You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Future Internet
  • Article
  • Open Access

26 January 2020

Mobility, Citizens, Innovation and Technology in Digital and Smart Cities

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Edifici Tànger, 122-140, 08018 Barcelona, Spain
2
Department of Computer Science, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Pavilhão João Lyra Filho, 6o andar—Bloco B, Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524—Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro—RJ 20.550-013, Brazil
3
Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Carrer de Ramon Trias Fargas, 25-27, 08005 Barcelona, Spain
4
Department of Software Engineering, Braude College of Engineering, P.O.Box 78 Snunit 51, Karmiel 21982, Israel
This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Cities, Innovation, and Multi-Dimensionality

Abstract

Cities are constantly transforming and, consequently, attracting efforts from researchers and opportunities to the industry. New transportation systems are being built in order to meet sustainability and efficiency criteria, as well as being adapted to the current possibilities. Moreover, citizens are becoming aware about the power and possibilities provided by the current generation of autonomous devices. In this sense, this paper presents and discusses state-of-the-art transportation technologies and systems, highlighting the advances that the concepts of Internet of Things and Value are providing. Decentralized technologies, such as blockchain, are been extensively investigated by the industry, however, its widespread adoption in cities is still desirable. Aligned with operations research opportunities, this paper identifies different points in which cities’ services could move to. This also study comments about different combinatorial optimization problems that might be useful and important for an efficient evolution of our cities. By considering different perspectives, didactic examples are presented with a main focus on motivating decision makers to balance citizens, investors and industry goals and wishes.
Key Contribution:
Highlights the importance of technology for mobility and the potential it brings for citizens in the scope of the wave of innovation discussed within smart cities. This study reinforces how computational intelligence allows precise cities’ decision-making. Blockchain as a tool for promoting trust, lower costs, transparency and exchange of value on services used by citizens.

1. Introduction

Aligned with machines’ advancement and the new generation of personal devices, cities are evolving into a new paradigm called Smart Cities (SC) [1]. This evolution, closely related to equipment embedded with techniques from the field of Computational Intelligence (CI), is occurring in urban and rural areas. In addition to promoting decentralization of the current system, these new cities’ paradigms open doors for different autonomous agents, devices with CI capabilities, to optimize and manage their own interests. A complex decision-making scenario has been emerging based on historical data and an increasing potential of solving mathematical problems. While each of these software-based systems optimizes specific goals, simulations with multi-agent scenarios [2,3] should focus on improving overall performance. While this combination of technologies emerges, there is a huge trend moving to decentralized solutions, such as those based on Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLTs). The hidden layer behind the intelligence of these selfish agents and decentralized entities is the core of the future Smart and Digital Cities [4], which will be presented along this paper.
The expected outcomes of current transformations encompass systems that should reach favorable agreements, considering citizen opinions and participation of all involved entities. However, coordinating these agents handling a big volume of historical and real-time information [5] usually leads to the resolution of combinatorial optimization problems [6,7], which are undoubtedly a challenge for modern societies and technological development. In this sense, a multi-criteria view of this transition [8], aligned with the management of these emerging decentralized cities [9], should be carefully considered to address different stakeholders’ perspectives.
It is noteworthy that connecting the dots between what the academy and industry have been doing, and how to take profit from this previous knowledge, may save time and create pillars for future implementations. Since investments and the boom of novel devices are usually sponsored by the private sector, which is usually profit-driven, we emphasize the importance of taking into account all involved partners wishes, which would contribute to a progressive and holistic development [10,11,12].
Blockchain based technologies are used not only for enhancing trust between parties, but also because it has the potential to reduce costs [13]. In this sense, a match between an emerging technology and private interests is evident. In particular, cities’ mobility [14] and the future of the transportation systems are often one of the main concerns when talking about SC [15]. Zhuadar et al. [16] emphasized a next wave of SC intelligent systems, in which humans’ ability to connect with machines is advocated. This ability mentions the possibilities of implementing operational systems that connect citizens to smart equipment, mostly embedded with Internet of Things (IoT) capabilities [17]. Nowadays, we can add this IoT design with the concepts of Internet of Value (IoV) [18,19], which combines the potential of IoT with value transfer, mostly assisted by smart contracts designed with decentralized and semi-decentralized technologies such as blockchain [20].
In summary, the main points that will be highlighted along this paper are:
(i)
technological solutions that will be used in the digital cities transportation environment, both for the public and private interest;
(ii)
blockchain based technologies for promoting distributed trust on transportation systems;
(iii)
consider social aspects, highlighting how citizens are now interacting with the transportation services offered within the cities, such as carpooling, smart parking, and alternative transports.
(iv)
discussions about the possibilities that CI inspired tools have been offering for the future of our cities, pondering a trade-off between technology and quality of life.
Ultimately, this overview paper expects to contribute with readers to:
(i)
understanding some of the current transportation systems that are reality in some parts of the globe, as well as envisioning possibilities and technologies that might come to;
(ii)
creating awareness among citizens, researchers, teachers and students about the importance of the transformations that are occurring in urban environments, aligned with the SC paradigms;
(iii)
introducing state-of-the-art concepts about decentralized solutions, such as those using blockchain;
(iv)
highlighting the importance of considering multi-objective optimization problems and multi-criteria analysis;
(v)
motivating the academy and the industry to develop and work towards “fully” distributed and “transparent” approaches, in order to balance the goals of different autonomous agents;
(vi)
understanding the potential that DLT technologies have in removing the trust barriers in Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Transportation systems.
In order to achieve the desired impacts, the remainder of this paper is organized simply. First, it discusses some current real applications and undergoing studies on operational research and high-performance computing in Section 2. Trends for transportation systems are pointed out inside the scope of Section 3. Finally, final considerations and future research directions are presented in Section 4.

2. The Search for an Optimized Urban Transportation Ecosystem

As mentioned by Derrible and Kennedy [21], urban transportation planning and network design is a problem that has been faced by society from the street patterns of the Roman Empire [22] to the current computational intelligence systems of our present days [23]. Logistics and urban planning problems encompass crucial aspects that can guide efficient cities’ functioning and citizens life quality, such as modeling and designing in order to increase pedestrian mobility [24]. In this section, we are going to highlight advances that the optimization has been bringing for an efficient use of the transportation systems.

2.1. Graph Modeling

The topological/geometric nature of transportation systems and their dynamics motivates studies focused on graph theoretical models. Derrible and Kennedy [21] revise that graph theory dates back to 1741, when mathematician Leonhard Euler had some insights about the “The Seven Bridges of Königsberg”, a problem that can be succinctly described as follows: find, if possible, a tour that traverses every edge of the graph exactly once and returns to the starting point.
Modeling the novel class of transportation problems in a efficient manner, mostly dealing with huge amounts of information, increases the chance to achieve more efficient solutions, in accordance to what decision makers are looking for. For this purpose, we highlight the use of graph clustering techniques, as in [25,26], since such tools can connect these new problems with works already addressed in the literature. For example, in [25], the problem of grouping parts to be produced and the machines that will process such parts into homogeneous cells is studied so that the number of faults (part-machine pairs that do not have relation) is minimized. The motivation for such a study comes from industrial planning and development, where optimizing transportation of parts between industrial parks is highly desired. In [26], efficient algorithms to solve the cluster editing problem (that consists of adding and/or removing the minimum number of edges in order to transform the input graph into a disjoint union of complete graphs or “clusters”) have been described by the authors, motivated by applications that demand grouping data with high degree of similarity, while discarding spurious information. Such “clustered solutions” can be viewed as an attempt to cover large urban agglomerations by homogeneous, self-governing small cells that can work autonomously. A scatter search was designed by Chebbi and Nouri [27] to solve a graph with stations and nodes, for moving jointly persons and goods in urban areas, in order to minimize energy consumption within the context of smart cities.
Multi-modal transportation systems [28] are interesting examples for highlighting the actual complexity of urban transportation. This family of problems also can cover the locomotion for motor profile (reduced mobility). This kind of optimization can be dealt within the scope multi-objective optimization [29,30]. As an example, the Minimum Coloring Cut Problem (MCCP) is defined as follows: given a connected graph G with colored edges, find an edge cut E of G (a minimal set of edges whose removal renders the graph disconnected) such that the number of colors used by the edges in E is minimum. A potential application of the MCCP is in transportation planning systems, where nodes represent locations served by bus and edge colors represent bus companies. In this case, a solution of the MCCP gives the minimum number of companies that must stop working in order to create pairs of locations not reachable by bus from one another. Such application is more suitably modeled by allowing a multigraph as the input of the MCCP, since two locations can be connected by bus services offered by more than a single company.
Furthermore, the so-called interruption graphs can be considered in post-disaster logistics, a problem of great importance for different events that may occur in urban centers. These approaches are suitable to assist with the human decision-making process, in particular, when huge disasters happen, such as the 2017 Irma hurricane. In order to promote better integration with citizens, it is also suggested to study and develop new techniques for processing huge graphs, using high-performance computing, in order to verify interaction between citizens, cities and social networks.

2.2. Smart Routing Problems: Multi-Objective Optimization

Vehicle Routing Problems (VRP) [31] cover a wide variety of problems faced by modern society, both in the industry and public sector. From a simple route apparently taken by a postman [32] in order to deliver packages to a set of customers, humans have been facing complex decision-making scenarios in which computers’ assistance has been shown to be crucial. These challenges are now being solved without users realizing how it indeed happens. In this sense, we pinpoint the open opportunities for innovative applications that should carefully consider the users’ profiles, wishes and desired goals. Furthermore, due to the current advances of many-objective visualization tools [33,34], we expect that data visualization on complex problems will start to turn into common tools used by the industry and decision makers.
Recently, an optimal trip system was claimed by Dotoli et al. [35]. At this point, we highlight the discussion about what is actually an optimal trip in the context of a multicultural SC? While some will surely enjoy specific paths (with particular amount of light, temperature, wind, etc.), others will opt for the fastest or the less noisy. In addition, the specific types of vehicles and mobility systems that each person uses is another point to be added to this multi-objective scenario [36,37]. Furthermore, when public transportation systems are considered, cost and speed is another trade-off handled when citizens use transport integration [38]. The resolution of problems in the scope of green logistics is under discussion not only by the academia [39,40,41,42] but also by the industry [43,44], which basically involve different models for calculating the cost of the routes, involving other components in the objective function equation, such as carbon emissions [45,46]. Discussions under the scope of autonomous also involve batteries and fuel cell based equipment [47]. In this sense, there is a trend in researching more sustainable transports connected with the achievement of higher profits [48], which are concepts that should match for the achievement of a widespread adoption by the industry.
Let us consider an undirected graph G = ( V , E ) , where V = { v 1 , v 2 , , v n } and E = { ( i , j ) | v i , v j V , i < j } represent, respectively, the vertices and edges of a given graph G. Da Silva and Ochi [49] designed an Adaptive Local Search Procedure for tackling a travelling salesman problems in which the rented car could be returned or not at the nodes from a graph G. In this sense, the graph could contain dynamic points in which the users might spontaneously decide where to deliver the vehicle regarding a set of stochastic aspects. It is noteworthy that this problem can be adapted for dealing with several rented cars and car sharing systems on urban scenarios. Doppstadt et al. [50] considered routes that could be optimized according to different operating modes, such as: pure combustion mode, pure electric mode, charging mode (in which the battery is charged while driving with the combustion engine) and a boost mode (in which combustion and electric engines are combined for the drive). However, other points are still open to be considered, such as modes in which the vehicle would charge from: breaks, solar radiation or even rapid winds streams. The study of Quercia et al. [23] also provides an idea on how routing can be considered under many different points of view, defining routes in terms of “smellwalks”, in a study where participants followed different smellscapes and asked to record their experiences.

2.3. The Role of Metaheuristic and High-Performance Optimization

Metaheuristics are a family of methods that dates back the 1950s with the advent of Alan Turing publishing a study called “Obvious connection between machine learning and evolution”, focused on an effort to find solutions to problems inspired by behaviors presented in the nature. In addition, Design by Natural Selection [51], written by Dunham et al. in 1963, presents some descriptions about a method that deals with exploration–exploitation concepts [52].
While some combinatorial problems can be solved with exact algorithms [53], NP-hard problems have a exponential nature in which the size of the problem strongly affects the time in which optimal solutions can be obtained. Added to this, the sea of big-data that is currently available in modern cities makes the decision-making scenario [54] a big trade-off between using computational resources and providing a solution as quick as possible. For this reason, this current paper emphasizes and motivates the use of metaheuristic inspired techniques [55]. One of the core of several trajectory search based Metaheuristics is the use of Neighborhood Structures [56] and, consequently, local search mechanisms [57], which have the potential of proving optimality in some specific cases. For this purpose, efficient high-performance techniques have been suggested for tackling this problems, such as Graphics Processing Units [58,59].

4. Final Remarks

4.1. Final Considerations

The academy and the industry have been directing their efforts in a race to improve urban environments, but this transition will have no meaning if the goals and desires of the citizens are not considered. In particular, the industry focuses on competitiveness and, for achieving better profits and a more wide public, the technologies and trends described in this paper can be seen as a must read manual. One of the key points of living in cities’ turbulent environments is obviously related to mobility, as highlighted in the survey of Barbosa et al. [195]. In this sense, society is facing the opportunity of guiding the evolution of one of the most immense sets of machines ever built, the urban cities. Evolving and building new urban centers adequately are extremely important for building efficiently designed systems that will be the pillars for future generations. Besides promoting the use of renewable resources, and their interaction with classic urban logistics problems, solutions that rely on digital technologies can boost a better quality of life.
In this paper, recent trends towards autonomous transportation systems for the future Digital and Smart Cities were discussed. The insertion of emerging transportation systems into the current cities requires a strategical, comprehensive, operational and technical analysis. In particular, state-of-the-art optimization methods should be considered and embedded into the best available high performance computers in order to process the huge amount of data currently available both for private and public interests. The potential of Smart Contracts designed with DLTs was particularly highlighted along this study, detailing how decentralized transportation systems could be profitable and more transparent for service providers and users. However, studies in the literature have been showing that new technologies still face challenges in terms of skeptcism. For instance, the distrust of V2G has been shown to be highly prevalent in a study in the Nordic region [196]. This is one of the main reasons that we believe that studies, such as the one conducted throughout this paper, have a great potential for triggering cities’ transformation.
This study recapitulates that, once considering the inclusion of novel technologies, it is quite relevant to determine the impacts it may promote. Besides that, it is important to have in mind that each context has a specificity and may respond to the introduction of technologies differently. In this sense, combining strategies that promote social development and also looking toward a more effective and efficient urban environment are essential. For this reason, the renewal of cities’ transportation should be assisted by devices able to perform multi-criteria analysis and solve complex problems, considering citizens’ perspectives.

4.2. Future Research Directions

Focusing on the use of CI techniques is promising for an efficient and sustainable advancement of cities. The potential of the use of these tools should be emphasized, which can be able to: reduce operational costs; improve various services offered in urban environments; promote fairer and more balanced systems; contrast long-term planning models with efficient solutions that process real-time data; and, in summary, increase the quality of life and human wellbeing. By considering state-of-the-art optimization tools, such as metaheuristic based algorithms [197,198,199,200], along with high-performance computing architectures, a sea of data measured by intelligent devices can be mined, processed, learned, predicted and integrated in the search of optimized solutions for our cities.
Studying, designing and developing these systems have a great potential to provide sustainable services, improve services quality and raise awareness about the different possibilities that new technologies are enabling. In this sense, the authors would like to reiterate that there is still a family of open problems that the new generation may work on. In addition, classical problems which were commonly handled as single objectives, and optimized based on a specific metric, may still have research potential. We believe that this potential is mostly due to how humans adjust their vision on their needs; thus, new tools have emerged and, in consequence, brought to society new possibilities to think about. The need for designing solutions that are more friendly and promote a sustainable urban environment are not only citizens’ wishes but also tools with the potential for reducing companies’ costs and enhancing their profits. The latter happens because when society wishes changes the economy model behind it is also transformed, proportioning a new path for being optimized in order to attend the needs of the modern transportation systems.
Finally, the implementation of platforms that promote the decentralization of trust in the context of cities’ transportation will surely change the way we are interacting with the emerging P2P transportation systems.

Author Contributions

The group of authors contain researchers with a variety of backgrounds, from applied computers scientists to specialists in business and social science. Some authors are closely connected with each other, which have been collaborating with brilliant scientists from Brazil, Spain, Israel and France, co-authors of this paper. Physicists were able to connect this study with state-of-the-art concepts of cutting-edge batteries while computer scientists gave the touch of computational intelligence and high-performance computing. The integration of transportation system is considered with contributions from control and automation engineers while integration with citizens and possibilities of blockchain technologies are handled by those engaged in the field of social sciences and also contributors of different open-source blockchain projects. We believe that our team represents the current possibilities that a globalized world and the future internet can offer, in which science is worldwide and can share visions from different cultures and ideologies, giving light to society while instigating readers with peculiar questions and answers. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Thays A. Oliveira, Vitor N. Coelho and Igor M. Coelho would like to thank the partnership with NeoResearch community and support of Neo Foundation. Miquel Oliver was supported by the Spanish Government under projects TEC2016-79510-P (Proyectos Excelencia 2016) and 2017-SGR-1739. Vitor N. Coelho was funded by FAPERJ grant number E-26/202.868/2016. Luiz S. Ochi, Fábio Protti and Igor M. Coelho were partially supported by the CNPq and FAPERJ. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks the different supports and efforts that were done among in order to make this research a reality. In addition, thanks all past generation for providing us with the necessary background for summarizing the information open-source shared within this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CIComputational Intelligence
BFTByzantine Fault Tolerance
DAppsDecentralized Applications
DERDistributed Energy Resources
DLTDistributed Ledger Technologies
DSRCDedicated Short Range Communications
EVElectric Vehicle
ICTInformation and Communication Technologies
IoTInternet of Things
IoVInternet of Value
MASMulti Agent Systems
MCCPMinimum Coloring Cut Problem
P2PPeer-to-peer
SCSmart Cities
SMESSuperconductive Magnetic Energy Storage
SQUIDSuperconducting Quantum Interference Device
UAVUnmanned Aerial Vehicle
V2GVehicle-to-Grid
V2XVehicle-to-Everything
VRPVehicle Routing Problems

References

  1. Shetty, V. A tale of smart cities. Commun. Int. 1997, 24, 16. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sarvapali, D.; Ramchurn, D.H.; Jennings, N.R. Trust in multi-agent systems. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 2004, 19, 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  3. Benenson, I. Multi-agent simulations of residential dynamics in the city. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 1998, 22, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Schaffers, H.; Komninos, N.; Pallot, M.; Trousse, B.; Nilsson, M.; Oliveira, A. Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In The Future Internet Assembly; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2011; pp. 431–446. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sun, Y.; Song, H.; Jara, A.J.; Bie, R. Internet of things and big data analytics for smart and connected communities. IEEE Access 2016, 4, 766–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lawler, E.L.; Lenstra, J.K.; Kan, A.R.; Shmoys, D.B. The Traveling Salesman Problem: A Guided Tour of Combinatorial Optimization; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  7. Colorni, A.; Dorigo, M.; Maffioli, F.; Maniezzo, V.; Righini, G.; Trubian, M. Heuristics from nature for hard combinatorial problems. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 1996, 3, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Triantaphyllou, E. Multi-criteria decision-making methods. In Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Comparative Study; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2000; pp. 5–21. [Google Scholar]
  9. Samaniego, H.; Moses, M.E. Cities as organisms: Allometric scaling of urban road networks. J. Trans. Land Use 2008, 1, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fowke, R.; Prasad, D.K. Sustainable development, cities and local government: Dilemmas and definitions. Aust. Plan. 1996, 33, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Roseland, M. Toward Sustainable Communities: Solutions for Citizens and Their Governments, 4th ed.; New Society Publishers: Gabriola Island, BC, Canada, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  12. Campbell, S. Green cities, growing cities, just cities?: Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 1996, 62, 296–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, J.; Yan, J.; Zhang, K.Z. Blockchain-based sharing services: What blockchain technology can contribute to smart cities. Financ. Innov. 2016, 2, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Soriano, F.R.; Samper-Zapater, J.J.; Martinez-Dura, J.J.; Cirilo-Gimeno, R.V.; Plume, J.M. Smart Mobility Trends: Open Data and Other Tools. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 2018, 10, 6–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yin, C.; Xiong, Z.; Chen, H.; Wang, J.; Cooper, D.; David, B. A literature survey on smart cities. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2015, 58, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhuhadar, L.; Thrasher, E.; Marklin, S.; de Pablos, P.O. The next wave of innovation-Review of smart cities intelligent operation systems. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 66, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zanella, A.; Bui, N.; Castellani, A.; Vangelista, L.; Zorzi, M. Internet of Things for Smart Cities. IEEE Internet Things J. 2014, 1, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Antonopoulos, A. The Internet of Money. Available online: https://www.bortzmeyer.org/internet-of-money.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2020).
  19. Lynch, D.C.; Lundquist, L. Digital Money: The New Era of Internet Commerce; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  20. Buterin, V. On public and private blockchains. Ether. Blog, 6 August 2015. [Google Scholar]
  21. Derrible, S.; Kennedy, C. Applications of Graph Theory and Network Science to Transit Network Design. Transp. Rev. 2011, 31, 495–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pollio, V. Vitruvius: The Ten Books on Architecture; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1914. [Google Scholar]
  23. Quercia, D.; Schifanella, R.; Aiello, L.M.; McLean, K. Smelly maps: The digital life of urban smellscapes. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1505.06851. [Google Scholar]
  24. Parkin, J.; Smithies, N. Accounting for the needs of blind and visually impaired people in public realm design. J. Urban Des. 2012, 17, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Martins, I.C.; Pinheiro, R.G.; Protti, F.; Ochi, L.S. A hybrid iterated local search and variable neighborhood descent heuristic applied to the cell formation problem. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015, 42, 8947–8955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bastos, L.; Ochi, L.S.; Protti, F.; Subramanian, A.; Martins, I.C.; Pinheiro, R.G.S. Efficient algorithms for cluster editing. J. Comb. Optim. 2016, 31, 347–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chebbi, O.; Nouri, N. Reducing Energy Consumption in Smart Cities: A Scatter Search Based Approach. In Proceedings of the 2016 on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, Denver, CO, USA, 20–24 July 2016; pp. 1459–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lillo, F.; Schmidt, F. Optimal Paths in Real Multimodal Transportation Networks: An Appraisal Using GIS Data from New Zealand and Europe. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Felipe_Lillo4/publication/268400265_Optimal_Paths_in_Real_Multimodal_Transportation_Networks_An_Appraisal_Using_GIS_Data_from_New_Zealand_and_Europe/links/5696489c08ae1c4279038b1d.pdf (accessed on 26 January 2020).
  29. Silva, J.; Rampazzo, P.B.; Yamakami, A. Urban Mobility in Multi-Modal Networks Using Multi-Objective Algorithms. In Smart and Digital Cities; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2019; pp. 9–22. [Google Scholar]
  30. Völkel, T.; Weber, G. RouteCheckr: Personalized multicriteria routing for mobility impaired pedestrians. In Proceedings of the 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, Halifax, NS, Canada, 13–15 October 2008; pp. 185–192. [Google Scholar]
  31. Golden, B.L.; Assad, A.A.; Levy, L.; Gheysens, F. The fleet size and mix vehicle routing problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 1984, 11, 49–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Or, I. Traveling Salesman-Type Combinational Problems and Their Relation to the Logistics of Blood Banking. Ph.D. Thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  33. Koochaksaraei, H.R.; Enayatifar, R.; Guimarães, F.G. A New Visualization Tool in Many-Objective Optimization Problems. In Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2016; pp. 213–224. [Google Scholar]
  34. Koochaksaraei, R.H.; Meneghini, I.R.; Coelho, V.N.; Guimaraes, F.G. A new visualization method in many-objective optimization with chord diagram and angular mapping. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2017, 138, 134–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dotoli, M.; Zgaya, H.; Russo, C.; Hammadi, S. A Multi-Agent Advanced Traveler Information System for Optimal Trip Planning in a Co-Modal Framework. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2017, PP, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dotoli, M.; Epicoco, N.; Falagario, M. A technique for efficient multimodal transport planning with conflicting objectives under uncertainty. In Proceedings of the 2016 European Control Conference (ECC), Aalborg, Denmark, 29 June–1 July 2016; pp. 2441–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Peprah, C.; Amponsah, O.; Oduro, C. A system view of smart mobility and its implications for Ghanaian cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 44, 739–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ziliaskopoulos, A.; Wardell, W. An intermodal optimum path algorithm for multimodal networks with dynamic arc travel times and switching delays. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2000, 125, 486–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sbihi, A.; Eglese, R.W. Combinatorial optimization and Green Logistics. 4OR 2007, 5, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dekker, R.; Bloemhof, J.; Mallidis, I. Operations Research for green logistics—An overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 219, 671–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Duan, F.; He, X. Multiple Depots Incomplete Open Vehicle Routing Problem Based on Carbon Tax. In Bio-Inspired Computing—Theories and Applications; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, S.; Tao, F.; Shi, Y.; Wen, H. Optimization of Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows for Cold Chain Logistics Based on Carbon Tax. Sustainability 2017, 9, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sawik, B.; Faulin, J.; Pérez-Bernabeu, E. A multicriteria analysis for the green VRP: A case discussion for the distribution problem of a Spanish retailer. Transp. Res. Procedia 2017, 22, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ubeda, S.; Arcelus, F.; Faulin, J. Green logistics at Eroski: A case study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2011, 131, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gang, H.; Zhijing, G.; Peng, Y.; Junqing, S. Vehicle routing problem with simultaneous pickups and deliveries and time windows considering fuel consumption and carbon emissions. In Proceedings of the 2016 Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Yinchuan, China, 28–30 May 2016; pp. 3000–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Messaoud, E.; Idrissi, A.E.B.E.; Alaoui, A.E. The green dynamic vehicle routing problem in sustainable transport. In Proceedings of the 2018 4th International Conference on Logistics Operations Management (GOL), Le Havre, France, 10–12 April 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hardman, S.; Shiu, E.; Steinberger-Wilckens, R. Changing the fate of Fuel Cell Vehicles: Can lessons be learnt from Tesla Motors? Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40, 1625–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rahimi, M.; Baboli, A.; Rekik, Y. Multi-objective inventory routing problem: A stochastic model to consider profit, service level and green criteria. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 2017, 101, 59–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. da Silva, A.R.V.; Ochi, L.S. An efficient hybrid algorithm for the Traveling Car Renter Problem. Expert Syst. Appl. 2016, 64, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Doppstadt, C.; Koberstein, A.; Vigo, D. The Hybrid Electric Vehicle—Traveling Salesman Problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2016, 253, 825–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dunham, B.; Fridshal, D.; Fridshal, R.; North, J.H. Design by natural selection. Synthese 1963, 15, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xu, J.; Zhang, J. Exploration-exploitation trade-offs in metaheuristics: Survey and analysis. In Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control Conference, Nanjing, China, 28–30 July 2014; pp. 8633–8638. [Google Scholar]
  53. Woeginger, G.J. Exact algorithms for NP-hard problems: A survey. In Combinatorial Optimization—Eureka, You Shrink! Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2003; pp. 185–207. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kitchin, R. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 2014, 79, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nemhauser, G.L.; Wolsey, L.A. Integer programming and combinatorial optimization. In Proceedings of the IPCO: International Conference on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, Houston, TX, USA, 22–24 June 1998. [Google Scholar]
  56. Coelho, V.N.; Coelho, I.M.; Souza, M.J.F.; Oliveira, T.A.; Cota, L.P.; Haddad, M.N.; Mladenovic, N.; Silva, R.C.P.; Guimaraes, F.G. Hybrid Self-Adaptive Evolution Strategies Guided by Neighborhood Structures for Combinatorial Optimization Problems. Evol. Comput. 2016, 24, 637–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Johnson, D.S.; Papadimitriou, C.H.; Yannakakis, M. How easy is local search? J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 1988, 37, 79–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Schulz, C. Efficient local search on the GPU—Investigations on the vehicle routing problem. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 2013, 73, 14–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Szymon, J.; Dominik, Ż. Solving multi-criteria vehicle routing problem by parallel tabu search on GPU. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2013, 18, 2529–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  60. Sguglio, A.; Arcuri, N.; Bruno, R. Integration of Social Science in Engineering Research for Smart Cities. The Italian Case of the RES NOVAE Project. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2018 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I CPS Europe), Palermo, Italy, 12–15 June 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Want, R. Remembering Mark Weiser: Chief Technologist, Xerox Parc. IEEE Pers. Commun. 2000, 7, 8–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Russell, S.J.; Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach; Pearson: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  63. Nigon, J.; Glize, E.; Dupas, D.; Crasnier, F.; Boes, J. Use cases of pervasive artificial intelligence for smart cities challenges. In Proceedings of the 2016 Intl IEEE Conferences on Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced and Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing and Communications, Cloud and Big Data Computing, Internet of People, and Smart World Congress (UIC/ATC/ScalCom/CBDCom/IoP/SmartWorld), Toulouse, France, 18–21 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
  64. Oliveira, T.A.; Barbosa, A.C.; Ramalhinho, H.; Oliver, M. Citizens and Information and Communication Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 8–13 July 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Oliveira, T.A.; Coelho, V.N.; Tavares, W.; Ramalhinho, H.; Oliver, M. Desafios operacionais e digitais para conectar cidadãos em cidades inteligentes. Available online: http://www.sbpo2017.iltc.br/pdf/170636.pdf (accessed on 26 January 2020).
  66. Oliveira, T.A.; Coelho, V.N.; Ramalhinho, H.; Oliver, M. Digital Cities and Emerging Technologies. In Smart and Digital Cities; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2019; pp. 197–207. [Google Scholar]
  67. Dobrovnik, M.; Herold, D.; Fürst, E.; Kummer, S. Blockchain for and in Logistics: What to Adopt and Where to Start. Logistics 2018, 2, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kshetri, N. Can blockchain strengthen the internet of things? IT Prof. 2017, 19, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kahrobaee, S.; Rajabzadeh, R.A.; Soh, L.K.; Asgarpoor, S. Multiagent study of smart grid customers with neighborhood electricity trading. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2014, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Merabet, G.; Essaaidi, M.; Talei, H.; Abid, M.; Khalil, N.; Madkour, M.; Benhaddou, D. Applications of Multi-Agent Systems in Smart Grids: A survey. In Proceedings of the Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS), Marrakech, Morocco, 14–16 April 2014; pp. 1088–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Olivares, D.; Mehrizi-Sani, A.; Etemadi, A.; Canizares, C.; Iravani, R.; Kazerani, M.; Hajimiragha, A.; Gomis-Bellmunt, O.; Saeedifard, M.; Palma-Behnke, R.; et al. Trends in Microgrid Control. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2014, 5, 1905–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mengelkamp, E.; Gärttner, J.; Rock, K.; Kessler, S.; Orsini, L.; Weinhardt, C. Designing microgrid energy markets: A case study: The Brooklyn Microgrid. Appl. Energy 2018, 210, 870–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Park, S.; Lee, J.; Bae, S.; Hwang, G.; Choi, J.K. Contribution-based energy-trading mechanism in microgrids for future smart grid: A game theoretic approach. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2016, 63, 4255–4265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhu, T.; Huang, Z.; Sharma, A.; Su, J.; Irwin, D.; Mishra, A.; Menasche, D.; Shenoy, P. Sharing renewable energy in smart microgrids. In Proceedings of the C2013 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 8–11 April 2013; pp. 219–228. [Google Scholar]
  75. Liu, J.; Li, Q.; Qu, M.; Chen, W.; Yang, J.; Xiong, H.; Zhong, H.; Fu, Y. Station Site Optimization in Bike Sharing Systems. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Atlantic City, NJ, USA, 14–17 November 2015; pp. 883–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Frade, I.; Ribeiro, A. Bike-sharing stations: A maximal covering location approach. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2015, 82, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Maggioni, F.; Cagnolari, M.; Bertazzi, L.; Wallace, S.W. Stochastic optimization models for a bike-sharing problem with transshipment. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2019, 276, 272–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ji, S.; Cherry, C.R.; Han, L.D.; Jordan, D.A. Electric bike sharing: Simulation of user demand and system availability. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 85, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Rose, G.; Delbosc, A. Powered-two-wheelers for city commuting: Insight from Australia’s three largest capital cities. J. Trans. Geogr. 2016, 54, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hardt, C.; Bogenberger, K. Usage of e-scooters in urban environments. Transp. Res. Procedia 2019, 37, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wild, K.; Woodward, A. Why are cyclists the happiest commuters? Health, pleasure and the e-bike. J. Transp. Health 2019, 14, 100569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Thoreau, R. The impact of mobility scooters on their users. Does their usage help or hinder?: A state of the art review. J. Transp. Health 2015, 2, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. May, E.; Garrett, R.; Ballantyne, A. Being mobile: Electric mobility-scooters and their use by older people. Ageing Soc. 2010, 30, 1219–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Nocerino, R.; Colorni, A.; Lia, F.; Luè, A. E-bikes and E-scooters for smart logistics: Environmental and economic sustainability in pro-E-bike Italian pilots. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 14, 2362–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Tasseron, G.; Martens, K. Urban parking space reservation through bottom-up information provision: An agent-based analysis. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2017, 64, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ji, Z.; Ganchev, I.; O’Droma, M.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, X. A cloud-based car parking middleware for IoT-based smart cities: Design and implementation. Sensors 2014, 14, 22372–22393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ganchev, I.; O’Droma, M.; Meere, D. Intelligent car parking locator service. Int. J. 2008, 2, 166–173. [Google Scholar]
  88. Grodi, R.; Rawat, D.B.; Rios-Gutierrez, F. Smart parking: Parking occupancy monitoring and visualization system for smart cities. In Proceedings of the SoutheastCon 2016, Norfolk, VA, USA, 30 March–3 April 2016; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Coelho, V.N.; Coelho, I.M.; Coelho, B.N.; Cohen, M.W.; Reis, A.J.; Silva, S.M.; Souza, M.J.; Fleming, P.J.; Guimaraes, F.G. Multi-objective energy storage power dispatching using plug-in vehicles in a smart-microgrid. Renew. Energy 2016, 89, 730–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wolfram, P.; Lutsey, N. Electric vehicles: Literature review of technology costs and carbon emissions. In Proceedings of the International Council on Clean Transportation, Washington, DC, USA, 15 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
  91. Nordelöf, A.; Messagie, M.; Tillman, A.M.; Söderman, M.L.; Van Mierlo, J. Environmental impacts of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and battery electric vehicles—What can we learn from life cycle assessment? Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2014, 19, 1866–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Agha, A.; Ranjan, R.; Gan, W.S. Noisy vehicle surveillance camera: A system to deter noisy vehicle in smart city. Appl. Acoust. 2017, 117, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Coelho, V.N.; Cohen, M.W.; Coelho, I.M.; Liu, N.; Guimarães, F.G. Multi-agent systems applied for energy systems integration: State-of-the-art applications and trends in microgrids. Appl. Energy 2017, 187, 820–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Di Napoli, C.; Di Nocera, D.; Rossi, S. Using Negotiation for Parking Selection in Smart Cities. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Salamanca, Spain, 4–6 June 2014; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Longo, M.; Roscia, M.; Lazaroiu, G.C. Innovating Multi-agent Systems Applied to Smart City. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2014, 7, 4296–4302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Battistelli, C.; Baringo, L.; Conejo, A. Optimal energy management of small electric energy systems including {V2G} facilities and renewable energy sources. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2012, 92, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kempton, W.; Tomić, J. Vehicle-to-grid power fundamentals: Calculating capacity and net revenue. J. Power Sources 2005, 144, 268–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Coelho, V.N.; Coelho, I.M.; Coelho, B.N.; de Oliveira, G.C.; Barbosa, A.C.; Pereira, L.; de Freitas, A.; Santos, H.G.; Ochi, L.S.; Guimarães, F.G. A communitarian microgrid storage planning system inside the scope of a smart city. Appl. Energy 2017, 201, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Saber, A.Y.; Venayagamoorthy, G.K. Intelligent unit commitment with vehicle-to-grid—A cost-emission optimization. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 898–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. García-Magariño, I.; Palacios-Navarro, G.; Lacuesta, R.; Lloret, J. ABSCEV: An agent-based simulation framework about smart transportation for reducing waiting times in charging electric vehicles. Comput. Netw. 2018, 138, 119–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hu, J.; Saleem, A.; You, S.; Nordström, L.; Lind, M.; Østergaard, J. A multi-agent system for distribution grid congestion management with electric vehicles. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2015, 38, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lin, C.; Choy, K.; Ho, G.; Chung, S.; Lam, H. Survey of Green Vehicle Routing Problem: Past and future trends. Expert Syst. Appl. 2014, 41, 1118–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Erdoğan, S.; Miller-Hooks, E. A Green Vehicle Routing Problem. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 2012, 48, 100–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gnann, T.; Plotz, P.; Funke, S.; Wietschel, M. What is the market potential of plug-in electric vehicles as commercial passenger cars? A case study from Germany. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2015, 37, 171–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Khaligh, A.; Li, Z. Battery, Ultracapacitor, Fuel Cell, and Hybrid Energy Storage Systems for Electric, Hybrid Electric, Fuel Cell, and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles: State of the Art. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2010, 59, 2806–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Peters, A. This Bike Path Paved With Solar Panels Shows That All Streets Could Double As Power Sources. Available online: https://www.fastcompany.com/3053585/this-bike-path-paved-with-solar-panels-shows-that-all-streets-could-double-as-power-sources (accessed on 25 January 2020).
  107. Gupta, S.G.; Ghonge, M.M.; Jawandhiya, P. Review of unmanned aircraft system (UAS). Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Eng. Technol. 2013, 2, 1646–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Coelho, B.N.; Coelho, V.N.; Coelho, I.M.; Ochi, L.S.; Haghnazar, R.; Zuidema, D.; Lima, M.S.; da Costa, A.R. A multi-objective green UAV routing problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 2017, 88, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sun, L.; Huang, Y.; Liu, S.; Chen, Y.; Yao, L.; Kashyap, A. A completive survey study on the feasibility and adaptation of {EVs} in Beijing, China. Appl. Energy 2017, 187, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Celik, K.; Eren, H. UAV fuel preferences for future cities. In Proceedings of the 2018 6th International Istanbul Smart Grids and Cities Congress and Fair (ICSG), Istanbul, Turkey, 25–26 April 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Nguyen, H.T.; Nishiyama, S.; Izumi, M.; Zheng, L.; Miao, X.; Sakai, Y.; Goto, H.; Hirao, N.; Ohishi, Y.; Kagayama, T.; et al. Fabrication of new superconducting materials, CaxK1-xCy (0 < x< 1). Carbon 2016, 100, 641–646. [Google Scholar]
  112. Savitskii, E. Superconducting Materials; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  113. Kolmogorov, A. Theory-Guided Discovery of New Superconducting Materials. Available online: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015APS..MARA16001K/abstract (accessed on 26 January 2020).
  114. Toida, H.; Matsuzaki, Y.; Kakuyanagi, K.; Zhu, X.; Munro, W.J.; Nemoto, K.; Yamaguchi, H.; Saito, S. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy using a direct current-SQUID magnetometer directly coupled to an electron spin ensemble. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108, 052601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Liu, X.D.; Jin, J.X.; Wen, L. A Multifunction Measurement Instrument for Applied Superconductor Properties and Applications. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2016, 26, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Benz, S.P. Quantum-based voltage metrology with superconducting Josephson devices at NIST. In Proceedings of the Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM 2016), Ottawa, ON, Canada, 10–15 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
  117. Scurti, F.; Schwartz, J. Optical fiber distributed sensing for high temperature superconductor magnets. In Proceedings of the 2017 25th Optical Fiber Sensors Conference (OFS), Jeju, South Korea, 24–28 April 2017. [Google Scholar]
  118. Chu, C.; Canfield, P.; Dynes, R.; Fisk, Z.; Batlogg, B.; Deutscher, G.; Geballe, T.; Zhao, Z.; Greene, R.; Hosono, H.; et al. Epilogue: Superconducting materials past, present and future. Phys. C: Supercond. Appl. 2015, 514, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  119. Barrentine, E.M.; Noroozian, O.; Brown, A.D.; Cataldo, G.; Ehsan, N.; Hsieh, W.T.; Stevenson, T.R.; U-Yen, K.; Wollack, E.J.; Moseley, S.H. Overview of the Design, Fabrication and Performance Requirements of Micro-Spec, an Integrated Submillimeter Spectrometer. Available online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20150016073 (accessed on 25 January 2020).
  120. Bertola, L.; Cox, T.; Wheeler, P.; Garvey, S. Superconducting and conventional electromagnetic launch system for civil aircraft assisted take-off. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Milwaukee, MI, USA, 18–22 September 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ashtineh, H.; Pishvaee, M.S. Alternative fuel vehicle-routing problem: A life cycle analysis of transportation fuels. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 219, 166–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Shaukat, N.; Khan, B.; Ali, S.; Mehmood, C.; Khan, J.; Farid, U.; Majid, M.; Anwar, S.; Jawad, M.; Ullah, Z. A survey on electric vehicle transportation within smart grid system. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 1329–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Tolpygo, S.K.; Bolkhovsky, V.; Weir, T.; Wynn, A.; Oates, D.; Johnson, L.; Gouker, M. Advanced fabrication processes for superconducting very large-scale integrated circuits. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2016, 26, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Snitchler, G. Progress on high temperature superconductor propulsion motors and direct drive wind generators. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Power Electronics Conference—ECCE ASIA, Sapporo, Japan, 21–24 June 2010. [Google Scholar]
  125. Snitchler, G.; Gamble, B.; Kalsi, S.S. The performance of a 5 MW high temperature superconductor ship propulsion motor. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2005, 15, 2206–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Stumberger, G.; Aydemir, M.T.; Zarko, D.; Lipo, T.A. Design of a linear bulk superconductor magnet synchronous motor for electromagnetic aircraft launch systems. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2004, 14, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Snitchler, G.; Gamble, B.; King, C.; Winn, P. 10 MW class superconductor wind turbine generators. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2011, 21, 1089–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Lee, H.W.; Kim, K.C.; Lee, J. Review of maglev train technologies. IEEE Trans. Mag. 2006, 42, 1917–1925. [Google Scholar]
  129. Xu, Y.L.; Wang, Z.L.; Li, G.Q.; Chen, S.; Yang, Y.B. High-speed running maglev trains interacting with elastic transitional viaducts. Eng. Struct. 2019, 183, 562–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Younis, L.; Al Suhail, A.; Ziai, S.; Sun, L. Connecting the GCC Countries with the Maglev Train. Available online: https://dspace.aus.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11073/7483/HGCCcountries26theMaglevtrain.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 25 January 2020).
  131. Anthopoulos, L. Smart utopia VS smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases. Cities 2017, 63, 128–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Rothengatter, W. Megaprojects in transportation networks. Transp. Policy 2019, 75, A1–A15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Hossain, M.F. Chapter Five—Infrastructure and Transportation. In Sustainable Design and Build; Hossain, M.F., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 231–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Ali, M.H.; Wu, B.; Dougal, R.A. An overview of SMES applications in power and energy systems. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2010, 1, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Trevisani, L.; Morandi, A.; Negrini, F.; Ribani, P.L.; Fabbri, M. Cryogenic Fuel-Cooled SMES for Hybrid Vehicle Application. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2009, 19, 2008–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Xing, Y.Q.; Jin, J.X.; Wang, Y.L.; Du, B.X.; Wang, S.C. An Electric Vehicle Charging System Using an SMES Implanted Smart Grid. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2016, 26, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Furrer+Frey Opbrid Charging Systems. Available online: https://opbrid.info/ (accessed on 26 January 2020).
  138. A Giant Charger That Juices Up Electric Buses in Three Minutes | WIRED. Available online: https://www.wired.com/2014/10/giant-charger-juices-electric-buses-three-minutes/ (accessed on 27 June 2017).
  139. Lagorse, J.; Simoes, M.; Miraoui, A. A Multiagent Fuzzy-Logic-Based Energy Management of Hybrid Systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2009, 45, 2123–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Annaswamy, A.M.; Malekpour, A.R.; Baros, S. Emerging research topics in control for smart infrastructures. Annu. Rev. Control 2016, 42, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Shoham, Y.; Leyton-Brown, K. Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  142. Postráneckỳ, F.; Svítek, M. Conceptual model of complex multi-agent system smart city 4. In 0. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Applications of Holonic and Multi-Agent Systems, Lyon, France, 28–30 August 2017; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017; pp. 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zambonelli, F. Engineering self-organizing urban superorganisms. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2015, 41, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Bicocchi, N.; Leonardi, L.; Zambonelii, F. Software-Intensive Systems for Smart Cities: From Ensembles to Superorganisms. In Software, Services, and Systems; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 538–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Chen, M. Towards smart city: M2M communications with software agent intelligence. Multimed. Tool. Appl. 2013, 67, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Marsa-Maestre, I.; Lopez-Carmona, M.A.; Velasco, J.R.; Navarro, A. Mobile agents for service personalization in smart environments. J. Netw. 2008, 3, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Mannion, P.; Duggan, J.; Howley, E. Parallel reinforcement learning for traffic signal control. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2015, 52, 956–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Prendinger, H.; Gajananan, K.; Zaki, A.B.; Fares, A.; Molenaar, R.; Urbano, D.; van Lint, H.; Gomaa, W. Tokyo virtual living lab: Designing smart cities based on the 3d internet. IEEE Internet Comput. 2013, 17, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Bjornskau, T. The Zebra Crossing Game – Using game theory to explain a discrepancy between road user behaviour and traffic rules. Saf. Sci. 2017, 92, 298–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Soares, G.; Kokkinogenis, Z.; Macedo, J.L.; Rossetti, R.J.F. Agent-Based Traffic Simulation Using SUMO and JADE: An Integrated Platform for Artificial Transportation Systems. In Proceedings of the Simulation of Urban MObility User Conference, Berlin, Germany, 15–17 May 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Lämmer, S.; Helbing, D. Self-control of traffic lights and vehicle flows in urban road networks. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2008, 2008, P04019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Paruchuri, P.; Pullalarevu, A.R.; Karlapalem, K. Multi agent simulation of unorganized traffic. In Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Part 1, Bologna, Italy, 15–19 July 2002. [Google Scholar]
  153. Hernández, R.; Cárdenas, C.; Muõz, D. Game theory applied to transportation systems in Smart Cities: Analysis of evolutionary stable strategies in a generic car pooling system. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2018, 12, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Wang, J.; Wang, C.; Song, X.; Raghavan, V. Automatic intersection and traffic rule detection by mining motor-vehicle GPS trajectories. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2017, 64, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Xie, X.; Liao, W.; Aghajan, H.; Veelaert, P.; Philips, W. A novel approach for detecting intersections from GPS traces. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Beijing, China, 10–15 July 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. D’Andrea, E.; Marcelloni, F. Detection of traffic congestion and incidents from GPS trace analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 2017, 73, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Qiu, J.; Wang, R.; Wang, X. Inferring road maps from sparsely-sampled GPS traces. Lect. Note Comput. Sci. 2014, 8436, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Sandel, M.J. Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? Farrar, Straus and Giroux: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  159. Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Available online: https://git.dhimmel.com/bitcoin-whitepaper/ (accessed on 25 January 2020).
  160. Da, H.; Zhang, E. NEO: A Distributed Network for the Smart Economy. Available online: https://bravenewcoin.com/insights/neo-white-paper-a-distributed-network-for-the-smart-economy (accessed on 25 January 2020).
  161. Perlman, L. Distributed Ledger Technologies and Financial Inclusion. Available online: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/dfs/Documents/201703/ITU_FGDFS_Report-on-DLT-and-Financial-Inclusion.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2020).
  162. The Linux Foundation. Blockchain for Business—An Introduction to Hyperledger Technologies. Available online: https://d37djvu3ytnwxt.cloudfront.net/assets/courseware/v1/f78e55f0cfc90346abab4ae5096007d2/asset-v1:LinuxFoundationX+LFS171x+3T2017+type@asset+block@LFS171x_-_Blockchain_for_Business_-_An_Introduction_to_Hyperledger_Technologies_Outline.pdf (accessed on 26 January 2020).
  163. Blockchains for Social Good. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/research/eic/index.cfm?pg=prizes_blockchains (accessed on 26 January 2020).
  164. Swan, M. Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy; O’Reilly Media: Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  165. PwC. Blockchain—An Opportunity for Energy Producers and Consumers? Available online: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/assets/pwc-blockchain-opportunity-for-energy-producers-and-consumers.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2020).
  166. Lamport, L.; Shostak, R.; Pease, M. The Byzantine generals problem. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 1982, 4, 382–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Castro, M.; Liskov, B. Practical Byzantine fault tolerance. OSDI 1999, 99, 173–186. [Google Scholar]
  168. Kandaswamy, R. Blockchain: How Real Is The Market? Available online: https://www.gartner.com/en/site-index (accessed on 25 January 2020).
  169. Valtanen, K.; Backman, J.; Yrjölä, S. Blockchain-Powered Value Creation in the 5G and Smart Grid Use Cases. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 25690–25707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Merz, M. Potential of the Blockchain Technology in Energy Trading. Available online: http://www.ponton.de/downloads/mm/Potential-of-the-Blockchain-Technology-in-Energy-Trading_Merz_2016.en.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2020).
  171. Groarke, D. Utilities and Blockchain Pilots—A Global Snapshot. Available online: https://www.indigoadvisorygroup.com/blog/2016/10/7/utilities-piloting-blockchain-application-globally (accessed on 24 September 2017).
  172. Grid Singularity. The Blockchain: Enabling a Distributed and Connected Energy Future. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpMwPhA9QzM&feature=youtu.be&t=1h33m5s (accessed on 26 January 2020).
  173. Power Ledger Whitepaper. Available online: https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/4519667/Documents /Power Ledger Whitepaper.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2020).
  174. Smolenski, N. BLOCKCHAIN IN GOVERNMENT BRIEFING: Q3 2017. Available online: http://www.learningmachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Blockchain-in-Government-2017-Q3.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2020).
  175. Council of European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/2016-05-04 (accessed on 25 January 2020).
  176. Portier, C.C.M.L.B. Blockchain and GDPR: How Blockchain Could Address Five Areas Associated with GDPR Compliance. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/2EXR2XYP (accessed on 25 January 2020).
  177. Timsit, T.L.L.C.K. Blockchain and the GDPR. Available online: https://www.cnil.fr/en/blockchain-and-gdpr-solutions-responsible-use-blockchain-context-personal-data (accessed on 25 January 2020).
  178. Morkunas, V.J.; Paschen, J.; Boon, E. How blockchain technologies impact your business model. Bus. Horiz. 2019, 62, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Di Stasi, G.; Avallone, S.; Canonico, R.; Ventre, G. Routing Payments on the Lightning Network. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData), Halifax, NS, Canada, 30 July–3 August 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Xie, L.; Ding, Y.; Yang, H.; Wang, X. Blockchain-Based Secure and Trustworthy Internet of Things in SDN-Enabled 5G-VANETs. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 56656–56666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Molina-Masegosa, R.; Gozalvez, J. LTE-V for Sidelink 5G V2X Vehicular Communications: A New 5G Technology for Short-Range Vehicle-to-Everything Communications. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2017, 12, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Qiu, H.; Qiu, M.; Lu, Z.; Memmi, G. An efficient key distribution system for data fusion in V2X heterogeneous networks. Inf. Fusion 2019, 50, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Kenney, J.B. Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) Standards in the United States. Proc. IEEE 2011, 99, 1162–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Vukadinovic, V.; Bakowski, K.; Marsch, P.; Garcia, I.D.; Xu, H.; Sybis, M.; Sroka, P.; Wesolowski, K.; Lister, D.; Thibault, I. 3GPP C-V2X and IEEE 802.11p for Vehicle-to-Vehicle communications in highway platooning scenarios. Ad Hoc Netw. 2018, 74, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Al-Turjman, F.; Malekloo, A. Smart parking in IoT-enabled cities: A survey. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 49, 101608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Ligo, A.K.; Peha, J.M.; Ferreira, P.; Barros, J. Throughput and Economics of DSRC-Based Internet of Vehicles. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 7276–7290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Smith, A. EARN AS YOU DRIVE WITH JAGUAR LAND ROVER AND IOTA. 2019. Available online: https://blog.iota.org/earn-as-you-drive-with-jaguar-land-rover-and-iota-3c744d8c0cba (accessed on 26 January 2020).
  188. Carrese, S.; Giacchetti, T.; Patella, S.M.; Petrelli, M. Real time ridesharing: Understanding user behavior and policies impact: Carpooling service case study in Lazio Region, Italy. In Proceedings of the 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), Naples, Italy, 26–28 June 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Santoso, A.S.; Nelloh, L.A.M. User Satisfaction and Intention to Use Peer-to-Peer Online Transportation: A Replication Study. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2017, 124, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Zhu, M.; Liu, X.; Wang, X. An Online Ride-Sharing Path-Planning Strategy for Public Vehicle Systems. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2019, 20, 616–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Tavory, S.S.; Trop, T.; Shiftan, Y. Self-organized ridesharing: Multiperspective annotated review. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2019, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Yan, C.Y.; Hu, M.B.; Jiang, R.; Long, J.; Chen, J.Y.; Liu, H.X. Stochastic Ridesharing User Equilibrium in Transport Networks. Netw. Spat. Econ. 2019, 19, 1007–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Yu, J.J.Q.; Yu, W.; Gu, J. Online Vehicle Routing With Neural Combinatorial Optimization and Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2019, 20, 3806–3817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Teubner, T.; Flath, C.M. The Economics of Multi-Hop Ride Sharing. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2015, 57, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Barbosa, H.; Barthelemy, M.; Ghoshal, G.; James, C.R.; Lenormand, M.; Louail, T.; Menezes, R.; Ramasco, J.J.; Simini, F.; Tomasini, M. Human mobility: Models and applications. Phys. Rep. 2018, 734, 1–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Noel, L.; de Rubens, G.Z.; Kester, J.; Sovacool, B.K. Navigating expert skepticism and consumer distrust: Rethinking the barriers to vehicle-to-grid (V2G) in the Nordic region. Transp. Policy 2019, 76, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Coelho, V.N.; Grasas, A.; Ramalhinho, H.; Coelho, I.M.; Souza, M.J.F.; Cruz, R.C. An ILS-based algorithm to solve a large-scale real heterogeneous fleet VRP with multi-trips and docking constraints. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2016, 250, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Coelho, I.M.; Munhoz, P.L.A.; Ochi, L.S.; Souza, M.J.F.; Bentes, C.; Farias, R. An integrated CPU–GPU heuristic inspired on variable neighbourhood search for the single vehicle routing problem with deliveries and selective pickups. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2016, 54, 945–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Silva, M.M.; Subramanian, A.; Ochi, L.S. An iterated local search heuristic for the split delivery vehicle routing problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 2015, 53, 234–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Subramanian, A.; Uchoa, E.; Ochi, L.S. A hybrid algorithm for a class of vehicle routing problems. Comput. Oper. Res. 2013, 40, 2519–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.