You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Nora A. Bahlmann1,
  • Raphael L. Tsoukas1,2 and
  • Sebastian Erkens1
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Alan Parker Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I am glad to see the authors have improved their manuscript and improved if taking the reviewers collected comments into account.

Whilst the data may be conceived as rather negative, these data are important for the field to see and their publication is important, so I am supportive of publication, and commend the authors on their efforts to improve the manuscript for publication.

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a revised submission of a manuscript that I have previously reviewed. The authors have answered all my concerns in a satisfactory manner and have properly addressed my major concerns. As such I feel this manuscript is suitable for publication.