and occasional communication between the train and the track (using so-called Eurobalise). Trackside signals are required at this level.
- (b)
- Level 2, which includes constant monitoring of the train movement and constant communication between the train and the track using the GSM-R system. At this level, signalling equipment is not required along the track.
3.2. Narrow-Band Internet of Things for Distributed Supervision and Control
3.3. Some Examples of Remote Sensor Use for Improving Transport Energy Efficiency and Safety
4. Industry 4.0 Concept in Railway Transportation
4.1. Autonomous Trains and Automated Railway Traffic
4.2. Multimodal Transportation
4.3. Predictive Maintenance
4.4. Resilience Improvement Measures and Inspection of Critical Infrastructure
- Topological approaches that use network and graph theory to perform assessments by removing links from the network in a stochastic manner (thus emulating stochastic disturbances) or according to a predefined strategy (thus emulating deterministic disturbances) using a well-defined mathematical theory;
- Simulation approaches, which model traffic flows within the system using software tools and can overcome the main disadvantage of the topological approach, i.e., the exponential growth of the problem with the number of combinations;
- Optimisation approaches, which can handle combinatorically complex scenarios in a systematic manner without the need to analyse every possible combination of events (which would be needed if the topological or simulation approach is used);
- Data-driven approaches, which do not require explicit traffic network modelling and can provide good a posteriori insights about network resilience using historical data.
4.5. Smart Grid Paradigm in Railway Transport
- Demand response and demand-side management, which is accomplished through the utilisation of smart metering and smart consumers, local or distributed generation (DG), electrical energy storage (ESS), and, generally, any distributed energy resources (DERs) coupled with providing timely information about energy prices [230];
- Renewable energy sources (RES), along with distributed generation, residential micro-generation, and energy storage (the so-called microgrid concept), which have the potential to improve the energy sector’s environmental impact [231], and are thus accommodated within the SG paradigm, which also provides means of resource aggregation [232];
- Improved reliability and security of the power supply through an improved resilience to deterministic and stochastic disturbances such as adverse weather conditions and cyber threats [233], and through measures such as predictive maintenance, fault isolation techniques, and an enhancement of the power transfer capabilities [228];
- The optimisation and efficient operation of assets and opening access to markets by means of intelligent distribution system nodes [230], wherein efficient asset management is carried out based on the timely response to highly dynamic demand using enhanced power transmission paths and an aggregated power supply [228];
- Maintaining the power quality, which is key for the correct operation of sensitive equipment [228].
- Information and communication technologies, which enable two-way communication to ensure the interoperability of automation and control and to ensure connectivity between heterogeneous communication nodes connected to different energy sources and loads [234], with the possibility of using the existing electrical network for narrow-band and broad-band communications (operating network, business network, and consumer network) (appropriate hardware and software for secure communications are needed for energy trading and demand-side response [235] and for the seamless integration of intermittent renewable energy sources into the electricity grid [231]);
- Power electronics and energy storage technologies at different scales (power and energy ratings), including high-voltage direct current (HVDC), flexible alternating current transmission systems (FACTSs), and various back-to-back power converter topologies, which can facilitate the straightforward integration of renewable energy sources and electrical energy storage systems into the electricity grid [236].
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Nomenclature
3D | Three-Dimensional |
4G | Fourth Generation New Radio Network |
5G | Fifth Generation New Radio Network |
5G-R | Fifth Generation New Radio Network for Railways |
AC | Alternating Current |
AI | Artificial Intelligence |
ANN | Artificial Neural Network |
ARRT | Autonomous Rail Rapid Transit |
CNN | Convolution Neural Network |
R-CNN | Region-Based Convolution Neural Network |
CO2 | Carbon Dioxide |
DC | Direct Current |
DC/DC | Direct Current to Direct Current (power converter) |
DER | Distributed Energy Resource |
DGs | Distributed Generators |
DME | Dimethyl Ether |
DOEM | Dynamic On-Board Energy Management |
DP | Dynamic Programming |
EC | European Commission |
ECo | External Consumer |
EEE | Energy, Economic, and Ecological (indicator) |
EMO | Electricity Market Operator |
EMS | Energy Management System |
ERA | European Railway Agency |
ERTMS | European Rail Traffic Management System |
ESO | Electrical System Operator |
ESS | Energy Storage System |
EU | European Union |
FACTS | Flexible Alternating Current Transmission Systems |
FBMC | Filter Bank Multi-Carrier (modulation technique) |
FFT | Fast Fourier Transform |
FLIR | Forward-Looking Infra-Red (thermal imaging camera) |
H2 | Hydrogen |
HD | High Definition (video camera) |
HESS | Hybrid Energy Storage System |
HIL | Hardware-in-the-Loop |
HPT | Hypercomplex Fourier Transform (model) |
HVDC | High-Voltage Direct Current |
IFFT | Inverse Fast Fourier Transform |
GHGs | Greenhouse Gases |
GIS | Geographic Information System |
GNSS | Global Navigation Satellite System |
GSM | Global System for Mobile Communication |
GSM-R | Global System for Mobile Communication—Railways |
I2V | Infrastructure-to-Vehicle (communication) |
ICT | Information and Communication Technologies |
IoT | Internet of Things |
IIoT | Industrial Internet of Things |
IoV | Internet of Vehicles |
IMU | Inertial Measurement Unit |
IP | Ingress Protection |
ISST | Intelligent Sub-Station |
IT | Information Technology |
ITC | Information and Telecommunications |
ITS | Intelligent Transportation System |
LCA | Life Cycle Assessment |
LIDAR | Light Detection and Ranging |
LiFePO4 | Lithium Iron Phosphate (batteries) |
LNG | Liquefied Natural Gas |
LP | Linear Programming |
LSTM | Long Short-Term Memory (neural network type) |
LTE | Long-Term Evolution (radio networks) |
LTE-R | Long-Term Evolution (radio networks) for Railways |
LTO | Lithium-Titanate (battery chemistry) |
M2M | Machine-to-Machine (communications) |
MILP | Mixed-Integer Linear Programming |
ML | Machine Learning |
MPC | Model-Predictive Control |
NB | Narrow-Band |
NB-IoT | Narrow-Band IoT |
NB-LTE | Narrow-Band LTE (network) |
NiMH | Nickel-Metal-Hydride (batteries) |
NR | New Radio |
OFDM | Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex (modulation technique) |
QAM | Quadrature Amplitude Modulation |
PI | Proportional-Integral (control) |
PV | Photovoltaic |
PWM | Pulse-Width Modulation |
R&D | Research and Development |
REM-S | Railway Energy Management System |
RESs | Renewable Energy Sources |
RN | Radio Network |
RSO | Railway System Operator |
RSST | Reversible Sub-Station |
SG | Smart Grid |
SGAM | Smart Grid Architecture Model |
SIL | Safety Integrity Level |
SoC | State-of-Charge (of a battery or an ultracapacitor energy storage) |
SST | Sub-Station (non-reversible) |
SUMO | Simulation of Urban Mobility (traffic simulation software) |
SVM | Support Vector Machine (machine learning model) |
SVR | Support Vector Regression (machine learning model) |
UAV | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle |
V2I | Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (communication) |
V2P | Vehicle-to-Pedestrian (communication) |
V2V | Vehicle-to-Vehicle (communication) |
V2X | Vehicle-to-Anything (communication) |
WANs | Wide-Area Networks |
WLAN | Wireless Local-Area Network |
ZEBRA | Sodium-Nickel Chloride (batteries) |
References
- Natural Resources Defense Council. The Paris Agreement on Climate Change. Issue Brief, IB: 17-11-A. 2017. Available online: https://www.nrdc.org/resources/paris-agreement-climate-change (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- European Commission, Directorate—General for Research and Innovation: Accelerating Clean Energy Innovation. COM (2016) 0763 Final, Bruxelles, November 2016. Available online: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/research-and-technology/energy-storage_en (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- European Economic and Social Committee. Implications of the Digitalisation and Robotisation of Transport for EU Policy-Making; TEN/632EESC2017, OJC 345; European Economic and Social Committee: Brussels, Belgium, 2017; pp. 52–57. Available online: https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/our-work/opinions-information-reports/opinions/implications-digitalisation-and-robotisation-transport-eu-policy-making-own-initiative-opinion (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- McCollum, D.; Krey, V.; Kolp, P.; Nagai, Y.; Riahi, K. Transport electrification: A key element for energy system transformation and climate stabilization. Clim. Chang. 2014, 123, 651–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saber, A.Y.; Venayagamoorthy, G.K. Plug-in Vehicles and Renewable Energy Sources for Cost and Emission Reductions. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2011, 58, 1229–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, X.; Guan, D. Determinants of global CO2 emissions growth. Appl. Energy 2016, 184, 1132–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, J.; Sato, M.; Kharecha, P.; Beerling, D.; Berner, R.; Masson-Delmotte, V.; Pagani, M.; Raymo, M.; Royer, D.L.; Zachos, J. Target atmospheric CO2: Where should humanity aim? Open Atmos. Sci. J. 2008, 2, 2217–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zawadzki, A.; Reszewski, F.; Pahl, M.; Schierholz, H.; Burke, D.; Vasconcellos, B.; Toppan, M. Riding the Rails to Sustainability; Boston Consulting Group: Tokyo, Japan, 2022; Available online: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2022/riding-the-rails-to-the-future-of-sustainability (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- European Commission. Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy: Putting European Transport on Track for the Future. COM/2020/789 Final. 2020. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0789 (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Dincer, I.; Zamfirescu, C. A review of novel energy options for clean rail applications. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2016, 28, 461–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Action Plan to Boost Long Distance and Cross-Border Passenger Rail; COM (2021) 810 Final; European Commission: Strasbourg, France, 2021; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0810&from=EN (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Kylä-Harakka-Ruonala, T. Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Implications of the digitalisation and robotisation of transport for EU policy-making’. Off. J. Eur. Union 2017, C345, 52–57. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4eab6889-afbf-11e7-837e-01aa75ed71a1 (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Towards Clean, Competitive and Connected Mobility: The Contribution of Transport Research and Innovation to the Mobility Package; SWD (2017) 223 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2017; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52017IE0663 (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Moreno, J.; Riera, J.M.; de Haro, L.; Rodriguez, C. A survey on future railway radio communications services: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2015, 53, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talvitie, J.; Levanen, T.; Koivisto, M.; Pajukoski, K.; Renfors, M.; Valkama, M. Positioning of High-speed Trains using 5G New Radio Synchronization Signals. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC 2018), Barcelona, Spain, 15–18 April 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, J.; He, L.; Zhu, F. Swarm Robotics Control and Communications: Imminent Challenges for Next Generation Smart Logistics. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fischer, J.; Lieberoth-Leden, C.; Fottner, J.; Vogel-Heuser, B. Design, Application, and Evaluation of a Multiagent System in the Logistics Domain. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2020, 17, 1283–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsumoto, M.; Kitamura, N. Autonomous decentralized train control technology. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems, Athens, Greece, 23–25 March 2009; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trentesaux, D.; Dahyot, R.; Ouedraogo, A.; Arenas, D.; Lefebvre, S.; Lussier, B.; Chéritel, H. The Autonomous Train. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE), Paris, France, 19–22 June 2018; pp. 514–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, S.A.A.; Ahmed, E.; Imran, M.; Zeadally, S. 5G for Vehicular Communications. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stankovic, J.A. Research Directions for the Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Things J. 2014, 1, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaiwartya, O.; Abdullah, A.H.; Cao, Y.; Altameem, A.; Prasad, M.; Lin, C.-T.; Liu, X. Internet of Vehicles: Motivation, Layered Architecture, Network Model, Challenges, and Future Aspects. IEEE Access 2016, 4, 5356–5373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owojaiye, G.; Sun, Y. Focal design issues affecting the deployment of wireless sensor networks for intelligent transport systems. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2012, 6, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grob, G.R. Future Transportation with Smart Grids & Sustainable Energy. In Proceedings of the 6th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices, Djerba, Tunisia, 23–26 March 2009; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imeri, A.; Khadraoui, D. The security and traceability of shared information in the process of transportation of dangerous goods. In Proceedings of the 9th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security, Paris, France, 26–28 February 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shladover, S.E. Connected and automated vehicle systems: Introduction and overview. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2018, 22, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadimitratos, P.; Fortelle, A.; Evenssen, K.; Brignolo, R.; Cosenza, S. Vehicular communication systems: Enabling technologies, applications, and future outlook on intelligent transportation. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2009, 47, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, X.; Li, Z.; Li, S. 5G Software Defined Vehicular Networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, 55, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuenca, O. KRRI Tests 5G Autonomous Trains. International Railway Journal. 2020. Available online: https://www.railjournal.com/technology/krri-tests-5g-autonomous-trains/ (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Xu, Q.; Gao, D.; Li, T.; Zhang, H. Low Latency Security Function Chain Embedding Across Multiple Domains. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 14474–14484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sneps-Sneppe, M.; Namiot, D. On 5G Projects for Urban Railways. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of Open Innovations Association, Jyvaskyla, Finland, 15–18 May 2018; pp. 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alves dos Santos, J.L.; Carvalho de Araújo, R.C.; Lima Filho, A.C.; Belo, F.A.; Gomes de Lima, J.A. Telemetric system for monitoring and automation of railroad networks. Transp. Plan. Technol. 2011, 34, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walter, M.; Dammann, A.; Jost, T.; Raulefs, R.; Zhang, S. Waveform Parameter Selection for ITS Positioning. In Proceedings of the IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring 2017), Sydney, NSW, Australia, 4–7 June 2017; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kljaić, Z.; Cipek, M.; Mlinarić, T.-J.; Pavković, D.; Zorc, D. Utilization of Track Condition Information from Remote Wireless Sensor Network in Railways–A Mountainous Rail Track Case Study. In Proceedings of the 27th Telecommunications Forum TELFOR 2019, Belgrade, Serbia, 26–27 November 2019; Paper No. 4485. pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossetti, M. Analysis of Weather Events on U.S. Railroads. In Proceedings of the 87th American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, USA, 13 January 2007; pp. 1–10. Available online: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/9745 (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Kljaić, Z.; Cipek, M.; Pavković, D.; Mlinarić, T.-J. Assessment of Railway Train Energy Efficiency and Safety Using Real-time Track Condition Information. J. Sustain. Dev. Energy Water Environ. Syst. 2021, 9, 1080352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chinowsky, P.; Helman, J.; Gulati, S.; Neumann, J.; Martinich, J. Impacts of climate change on operation of the US rail network. Transp. Policy 2019, 75, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barth, M.; Todd, M. Intelligent Transportation System Architecture for a Multi Station Shared Vehicle System. In Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, Dearborn, MI, USA, 1–3 October 2000; pp. 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, W.; Eichi, H.R.; Zhang, W.; Chow, M.-Y. A Survey on the Electrification of Transportation in a Smart Grid Environment. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2012, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shakya, S.R.; Shrestha, R.M. Transport sector electrification in a hydropower resource rich developing country: Energy security, environmental and climate change co-benefits. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2011, 15, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frey, S. Railway Electrification Systems & Engineering, 1st ed.; White Word Publications: Delhi, India, 2012; pp. 3–25. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Tony, F.E.S.; Lashine, A. Cost-benefit analysis of railway electrification: Case study for Cairo-Alexandria railway line. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 2012, 18, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Technical Report Prepared for Southern California Association of Governments Task 8: Analysis of Freight Rail Electrification in the SCAG Region; Technical Report No. 8114-008; Cambridge Systematics, Inc.: Oakland, CA, USA, 2012; Available online: https://docslib.org/doc/13518970/task-8-analysis-of-freight-rail-electrification-in-the-scag-region (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Spiryagin, M.; Cole, C.; Sun, Y.Q.; McClanachan, M.; Spiryagin, Y.; McSweeney, T. Design and Simulation of Rail Vehicles, 1st ed.; Taylor & Francis Group LLC: Abingdon, UK, 2014; pp. 27–72. [Google Scholar]
- Meinert, M.; Prenleloup, P.; Schmid, S.; Palacin, R. Energy storage technologies and hybrid architectures for specific diesel driven rail duty cycles: Design and system integration aspects. Appl. Energy 2015, 157, 619–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- General Electric Company. GE Energy Storage: Durathon DC System Technical Specifications—MWh Series; Technical Brochure GEA-988123002A; General Electric Company: Boston, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- International Renewable Energy Agency. Road Transport: The Cost of Renewable Solutions. Available online: https://www.irena.org/publications/2013/Jul/Road-Transport-The-Cost-of-Renewable-Solutions (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Pavković, D.; Sedić, A.; Guzović, Z. Oil Drilling Rig Diesel Power-plant Fuel Efficiency Improvement Potentials through Rule Based Generator Scheduling and Utilization of Battery Energy Storage System. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 121, 194–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayet, C.; Pouget, J.; Bouscayrol, A.; Lhomme, W. Influence of an Energy Storage System on the Energy Consumption of a Diesel-Electric Locomotive. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2014, 63, 1032–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meinert, M.; Melzer, M.; Kamburow, C.; Palacin, R.; Leska, M.; Aschemann, H. Benefits of hybridisation of diesel driven rail vehicles: Energy management strategies and life-cycle costs appraisal. Appl. Energy 2015, 157, 897–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asaei, B.; Amiri, M. High Efficient Intelligent Motor Control for a Hybrid Shunting Locomotive. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, Arlington, TX, USA, 9–12 September 2007; pp. 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, Q.; Tang, T.; Song, Y.-D. A Survey on Energy-saving Operation of Railway Transportation Systems. Meas. Control 2010, 43, 209–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klopper, B.; Sondermann-Wolke, C.; Romaus, C. Probabilistic Planning for Predictive Condition Monitoring and Adaptation Within the Self-Optimizing Energy Management of an Autonomous Railway Vehicle. J. Robot. Mechatron. 2012, 24, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cipek, M.; Pavković, D.; Kljaić, Z.; Mlinarić, T.-J. Assessment of Battery-Hybrid Diesel-electric Locomotive Fuel Savings and Emission Reduction Potentials based on a Realistic Mountainous Rail Route. Energy 2019, 173, 1154–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thorne, J.R.; Amundsen, A.H.; Sundvor, I. Battery Electric and Fuel Cell Trains: Maturity of Technology and Market Status; Report No. 1737/2019; Institute of Transport Economics Norvegian Centre for Transport Research (TØI): Oslo, Norway, 2019; ISSN 2535-5104. Available online: https://trid.trb.org/view/1679882 (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Schatz, R.S.; Nieto, A.; Dogruoz, C.; Lvov, S.N. Using modern battery systems in light duty mining vehicles. Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 2015, 29, 243–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shtang, A.A.; Yaroslavtsev, M.V. Battery-electric shunting locomotive with lithium-polymer storage batteries. In Proceedings of the 11th International Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST), Novosibirsk, Russia, 1–3 June 2016; pp. 162–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sladecek, V.; Neborak, I.; Palacky, P. Optimisation of electric drive setting in battery-powered locomotive. In Proceedings of the 2014 15th International Scientific Conference on Electric Power Engineering (EPE), Brno-Bystrc, Czech Republic, 12–14 May 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kreibick, J.A.; Bosch, M.S.; Cleary, T.P.; Ballew, B. Thermal Analysis of an Energy Storage System for a Battery Electric Switcher Locomotive. In Proceedings of the 2015 Joint Rail Conference, San Jose, CA, USA, 23–26 March 2015; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, J. Integrating renewables into the grid: Applying UltraBattery® Technology in MW scale energy storage solutions for continuous variability management. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology (POWERCON 2012), Auckland, New Zealand, 30 October–2 November 2012; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKeon, B.B.; Furukawa, J.; Fenstermacher, S. Advanced Lead–Acid Batteries and the Development of Grid-Scale Energy Storage Systems. Proc. IEEE 2014, 102, 951–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Royston, S.J.; Gladwin, D.T.; Stone, D.A.; Ollerenshaw, R.; Clark, P. Development and Validation of a Battery Model for Battery Electric Multiple Unit Trains. In Proceedings of the IECON 2019–45th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Lisbon, Portugal, 14–17 October 2019; pp. 4563–4568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brenna, M.; Foiadelli, F.; Stocco, J. Battery Based Last-Mile Module for Freight Electric Locomotives. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, Hanoi, Vietnam, 14–17 October 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, S.; Spiryagin, M.; Cole, C.; Wu, Q.; Wolfs, P.; Bosomworth, C. Analysis of positioning of wayside charging stations for hybrid locomotive consists in heavy haul train operations. Railw. Eng. Sci. 2021, 29, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zenith, F.; Isaac, R.; Hoffrichter, A.; Thomassen, M.S.; Møller-Holst, S. Techno-economic analysis of freight railway electrification by overhead line, hydrogen and batteries: Case studies in Norway and USA. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit 2020, 234, 791–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamedica, R.; Ruvio, A.; Tobia, M.; Buffarini, G.G.; Carones, N. A Preliminary Techno-Economic Comparison between DC Electrification and Trains with On-Board Energy Storage Systems. Energies 2020, 13, 6702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burke, A.F.; Zhao, J. Development, Performance, and Vehicle Applications of High Energy Density Electrochemical Capacitors. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thounthong, P.; Chunkag, V.; Sethakul, P.; Sikkabut, S.; Pierfederici, S.; Davat, B. Energy management of fuel cell/solar cell/supercapacitor hybrid power source. J. Power Sources 2021, 196, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavković, D.; Lobrović, M.; Hrgetić, M.; Komljenović, A. A Design of Cascade Control System and Adaptive Load Compensator for Battery/Ultracapacitor Hybrid Energy Storage-based Direct Current Microgrid. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 114, 154–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavković, D.; Cipek, M.; Kljaić, Z.; Mlinarić, T.-J.; Hrgetić, M.; Zorc, D. Damping Optimum-Based Design of Control Strategy Suitable for Battery/Ultracapacitor Electric Vehicles. Energies 2018, 11, 2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kupperman, A.; Aharon, I. Battery-Ultracapacitor Hybrids for Pulsed Current Loads: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 981–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, J.; Dusmez, S.; Khaligh, A. Optimization of Sizing and Battery Cycle Life in Battery/Ultracapacitor Hybrid Energy Storage Systems for Electric Vehicle Applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2014, 10, 2112–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naseri, F.; Karimi, S.; Farjah, E.; Schaltz, E. Supercapacitor management system: A comprehensive review of modeling, estimation, balancing, and protection techniques. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 155, 111913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahimi-Eichi, H.; Ojha, U.; Baronti, F.; Chow, M.-Y. Battery Management System—An Overview of Its Application in the Smart Grid and Electric Vehicles. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2013, 7, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbee, G.V.; Thelen, G.A.; Runyon, R.S.; Smicksburg, L.C.; Klippe, D.V. Battery-Powered All-Electric Locomotive and Related Locomotive and Train Configurations. U.S. Patent US8342103B2, 1 January 2013. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8342103B2/en (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Cipek, M.; Pavković, D.; Krznar, M.; Kljaić, Z.; Mlinarić, T.-J. Comparative Analysis of Conventional Diesel-Electric and Hypothetical Battery-Electric Heavy Haul Locomotive Operation in terms of Fuel Savings and Emissions Reduction Potentials. Energy 2021, 232, 121097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boudoudouh, S.; Maaroufi, M. Renewable Energy Sources Integration and Control in Railway Microgrid. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2019, 55, 2045–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandez, L.M.; Garcia, P.; Garcia, C.A.; Jurado, F. Hybrid electric system based on fuel cell and battery and integrating a single dc/dc converter for a tramway. Energy Convers. Manag. 2011, 52, 2183–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Hamed, K.H.M.; Dincer, I. A novel integrated solid-oxide fuel cell powering system for clean rail applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 205, 112327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longo, M.; Brenna, M.; Zaninelli, D.; Ceraolo, M.; Lutzemberger, G.; Poli, D. Fuel-Cell Based Propulsion Systems for Hybrid Railcars. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Milan PowerTech Conference, Milan, Italy, 23–27 June 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, A.R.; Hess, K.S.; Erickson, T.L.; Dippo, J.L. Fuelcell-Hybrid Shunt Locomotive: Largest Fuelcell Land Vehicle. In Proceedings of the IET Conference on Railway Traction Systems (RTS 2010), Birmingham, UK, 13–15 April 2010; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanescu, A.; Mocioi, N.; Dimitrescu, A. Hybrid Propulsion Train with Energy Storage in Metal Hydrides. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Electrical Vehicles International Conference and Show (EV 2019), Bucuresti, Romania, 3–4 October 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brenna, M.; Foiadelli, F.; Longo, M.; Zaninelli, D. Use of Fuel Cell Generators for Cell-Propelled Trains Renovation. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2018 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe, Palermo, Italy, 12–15 June 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoffrichter, A.; Hillmansen, S.; Roberts, C. Review and Assessment of Hydrogen Propelled Railway Vehicles. In Proceedings of the IET Conference on Railway Traction Systems, Birmingham, UK, 13–15 April 2010; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Logan, K.G.; Hastings, A.; Nelson, J.D. Challenges of Implementing Electric and Hydrogen Public Transport. In Transportation in a Net Zero World: Transitioning Towards Low Carbon Public Transport, 1st ed.; Logan, K.G., Hastings, A., Nelson, J.D., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 59–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herwartz, S.; Pagenkopf, J.; Streuling, C. Sector coupling potential of wind-based hydrogen production and fuel cell train operation in regional rail transport in Berlin and Brandenburg. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 29597–29615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Olivares, A.; Solé, J.; Osychenko, O. Transportation in a 100% renewable energy system. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 158, 266–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Manier, H.; Manier, M.-A. Hydrogen supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 103, 342–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hermesmann, M.; Grübel, K.; Scherotzki, L.; Müller, T.E. Promising pathways: The geographic and energetic potential of power-to-x technologies based on regeneratively obtained hydrogen. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 138, 110644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Ma, J.; Jia, L.; Cheng, H.; Gan, Y.; Qi, Q. Optimization design of non-stop power exchange system for hydrogen energy trains. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2021, 58, 2930–2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piraino, F.; Genovese, M.; Fragiacomo, P. Towards a new mobility concept for regional trains and hydrogen infrastructure. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 228, 113650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landgraf, M.; Zeiner, M.; Knabl, D.; Corman, F. Environmental impacts and associated costs of railway turnouts based on Austrian data. Transp. Res. Part D—Transp. Environ. 2022, 103, 103168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodić, S.N.; Popov, S.D.; Dodić, J.M.; Ranković, J.A.; Zavargo, Z.Z. Potential contribution of bioethanol fuel to the transport sector of Vojvodina. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 2197–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lal, A.; Kumar, A.; Gupta, A.K.; Yadav, N.K. Waste Cooked Oil as an Alternative Feed Stock for Bio-Diesel Production in Indian Railways. Asian J. Res. Chem. 2011, 4, 942–945. [Google Scholar]
- Gautam, A.; Misra, R.N.; Agarwal, A.K. Biodiesel as an Alternate Fuel for Diesel Traction on Indian Railways. In Locomotives and Rail Road Transportation, 1st ed.; Agarwal, A.K., Dhar, A., Gautam, A., Pandey, A., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2017; pp. 73–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDonnell, S.; Lin, J.J. The Challenges and Benefits of Using Biodiesel in Freight Railways. In Transport Beyond Oil, 1st ed.; Renne, J.L., Fields, B., Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; pp. 161–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kliucininkas, L.; Matulevicius, J.; Martuzevicius, D. The life cycle assessment of alternative fuel chains for urban buses and trolleybuses. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 99, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamelin, L.; Møller, H.B.; Jørgensen, U. Harnessing the full potential of biomethane towards tomorrow’s bioeconomy: A national case study coupling sustainable agricultural intensification, emerging biogas technologies and energy system analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 138, 110506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hopkins, D.; Fox, I.; Molden, D. Gas Powered Engines with Energy Storage—A Game Changer in Land Drilling. In Proceedings of the IADC/SPE International Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Galveston, TX, USA, 5–7 March 2020; Paper No. IADC/SPE-199671-MS. pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhardemov, B.; Kanatbayev, T.; Abzaliyeva, T.; Koilybayev, B.; Nazarbekova, Z. Justification of location of LNG infrastructure for dual-fuel locomotives on the railway network in Kazakhstan. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 149, 548–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luque, P.; Mántaras, D.A.; Sanchez, L. Artificial Intelligence Applied to Evaluate Emissions and Energy Consumption in Commuter Railways: Comparison of Liquefied Natural Gas as an Alternative Fuel to Diesel. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dincer, I.; Hogerwaard, J.; Zamfirescu, C. Clean Rail Transportation Options, 1st ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dominković, D.F.; Bačeković, I.; Pedersen, A.S.; Krajačić, G. The future of transportation in sustainable energy systems: Opportunities and barriers in a clean energy transition. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 1823–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maroufmashat, A.; Fowler, M. Transition of Future Energy System Infrastructure; through Power-to-Gas Pathways. Energies 2017, 10, 1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meurer, A.; Kern, J. Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis as the Key for Decentralized Sustainable Kerosene Production. Energies 2021, 14, 1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuby, M.; Lim, S. The flow-refuelling location problem for alternative-fuel vehicles. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2005, 39, 125–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, W.; Vicidomini, M.; Calise, F.; Duić, N.; Østergaard, P.A.; Wang, Q.; da Graça Carvalho, M. Recent Advances in Low-Carbon and Sustainable, Efficient Technology: Strategies and Applications. Energies 2022, 15, 2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraga-Lamas, P.; Fernández-Caramés, T.M.; Castedo, L. Towards the Internet of Smart Trains: A Review on Industrial IoT-Connected Railways. Sensors 2017, 17, 1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, R.; Long, W.X.; Mao, G.; Li, C. Development Trends of Mobile Communication Systems for Railways. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2018, 20, 3131–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nissel, R.; Rupp, M. OFDM and FBMC-OQAM in Doubly-Selective Channels: Calculating the Bit Error Probability. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2017, 21, 1297–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, A.N.; Abdullah, M.F.L. The Potential of FBMC over OFDM for the Future 5G Mobile Communication Technology. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1883, 020001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, T.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; Tao, C. Channel Modeling for Future High-Speed Railway Communication Systems: A Survey. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 52818–52926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, M.; Cong, J.; Xiao, J.; He, Q.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Chen, R.; Wang, P. Dynamic modeling and experimental investigation of self-powered sensor nodes for freight rail transport. Appl. Energy 2020, 257, 113969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernal, E.; Spiryagin, M.; Cole, C. Onboard Condition Monitoring Sensors, Systems and Techniques for Freight Railway Vehicles: A Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2019, 19, 4–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, T.; Yang, Y.; Liu, L.; Tao, C.; Liang, Y. A Dynamic 3-D Wideband GBSM for Cooperative Massive MIMO Channels in Intelligent High-Speed Railway Communication Systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2021, 20, 2237–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanno, A.; Tien Dat, P.; Yamamoto, N.; Kawanishi, T.; Iwasawa, N.; Iwaki, N.; Nakamura, K.; Kawasaki, K.; Kanada, N.; Yonemoto, N.; et al. High-Speed Railway Communication System Using Linear-Cell-Based Radio-Over-Fiber Network and Its Field Trial in 90-GHz Bands. J. Light. Technol. 2020, 38, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafiullah, G.M.; Azad, S.A.; Shawkat Ali, A.B.M. Energy-Efficient Wireless MAC Protocols for Railway Monitoring Applications. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2013, 14, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dirnfeld, R.; Flammini, F.; Marrone, S.; Nardone, R.; Vittorini, V. Low-Power Wide-Area Networks in Intelligent Transportation: Review and Opportunities for Smart-Railways. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 23rd Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2020), Rhodes, Greece, 20–23 September 2020; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jo, O.; Kim, Y.-K.; Kim, J. Internet of Things for Smart Railway: Feasibility and Applications. IEEE Internet Things J. 2018, 5, 482–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, L.; Fang, X.; Fang, X. Control and Data Signaling Decoupled Architecture for Railway Wireless Networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2015, 22, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aoun, J.; Quaglietta, E.; Goverde, R.M.P. Investigating Market Potentials and Operational Scenarios of Virtual Coupling Railway Signaling. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2020, 2674, 799–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Zhan, Z.; Zhang, W. MPC-based time synchronization method for V2V (vehicle-to-vehicle) communication. Railw. Sci. 2023, 2, 101–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quaglietta, E.; Wang, M.; Goverde, R.M.P. A multi-state train-following model for the analysis of virtual coupling railway operations. J. Rail Transp. Plan. Manag. 2020, 15, 100195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, P.; Dulebenets, M.A.; Pasha, J.; Gonzalez, E.D.R.S.; Lau, Y.-Y.; Kampmann, R. Deployment of Autonomous Trains in Rail Transportation: Current Trends and Existing Challenges. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 91427–91461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masson, É.; Richard, P.; Garcia-Guillen, S.; Morral Adel, G. TC-Rail: Railways Remote Driving. In Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Railway Research, Tokyo, Japan, 28 October 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Gadmer, Q.; Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P.; Richard, P. Human-Automation—Railway remote control: How to define shared information and functions? IFAC-Papers On-Line 2021, 54, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P.; Gadmer, Q.; Richard, P. Train remote driving: A Human-Machine Cooperation point of view. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS), Rome, Italy, 7–9 September 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šotek, M.; Márton, P.; Lendel, V.; Lendelová, L. Investigation of Options on the Acceptance of Autonomous Railway Vehicles in Slovakia. Transp. Res. Procedia 2021, 55, 1337–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, R.; De Donato, L.; Bešinović, N.; Flammini, F.; Goverde, R.M.P.; Lin, Z.; Liu, R.; Tang, T.; Vittorini, V.; Wang, Z. A literature review of Artificial Intelligence applications in railway systems. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2022, 140, 103679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thaduri, A.; Aljumaili, M.; Kour, R.; Karim, R. Cybersecurity for eMaintenance in railway infrastructure: Risks and consequences. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 2019, 10, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Liu, X. Cyber security of railway cyber-physical system (CPS)—A risk management methodology. Commun. Transp. Res. 2022, 2, 100078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kour, R.; Karim, R.; Thaduri, A. Cybersecurity for railways—A maturity model. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit 2020, 234, 1129–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kour, R.; Patwardhan, A.; Thaduri, A.; Karim, R. A review on cybersecurity in railways. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit 2023, 237, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Miao, Y.; Hao, Y.; Hwang, K. Narrow Band Internet of Things. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 20557–20577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narayanan, S.; Tsolkas, D.; Passas, N.; Merakos, L. NB-IoT: A Candidate Technology for Massive IoT in the 5G Era. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 23rd International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD), Barcelona, Spain, 17–19 September 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nair, K.K.; Abu-Mahfouz, A.M.; Lefophane, S. Analysis of the Narrow Band Internet of Things (NB-IoT) Technology. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Information Communications Technology and Society (ICTAS), Durban, South Africa, 6–8 March 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Zhang, C.; Li, R.; Wang, G.; Wang, J. Narrow-Band SCMA: A New Solution for 5G IoT Uplink Communications. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 84th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall), Montreal, QC, Canada, 18–21 September 2016; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chehri, A.; Chaibi, H.; Saadane, R.; El Mehdi Quafiq, E.M.; Slalmi, A. On the Performance of 5G Narrow-Band Internet of Things for Industrial Applications. In Proceedings of the Networking, Intelligent Systems and Security Conference 2021 (NISS 2021), Kenitra, Morocco, 1–2 April 2021; pp. 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beshley, M.; Kryvinska, N.; Seliuchenko, M.; Beshley, H.; Shakshuki, E.M.; Yasar, A.-U.-H. End-to-End QoS “Smart Queue” Management Algorithms and Traffic Prioritization Mechanisms for Narrow-Band Internet of Things Services in 4G/5G Networks. Sensors 2020, 20, 2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, M.; Yang, X.H.; Hua, F.C. The effect of transmission code and safety code on SIL in Safety-Critical System. In Proceedings of the 2009 Asia-Pacific Conference on Computational Intelligence and Industrial Applications (PACIIA), Wuhan, China, 28–29 November 2009; pp. 361–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Výrostko, M.; Lüley, P.; Ondrašina, T.; Franeková, M. Probabilistic error analysis of encrypted transmission for safety-related railway applications. In Proceedings of the 2012 ELEKTRO, Rajecke Teplice, Slovakia, 21–22 May 2012; pp. 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.-F.; Li, W. Component-Based Safety Computer of Railway Signal Interlocking System. In Proceedings of the 2008 ISECS International Colloquium on Computing, Communication, Control, and Management, Guangzhou, China, 3–4 August 2008; pp. 538–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thorat, S.B.; Jagtap, S.; Murthy, R.; Pal, S.; Kalyankar, N.V. Intelligent computing in railway signal engineering. In Proceedings of the 2011 6th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology (ICCIT), Seogwipo, Republic of Korea, 29 November–1 December 2011; pp. 12–17. [Google Scholar]
- Catelani, M.; Ciani, L.; Mugnaini, M.; Scarano, V.; Singuaroli, R. Definition of Safety Levels and Performances of Safety: Applications for an Electronic Equipment Used on Rolling Stock. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Technology Conference IMTC 2007, Warsaw, Poland, 1–3 May 2007; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, H.; Wu, W.H.; Zhang, C.D.; Ho, T.K.; Zhang, Z.M. Modelling safety monitors of safety-critical railway systems by formal methods. In Proceedings of the 6th IET Conference on Railway Condition Monitoring (RCM 2014), Birmingham, UK, 17–18 September 2014; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lisagor, O.; Sun, L.; Kelly, T.; Liu, C.; Niu, R. On validation of the safety analysis of modern railway systems. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations, Logistics and Informatics, Beijing, China, 10–12 July 2011; pp. 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Proakis, J.G.; Salehi, M. Digital Communications, 5th ed.; McGraw-Hill Co. Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 737–760. [Google Scholar]
- Mlinarić, T.-J.; Đorđević, B.; Krmac, E. Evaluating framework for key performance indicators or railway ITS. Promet Traffic Transp. 2018, 30, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kljaić, Z. Model for Improvement of Railway Transport Energy Efficiency and Traffic Safety by Means of Advanced Power-Train Technologies and Remote Narrow-Band Sensor Networks. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Traffic and Transportation Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, 29 September 2021. (In Croatian). [Google Scholar]
- Kljaić, Z.; Pavković, D.; Mlinarić, T.-J.; Nikšić, M. Scheduling of traffic entities under reduced traffic flow by means of fuzzy logic control. Promet—Traffic Transp. 2021, 33, 621–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakhtari, A.R.; Waris, M.M.; Mannan, B.; Sanin, C.; Szczerbicki, E. Assessing Industry 4.0 Features Using SWOT Analysis. In Intelligent Information and Database Systems, 1st ed.; Sitek, P., Pietranik, M., Krótkiewicz, M., Srinilta, C., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; Volume 1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mora Sanchez, D.O. Sustainable Development Challenges and Risks of Industry 4.0: A literature review. In Proceedings of the 2019 Global IoT Summit (GIoTS), Aarhus, Denmark, 17–21 June 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oztemel, E.; Gursev, S. Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. J. Intell. Manuf. 2020, 31, 127–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komarov, K. Development of transport systems as one of the areas of Industry 4.0. MATEC Web Conf. Polytransport Syst. 2018, 216, 04002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, C.S.; Veelenturf, L.P. The strategic role of logistics in the industry 4.0 era. Transp. Res. Part E 2019, 129, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- TELEFONICA: Telefónica Presents the First 5G Use Case with Autonomous Driving and Content Consumption. Press Release. Available online: https://www.telefonica.com/en/web/press-office/-/telefonica-presents-the-first-5g-use-case-with-autonomous-driving-and-content-consumption (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Smith, A. New “Trackless Train” Which Runs on Virtual Rail Lines Launched in China. Available online: https://metro.co.uk/2017/10/28/new-trackless-train-which-runs-on-virtual-rail-lines-launched-in-china-7034155/ (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Han, D.; Wang, J.; Yan, Y.; Wu, M.; Lin, Z.; Guodong, Y. Velocity Planning of the Autonomous Rail Rapid Transit with Consideration of Obstacles. In Proceedings of the 2020 4th CAA International Conference on Vehicular Control and Intelligence (CVCI), Hangzhou, China, 18–20 December 2020; pp. 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díez-Jiménez, E.; Fernández-Muñoz, M.; Oliva-Domínguez, R.; Fernández-Llorca, D.; Sotelo, M.Á. Personal Rapid Transport System Compatible With Current Railways and Metros Infrastructure. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 22, 2891–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosique, F.; Navarro, P.J.; Fernández, C.; Padilla, A. A Systematic Review of Perception System and Simulators for Autonomous Vehicles Research. Sensors 2019, 19, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, S.; Li, M.; Zheng, Y.; Zhao, N.; Dong, H. Fuzzy Adaptive Protective Control for High-Speed Trains: An Outstretched Error Feedback Approach. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 23, 17966–17975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pickering, J.E.; Davies, J.; Burnham, K.J. Development of Model Prototype to Investigate Closer Running Autonomous Train Operation: Seamless Interchangeability. In Proceedings of the 2019 23rd International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), Sinaia, Romania, 9–11 October 2019; pp. 572–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, H. Autonomous Intelligent Vehicles–Theory, Algorithms, and Implementation, 1st ed.; Springer: London, UK, 2011; pp. 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heirich, O.; Siebler, B. Onboard Train Localization with Track Signatures: Towards GNSS Redundancy. In Proceedings of the 30th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2017), Portland, OR, USA, 25–29 September 2017; pp. 3231–3237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, H.; Gao, S.; Ning, B. Cooperative Control Synthesis and Stability Analysis of Multiple Trains Under Moving Signaling Systems. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2016, 17, 2730–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, X.; Cao, C.; Chen, Z.; Chen, W.; Ni, L.; Ji, Z.; Gan, J. Using mixed methods to design service quality evaluation indicator system of railway container multimodal transport. Sci. Prog. 2020, 103, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, C.; Yue, Y. Optimization on Combination of Transport Routes and Modes on Dynamic Programming for a Container Multimodal Transport System. Procedia Eng. 2016, 137, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Glossary for Transport Statistics, 4th ed.; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Dębicki, T. Electronic Repository and Standardization of Processes and Electronic Documents in Transport. Transp. Probl. 2007, 2, 75–81. [Google Scholar]
- Li, L.; Negenborn, R.R.; De Schutter, B. A general framework for modeling intermodal transport networks. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), Evry, France, 10–12 April 2013; pp. 579–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Severino, A.; Martseniuk, L.; Curto, S.; Neduzha, L. Routes Planning Models for Railway Transport Systems in Relation to Passengers’ Demand. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapetanović, M.; Núñez, A.; van Oort, N.; Goverde, R.M.P. Reducing fuel consumption and related emissions through optimal sizing of energy storage systems for diesel-electric trains. Appl. Energy 2021, 294, 117018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapetanović, M.; Vajihi, M.; Goverde, R.M.P. Analysis of Hybrid and Plug-In Hybrid Alternative Propulsion Systems for Regional Diesel-Electric Multiple Unit Trains. Energies 2021, 14, 5920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barberi, S.; Sambito, M.; Neduzha, L.; Severino, A. Pollutant Emissions in Ports: A Comprehensive Review. Infrastructures 2021, 6, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaksari, S. The Sustainability of European Transportation through Intermodality. Int. J. Appl. Optim. Stud. 2018, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Dočkalíková, I.; Cempírek, V.; Indruchová, I. Multimodal Transport as a Substitution for Standard Wagons. Transp. Res. Procedia 2020, 44, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tumanov, A. Risk Assessment of Accidents During the Transportation of Liquid Radioactive Waste in Multimodal Transport. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 272, 032078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, X.; Ji, Z.; Chen, Z.; Chen, W.; Cao, C.; Gan, J. Synergy Degree Evaluation of Container Multimodal Transport System. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Przystupa, K.; Qin, Z.; Zabolotnii, S.; Pohrebennyk, V.; Mogilei, S.; Zhongju, C.; Gil, L. Constructing Reference Plans of Two-Criteria Multimodal Transport Problem. Transp. Telecommun. J. 2021, 22, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Lang, M.; Yu, X.; Li, S. A Sustainable Multimodal Transport System: The Two-Echelon Location-Routing Problem with Consolidation in the Euro–China Expressway. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Capodici, A.E.; D’Orso, G.; Migliore, M. A GIS-Based Methodology for Evaluating the Increase in Multimodal Transport between Bicycle and Rail Transport Systems: A Case Study in Palermo. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lees-Miller, J.D.; Wilson, R.E. Proactive empty vehicle redistribution for personal rapid transit and taxis. Transp. Plan. Technol. 2012, 35, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grover, P.; Kar, A.K. Big Data Analytics: A Review on Theoretical Contributions and Tools Used in Literature. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 2017, 18, 203–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghofrani, F.; He, Q.; Goverde, R.M.P.; Liu, X. Recent applications of big data analytics in railway transportation systems: A survey. Transp. Res. Part C 2018, 90, 226–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolar, D.; Lisjak, D.; Pajak, M.; Pavković, D. Fault Diagnosis of Rotary Machines Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network with Wide Three Axis Vibration Signal Input. Sensors 2020, 20, 4017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mujica, G.; Henche, J.; Portilla, J. Internet of Things in the Railway Domain: Edge Sensing System Based on Solid-State LIDAR and Fuzzy Clustering for Virtual Coupling. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 68093–68107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lesiak, P. Inspection and Maintenance of Railway Infrastructure with the Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Railw. Rep. Probl. Kolejnictwa 2020, 188, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medeiros, L.; Silva, P.H.O.; Valente, L.D.C.; Nepomuceno, E.G. A Prototype for Monitoring Railway Vehicle Dynamics Using Inertial Measurement Units. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Industry Applications (INDUSCON), Sao Paulo, Brasil, 12–14 November 2018; pp. 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Focaracci, A.; Greco, G.; Martirano, L. Dynamic Risk Analysis and Energy Saving in Tunnels. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2019 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe, Genova, Italy, 11–14 June 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nexiot, Globehopper EDGE. Available online: https://nexxiot.com/products/globehopper-edge/ (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Nexiot, Globehopper Crossmodal. Available online: https://nexxiot.com/products/globehopper-crossmodal/ (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Karakose, M.; Yaman, O. Complex Fuzzy System Based Predictive Maintenance Approach in Railways. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2020, 16, 6023–6032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, C.; Liu, X. Modeling track geometry degradation using support vector machine technique. In Proceedings of the 2016 Joint Rail Conference, Columbia, SC, USA, 12–15 April 2016; Paper No. JRC2016-5736. pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Massaro, A.; Dipiero, G.; Selicato, S.; Cannella, E.; Galiano, A.; Saponaro, A. Intelligent Inspection of Railways Infrastructure and Risks Estimation by Artificial Intelligence Applied on Noninvasive Diagnostic System. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 & IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT), Rome, Italy, 7–9 June 2021; pp. 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fetter, M.; Csonka, B. Multi-criteria evaluation method for operating battery electric railcars. In Proceedings of the Smart Cities Symposium Prague 2021, Prague, Czech Republic, 27–28 May 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, J.; Shen, H. Three-dimensional system structure model of intelligent high-speed railway. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference of Social Computing and Digital Economy, Chongqing, China, 28–29 August 2021; pp. 328–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bešinović, N. Resilience in railway transport systems: A literature review and research agenda. Transp. Rev. 2020, 40, 457–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngamkhanong, C.; Kaewunruen, S.; Afonso Costa, B.J. State-of-the-Art Review of Railway Track Resilience Monitoring. Infrastructures 2018, 3, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bondarenko, I.; Campisi, T.; Tesoriere, G.; Neduzha, L. Using Detailing Concept to Assess Railway Functional Safety. Sustainability 2023, 15, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adjetey-Bahun, K.; Planchet, J.-L.; Birregah, B.; Châtelet, E. Railway transportation system’s resilience: Integration of operating conditions into topological indicators. In Proceedings of the NOMS 2016—2016 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, 25–29 April 2016; pp. 1163–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ip, W.H.; Wang, D. Resilience and Friability of Transportation Networks: Evaluation, Analysis and Optimization. IEEE Syst. J. 2011, 5, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enache, M.F.; Letia, T.S. Approaching the Railway Traffic Resilience with Object Enhanced Time Petri Nets. In Proceedings of the 2019 23rd International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing, Sinaia, Romania, 9–11 October 2019; pp. 338–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enache, M.F.; Al-Janabi, D.; Letia, T.S. Conceiving of Resilient Railway Systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 21–23 May 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sresakoolchai, J.; Kaewunruen, S. Integration of Building Information Modeling and Machine Learning for Railway Defect Localization. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 166039–166047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drago, A.; Marrone, S.; Mazzocca, N.; Tedesco, A.; Vittorini, V. Model-driven estimation of distributed vulnerability in complex railway networks. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing and 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on Autonomic & Trusted Computing, Vietri sul Mare, Italy, 18–21 December 2013; pp. 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shangguan, W.; Luo, R.; Song, H.; Sun, J. High-Speed Train Platoon Dynamic Interval Optimization Based on Resilience Adjustment Strategy. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 23, 4402–4414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goverde, R.M.P.; Hansen, I.A. Performance indicators for railway timetables. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation, Beijing, China, 30 August–1 September 2013; pp. 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO). Available online: https://www.eclipse.org/sumo/ (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Neema, H.; Potteiger, B.; Koutsoukos, X.; Tang, C.; Stouffer, K. Metrics-Driven Evaluation of Cybersecurity for Critical Railway Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2018 Resilience Week, Denver, CO, USA, 20–23 August 2018; pp. 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kour, R.; Aljumaili, M.; Karim, R.; Tretten, P. eMaintenance in railways: Issues and challenges in cybersecurity. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit 2019, 233, 1012–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homay, A.; de Sousa, M.; Almeida, L. Nash equilibrium for proactive anti-jamming in IEEE 802.15.4e (Emerging wireless sensor actuator technologies for I4.0). In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial Informatics, Emden, Germany, 24–26 July 2017; pp. 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Ni, M.; Gao, S.; Bao, F.; Tang, H. A Resilience-based Security Assessment Approach for Railway Signalling Systems. In Proceedings of the 37th Chinese Control Conference, Wuhan, China, 25–27 July 2018; pp. 7724–7729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noureddine, M.; Ristic, M. Route Planning for Hazardous Materials Transportation: Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach. Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng. 2019, 2, 66–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kochan, A.; Rutkowska, P.; Wójcik, M. Inspection of the Railway Infrastructure with the Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Arch. Transp. Syst. Telemat. 2018, 11, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
- Cano, M.; Pastor, J.L.; Tomás, R.; Riquelme, A.; Asensio, J.L. A New Methodology for Bridge Inspections in Linear Infrastructures from Optical Images and HD Videos Obtained by UAV. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavković, D.; Cipek, M.; Kljaić, Z.; Mlinarić, T.-J. A fuzzy logic-based classifier for railway track condition estimation and tractive effort conditioning using data from remote sensors. In Proceedings of the XXIV International Conference on Material Handling, Constructions and Logistics—MHCL ’22, Belgrade, Serbia, 21–23 September 2022; pp. 121–126. [Google Scholar]
- Sreenath, S.; Malik, H.; Husnu, N.; Kalaichelavan, K. Assessment and Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Civil Structural Health Monitoring. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 170, 656–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, L.; Li, X.; Yang, H.; Jia, L. A Visual Saliency Based Railway Intrusion Detection Method by UAV Remote Sensing Image. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Sensing, Diagnostics, Prognostics, and Control, Beijing, China, 5–7 August 2020; pp. 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertrand, S.; Raballand, N.; Viguier, F.; Muller, F. Ground Risk Assessment for Long-Range Inspection Missions of Railways by UAVs. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Miami, FL, USA, 13–16 June 2017; pp. 1343–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krznar, M.; Piljek, P.; Kotarski, D.; Pavković, D. Modeling, Control System Design and Preliminary Experimental Verification of a Hybrid Power Unit Suitable for Multirotor UAVs. Energies 2021, 14, 2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quaternium Co. Available online: https://www.quaternium.com/hybrix20-rtf/ (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Skyfront Co. Available online: https://skyfront.com/uav/perimeter-8 (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Harris Aerial. Available online: https://www.harrisaerial.com/carrier-h6-hybrid-drone/ (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Dick, K.; Russell, L.; Souley Dosso, Y.; Kwamena, F.; Green, J.R. Deep Learning for Critical Infrastructure Resilience. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2019, 25, 05019003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kafetzis, D.; Fourfouris, I.; Argyropoulos, S.; Koutsopoulos, I. UAV-assisted Aerial Survey of Railways using Deep Learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Athens, Greece, 1–4 September 2020; pp. 1491–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guinard, S.A.; Riant, J.-P.; Michelin, J.-C.; D’Aguiar, S.C. Fast Weakly Supervised Detection of Railway-Related Infrastructures in LIDAR Acquisitions. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2021, V-2-2021, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayele, Y.Z.; Aliyari, M.; Griffiths, D.; Lopez Droguett, E. Automatic Crack Segmentation for UAV-Assisted Bridge Inspection. Energies 2020, 13, 6250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekanayake, J.; Liyanage, K.; Wu, J.; Yokoyama, A.; Jenkins, N. Smart Grid—Technology and Applications, 1st ed.; John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2012; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuballa, M.L.; Abundo, M.L. A review of the development of Smart Grid technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 59, 710–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panda, D.K.; Das, S. Smart grid architecture model for control, optimization and data analytics of future power networks with more renewable energy. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 301, 126877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehmani, M.H.; Reisslein, M.; Rachedi, A.; Erol-Kantarci, M.; Radenkovic, M. Integrating Renewable Energy Resources Into the Smart Grid: Recent Developments in Information and Communication Technologies. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 14, 2814–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopes, J.P.; Madureira, A.; Matos, M.; Bessa, R.; Monteiro, V.; Afonso, J.L.; Santos, S.; Catalao, J.; Antunes, C.H.; Magalhães, P. The Future of Power Systems: Challenges, Trends and Upcoming Paradigms. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ. 2019, 9, e368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jasiunas, J.; Lund, P.D.; Mikkola, J. Energy system resilience—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 150, 111476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, K.; Saini, L.M. Power-line communications for smart grid: Progress, challenges, opportunities, and status. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 67, 704–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Y.; Qian, Y.; Sharif, H.; Tipper, D. A Survey on Smart Grid Communication Infrastructures: Motivations, Requirements and Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2013, 15, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colak, I.; Kabalci, E.; Fulli, G.; Lazarou, S. A survey on the contributions of power electronics to smart grid systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 47, 562–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ETSI Standard SG-CG/M490/H; CEN-CENELEC-ETSI Smart Grid Coordination Group: Smart Grid Information Security. CENELEC; The European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2014. Available online: https://www.cencenelec.eu/media/CEN-CENELEC/AreasOfWork/CEN-CENELEC_Topics/Smart%20Grids%20and%20Meters/Smart%20Grids/7_sgcg_sgis_report.pdf (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Khayyam, S.; Ponci, F.; Lakhdar, H.; Monti, A. Agent-based energy management in railways. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway, Ship Propulsion and Road Vehicles (ESARS), Aachen, Germany, 3–5 March 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahinzadeh, H.; Moradi, J.; Gharehpetian, G.B.; Nafisi, H.; Abedi, M. Internet of Energy (IoE) in Smart Power Systems. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Knowledge-Based Engineering and Innovation, Tehran, Iran, 28 February–1 March 2019; pp. 627–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steele, H.; Roberts, C.; Hillmansen, S. Railway smart grids: Drivers, benefits, and challenges. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit 2019, 233, 526–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de la Fuente, E.P.; Mazumder, S.K.; González-Franco, I. Railway Electrical Smart Grids—An introduction to next-generation railway power systems and their operation. IEEE Electrif. Mag. 2014, 2, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zangiabadi, M.; Tian, Z.; Kamel, T.; Tricoli, P.; Wade, N.; Pickert, V. Smart Rail and Grid Energy Management System for increased synergy between DC Railway Networks & Electrical Distribution Networks. In Proceedings of the 56th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), Middlesbrough, UK, 31 August–3 September 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Arco, S.; Piegari, L.; Tricoli, P. Comparative Analysis of Topologies to Integrate Photovoltaic Sources in the Feeder Stations of AC Railways. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2018, 4, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morais, V.A.; Afonso, J.L.; Martins, A.P. Towards Smart Railways: A Charging Strategy for Railway Energy Storage Systems. EAI Endorsed Trans. Energy Web 2021, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şengör, I.; Kılıçkıran, H.C.; Akdemir, H.; Kekezoğlu, B.; Erdinç, O.; Catalão, J.P.S. Energy Management of a Smart Railway Station Considering Regenerative Braking and Stochastic Behaviour of ESS and PV Generation. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2018, 9, 1041–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
New Infrastructure | Production Costs | Production Efficiency | Food Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hydrogen | Yes * | High | Low ** | Not affected |
Biofuels | Not needed | Low | High | Affected |
Synthetic fuels | Not needed | High | Low | Not affected |
PV for synthetic fuels | Not needed | Low | High | Not affected |
Fuelling Infrastructure | Supply Chain | Land Demand | Intermittency Friendly | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hydrogen | New | New | No concern | Yes ** |
Biofuels | Existing | Existing | Yes (arable land) | No |
Synthetic fuels | Existing | Existing | No concern | Yes ** |
PV for synthetic fuels | Existing | Existing | No concern * | Yes |
Parameter | Frequency | Channel Bandwidth | Peak Data Rate | Maturity | Market Support |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSM-R | 921–925 MHz download 876–880 MHz upload | 200 kHz | 172 kbps | Mature | Until 2030 |
LTE-R | 450 MHz, 800 MHz, 1.4 GHz and 2.1 GHz | From 1.4 to 100 MHz | 50 Mbps download 10 Mbps upload | Emerging | Building standards |
Technology | Robustness | Real-Time Performance | Range | Throughput | Network Scalability | Power-Saving Awareness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEEE 802.11 | Not compliant | Not compliant | Full | Full | Partial | Not compliant |
IEEE 802.15.4 | Partial | Not compliant | Partial | Not compliant | Partial | Full |
Zigbee | Partial | Partial | Partial | Not compliant | Full | Full |
Zigbee Pro | Partial | Partial | Full | Not compliant | Full | Partial |
IEEE 802.15.1 | Partial | Full | Not compliant | Partial | Not compliant | Partial |
Bluetooth | Partial | Full | Not compliant | Partial | Not compliant | Partial |
Wireless HART | Full | Full | Partial | Not compliant | Partial | Full |
ISA 100.11a | Full | Full | Partial | Not compliant | Partial | Full |
WISA | Full | Full | Not compliant | Partial | Partial | Full |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kljaić, Z.; Pavković, D.; Cipek, M.; Trstenjak, M.; Mlinarić, T.J.; Nikšić, M. An Overview of Current Challenges and Emerging Technologies to Facilitate Increased Energy Efficiency, Safety, and Sustainability of Railway Transport. Future Internet 2023, 15, 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15110347
Kljaić Z, Pavković D, Cipek M, Trstenjak M, Mlinarić TJ, Nikšić M. An Overview of Current Challenges and Emerging Technologies to Facilitate Increased Energy Efficiency, Safety, and Sustainability of Railway Transport. Future Internet. 2023; 15(11):347. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15110347
Chicago/Turabian StyleKljaić, Zdenko, Danijel Pavković, Mihael Cipek, Maja Trstenjak, Tomislav Josip Mlinarić, and Mladen Nikšić. 2023. "An Overview of Current Challenges and Emerging Technologies to Facilitate Increased Energy Efficiency, Safety, and Sustainability of Railway Transport" Future Internet 15, no. 11: 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15110347
APA StyleKljaić, Z., Pavković, D., Cipek, M., Trstenjak, M., Mlinarić, T. J., & Nikšić, M. (2023). An Overview of Current Challenges and Emerging Technologies to Facilitate Increased Energy Efficiency, Safety, and Sustainability of Railway Transport. Future Internet, 15(11), 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15110347