Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide RNAi Screening Identifies Novel Host Factors Involved in Influenza A Virus Infection in A549 Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Beyond Pandemic Preparedness: Reframing Protracted War Against Infectious Diseases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 18
Issue 3
10.3390/v18030371
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

First Detection of Usutu Virus in Harbor Seals (Phoca vitulina)

by
Anne Schwarzer
1,
Franziska Schopf
1,
Insa Dammann
2,
Katharina Kramer
2,
Tanja Rosenberger
3,
Christine Fast
1,
Michaela Geese
1,
Martin H. Groschup
1,
Balal Sadeghi
1 and
Ute Ziegler
1,*
1
Institute of Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany
2
Landeslabor Schleswig-Holstein, Max-Eyth-Straße 5, 24537 Neumünster, Germany
3
Seehundstation Friedrichskoog, An der Seeschleuse 4, 25718 Friedrichskoog, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2026, 18(3), 371; https://doi.org/10.3390/v18030371
Submission received: 20 February 2026 / Revised: 9 March 2026 / Accepted: 13 March 2026 / Published: 17 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogenesis and Persistence in Flavivirus Infections: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Clinical Implications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

The zoonotic Orthoflavivirus Usutu virus (USUV) is distributed throughout Germany, putting hosts at a considerable risk of infection nationwide. Besides birds as reservoir hosts, a broad range of accidental hosts is suspected. However, there are few reports documenting the progression of USUV-associated disease. This case report describes the course of fatal USUV infections in three harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) from a rescue center on the North Sea coast in Germany. Corresponding samples were analyzed using (histo-)pathological, immunohistochemical, molecular and phylogenetic methods. The most prevalent findings in clinically affected animals were neurological signs and non-suppurative encephalitis. All animals were found dead or had been euthanized due to animal welfare reasons within 30 h after the onset of clinical signs. Blood samples taken from another 37 young harbor seals from the same rescue center in the same year revealed two further asymptomatic USUV RNA and antibody-positive animals. The sequences were found to belong to USUV lineages Europe 2 and Africa 3, which are known to circulate in birds in Germany. This case report highlights the importance of USUV as a potential diagnosis for neurological impairments in marine mammals and documents the first cases of USUV infection in harbor seals.

1. Introduction

Usutu virus (USUV, Orthoflavivirus usutuense) is a zoonotic arbovirus transmitted by mosquitoes. It is closely related to West Nile virus (WNV, Orthoflavivirus nilense). USUV was first isolated in South Africa and has been circulating on this continent among wild birds for a long time, apparently without causing high mortality rates [1]. In contrast, massive die-offs of Eurasian Blackbirds (Turdus merula) in Austria preceded the initial detection of this virus on the European continent in 2001 [2]. It was discovered later that considerable bird fatalities in Italy during the late 1990s had already been linked causally to the introduction of USUV in 1996 [3]. Subsequently, USUV spread rapidly throughout Europe. It was first discovered in Germany in 2010 in mosquitoes in Baden-Wurttemberg [4] and circulated thereafter for several years in various regions in southern and southwestern Germany until it was detected in almost all of Germany in 2018 [5,6,7]. Phylogenetic studies revealed the circulation of various USUV lineages in birds in Germany, with USUV lineages Europe 2 and 3 and Africa 2 and 3 exhibiting pivotal roles [7,8]. As with WNV, the vectors of this virus are mosquitoes, primarily from the Culex pipiens complex. Birds act as reservoir and amplification hosts, while mammals serve as incidental hosts and can also become infected [9]. Mass deaths of birds, especially Eurasian Blackbirds, have been reported following infections with USUV [3,10,11].
USUV infections can cause multisystemic diseases in birds, which are associated with non-specific clinical signs such as apathy and/or immobility and neurological deficits such as ataxia, torticollis or tremors [12]. Encephalitis, multiorgan congestion, renal tubular epithelium necrosis and hemosiderosis in the liver and spleen have been described in Song Thrushes (Turdus philomelos) in Spain [13]. USUV is mainly associated with significant outbreaks in passerines, but clinical disease and histopathological alterations have also been described in other avian species. Experimentally infected canaries developed tissue lesions in the brain (neuronal damage and inflammation), in the liver (inflammation, necrosis) and the spleen (inflammation, necrosis, lymphoid tissue degradation), as well as in the lungs (mild inflammation), in the proventriculus (severe inflammation and bleeding), and in the lacrimal glands (necrosis and inflammation) [14]. It should be noted that (histo-)pathological lesions of USUV-associated disease have only been described in birds so far, although infections have been detected in various animals, such as horses, dogs, wild boars, wild ruminants, squirrels, lizards, bats and even humans. In those, clinical signs are usually limited to fevers or rashes, but neurological deficits are also possible [12]. In humans, neuroinvasive cases of USUV infection have been detected in Italy, Austria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, France and Hungary. USUV is also regularly found in asymptomatic blood donors [15,16]. Furthermore, USUV antibodies have been found in a variety of horses without clinical signs, in, e.g., Germany [17,18] and Croatia [16,19].
Severe outbreaks of non-suppurative encephalitis in marine mammals have also been described for other viral infections, e.g., distemper virus [20] or highly pathogenic avian influenza virus [21]. The susceptibility of these animals to arthropod-borne viral infections was recently demonstrated by the detection of a Batai virus infection in a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) in northern Germany [22]. Moreover, there have been some reports of WNV infection in marine mammals worldwide, e.g., when a harbor seal in New Jersey was found with polioencephalomyelitis caused by WNV in 2006 [23]. Another case report described WNV in a killer whale (Orcinus orca) in Texas in 2007, where the animal died without any apparent clinical signs but showed WNV-associated pathological lesions [24]. In Germany, WNV has been found in captive harbor seals in Berlin in 2022 and more recently in a zoological facility in Schleswig-Holstein in 2024 [25,26,27]. However, there have been no reports of USUV infections in marine mammals to date.
This case report describes the lethal progression of USUV infections in sick harbor seal pups and the subsequent monitoring of 37 healthy harbor seal pups from the same rescue center located on the North Sea coast in Germany shortly before their release into the wild, two of which were found to be USUV-positive. These are the first case reports of fatal USUV infections in mammals, including descriptions of the clinical course of the disease and the associated (histo-)pathological lesions.

2. Case Presentation

Here, we report a USUV outbreak in harbor seal pups at a rescue center at the North Sea coast in the most northern federal state of Germany, Schleswig-Holstein. Five pups died or had to be euthanized due to animal welfare reasons in July and August 2024 after developing severe generalized disease within a remarkably short timeframe including neurological signs. Subsequently, all five harbor seals were necropsied and analyzed using histopathology, revealing signs of (meningo-)encephalitis. USUV RNA was found in the brain and pools of the liver and heart of three of five harbor seals using USUV reverse transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Virus-specific immunohistochemical staining (IHC) was performed on these three USUV-RNA-positive animals, detecting USUV antigen in the brain stem and cerebrum. Additionally, blood samples of 37 clinically healthy harbor seal pups raised at the rescue center were tested at a later date in the same year, shortly before their release into the wild. Two of these 37 animals tested positive for USUV RNA as well as USUV-specific antibodies.

2.1. Case History and Clinical Findings

In July (n = 2) and August (n = 3) of the year 2024, neurological signs were observed in five harbor seals at the Seal center Friedrichskoog, a rescue center in Schleswig-Holstein. These animals were assigned case numbers 1 to 5 in chronological order of diagnosis. Case 1 had been staying in the rescue center for two and a half weeks when clinical signs appeared, while the cases 2 to 5 had been fostered at the rescue center for at least one month before clinical sign onset. All of these harbor seals (5/5) showed severe neurological signs, including lethargy, muscle tremor, uncoordinated movement, facial or eye twitching, fin flapping, and loss of body tension. Abnormal behavior such as floating on the water surface, reduced responsiveness, and water avoidance were observed in several cases, suggesting progressive central nervous system (CNS) impairment. Meanwhile, non-neurological clinical signs were infrequent. Elevated body temperature, for example, was documented in two animals (cases 1 and 3). Moreover, forced breathing was documented in two cases (cases 3 and 4). All individuals either died (3/5) or had to be euthanized (2/5) within 30 h following the onset of neurological signs, indicating an acute disease course. Table 1 summarizes relevant information regarding the clinical signs.

2.2. Gross Examination

Necropsy was perfomed less than 24 h post mortem at the Landeslabor Schleswig-Holstein in Neumünster. The harbor seals were in moderate (case 1) to good (cases 2 to 5) body condition. There were no consistent macroscopic findings despite depletion of lymphoreticular tissues such as thymus and different lymph nodes. The results can be found in Table 2.

2.3. Histopathological Findings

Samples from the lungs, pulmonary lymph nodes, thymus, heart, liver, spleen, kidney, esophagus, stomach, intestine, mesenteric lymph nodes, urinary bladder, muscle, and bone marrow were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and routinely stained with haematoxylin–eosin (HE).
In histopathology, the harbor seals showed a variable pattern of inflammation and degeneration of the brain (Table 2). Case 1 (1/5) showed subacute, suppurative meningoencephalitis, which was most prominent in the meninges of the cerebrum and cerebellum and included the adjacent gray matter but without severe involvement of the white matter. On the other hand, cases 2 to 5 (4/5) showed acute non-suppurative encephalitis of gray and white matter with diencephalon, including basal ganglia and thalamus, as well as the cerebral cortex as the most frequently affected regions. Multifocal perivascular cuffing caused by mononuclear inflammatory cells was present in these four animals (4/4). In addition, predominantly multifocal clusters of glial cells (4/4), neuronal necrosis (4/4) from single neuronal cells (1/4) up to foci of malacia (3/4) were frequent findings. Moreover, signs of non-suppurative vasculitis were seen in two of these harbor seals (2/4). Additional findings most probably related to a viral infection were confined to the heart, showing in three harbor seals (cases 3–5) multifocal mild single-cell necrosis (2/3) up to acute mild non-suppurative necrotizing myocarditis (1/3). Images of the HE-stained heart and brain of case number 4 can be found in Figure 1.

2.4. Molecular Differentiation and Phylogeny

RT-qPCR was performed on tissue samples from all five clinically diseased harbor seals to reveal potential viral infections, including USUV and WNV. For the initial detection of specific USUV genome, a protocol was perfomed to detect the non-structural protein 1 (NS1) gene [4]. In a second step, USUV RNA presence was confirmed in positive samples using a protocol targeting the viral non-structural protein 5 (NS5) gene of USUV [28]. The results revealed the presence of USUV RNA in the brain and pools of the liver and heart of 3/5 harbor seals (Table 3). The respective cycle threshold (Ct) values ranged from 16.65 to 37.09 for USUV RT-qPCRs. WNV infections were excluded in all five animals according to an RT-qPCR protocol using WNV-specific 5′ non-translated region primers and probe [29]. The animals with case number 1 and 2 (2/5) tested negative for both USUV and WNV according to RT-qPCR. Therefore, USUV was likely the causative agent in three of the five affected harbor seals showing similar clinical signs, while WNV was not implicated in the disease.
Additional PCR assays and bacterial cultures were performed to rule out other potential pathogens as relevant differential diagnoses: All harbor seals (5/5) tested negative for avian influenza virus, canine herpesvirus and phocine herpesvirus 1, canine and phocine distemper virus, and Brucella spp. using PCR. Bacterial cultures of meningeal swabs were sterile (2/5) or only ubiquitous bacteria deemed non-pathogenic were isolated (3/5). Additionally, two harbor seals (cases 1 and 2) were screened for rabies and parvovirus infection by PCR with negative results.
Two organ samples from cases number 3 (brain) and 5 (organ pool of liver and heart) were chosen for USUV lineage classification via viral whole-genome sequencing (WGS) due to their comparatively low Ct values. The extracted RNA was reverse transcribed with non-specific primers and afterwards, only the USUV-derived complementary DNA was amplified using two separate sets of oligonucleotide primers [30] to generate overlapping amplicons in two separate reactions. Amplicons were subsequently processed for WGS using MinION technology (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK) as previously described by Schwarzer et al. [31]. Consensus sequences were generated using the VirDetector pipeline [32]. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted in MEGA X version 10.2.6 [33] using a maximum likelihood method with 1000 bootstrap replicates and KC754958 as the outgroup. Trees were visualized in FigTree v1.4.4 [34].
The analysis for Figure 2 included sequences from USUV-infected birds in Germany from the years 2018 to 2022 [7,35,36]. The phylogenetic analysis was primarily intended for lineage assignment and contextual classification within known circulating German USUV strains. It was not designed to reconstruct transmission dynamics or perform time-resolved phylodynamic analyses, particularly in view of the currently limited number of available mammalian-derived USUV whole-genome sequences. Sequences were selected based on their proximity to the rescue center and supplemented with sequences from the USUV lineage Europe 2 to classify the harbor seal sequences from this study that belong to this lineage. Sequences gained in this study are available under https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18402969. Lineage analyses revealed the harbor seal with case number 5 being infected with a USUV lineage Africa 3 strain while the whole-genome sequence of the harbor seal with case number 3 was found to belong to USUV lineage Europe 2.

2.5. Immunohistochemistry

For the three clinically apparent USUV-RNA-positive harbor seals (cases 3 to 5), paraffin blocks were cut (3 µm sections) for immunohistochemical staining with an in-house polyclonal rabbit anti-USUV antibody (pab U433, two h at room temperature). To exclude a WNV infection, consecutive sections were stained with an in-house polyclonal anti-WNV antibody (pab OM8, two h at room temperature). Negative control sections were incubated with goat serum alone. The pretreatment for both antibodies included a blocking step for the endogenous peroxidase using 3% H2O2/methanol (30 min) and for unspecific reactions using goat serum (1:1 diluted with Tris-buffered saline, 10 min). The USUV antigen was retrieved using a heat pretreatment in the microwave (600 W for 10 min), whereas the WNV antigen was retrieved using PK digestion (37°C, 15 min, 10 mg/ml). The EnVisionTM reagent (Dako) was used as a secondary antibody for 30 min. The slices were finally developed in diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Fluka) and counterstained with Mayer’s haematoxylin.
In each of these three animals, the cerebrum, brain stem, and cerebellum were investigated. Only two of the investigated animals (2/3) showed a staining reaction for USUV antigen in only a few cells. In case 3, the USUV antigen was detected in single neurons of the brain stem, accompanied by mild glial reactions (satellitosis) and/or signs of necrosis in the affected areas (Figure 3A). In case 5, a distinct reaction pattern with a multifocal cluster of IHC-positive neurons and glial cells was seen in the cerebrum (Figure 3B), while only a single neuron stained positive in the brain stem. No viral antigen was detected in the cerebellum. For case 4, no virus antigen was discernible. In all cases, no cross-reactive binding was detected by using the WNV-specific antibody.

2.6. Further Monitoring of Young Harbor Seals in the Rescue Center

In addition to the five animals presented in the preceding paragraphs, of which three were USUV-RNA-positive, blood samples from 37 harbor seal pups without clinical signs raised in the rescue center were taken and tested for USUV antibodies and genomes prior to the release of these animals into the wild in autumn. The tests were conducted two to three months after the discovery of the five harbor seals with the neurological signs described above. Two orthoflavivirus antibody-specific Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISAs; ID Screen® Flavivirus Competition, IDvet and INgezim WEST NILE Compac, Ingenasa) were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Two sera (2/37, assigned case numbers 6 and 7) tested positive in both ELISAs, while the remaining 35 sera tested negative. These two positive sera were differentiated by virus neutralization tests (VNTs) for WNV, USUV, and tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV). VNTs were conducted as described by Seidowski et al. and Ganzenberg et al. [17,37]. The VNT results revealed neutralizing USUV-specific antibodies (ND50 1:320 and 1:480, see Table 4), but no antibodies specific to TBEV or WNV in the sera of both animals. Furthermore, RT-qPCRs targeting the NS1 [4] and NS5 regions of USUV [28] and the 5′ non-translated region of WNV [29] were performed on the blood of all 37 young harbor seals. RT-qPCRs were also positive for the two serologically USUV-antibody-positive harbor seals and the WNV RT-qPCR was negative. Blood cruor of these two harbor seals was submitted to WGS for USUV lineage classification as described in Section 2.1 of this case report. USUV lineage analysis revealed that the whole-genome sequences of these harbor seal pups belonged to USUV lineage Europe 2, as was also the case for the clinically affected harbor seal number 3 (Figure 2).

3. Discussion

Since arboviruses have been circulating among birds in Germany for several years, regular transmission to the mammalian population has been documented each year through reported cases of disease in horses and humans [38,39]. Long-term monitoring networks have been established to track the spread and evolution of zoonotic arboviruses in birds in Germany with a focus on USUV and WNV [6,36]. Case reports remain a crucial component as well for understanding infection chains and virus spread. They also provide information for risk assessments for both animal and public health. In Germany, USUV is widespread throughout the country [36]. Favorable climatic conditions, such as warm, humid springs and hot summers, can favor virus replication especially in large mosquito populations due to ideal breeding conditions. This elevated infection pressure can lead to more frequent transmissions to humans, e.g., as seen in Europe in 2018 [40]. Similar conditions in Germany in 2024 also led to a high mosquito abundance, which resulted in a sharp increase in the reproduction and spread of mosquito-borne arboviruses, many of which were USUV cases in birds in the northwest [31,41,42].
The fact that non-avian species such as humans, horses, dogs, wild boars, wild ruminants, rodents, squirrels, and bats have been described in the past as accidental hosts for USUV [43,44,45] suggests that other mammals, such as harbor seals, can also become accidental hosts. In rare cases, WNV infections have already been reported in harbor seals and killer whales [23,24,26]. Other orthoflaviviruses such as Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) [46,47,48] and St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) [49] have been detected in marine mammals as well. This exemplifies that marine mammals, and harbor seals in particular, are at risk of exposure to orthoflaviviruses and suggests that USUV could also play a similar role due to the close viral relationships and transmission cycles of WNV and USUV.
Here we present USUV infection in five harbor seals. To the best of our knowledge, this is not only the first description of a USUV infection in marine mammals, but also the first description of a fatal USUV infection in mammals. While arbovirus infections like WNV, SLEV and JEV are already known as a cause of neurological disease in marine mammals, our results clearly indicate that USUV should also be included in standard diagnostic protocols of neurological disease in marine mammals. A rescue center provides all the conditions necessary for care staff to promptly notice behavioral changes, neurological abnormalities, and other clinical symptoms in the animals. Hence, the diagnosis of the first cases in a rescue center rather than in the wild is most likely due to the fact that the animals can be observed more closely there than their counterparts in the wild. It is probable that harbor seals exhibiting neurological signs might perish without detection by humans in open waters.
For the scope of comprehensive documentation, it should also be noted here that in the same summer three additional harbor seals were investigated at Landeslabor Schleswig-Holstein, showing similar pathomorphological and histopathological signs as reported in this case report. This includes in particular non-suppurative necrotizing meningoencephalitis and vasculitis, necrotizing myocarditis and/or necrotizing splenitis. However, only one of these animals showed a clear USUV PCR signal, while the second and third cases were inconclusive and USUV PCR-negative. It is therefore tempting to speculate that the number of unreported cases is significantly higher than the five animals presented here, especially since two pups showed a subclinical infection.
Hence, for a complete diagnostic picture of viral infection, the combination of various methods is highly recommended. Such a comprehensive approach was taken in the present study using clinical findings and histopathological methods, assisted by virological and molecular testing, serological assays and phylogenetic analysis on obtained virus genomes. Most interestingly, the monitoring of the young harbor seals also underlines the possibility of an asymptomatic distribution of USUV infections in marine mammals as two of the 37 young healthy-looking harbor seals tested positive for USUV RNA and antibodies.
In birds, both WNV and USUV infections are very similar, causing a multisystemic disease including clinical signs that range from non-specific clinical signs such as the inability to fly up to neurological signs [12,50]. Histomorphological alterations in birds are also variable in distribution and degree of alteration, but frequently include necrotizing inflammations in the CNS, spleen, heart and liver [7,51,52]. In mammals, however, USUV infection has so far only been described in non-fatal human cases: accidental infections are usually mild, but USUV can also show clear neurovirulence inducing fever, skin rash, and, in rare cases, life-threatening meningoencephalitis and peripheral paralysis [15,44]. This is in accordance with the main findings and the most likely cause of death or severe clinical signs leading to the euthanasia of the harbor seals, which were mostly confined to the CNS. The alterations of the heart, on the other hand, are only mild. These results indicate a strong neurotropism of USUV similar to avian infections. Moreover, case reports of WNV in marine mammals include subacute vasculitis and non-suppurative encephalitis in a killer whale [24] and non-suppurative necrotizing encephalomyelitis in harbor seals [23,26]. However, we must bear in mind that only a few fatal case reports in (marine) mammals exist, hence a final conclusion for host-specific disease manifestation in marine mammals cannot be drawn. Nevertheless, these data not only suggest that USUV and WNV have a similar pathogenesis resulting in analogous diseases [53], but more importantly underline the significance to always include both viruses in differential diagnosis, not only in birds.
One question that remains unanswered is how the harbor seals could have become infected with USUV. The transmission route of orthoflaviviruses in marine animals has not yet been elucidated [54]. In the cases presented here, mosquito bites are the most likely route of infection. At first glance, the skin texture of harbor seals, with a thick epidermis and subcutaneous fat layer, seems almost impenetrable for a mosquito bite, but the animals have thinner skin on their eyelids, nostrils, fin edges, and around the mouth area [55]. This theory is further supported by the fact that these were young harbor seals, which have thinner skin than adult animals. A mosquito could bite while the seal is resting on land during the warm summer months (e.g., in August, as with the animals in the present study). In addition, mosquito exposure in Germany was high in 2024 due to favorable weather conditions [42]. Moreover, vectors are often found in resting places frequented by harbor seals. Incidentally, the staff at the rescue center noted a very high mosquito incidence throughout the entire area over many years. Another hypothetical infection route would be by oral ingestion. Oral transmission for WNV through the uptake of infected small passerines was assumed in rare cases in birds of prey. However, this route is considered to be less effective compared to mosquito bites [50,56,57]. Likewise, experimental infection in birds has been demonstrated intranasally and horizontally via sputum [58], and blackbirds also shed USUV after experimental infection [59]. While fish, the primary food source for captive harbor seals, are not known to be a reservoir for USUV or WNV, oral transmission via the ingestion of dead birds or bird droppings cannot be ruled out as an infection route. Interestingly, vector-independent transmission through contact with feces-contaminated water was already suspected in the transmission of WNV between crocodile hosts [60]. However, orthoflaviviruses are not stable in sea water [54], making this transmission route not very likely.
Phylogenetic analyses revealed that multiple USUV lineages can circulate in the same location. Three of the four whole-genome-sequenced samples belong to USUV lineage Europe 2, which has been circulating in Germany since 2018 and has so far only been found in birds in eastern, central, and southern Germany [35,36]. However, it has not previously been detected near the North Sea coast of Germany, where the harbor seal cases are located. The further spread of lineage Europe 2 in Germany, which was demonstrated here, had already been suspected in previous years [36]. The whole-genome sequence of case number 5, which exhibited clinical signs at the same time as case number 3, belongs to a different USUV lineage: Africa 3. This lineage has been circulating in Germany since 2014 [35] and has already been detected in birds near the rescue center several years before [7,35,36]. This finding shows the parallel and independent co-circulation of USUV lineages and underscores the importance of WGS in elucidating their genetic diversity.

4. Conclusions

This report offers the first description of USUV infections and their associated pathology in marine mammals worldwide by combining molecular, serological, histopathological, and phylogenetic methods. The most prevalent clinical signs in the affected animals were neurological signs such as muscle tremor, fin flapping, uncontrolled movements and histopathological alterations, including non-suppurative, in some cases necrotizing, (meningo-)encephalitis partly accompanied by non-suppurative vasculitis as well as necrotizing myocarditis as main lesions. However, USUV infection can also be asymptomatic in this species, as demonstrated by two clinically inapparent harbor seal pups found to be USUV-positive. Four USUV-RNA-positive samples were subjected to whole-genome sequence analysis. Sequences obtained from two of the necropsied animals belonged to USUV lineage Europe 2 and Africa 3, while both of the clinically unsuspicious harbor seals from the monitoring panel belonged to USUV lineage Europe 2. WGS is a useful tool to identify co-circulating USUV lineages and yields good results for expanding knowledge about USUV infections in accidental hosts and lineage distribution. Taken together, it should be kept in mind that arboviruses including USUV can also infect marine mammals, especially during the peak mosquito season, potentially leading to neurological impairments and a fatal outcome and has to be included in differential diagnosis in further examinations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v18030371/s1. Table S1: Information for all sequences of birds from Germany used for phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. and U.Z.; methodology, A.S., F.S., I.D., K.K., T.R., C.F., M.G. and B.S.; validation, B.S. and U.Z.; formal analysis, A.S., F.S. and B.S.; investigation, A.S., F.S., I.D., K.K., T.R., C.F. and M.G.; resources, T.R., M.H.G., C.F., B.S. and U.Z.; data curation, A.S., F.S., B.S. and U.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.; writing—review and editing, A.S., F.S., I.D., K.K., T.R., C.F., M.G., M.H.G., B.S. and U.Z.; visualization, A.S., C.F. and B.S.; supervision, M.H.G., C.F., B.S. and U.Z.; project administration, M.H.G., B.S. and U.Z.; funding acquisition, M.H.G. and U.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by the Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Regional Identity (BMLEH) under the CuliFo3 research initiative (grant number: 2819107E22).

Institutional Review Board Statement

As this is a case report on deceased animals, the samples were merely reused and no direct research was conducted on the animals. The seals described succumbed to USUV infection, and died or were euthanized by the on-site veterinarian from the rescue center for animal welfare reasons. No additional procedures (except for veterinary treatment) were performed before, and no further harm was caused to the animals. The Landeslabor Schleswig-Holstein and the Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut only received the carcasses and samples after the animals had died at the seal rescue center. Furthermore, the blood samples from the monitoring panel of the young seals were collected at the seal rescue center for diagnostic purposes as part of a veterinary examination, in order to adapt treatment and prognosis individually. The reuse of samples for diagnostic purposes is not subject to legal approval requirements in Germany, as it does not involve research on living animals. Accordingly, no approval code from an ethics committee is required.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article and its Supplementary Material. Sequences gained in this study are openly available under https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18402969. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Katja Wittig and Cornelia Steffen (Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut) and Dirk Schmeling, Sandra Harms and Petra Fehrs (Landeslabor Schleswig-Holstein) for excellent technical assistance. Furthermore, thanks to the staff of the Seal center Friedrichskoog.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CNSCentral nervous system
CtCycle threshold
e.g.For example (exempli gratia)
ELISAEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
HEHaematoxylin–eosin
IHCImmunohistochemistry
JEVJapanese encephalitis virus
ND5050% neutralization dose
No.Number
NS1Non-structural protein 1
NS5Non-structural protein 5
RT-qPCRReverse transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
SLEVSt. Louis encephalitis virus
TBEVTick-borne encephalitis virus
USUVUsutu virus
WGSWhole-genome sequencing
WNVWest Nile virus
VNTVirus neutralization test

References

  1. Roesch, F.; Fajardo, A.; Moratorio, G.; Vignuzzi, M. Usutu Virus: An Arbovirus on the Rise. Viruses 2019, 11, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Weissenböck, H.; Kolodziejek, J.; Url, A.; Lussy, H.; Rebel-Bauder, B.; Nowotny, N. Emergence of Usutu virus, an African mosquito-borne flavivirus of the Japanese encephalitis virus group, central Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002, 8, 652–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Weissenböck, H.; Bakonyi, T.; Rossi, G.; Mani, P.; Nowotny, N. Usutu virus, Italy, 1996. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 274–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jöst, H.; Bialonski, A.; Maus, D.; Sambri, V.; Eiden, M.; Groschup, M.H.; Günther, S.; Becker, N.; Schmidt-Chanasit, J. Isolation of usutu virus in Germany. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2011, 85, 551–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Michel, F.; Sieg, M.; Fischer, D.; Keller, M.; Eiden, M.; Reuschel, M.; Schmidt, V.; Schwehn, R.; Rinder, M.; Urbaniak, S.; et al. Evidence for West Nile Virus and Usutu Virus Infections in Wild and Resident Birds in Germany, 2017 and 2018. Viruses 2019, 11, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ziegler, U.; Bergmann, F.; Fischer, D.; Müller, K.; Holicki, C.M.; Sadeghi, B.; Sieg, M.; Keller, M.; Schwehn, R.; Reuschel, M.; et al. Spread of West Nile Virus and Usutu Virus in the German Bird Population, 2019–2020. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bergmann, F.; Schmoock-Wellhausen, M.; Fast, C.; Holicki, C.M.; Michel, F.; Wysocki, P.; Sadeghi, B.; Groschup, M.H.; Ziegler, U. Longitudinal Study of the Occurrence of Usutu Virus and West Nile Virus Infections in Birds in a Zoological Garden in Northern Germany. Pathogens 2023, 12, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cadar, D.; Lühken, R.; van der Jeugd, H.; Garigliany, M.; Ziegler, U.; Keller, M.; Lahoreau, J.; Lachmann, L.; Becker, N.; Kik, M.; et al. Widespread activity of multiple lineages of Usutu virus, western Europe, 2016. Eurosurveillance 2017, 22, 30452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Angeloni, G.; Bertola, M.; Lazzaro, E.; Morini, M.; Masi, G.; Sinigaglia, A.; Trevisan, M.; Gossner, C.M.; Haussig, J.M.; Bakonyi, T.; et al. Epidemiology, surveillance and diagnosis of Usutu virus infection in the EU/EEA, 2012 to 2021. Eurosurveillance 2023, 28, 2200929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Becker, N.; Jöst, H.; Ziegler, U.; Eiden, M.; Höper, D.; Emmerich, P.; Fichet-Calvet, E.; Ehichioya, D.U.; Czajka, C.; Gabriel, M.; et al. Epizootic emergence of Usutu virus in wild and captive birds in Germany. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lühken, R.; Jöst, H.; Cadar, D.; Thomas, S.M.; Bosch, S.; Tannich, E.; Becker, N.; Ziegler, U.; Lachmann, L.; Schmidt-Chanasit, J. Distribution of Usutu Virus in Germany and Its Effect on Breeding Bird Populations. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 1994–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Agliani, G.; Giglia, G.; Marshall, E.M.; Gröne, A.; Rockx, B.H.G.; van den Brand, J.M.A. Pathological features of West Nile and Usutu virus natural infections in wild and domestic animals and in humans: A comparative review. One Health 2023, 16, 100525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Höfle, U.; Gamino, V.; Mera, I.G.F.d.; Mangold, A.J.; Ortíz, J.-A.; La Fuente, J.d. Usutu virus in migratory song thrushes, Spain. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 1173–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Benzarti, E.; Rivas, J.; Sarlet, M.; Franssen, M.; Desmecht, D.; Schmidt-Chanasit, J.; Savini, G.; Lorusso, A.; van Laere, A.-S.; Garigliany, M.-M. Experimental Usutu Virus Infection in Domestic Canaries Serinus canaria. Viruses 2020, 12, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cadar, D.; Simonin, Y. Human Usutu Virus Infections in Europe: A New Risk on Horizon? Viruses 2022, 15, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vilibić-Čavlek, T.; Barbić, L.; Klobučar, A.; Vucelja, M.; Bogdanić, M.; Sabadi, D.; Kutleša, M.; Gjurašin, B.; Stevanović, V.; Curman Posavec, M.; et al. Re-Emergence of Usutu Virus and Spreading of West Nile Virus Neuroinvasive Infections During the 2024 Transmission Season in Croatia. Viruses 2025, 17, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ganzenberg, S.; Sieg, M.; Ziegler, U.; Pfeffer, M.; Vahlenkamp, T.W.; Hörügel, U.; Groschup, M.H.; Lohmann, K.L. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Equine West Nile Virus Infections in Eastern Germany, 2020. Viruses 2022, 14, 1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gothe, L.M.R.; Ganzenberg, S.; Ziegler, U.; Obiegala, A.; Lohmann, K.L.; Sieg, M.; Vahlenkamp, T.W.; Groschup, M.H.; Hörügel, U.; Pfeffer, M. Horses as Sentinels for the Circulation of Flaviviruses in Eastern-Central Germany. Viruses 2023, 15, 1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barbic, L.; Vilibic-Cavlek, T.; Listes, E.; Stevanovic, V.; Gjenero-Margan, I.; Ljubin-Sternak, S.; Pem-Novosel, I.; Listes, I.; Mlinaric-Galinovic, G.; Di Gennaro, A.; et al. Demonstration of Usutu virus antibodies in horses, Croatia. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013, 13, 772–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Siembieda, J.L.; Hall, A.J.; Gulland, F.M.D.; Rowles, T.; Garron, M.; Matassa, K.; Rotstein, D.S.; Gonzalez, S.; Network, N.R.M.M.S.; Johnson, C.K. Epidemiology of a Phocine Distemper Virus Outbreak Along the North Atlantic Coast of the United States. Aquat. Mamm. 2017, 43, 254–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  21. Mirolo, M.; Pohlmann, A.; Ahrens, A.K.; Kühl, B.; Rubio-Garcìa, A.; Kramer, K.; Meinfelder, U.; Rosenberger, T.; Morito, H.L.; Beer, M.; et al. Highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus (HPAIV) H5N1 infection in two European grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) with encephalitis. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2023, 12, e2257810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jo, W.K.; Pfankuche, V.M.; Lehmbecker, A.; Martina, B.; Rubio-Garcia, A.; Becker, S.; Kruppa, J.; Jung, K.; Klotz, D.; Metzger, J.; et al. Association of Batai Virus Infection and Encephalitis in Harbor Seals, Germany, 2016. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 1691–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Del Piero, F.; Stremme, D.W.; Habecker, P.L.; Cantile, C. West Nile Flavivirus Polioencephalomyelitis in a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina). Vet. Pathol. 2006, 43, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. St Leger, J.; Wu, G.; Anderson, M.; Dalton, L.; Nilson, E.; Wang, D. West Nile virus infection in killer whale, Texas, USA, 2007. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 1531–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Striewe, L.C. (Foundation, Institute for Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife Research, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Büsum, Germany). Personal communication, 2025.
  26. Wibbelt, G. Pool Party? West Nile Virus Neuroinvasive Disease in a Captive Common Seal (Phoca vitulina). In Proceedings of the Zoonoses 2023—International Symposium on Zoonoses Research, Berlin, Germany, 9–11 October 2023. [Google Scholar]
  27. Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut. Das West-Nil-Virus war auch im Jahr 2022 wieder Deutlich Sichtbar. Available online: https://www.fli.de/de/aktuelles/kurznachrichten/neues-einzelansicht/das-west-nil-virus-war-auch-im-jahr-2022-wieder-deutlich-sichtbar/ (accessed on 17 November 2025).
  28. Cavrini, F.; Della Pepa, M.E.; Gaibani, P.; Pierro, A.M.; Rossini, G.; Landini, M.P.; Sambri, V. A rapid and specific real-time RT-PCR assay to identify Usutu virus in human plasma, serum, and cerebrospinal fluid. J. Clin. Virol. 2011, 50, 221–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Eiden, M.; Vina-Rodriguez, A.; Hoffmann, B.; Ziegler, U.; Groschup, M.H. Two New Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays with Unique Target Sites for the Specific and Sensitive Detection of Lineages 1 and 2 West Nile Virus Strains. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 2010, 22, 748–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ndione, M.H.D.; Diagne, M.M.; Mencattelli, G.; Diallo, A.; Ndiaye, E.H.; Di Domenico, M.; Diallo, D.; Kane, M.; Curini, V.; Top, N.M.; et al. An amplicon-based sequencing approach for Usutu virus characterization. Virol. J. 2024, 21, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schwarzer, A.; Schopf, F.; Groschup, M.H.; Bock, S.; Heenemann, K.; Herms, L.; Himmelreich, A.; Kenklies, S.; Kilwinski, J.; Konrath, A.; et al. Circulation dynamics of West Nile virus in Germany, 2023 and 2024. Virol. J. 2025, 23, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kaiser, N.L.; Groschup, M.H.; Sadeghi, B. VirDetector: A bioinformatic pipeline for virus surveillance using nanopore sequencing. Bioinformatics 2025, 41, btaf029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rambaut, A. FigTree; Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edingburgh: Edinburgh, Scotland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  35. Bergmann, F.; Holicki, C.M.; Michel, F.; Bock, S.; Scuda, N.; Priemer, G.; Kenklies, S.; Siempelkamp, T.; Skuballa, J.; Sauerwald, C.; et al. Reconstruction of the molecular evolution of Usutu virus in Germany: Insights into virus emersion and circulation. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2023, 17, e0011203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Schopf, F.; Sadeghi, B.; Bergmann, F.; Fischer, D.; Rahner, R.; Müller, K.; Günther, A.; Globig, A.; Keller, M.; Schwehn, R.; et al. Circulation of West Nile virus and Usutu virus in birds in Germany, 2021 and 2022. Infect. Dis. 2024, 57, 256–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Seidowski, D.; Ziegler, U.; Rönn, J.A.C.; von Müller, K.; Hüppop, K.; Müller, T.; Freuling, C.; Mühle, R.-U.; Nowotny, N.; Ulrich, R.G.; et al. West Nile virus monitoring of migratory and resident birds in Germany. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010, 10, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Frank, C.; Jung-Sendzik, T. Saison 2025 stechmückenübertragener Krankheitserreger in Deutschland beginnt. Epid. Bull. 2025, 29, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut. Tierseuchengeschehen West-Nil-Virus. Available online: https://www.fli.de/de/aktuelles/tierseuchengeschehen/west-nil-virus/ (accessed on 2 December 2025).
  40. Camp, J.V.; Nowotny, N. The knowns and unknowns of West Nile virus in Europe: What did we learn from the 2018 outbreak? Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2020, 18, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit. Deutlicher Anstieg der Usutu-Virus-Nachweise in Niedersächsischen Amseln. Available online: https://www.laves.niedersachsen.de/startseite/tiere/wildtiere_und_jagd/deutlicher-anstieg-der-usutu-virus-nachweise-in-niedersachsischen-amseln-157311.html (accessed on 22 October 2025).
  42. Deutscher Wetterdienst. Jahresberichte des Deutschen Wetterdienstes. Available online: https://www.dwd.de/DE/leistungen/jahresberichte_dwd/jahresberichte_dwd.html?nn=510076 (accessed on 11 July 2025).
  43. Störk, T.; Le Roi, M.d.; Haverkamp, A.-K.; Jesse, S.T.; Peters, M.; Fast, C.; Gregor, K.M.; Könenkamp, L.; Steffen, I.; Ludlow, M.; et al. Analysis of avian Usutu virus infections in Germany from 2011 to 2018 with focus on dsRNA detection to demonstrate viral infections. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 24191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Clé, M.; Beck, C.; Salinas, S.; Lecollinet, S.; Gutierrez, S.; van de Perre, P.; Baldet, T.; Foulongne, V.; Simonin, Y. Usutu virus: A new threat? Epidemiol. Infect. 2019, 147, e232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Holicki, C.M.; Ziegler, U.; Gaede, W.; Albrecht, K.; Hänske, J.; Walraph, J.; Sadeghi, B.; Groschup, M.H.; Eiden, M. Tracking WNV transmission with a combined dog and wild boar surveillance system. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 11083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fujii, M.; Ito, S.; Katsumata, E.; Chambers, J.K.; Matsugo, H.; Takenaka-Uema, A.; Murakami, S.; Uchida, K.; Horimoto, T. Japanese Encephalitis Virus and Schizophyllum commune Co-Infection in a Harbor Seal in Japan. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, X.; Qiao, M.; Deng, X.; Chen, X.; Sun, S.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Tan, F.; Sun, Z.; Chen, X.; et al. Lethal Encephalitis in Seals with Japanese Encephalitis Virus Infection, China, 2017. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 1539–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jung, J.Y.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, K.; Choi, J.G.; Kim, Y.H.; Lee, K.K.; Kim, Y.D.; So, B.; Kang, H.E.; Choi, E.J. Co-infection of Dirofilaria immitis and Japanese encephalitis virus in a spotted seal (Phoca largha) in the Republic of Korea. J. Vet. Sci. 2019, 20, e65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Buck, C.; Paulino, G.P.; Medina, D.J.; Hsiung, G.D.; Campbell, T.W.; Walsh, M.T. Isolation of St. Louis encephalitis virus from a killer whale. Clin. Diagn. Virol. 1993, 1, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vidaña, B.; Busquets, N.; Napp, S.; Pérez-Ramírez, E.; Jiménez-Clavero, M.Á.; Johnson, N. The Role of Birds of Prey in West Nile Virus Epidemiology. Vaccines 2020, 8, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Giglia, G.; Agliani, G.; Munnink, B.B.O.; Sikkema, R.S.; Mandara, M.T.; Lepri, E.; Kik, M.; Ijzer, J.; Rijks, J.M.; Fast, C.; et al. Pathology and Pathogenesis of Eurasian Blackbirds (Turdus merula) Naturally Infected with Usutu Virus. Viruses 2021, 13, 1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ziegler, U.; Fast, C.; Eiden, M.; Bock, S.; Schulze, C.; Hoeper, D.; Ochs, A.; Schlieben, P.; Keller, M.; Zielke, D.E.; et al. Evidence for an independent third Usutu virus introduction into Germany. Vet. Microbiol. 2016, 192, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Marshall, E.M.; Rashidi, A.S.; van Gent, M.; Rockx, B.; Verjans, G.M.G.M. Neurovirulence of Usutu virus in human fetal organotypic brain slice cultures partially resembles Zika and West Nile virus. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 20095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sano, Y.; Al-Alawi, H.; Himeno, M.; Majima, R.; Haga, K.; Kyaw, M.T.; Taniguchi, S.; Moi, M.L. Assessment of flavivirus RNA stability and infectivity in various water environments. Trop. Med. Health 2025, 53, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Grear, M.E.; Motley, M.R.; Crofts, S.B.; Witt, A.E.; Summers, A.P.; Ditsche, P. Mechanical properties of harbor seal skin and blubber—A test of anisotropy. Zoology 2018, 126, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Mencattelli, G.; Iapaolo, F.; Polci, A.; Marcacci, M.; Di Gennaro, A.; Teodori, L.; Curini, V.; Di Lollo, V.; Secondini, B.; Scialabba, S.; et al. West Nile Virus Lineage 2 Overwintering in Italy. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Garmendia, A.E.; van Kruiningen, H.J.; French, R.A. The West Nile virus: Its recent emergence in North America. Microbes Infect. 2001, 3, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Blanquer, A.; Rivas, F.; Gérardy, M.; Sarlet, M.; Moula, N.; Ziegler, U.; Groschup, M.H.; Desmecht, D.; Marichal, T.; Garigliany, M. Evaluation of Non-Vector Transmission of Usutu Virus in Domestic Canaries (Serinus canaria). Viruses 2024, 16, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Agliani, G.; Visser, I.; Marshall, E.M.; Giglia, G.; Bruin, E.d.; Verstappen, R.; van Mastrigt, T.; Chandler, F.; Sikkema, R.; van der Jeugd, H.; et al. Experimental Usutu virus infection in Eurasian blackbirds (Turdus merula). npj Viruses 2025, 3, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Habarugira, G.; Moran, J.; Colmant, A.M.G.; Davis, S.S.; O’Brien, C.A.; Hall-Mendelin, S.; McMahon, J.; Hewitson, G.; Nair, N.; Barcelon, J.; et al. Mosquito-Independent Transmission of West Nile virus in Farmed Saltwater Crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus). Viruses 2020, 12, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Viruses 18 00371 g001
Figure 1. Histomorphological alterations caused by USUV in the heart and brain of two seals, (A) heart of case 4, with focal mild, acute, necrotizing, non-suppurative myocarditis, HE, (B) cerebrum of case 4 with signs of acute, non-suppurative, necrotizing encephalitis composed of multifocal mild perivascular lymphohistiocytic cuffing and glial nodules with central necrosis, HE, bar 20 µm.
Figure 1. Histomorphological alterations caused by USUV in the heart and brain of two seals, (A) heart of case 4, with focal mild, acute, necrotizing, non-suppurative myocarditis, HE, (B) cerebrum of case 4 with signs of acute, non-suppurative, necrotizing encephalitis composed of multifocal mild perivascular lymphohistiocytic cuffing and glial nodules with central necrosis, HE, bar 20 µm.
Viruses 18 00371 g001
Viruses 18 00371 g002
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of USUV lineages from Germany. USUV sequences of harbor seals with clinical signs are shown in red, USUV sequences of harbor seals from the monitoring panel without clinical signs are shown in blue. A maximum likelihood tree was generated using complete genome sequences, with a sequence from the Central African Republic designated as the outgroup. The scale bar represents the mean number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Branch labels indicate bootstrap support values. Sequences obtained in this study are highlighted in red and blue. Detailed information for all sequences is provided in Supplementary File (Table S1).
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of USUV lineages from Germany. USUV sequences of harbor seals with clinical signs are shown in red, USUV sequences of harbor seals from the monitoring panel without clinical signs are shown in blue. A maximum likelihood tree was generated using complete genome sequences, with a sequence from the Central African Republic designated as the outgroup. The scale bar represents the mean number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Branch labels indicate bootstrap support values. Sequences obtained in this study are highlighted in red and blue. Detailed information for all sequences is provided in Supplementary File (Table S1).
Viruses 18 00371 g002
Viruses 18 00371 g003
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical detection of USUV antigen in the brain of two seals, (A) brain stem of case 3, showing a distinct staining reaction in a necrotic neuron surrounded by glial cells (satellitosis), (B) focal cluster of USUV-positive neurons and glial cells in the gray matter of the cerebrum of case 5. In-house polyclonal rabbit anti-USUV antibody (pab U433), bar 20 µm.
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical detection of USUV antigen in the brain of two seals, (A) brain stem of case 3, showing a distinct staining reaction in a necrotic neuron surrounded by glial cells (satellitosis), (B) focal cluster of USUV-positive neurons and glial cells in the gray matter of the cerebrum of case 5. In-house polyclonal rabbit anti-USUV antibody (pab U433), bar 20 µm.
Viruses 18 00371 g003
Table 1. Clinical findings in the five harbor seals.
Table 1. Clinical findings in the five harbor seals.
Case No.Estimated AgeSexNeurological SignsOther Major Clinical FindingsAdditional Remarks
14 weeksfAlternating lethargy and activity, lack of body tension, eye twitching, disorientationElevated body temperatureFound dead after
30 h
26 weeksmMuscle tremor, lethargy, cramping, staggering, fin flapping Euthanized 30 h
after onset of
clinical signs
37.5 weeksfFloating in the pool, lack of body tension, eyes rolled back, fin flapping, head movementsElevated body temperature, forced breathingFound dead the next day after onset of clinical signs
47.5 weeksmUncoordinated movements,
facial twitching, limp lying, cramps		Forced breathingFound dead the next day after onset of clinical signs
57 weeksfEye twitching, head movementsAvoiding water, no position changeEuthanized the same day
m = male; f = female.
Table 2. Summary of the results obtained by gross examination, histopathology and immunohistochemistry.
Table 2. Summary of the results obtained by gross examination, histopathology and immunohistochemistry.
Case No.Gross ExaminationHistopathologyUSUV IHC
LRSRSGITCNSCNSHeart
1Severe thymic atrophy; moderate hypoplasia of mesenteric LNNo specific findingsStomach filled; catarrhal enteritisNo specific findingsCerebral, cerebellar cortex: multifocal, moderate, subacute suppurative meningoencephalitisNo specific findingsNot done
2Severe thymic atrophyCongestion of tracheal mucosaStomach slightly filledDiffuse leptomeningeal edemaBrain stem, diencephalon: multifocal, severe, acute non-suppurative, perivascular to coalescing encephalitis with severe, focal gliosis and neuronal necrosisNo specific findingsNot done
3Moderate thymic atrophyLungs: slightly engorged (less collapsed)Stomach slightly filledNo specific findingsDiencephalon, basal ganglia, cerebral cortex: multifocal,
moderate, acute non-suppurative, perivascular encephalitis with severe, focal gliosis and extensive neuronal necrosis (malacia)		Multifocal single-cell necrosisBrain stem: single pos. neurons
4Severe thymic atrophyCongestion of tracheal mucosaStomach filledInjected meningeal blood vessels; red, greasy material in the basal meningesHippocampus, thalamus, cerebral cortex: multifocal, moderate, acute non-suppurative, perivascular encephalitis and vasculitis with moderate, focal gliosis and extensive neuronal necrosisMultifocal, mild, acute myocardial necrosisNegative
5Severe thymic atrophy; severe hypoplasia of axillary, inguinal, mesenteric LNCongestion of tracheal mucosa; lungs: severe acute congestion and edemaEmpty stomachDiffuse leptomeningeal edemaCerebral cortex: multifocal, severe, acute non-suppurative, perivascular meningoencephalitis and vasculitis with bleeding diathesis, severe, focal gliosis and extensive neuronal necrosis accompanied by a mild infiltration of neutrophilic granulocytesMultifocal, acute, myocardial
single-cell necrosis		Cerebrum: multifocal cluster of pos. neurons/glial cells; brain stem: single pos. neurons
LRS = lymphoreticular system; LN = lymph nodes; RS = respiratory system; GIT = gastrointestinal tract; CNS = central nervous system; IHC = immunohistochemistry; pos. = positive.
Table 3. Molecular test results of the five dead harbor seals.
Table 3. Molecular test results of the five dead harbor seals.
Case
No.		Tested TissueCt Value USUV NS1
RT-qPCR		Ct Value USUV NS5
RT-qPCR		Ct Value WNV 5′NTR
RT-qPCR
1B/LH>42/>42>42/>42>42/>42
2B/LH>42/>42>42/>42>42/>42
3B/LH16.65/33.0817.63/33.32>42/>42
4B/LH>42/>4241.19/32.76>42/>42
5B/LH37.09/>4234.72/30.83>42/>42
B = brain; LH = organ pool of liver and heart; Ct = cycle threshold; Ct value >42 = negative.
Table 4. Molecular and serological test results from two clinically healthy USUV-positive harbor seal pups from the rescue center.
Table 4. Molecular and serological test results from two clinically healthy USUV-positive harbor seal pups from the rescue center.
VirologySerology
RT-qPCR BloodELISAVNT
Case No.Ct Value USUV NS1
RT-qPCR		Ct Value USUV NS5
RT-qPCR		Ct Value WNV 5′NTR
RT-qPCR		ID SCREEN® Flavivirus Competition [S/N%]INgezim WEST NILE Compac [S/P%]USUV ND50WNV ND50TBEV ND50
640.0435.99>42pos. [19.58]pos. [84.09]1:3201:20 *neg. (<1:10)
733.8935.69>42pos. [12.28]pos. [84.55]1:480neg. (<1:10)neg. (<1:10)
ND50 = 50% neutralization dose; pos. = positive; neg. = negative; * = cross-reactive; Ct value >42 = negative.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schwarzer, A.; Schopf, F.; Dammann, I.; Kramer, K.; Rosenberger, T.; Fast, C.; Geese, M.; Groschup, M.H.; Sadeghi, B.; Ziegler, U. First Detection of Usutu Virus in Harbor Seals (Phoca vitulina). Viruses 2026, 18, 371. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18030371

AMA Style

Schwarzer A, Schopf F, Dammann I, Kramer K, Rosenberger T, Fast C, Geese M, Groschup MH, Sadeghi B, Ziegler U. First Detection of Usutu Virus in Harbor Seals (Phoca vitulina). Viruses. 2026; 18(3):371. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18030371

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schwarzer, Anne, Franziska Schopf, Insa Dammann, Katharina Kramer, Tanja Rosenberger, Christine Fast, Michaela Geese, Martin H. Groschup, Balal Sadeghi, and Ute Ziegler. 2026. "First Detection of Usutu Virus in Harbor Seals (Phoca vitulina)" Viruses 18, no. 3: 371. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18030371

APA Style

Schwarzer, A., Schopf, F., Dammann, I., Kramer, K., Rosenberger, T., Fast, C., Geese, M., Groschup, M. H., Sadeghi, B., & Ziegler, U. (2026). First Detection of Usutu Virus in Harbor Seals (Phoca vitulina). Viruses, 18(3), 371. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18030371

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop