Next Article in Journal
A Review on Recent Advances in Stabilizing Peptides/Proteins upon Fabrication in Hydrogels from Biodegradable Polymers
Next Article in Special Issue
Chitosan Loaded into a Hydrogel Delivery System as a Strategy to Treat Vaginal Co-Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Region-Specific Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Brain Model to Assess Hippocampus and Frontal Cortex Pharmacokinetics
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Chitosan—Based Liposome Formulation Enhances the In Vitro Wound Healing Efficacy of Substance P Neuropeptide
Open AccessArticle

Chitosan Gel to Treat Pressure Ulcers: A Clinical Pilot Study

1
Department of Pharmacy, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via D. Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy
2
M.D. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Burn Unit, Hospital Hospital “A. Cardarelli”, Via A. Cardarelli 9, 80131 Naples, Italy
3
First Division of Nephrology, Department of Cardio-thoracic and Respiratory Sciences, Second University of Naples, School of Medicine, via Pansini 5, Ed. 17, 80131 Naples, Italy
4
U.O.S.C Farmacia, U.O.S.S. Galenica Clinica e Preparazione Farmaci Antiblastici, Hospital “A. Cardarelli”, Via A. Cardarelli 9, 80131 Naples, Italy
5
U.M.R.S. 1138, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, 15, rue de l’Ecole de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2018, 10(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10010015
Received: 7 December 2017 / Revised: 10 January 2018 / Accepted: 14 January 2018 / Published: 17 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chitosan Biomedical Applications: Opportunities and Challenges)

Abstract

Chitosan is biopolymer with promising properties in wound healing. Chronic wounds represent a significant burden to both the patient and the medical system. Among chronic wounds, pressure ulcers are one of the most common types of complex wound. The efficacy and the tolerability of chitosan gel formulation, prepared into the hospital pharmacy, in the treatment of pressure ulcers of moderate severity were evaluated. The endpoint of this phase II study was the reduction of the area of the lesion by at least 20% after four weeks of treatment. Thus, 20 adult volunteers with pressure ulcers within predetermined parameters were involved in a 30 days study. Dressing change was performed twice a week at outpatient clinic upon chronic wounds management. In the 90% of patients involved in the study, the treatment was effective, with a reduction of the area of the lesion and wound healing progress. The study demonstrated the efficacy of the gel formulation for treatment of pressure ulcers, also providing a strong reduction of patient management costs.
Keywords: chitosan; gel; pressure ulcers; chronic wounds; wound healing; clinical study chitosan; gel; pressure ulcers; chronic wounds; wound healing; clinical study

1. Introduction

Pressure ulcers are localized areas of injury to the skin and they mainly affect patients that require bed rest. They are caused by external forces, such as pressure, or shear, or a combination of both, and often occur over bony prominence [1]. Wound resolution is often impaired by bacterial proliferation and the production of exudates that causes maceration of healthy skin layers [2,3,4]. Moreover, many factors like smoking, obesity, old age, and malnutrition can promote the development of chronic skin damage and impair healings processes [3]. Wound care represents a heavy cost on the total health care budget [5]. Pressure ulcers have been shown to increase length of hospital stay and associated hospital costs. Costs are mainly dominated by health professional time and, for more severe ulcers, by the incidence of complications, including hospital admission/length of stay [6]. Advanced wound dressings have prohibitive costs for public health system. The economic care impacts of wound healing represent a serious bottleneck for the correct wound care, especially in public hospitals.
Chitosan (CHI) is a natural polysaccharide that is composed of units of glucasamine linked by a 1–4 glycosid bond to N-acetyl glucosamine units [7]. Due to its characteristics of biodegradability, biocompatibility and safety, CHI has attracted considerable interest for biological applications. The presence of a positive charge at physiological pH makes CHI adhesive, ensuring a longer permanence in the application site [8,9]. Furthermore, the antiseptic activity of CHI was also demonstrated [10]. Finally, its abundance in nature and the low-cost of production make this polymer of commercial interest and suitable to be used for a large-scale production [11]. Many studies have demonstrated the effect of CHI in wound healing due to its microbiological activity, and to the ability to promote homeostasis and angiogenesis processes [12,13,14,15,16]. Moreover, CHI positive charges attract growth factors that enhance cell growth and proliferation [17]. In particular, severe infiltrations of polymorphonuclear cells and thick scab have been reported when treating skin wound with CHI-based dressings in dogs [18]. Recently, our research group reported an experimental protocol to prepare the CHI gel suitable for a hospital pharmacy [19]. These CHI-based gels demonstrated the ability to promote wound healing in vitro and in vivo in an animal model of pressure ulcer [19].
Here, we report a pilot clinical study on 20 patients with pressure ulcers and treated with the CHI gels prepared into the hospital. In this study, the efficacy and the tolerability of the treatment were evaluated. The aim of study was to provide a proof-of-concept to support further study on this device, prepared with low-cost biomaterial and directly into the hospital, to reduce the management cost of hospitalized patients affected by pressure ulcers.

2. Materials and Methods

Chitosan from crab shells, highly viscous (>400 mPa·s 1% acetic acid at 20 °C) was purchased from Farmalabor (Canosa di Puglia, Italy), acetic acid was obtained by Carlo Erba (Milano, Italy), sterile water was purchased from B. Braun (Milan, Italy), regenerated cellulose 0.22 microM membranes were obtained by Corning (Viesbaden, Germany), and the immediate sterile packaging was kindly offered by Alfamed (Naples, Italy).

2.1. Gel Preparation

CHI gels were prepared at the Unità di Manipolazione di Chemioterapici Antiblastici (U.M.A.C.A.) center situated in the Azienda di rilievo nazionale, A.O.R.N. Antonio Cardarelli (Naples, Italy). Gels were prepared, as previously described by Mayol et al. [19] with same modifications. Briefly, CHI powder was sterilized in autoclave at 121 °C for 20 min and 2 atm. Sterilization was checked by microbiological tests carried out on CHI samples at the Laboratorio Chimico Merceologico (Naples, Italy). Samples preparation was made under laminar flow hood and directly in the immediate sterile packaging. The acetic acid aqueous solution was filtered on 0.22 microM membrane filters before use. Then, 0.1 M acetic acid solution was slowly added under continuous stirring to 2% CHI powder until the obtainment of a clear solution. To evaporate the organic solvent, gels were sealed with 0.22 microM filter caps and then placed in oven for 48 h at 37 °C under vacuum (Vuototest, Mazzali, Monza, Italy); finally, filters were removed and the samples were sealed with hermetic caps. Each formulation was prepared in 30 mL sterile container (kindly provided by Alfamed s.r.l., Naples, Italy), intended for a single administration and stored at 4 °C (Figure 1).

2.2. Patients Eligibility

Volunteers patients of both sexes, aged between 40 to 80 years with good nutrition conditions, a life expectancy of at least six months with the ability to sign informed consent and affected by pressure ulcers of moderate severity (class II EUPAP/NPUAP 2014) were enrolled. The study excluded subject with: age less than 40 years or older than 80 years, malnutrition state, predisposition to bleeding, or treatment with anticoagulants, infections (including HIV positive), infected injuries, patients not available to follow the procedures envisaged by the study.
A total of 20 adult volunteers with skin ulcers were involved in this 30 days study. Only patients susceptible to outpatient treatment were recruited and hospitalization was not envisaged at any stage of the study. The protocol for the clinical study (identification code: CHITODERM) was examined and approved by ethics committee (No. 558 of 06/24/2016) of “Cardarelli-Santobono” responsible for the experimentation and biomedical research activities carried out at the A.O.R.N. Antonio Cardarelli and A.O.R.N. Santobono-Pausilipon.

2.3. Patients Retirement

Patients had the opportunity to retire from the clinical trial at any time and with no obligation to motivate the interruption. Moreover, treatment discontinuation has been provided in case of adverse events such as erythema, itching, and pain. In this case, motivations were attached to the medical record of the patient and no patient replacement was expected. For these patients a follow-up of 30 days duration was planned.

2.4. Study Design and Treatment

Pressure ulcers were treated according to the EUPAP/NPUAP guidelines. Firstly, the lesion was cleaned with povidone iodine solution and finally washed with physiological solution. The gel preparation was applied on the decubitus ulcer covering the total area of the lesion. Once filled with the CHI gel, the skin lesion was covered with a secondary dressing. Dressing change was performed two times a week at the outpatient clinic for chronic wound treatment. The study lasted 30 days.

2.5. Safety and Efficacy Assessment

The endpoint of the phase II study was the reduction (expressed as a percentage) of the area of the lesion by at least 20% after four weeks of treatment. The secondary endpoint of the study was to establish the tolerability of the gel preparations in the treatment of pressure ulcers. The occurrence of adverse events such as erythema, itching, and pain was evaluated. Patients assessed their degrees of overall satisfaction with the treatment using a 100 mm long horizontal line visual analog scale (VAS).
Patients were treated twice a week. Before each application and at the end of the treatment, the area of the skin lesion was measured. Moreover, any influence of concomitant therapies and the general status of the patient were evaluated.
The area of the lesion was evaluated by digital photography, applying a ruler beside the lesion. Digital images were analyzed using the open source software “Image J” (Java 1.8.0_112) to calculate the area of the wound. At 14 and 30 days visit patient’s satisfaction level was assessed by VAS score, ranging from not satisfied (score-0) to fully satisfied (score-100) with the treatment outcomes.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

All of the skin lesion areas were analyzed. The data obtained for each lesion area changes (assessed by image analysis) and presented as area (cm2) and as percentage (%) of reduction of the area of lesion were then statistically analyzed. A one-sample Student’s t-test was utilized, and the results were analyzed with the statistics software GraphPad Prism Version 6.0a for Macintosh (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

The aim of this trial was to test the efficacy of the gel to accelerate the healing of pressure ulcers. CHI is a biocompatible, biodegradable, and low cost natural polymer proposed for several biopharmaceutical applications, among them wound healing [13,14,15,16]. Although the clinical use of CHI as a wound healing agent has shown difficulty in taking off, its ability to promote tissue regeneration is well known [13,14,15,16]. Different effects, among them inhibition of the microbial growth and increased homeostasis, able to promote healing of injured tissues have been ascribed to CHI. In particular, CHI has been found to be involved in the rapid mobilization of platelets and red blood cells to the injured site and also in vasoconstriction and activation of blood clotting factors responsible for blood clotting [4,12,13]. Thus, CHI accelerates the granulation phase in wound healing and stimulates macrophage activity. Finally, the N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, which os responsible for fibroblast proliferation, increases collagen and HA synthesis in the wound cavity, and it also allows oxygen permeability at the wound site [12,13]. At the moment, few CHI-based wound dressings (i.e., ChitoFlex®, ChitoGauze®, ChitoSAM™, Celox™ Rapid Gauze) are available on the market, but proposed for their hemostatic properties although than for tissue regeneration. This pilot clinical study is aimed to support the use of a CHI-based device to increase the wound healing rate, independently on the bleeding of the wound.
Here, to carry out the study, the preparation protocol previously developed [19] was reproduced in a sterile manufacturing area at the U.M.A.C.A. center of the A.O.R.N. Antonio Cardarelli. Thus, in the first phase of the work, three batches prepared into the hospital were characterized in terms of viscoelastic behavior, showing no significant differences with gel previously prepared [19]. Gels were prepared and stored in hermetically sealed containers, to avoid following growth of microbiological contamination. Microbiological tests carried out at the Laboratorio Chimico Merceologico of Naples confirmed that all the three pilot batches prepared in this study were sterile and suitable to be administrated on damaged skin (data not shown).
The clinical protocol was designed according to the 2014 EUPAP/NPUAP guidelines. In particular, following the cleansing of the wound, CHI gel was spread on the skin lesions, then covered with a secondary dressing. The primary endpoint to investigate the efficacy of the treatment was the reduction of the area of the lesion at least 20% after 30 days of treatment of the skin lesion. Indeed, a reduction of the area of the lesion of about 20% observed after the first weeks of treatment can be considered a predictive healing factor [20]. In Table 1, the percentages of reduction of the area of the lesion after 30 days of treatment were reported. As shown, a significant reduction of the area of the lesion (higher than 20%) was observed in most patients (about 90%) with a complete wound healing in 20% of the cases after four-week of treatment with CHI gel. Moreover, in 18 patients the treatment was effective, showing a significantly reduction of the area of the lesion and wound healing progression. Furthermore, in 50% of patients involved in the clinical study, the reduction of the area of the lesion was higher than 50% (patients 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 14, 16, 17), with a complete wound healing of the ulcers in some cases (patients 2, 5, 9, 16). The results obtained from t test demonstrated that the reduction of the area of the lesions after 30 days of treatment was statistically significant with a two-tailed p value of 0.0002 (t value of 4.16 and a p value of 0.0002).
In Figure 2, representative images of the wounds in three patients before the treatment (panels A1, B1, C1) and after 30 days of treatment (panels A2, B2, C2) are showed. Interestingly, any patient reported adverse effects of mild, moderate of serious severity after the administration of the gel preparations. Finally, in any case, the discontinuation of the treatment was required.
Furthermore, we evaluated the overall patient satisfaction level on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from not satisfied (score-0) to fully satisfied (score-100). The VAS scale was used due to its advantages in the evaluation of satisfaction outcome; indeed, VAS scale is reported as a very powerful research tool, reliable, sensitive, and easy to use [21]. As expected, the patient who obtained a significant reduction of the area of the lesion gave VAS score higher than those patients who did not obtain a significant result after 30 days of treatment (Table 2).
These results on patients confirm our previous findings in an animal model of pressure ulcers [19], where a significant reduction of the area of the lesion after 3 and 10 days of treatment with CHI gel was found. On the other hand, the healing process should not be observed in chronic wound, such as pressure ulcers, during 12 weeks, from the beginning of the treatment [22]. On the contrary, in this study, significant wound healing progression was observed in the majority of the patients (90%) treated with the CHI gel for four weeks. Interestingly, the 50% of the patients the reduction of the area was superior to the 50% compared to the area before the treatment; finally, 20% of the patients resulted completely healed. These encouraging results confirmed the efficacy of the CHI gel in wound healing, suggesting that this formulation could provide real advantages in term of efficacy and the cost of the treatment. A clinical trial on a larger group of patients (phase III) could provide further information on the use of CHI gels on patients with pressure ulcers and other kind of ulcers. Moreover, in this case, only patients with ulcers at the stage II were enrolled. Other studies should also be organized to investigate the effect of CHI gels also on ulcers of a higher severity.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, this pivotal study on a restricted group of subjects affected by pressure ulcers demonstrated the tolerability and the efficacy of the CHI-based gel formulation in promoting wound healing. Although on a limited number of volunteers, 90% of the treated patients were responder to treatment, with 20% of the patients completely healed. Furthermore, in this study the gel was prepared directly into the hospital, in the sterile area of the hospital pharmacy. This approach could represent an alternative to the marketed dressing of innovative biomaterials that are generally quite expensive and not always available in public hospital. On the contrary, CHI gel preparation is very easy to perform and the materials that are used in the preparation have negligible costs. Once that the efficacy of this device will be demonstrated on a larger number of patients (Phase III), these findings could represent the basis of new protocols making together increased healing rate with cost-saving for the public health systems.

Acknowledgments

The study was financed by the Italian Minister of Health (Progetto Giovani Ricercatori–bando 2007).

Author Contributions

Virginia Campani: design and characterization of the formulations, analysis of the experimental results, preparation of the manuscript. Eliana Pagnozzi: coordinator of the clinical trial. Ilaria Mataro: analysis and interpretation of clinical results. Laura Mayol: characterization of the formulations. Alessandra Perna: statistical analysis. Floriana D’Urso: preparation of the clinical protocol and dossier for the ethical committee. Antonietta Carillo: preparation of the formulation in the hospital pharmacy. Maria Cammarota: coordination of the HUMACA center in which the formulation has been prepared. Maria Chiara Maiuri: Design of clinical study. Giuseppe De Rosa coordinator together of the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Westby, M.J.; Dumville, J.C.; Soares, M.O.; Stubbs, N.; Norman, G. Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mutsaers, S.E.; Bishop, J.E.; McGrouther, G.; Laurent, G.J. Mechanism of tissue repair: From wound healing to fibrosis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1997, 29, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pereira, R.F.; Barrias, C.C.; Granja, P.L.; Bartolo, P.J. Advanced biofabrication strategies for skin regeneration and repair. Nanomedicine 2013, 8, 603–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Agrawal, P.; Soni, S.; Mittal, G.; Bhatnagar, A. Role of polymeric biomaterials as wound healing agents. Int. J. Low Extrem. Wounds 2014, 13, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lindholm, C.; Searle, R. Wound management for the 21st century: Combining effectiveness and efficiency. Int. Wound J. 2016, 13, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dealey, C.; Posnett, J.; Walker, A. The cost of pressure ulcers in the United Kingdom. J. Wound Care 2012, 6, 261–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tomihata, K.; Ikada, Y. In vitro and in vivo degradation of films of chitin and its deacetylated derivatives. Biomaterials 1997, 18, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. He, P.; Davis, S.S.; Illum, L. In vitro evaluation of the mucoadhesive properties of chitosan microspheres. Int. J. Pharm. 1998, 166, 75–88. [Google Scholar]
  9. Calvo, P.; Remunan-Lopez, C.; Vila-Jato, J.L.; Alonso, M.J. Novel chitosan derivatives enhance the transport of hydrophilic hydrophilic chitosan-polyethylene oxide nanoparticles as protein carriers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997, 63, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Burkatovskaya, M.; Castano, A.P.; Demidova-Rice, T.N.; Tegos, G.P.; Hamblin, M.R. Effect of chitosan acetate bandage on wound healing in infected and noninfected wounds in mice. Wound Repair Regen. 2008, 3, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Khor, E.; Lim, L.Y. Implantable applications of chitin and chitosan. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 2339–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Muzzarelli, R.; Tarsi, R.; Filippini, O.; Giovanetti, E.; Biagini, G.; Varaldo, P.E. Antimicrobial properties of N-carboxybutyl chitosan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1990, 34, 2019–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ueno, H.; Mori, T.; Fujinaga, T. Topical formulations and wound healing applications of chitosan. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 52, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, W.; Lin, S.; Xiao, Y.; Huang, Y.; Tan, Y.; Cai, L.; Li, X. Acceleration of diabetic wound healing with chitosan-crosslinked collagen sponge containing recombinant human acidic fibroblastgrowth factor in healing-impaired STZ diabetic rats. Life Sci. 2008, 82, 190–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Boateng, J.S.; Matthews, K.H.; Stevens, H.N.; Eccleston, G.M. Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: A review. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 97, 2892–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Charernsriwilaiwat, N.; Rojanarata, T.; Ngawhirunpat, T.; Opanasopit, P. Electrospun chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol nanofibre mats for wound healing. Int. Wound J. 2014, 11, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lee, D.W.; Lim, H.; Chong, H.N.; Shim, W.S. Advances in chitosan material and its hybrid derivatives: A review. Open Biomater. J. 2009, 1, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ueno, H.; Yamada, H.; Tanaka, I.; Kaba, N.; Matsuura, M.; Okumura, M.; Kadosawa, T.; Fujinaga, T. Accelerating effects of chitosan for healing at early phase of experimental open wound in dogs. Biomaterials 1999, 20, 1407–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mayol, L.; De Stefano, D.; Campani, V.; De Falco, F.; Ferrari, E.; Cencetti, C.; Matricardi, P.L.; Maiuri, R.; Carnuccio, A.; Gallo, M.C.; et al. Design and characterization of a chitosan physical gel promoting wound healing in mice. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2014, 25, 1483–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Flanagan, M. Improving accuracy of wound measurement in clinical practice. Ostomy Wound Manag. 2003, 49, 28–40. [Google Scholar]
  21. Singer, A.J.; Church, A.L.; Forrestal, K.; Werblud, M.; Valentine, S.M.; Hollander, J.E. Comparison of patient satisfaction and practitioner satisfaction with wound appearance after traumatic wound repair. Acad. Emerg. Med. 1997, 4, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Boateng, J.; Catanzano, O. Advanced Therapeutic Dressings for Effective Wound Healing—A Review. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 104, 3653–3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chitosan gel formulation used in the study.
Figure 1. Chitosan gel formulation used in the study.
Pharmaceutics 10 00015 g001
Figure 2. Images of pressure ulcers before (A1, B1, C1) and after 30 days of treatment with chitosan gel (A2, B2, C2).
Figure 2. Images of pressure ulcers before (A1, B1, C1) and after 30 days of treatment with chitosan gel (A2, B2, C2).
Pharmaceutics 10 00015 g002
Table 1. Area of the lesion before and after treatment with chitosan (CHI) formulation and the percentage of reduction of the lesion for each patient.
Table 1. Area of the lesion before and after treatment with chitosan (CHI) formulation and the percentage of reduction of the lesion for each patient.
Patient Area of the Lesion (before Treatment)Area of the Lesion (after Treatment)Reduction of the Area of the Lesion (%)
130,23813,45755
2124512590
312,58010,74215
47271542125
57356103186
67205337953
78479388154
817,492909048
9250067073
1010,832432960
112352156434
121929152721
133687290121
14226314694
1533,40326,33621
1633,40326,33697
17134646066
1814,407991031
1932,36620,92735
2014,69913,9945
Table 2. Patient’s satisfaction level assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 14 days and 30 days visit.
Table 2. Patient’s satisfaction level assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 14 days and 30 days visit.
Patient VAS ScoreVAS Score
14 Days30 Days
14175
26394
31925
43436
57491
64582
75668
84470
95588
107086
114259
122843
133159
1475100
151540
166695
176384
182749
193645
201521
Back to TopTop